NEUROARCHAEOLOGY – NEW PROSPECTS, OLD PROBLEMS

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article discusses the main ideas of British neuroarchaeology and American cognitive archaeology as well as their practical implementation. Neuro/cognitive archaeology is a new area of research that emerged at the junction of the social/cultural neuro/cognitive sciences and Palaeolithic archaeology. The basis of this line of research is the concept of “social brain”, which views this organ as a social/cultural “artifact”. Such an interpretation suggests that brain activity as well as another important human quality, mind, should be considered in conjunction with its corporeality and external environment. This idea has been further developed by L. Malafouris in his material engagement theory. He connected the mind with the ability to think and with tools in a process of tool activity. However, for the correct application of this theory, it is crucial to distinguish between ancient tools from natural mediators used by animals. The introduction of this distinction permits to establish an unambiguous connection of the emergence of tool making and mind with the beginning of the Oldowan. The previous stage of development (from 7 to 2.6 million years) was the period of the formation of preconditions for the transition that marked the beginning of the sociocultural development of our most ancient ancestors, which influenced their biosocial nature.

About the authors

Anatoly M. Kuznetsov

Far Eastern Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kuznetsov.2012@mail.ru
Russia, Vladivostok

References

  1. Amirkhanov Kh.A., 2017. Acheulian handaxes of the North-East Caucasus. Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian archaeology], 1, pp. 3–18. (In Russ.)
  2. Amirkhanov Kh.A., 2020. Palaeolithic culture of the Caucasus in the upper Eopleistocene: Oldowan, early Acheule, transitional stage? Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian archaeology], 2, pp. 7–21. (In Russ.)
  3. Amirkhanov Kh.A., Bronnikova M.A., Taymazov A.I., 2013. Fire traces at the Oldowan site of Aynikab 1 in Central Dagestan. Drevneyshiy Kavkaz: perekrestok Evropy i Azii [Ancient Caucasus: Crossroads of Europe and Asia]. S.A. Vasil’ev, ed. St. Petersburg: Institut istorii material’noy kul’tury Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, pp. 7–19. (In Russ.)
  4. Axe Age: Acheulian Tool-making from Quarry to Discard. N. Goren-Inbar, G.L. Sharon, eds. Oakvill: Equinox, 2006. 514 р.
  5. Barona A.M., 2021. The archaeology of the social brain revisited: rethinking mind and material culture from a material engagement perspective. Adaptive Behavior, 29, 2, pp. 137–152.
  6. Belyaeva E.V., Lyubin V.P., 2011. Acheulian handaxes and the origins of protodesign. Rossiyskiy arkheologicheskiy ezhegodnik [Russian archaeological yearbook], 1. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, pp. 73–99. (In Russ.)
  7. Boriskovskiy P.I., 1977. The emergence of human society. Vozniknovenie chelovecheskogo obshchestva. Paleolit Afriki [The emergence of human society. Palaeolithic of Africa]. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 11–42. (In Russ.)
  8. Broom A., Moore M.W., 2012. Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective. Australian Archaeology, vol. 74, iss. 1, pp. 32–46.
  9. Callaway E., 2017. Oldest Homo sapiens fossil claim rewrites our species history (Electronic resource). Nature. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.22114.pdf.
  10. Cognitive Models in Palaeolithic Archaeology. T. Wynn, F.L. Coolidge, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. 240 p.
  11. Cole J., 2017. Accessing hominin cognition: Language and social signaling in the lower to middle palaeolithic. Cognitive Models in Palaeolithic Archaeology. T. Wynn, F.L. Coolidge, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–196.
  12. Coolidge F.L., Wynn T., 2016. An Introduction to Cognitive Archaeology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 386–392.
  13. Corbey R., Collard M., Vaeson K., Jagich A., 2016. The Acheulean handaxe: more like a bird’s song than a beatles' tune. Evolution Anthropology, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 6–19.
  14. Derevyanko A.P., Shun’kov M.V., Markin S.V., 2014. Palaeolithic industries in Africa and Eurasia and the issue of homo sapiens formation. Kul’turnaya dinamika v paleolite Evrazii i formirovanie cheloveka sovremennogo fizicheskogo vida [Cultural dynamics in the Palaeolithic of Eurasia and the formation of modern human]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo Instituta arkheologii i etnografii Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, pp. 78–95. (In Russ.)
  15. Efimenko P.P., 1953. Pervobytnoe obshchestvo [Prehistoric society]. Kiev: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk Ukrainskoy SSR. 663 p.
  16. Falikman M.V., 2017. Vygotsky new wave in cognitive science: the mind as an unfinished project (electronic resource). Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal [Psychological research: Online journal], vol. 10, no. 54. URL: https://publications.hse.ru/articles/211455486. (In Russ.)
  17. Falikman M.V., Koul M., 2014. “Cultural revolution” in cognitive science: from neuroplasticity to genetic mechanisms of cultural experience acquisition. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural and historical psychology], vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 4–18. (In Russ.)
  18. Gamble C., 2007. Origin and Revolution. Human identity in earliest prehistory. New York: Cambridge University Press. 352 p.
  19. Gamble C., Gowlett J., Dunbar R., 2014. Thinking big: How the evolution of social life shaped the human mind. London: Thames & Hudson. 224 р.
  20. Gowlett J.A., 2006. The elements of design form in Acheulian bifaces: Modes, modalities, rules and language. Axe Age: Acheulian Tool-Making from Quarry to Discard. N. Goren-Inbar, G.L. Sharon, eds. Oakvill: Equinox, pp. 1–20.
  21. Gowlett J.A., Gamble C., Dunbar R., 2012. Human Evolution and the Archaeology of the Social Brain. Current Anthropology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 693–722.
  22. Hawks J., 2017. Neanderthals and Denisovans as biological invaders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 37, pp. 9761–9763.
  23. Hodgson D., 2015. The symmetry of Acheulean handaxes and cognitive evolution. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2, pp. 204–208.
  24. Hodgson D., 2020. The Cognitive Mechanisms Deriving from the Acheulean Handaxe that Gave Rise to Symmetry, Form, and Pattern Perception. Handbook of Cognitive Archaeology: Psychology in Prehistory. T.B. Henley., M.J. Rossano, E.P. Kardas, eds. New York; London: Routledge, pp. 241–260.
  25. Homo-sapiens – Origin (Electronic resource). URL: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Homo-sapiens/Origin.
  26. Ihde D., Malafouris L., 2019. Homo faber Revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory (Electronic resource). URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31205848/.
  27. James W., 2017. ‘From Lucy to language: The archaeology of the social brain’: An open invitation for social anthropology to join the evolutionary debate. Human origins: Contributions from social anthropology. C. Power, M. Finnegan, H. Callan, eds. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 293–318.
  28. Laughlin C.D., 2015. Neuroarchaeology. Time and Mind. The Journal of Archaeology, Consciousness and Culture, vol. 8, iss. 4, pp. 335–349.
  29. Lycett S.J., 2010. The importance of history in definitions of culture: implications from phylogenetic approaches to the study of social learning in chimpanzees. Learning & Behavior, 38, 3, pp. 252–264.
  30. Lycett S.J., 2011. “Most Beautiful and Most Wonderful”: Those Endless Stone Tool Forms. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9, pp. 143–171.
  31. Malafouris L., 2008. Between brains, bodies and things: tectonoetic awareness and the extended self. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363, pp. 1993– 2002.
  32. Malafouris L., 2010. The brain–artifact interface (BAI): a challenge for archaeology and cultural neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 2–3, pp. 264–273.
