Extrafocal osteosynthesis in open crus fractures

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment of open crus fractures with pin (116 patients) versus rod (107 patients) extrafocal fixation devices. In all cases primary osteosynthesis was performed within the first hours after trauma. Authors consider that choice of extrafocal fixation technique depends on the pattern of open fracture. Rod fixation is preferred in simple or wedge fractures. Pin fixation provides better outcome in all types of comminuted shaft fractures. Rod fixators are of more simple design than pin ones and it takes less time to handle with them. Uncomplicated postoperative period was noted in 179 patients (80.3%) out of 223. Purulent complications were in 16.5% of cases (5.8% of cases in rod fixation, 10.7% of cases in pin fixation). The rate of other complications was 3.2%.

About the authors

S. A. Krasnov

Russian State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

V. E. Dubrov

Russian State Medical University

Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

B. N. Kolesnikov

Russian State Medical University

Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Агарков Н.М. и др. //Здравоохр. Рос. Федерации. — 1992. - N 8. — С. 17—19.
  2. Илизаров Г.А., Швед С.И., Мартелъ И.И. Чрескостный остеосинтез тяжелых открытых переломов костей голени: Метод. рекомендации. — Курган. 1990.
  3. Allgower М., Border J.R. //World J. Surg. — 1983. — Vol. 7, N 1. — P. 88—95.
  4. Helfet D.L. //Orthop. Rev. — 1994. — Febr. — Suppl. — P. 9—17.
  5. McNamara M.G. //J. Orthop. Trauma. — 1994. — Vol 8, N 2. — P. 81—87.

Copyright (c) 1997 Eco-Vector



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies