Email this article Comparison of fixation stability in modern devices for transosseous osteosynthesis
- Authors: Gorodnichenko A.I.1,2,3, Gavryushenko N.S.1,2,3, Kazakov M.E.1,2,3, Kernichansky V.M.1,2,3
-
Affiliations:
- Medical Center of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation
- , Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics. N.N. Priorov
- Research and Production Association "UVICOM"
- Issue: Vol 6, No 4 (1999)
- Pages: 49-52
- Section: Original study articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-8678/article/view/105131
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto105131
- ID: 105131
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
At the Test Laboratory of CITO five modern devices for transosseous osteosynthesis were studied to evaluate the fixation stability in comminuted fractures. Firmness was defined in compression, twisting as well as frontal and sagittal bends. In all planes the highest level of fixation stability was found in RAPFIS device. Design peculiarity of that device provided the additional increase of fixation stability by roads insertion into bone fragments at an angle and diminution of the «bonefixative» distance (console) that almost 3 times improve the fixation stability.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
A. I. Gorodnichenko
Medical Center of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation;, Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics. N.N. Priorov; Research and Production Association "UVICOM"
Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Mytishchi
N. S. Gavryushenko
Medical Center of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation;, Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics. N.N. Priorov; Research and Production Association "UVICOM"
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Mytishchi
M. E. Kazakov
Medical Center of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation;, Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics. N.N. Priorov; Research and Production Association "UVICOM"
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Mytishchi
V. M. Kernichansky
Medical Center of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation;, Central Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics. N.N. Priorov; Research and Production Association "UVICOM"
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Mytishchi
References
- Alonso J. //Clin. Orthop. — 1989. — N 241. — Р. 83-88.
- Broekhuizen Т.Н., Вохта Н. et al. //Injury. — 1990.— Vol. 21. — P. 145-151.
- Chao EYS. //J. Biomech. — 1982. — N 12. — P. 971- 983.
- Chao EYS. //Orthopedics. — 1988. — N 11. — P. 1057-1069.
- Chevalley F., Amsutz Ch., Bally A. //J. Orthop. Surg.— 1993. — N 1. — P. 1-7.
- Finlay J.B., Moroz T.K. //J. Bone Jt Surg. — 1987. — Vol. 69A. — P. 734-744.
- McCoy M.T., Chao EYS. //Clin. Orthop. — 1983. — N 180. — P. 23-33.
Supplementary files