  33. Malafouris L., 2010а. Metaplasticity and the human becoming: principles of neuroarchaeology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 88, pp. 49–72.
  34. Malafouris L., 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 292 p.
  35. Malafouris L., 2015. Metaplasticity and the primacy of material engagement. Time and Mind, vol. 8, iss. 4, pp. 351–371.
  36. Malafouris L., 2021. How does thinking relate to tool making? (Electronic resource). Adaptive Behavior. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1059712320950539
  37. Malafouris L., 2021а. Making hands and tools: steps to a process archaeology of mind. World Archaeology, vol. 53, iss. 1, pp. 38–55.
  38. Maravito A., Iriki A., 2004. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–86.
  39. Marks K., 1956. 1844 manuscripts on economic and philosophical issues. Marks K., Engel’s F. Iz rannikh proizvedeniy [From early works]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, pp. 585–598. (In Russ.)
  40. Millar C.D., Lambert D.M., 2013. Ancient DNA: Towards a million-year-old genome. Nature, vol. 499, no. 7456, pp. 34–35.
  41. Newen A., Gallagher S., de Bruin L. 4E cognition: Historical roots, key concepts, and central issues (Electronic resource). URL: https://cspeech.ucd.ie/Fred/docs/newen2018.pdf.
  42. Nonaka T., Bril B., Rein R., 2010. How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 155–167.
  43. Noonan J.P., 2010. Neanderthal genomics and the evolution of modern humans. Genome Research, 20, 5, pp. 547–553.
  44. Overmann K.A., Wynn T., 2019а. Materiality and Human Cognition. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 26, 2, pp. 457–478.
  45. Overmann K.A., Wynn T., 2019б. On Tools Making Minds: an Archaeological Perspective on Human Cognitive Evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 19, pp. 39–58.
  46. Rozov N.S., 2022. Proiskhozhdenie yazyka i soznaniya. Kak sotsial’nye poryadki i kommunikativnye zaboty porozhdali rechevye i kognitivnye sposobnosti [Origin of language and consciousness. How social order and communicative concerns gave rise to speech and cognitive abilities]. Novosibirsk: Manuskript. 356 p.
  47. Shumaker R.W., Walkup K.R., Beck B.B., 2011. Animal Tool Behavior. The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 282 p.
  48. Social Brain, Distributed Mind. Oxford: Oxford University for The British Academy, 2010. 548 р. (Proceedings of the British Academy, 158).
  49. Spikins P.A., 2012. Goodwill hunting? Debates over the ‘meaning’ of lower Palaeolithic handaxe form revisited. World Archaeology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 378–392.
  50. Squeezing Minds from Stones. Cognitive Archaeology and the Evolution of the Human Mind. K.A. Overmann, F.L. Coolidge, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. 505 p.
  51. Stade C.M., 2020. Theory of mind as a proxy for Palaeolithic language ability. Language Dynamics and Change, 10, 1, pp. 59–85.
  52. Stade C.M., Gamble C., 2019. In three minds: Extending cognitive archaeology with the social brain. Squeezing Minds from Stones. Cognitive Archaeology and the Evolution of the Human Mind. K.A. Overmann, F.L. Coolidge, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 319–331.
  53. Stegniy V.N., 2019. Genetika sal’tatsionnogo vidoobrazovaniya i sistemnye mutatsii [Genetics of saltation speciation and systemic mutations]. Tomsk: Izdatel’skiy dom Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 264 p.
  54. Vishnyatskiy L.B., 2010. Neandertal’tsy: istoriya nesostoyavshegosya chelovechestva [Neanderthals: the history of a failed humanity]. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. 157 p.
  55. Wynn T., 2017. Evolutionary Cognitive Archaeology. Cognitive Models in Palaeolithic Archaeology. T. Wynn, F.L. Coolidge, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–44.
  56. Wynn T., Berlant T., 2019. The Handaxe Aesthetic. Squeezing Minds from Stones. Cognitive Archaeology and the Evolution of the Human Mind. K.A. Overmann, F.L. Coolidge, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 278–303.

Copyright (c) 2022 А.М. Кузнецов

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies