Can imitation emancipate
- Authors: Markova Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- European University at St. Petersburg
- Issue: Vol 34, No 5 (2024)
- Pages: 41-64
- Section: A RUPTURE AND AN EVENT
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-5377/article/view/291430
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2024-5-41-61
- ID: 291430
Cite item
Abstract
The article undertakes a review of contemporary feminist theory regarding its relationship to the question of the use of the given: whether existing models of femininity can be a resource for subversive imitation in the process of emancipation, or should they be rejected as ideological constructs. These strategies lead up to a broader philosophical opposition between historicism and immanentism (Michel Foucault and the field of cultural studies) on the one hand, and theories that put their stakes on the subject and the event (Alain Badiou and Slavoj Žižek) on the other. The author analyzes the trajectory of the development of the first strategy in the feminist theory of the third wave in its opposition to the revolutionary-minded radical feminism of the second wave, and comes to the conclusion about the fundamentally melancholic affectation of Foucauldian feminism of Judith Butler and the like.
From the Butlerian parodic repetition, the author moves to a more positive idea of mimesis in the theory of sexual difference by Luce Irigaray and her followers Rosi Braidotti and Elizabeth Grosz, and then criticizes the latter from the point of view of the late Irigaray and her concept of real sexual difference. The article argues that Irigaray is not a post-structuralist philosopher of plurality, and that her early concept of mimesis should be understood in conjunction with her later ideas about creating feminine ideals that could allow real sexual difference to unfold culturally. Ultimately, the question of the emancipatory use of the given is resolved by synthesizing Irigaray’s ideas with Jacques Lacan’s theory of sublimation. Imitation is understood as being able to elevate existing objects, practices and images to the rank of sublime, and thus create a rupture in the given, inventing new signifiers in art, love and politics.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
Yana Markova
European University at St. Petersburg
Author for correspondence.
Email: ymarkova@eu.spb.ru
Stasis Center for Practical Philosophy
Russian Federation, St. PetersburgReferences
- Badiou A. Etika: ocherk o soznanii zla [L’éthique. Essai sur la conscience du mal], St. Petersburg, Machina, 2006.
- Berlant L. Cruel Optimism, Durham, London, Duke University Press, 2012.
- Braidotti R. Becoming Woman or Sexual Difference Revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 2003, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 43–64.
- Braidotti R. Polovoe razlichie kak politicheskii proekt nomadizma [Sexual Difference as A Nomadic Political Project]. Khrestomatiia feministskikh tekstov. Perevody [A Textbook of Feminist Texts. Translations] (eds E. Zdravomyslova, A. Temkina), St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin, 2000, pp. 220–250.
- Butler J. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London, New York, Verso, 2009.
- Butler J. Gendernoe bespokoistvo: feminizm i podryv identichnosti [Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity], Moscow, V–A–C Press, 2022.
- Butler J. Giving an Account of Oneself, New York, Fordham University Press, 2005.
- Butler J. Psikhika vlasti: teorii sub’ektsii [The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection], Kharkiv, Kharkiv Center for Gender Studies, St. Petersburg, Aleteia, 2002.
- Butler J. Sila nenasiliia: stsepka politiki i etiki [The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind], Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2022.
- Deleuze G. Predstavlenie Zakher-Mazokha [Présentation de Sacher-Masoch]. In: Von Sacher-Masoch L. Venera v mekhakh [Venus im Pelz], Moscow, Kul’tura, 1992, pp. 189–314.
- Deutscher P. A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray, Ithaca, London, Cornell University Press, 2002.
- Fanon F. Black Skin, White Masks, New York, Grove Press, 2008.
- Firestone S. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for a Feminist Revolution, New York, William and Morrow, 1970.
- Fisher M. Kapitalisticheskii realizm. Al’ternativy net? [Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?], Moscow, Ultraculture 2.0, 2010.
- Foucault M. Istoriia seksual’nosti. T. 1: Volia k znaniiu [Histoire de la Sexualite. Vol. 1, La volonte de savoir]. Volia k istine: po tu storonu znaniia, vlasti i seksual’nosti. Raboty raznykh let [The Will to Truth: on the Other Side of Knowledge, Power and Sexuality. Works From Different Years], Moscow, Kastal’, 1996, pp. 97–268.
- Freud S. Pechal’ i melankholiia [Trauer und Melancholie]. Sobr. soch.: V 10 t. [Works: In 10 vols], Moscow, STD Firm, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 205–226.
- Grosz E. “Feminist Futures?” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 2002, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–20.
- Heidegger M. Veshch’ [Das Ding]. Vremia i bytie. Stat’i i vystupleniia [Zeit und Sein], Moscow, Respublica, 1993, pp. 316–326.
- Irigaray L. Etika polovogo razlichiia [Éthique de la différence sexuelle], Moscow, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, 2004.
- Irigaray L. Speculum of the Other Woman, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1985.
- Irigaray L. This Sex Which Is Not One, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1985.
- Irigaray L. To Be Two, London, Athlone Press, 2000.
- Irigaray L. To Speak Is Never Neutral, New York, Routledge, 2002.
- Lacan J. Etika psikhoanaliza. Seminary: Kn. VII (1959–1960) [L’éthique de la psychanalyse. Le Séminaire, livre VII (1959–1960)], Moscow, Gnosis, Logos, 2006.
- Lacan J. Znachenie fallosa [La signification du phallus]. Instantsiia bukvy v bessoznatel’nom, ili Sud’ba razuma posle Freida [L’instance de la lettre dans l’inconscient], Moscow, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1997, pp. 137–147.
- Lewis S. Serf’n’Terf: Notes on Some Bad Materialisms. Salvage, February 6, 2017. Available at: https://salvage.zone/serf-n-terf-notes-on-some-bad-materialisms.
- Lorde A. Sestra-otverzhennaia [Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches], Moscow, No Kidding Press, 2022.
- Nicholson L. Feminism in “Waves”: Useful Metaphor or Not? New Politics, 2010, vol. XII, no. 4, pp. 34–39.
- Riviere J. Zhenstvennost’ kak maskarad [Womanliness as a masquerade]. Revnost’ i zhenskoe [Jealousy and the Feminine], Izhevsk, ERGO, 2014.
- Rubin G. Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader (eds H. Abelove, D. M. Halperin, M. A. Barale), New York, Routledge, 1993, pp. 3–44.
- Ruti M. The Singularity of Being: Lacan and the Immortal Within, New York, Fordham University Press, 2012.
- Schwab G. Sexual Difference as a Model: An Ethics for the Global Future. Diacritics, 1998, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 76–92.
- Srinivasan A. Pravo na seks. Feminizm v XXI veke [The Right to Sex: Feminism in the Twenty-First Century], Moscow, AST, 2022.
- Stone A. Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference, Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
- Waller M. The History, Drivers, and Social Issues of the Cottagecore Movement. Western Washington University, 2022. Available at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/531.
- Žižek S. Shchekotlivyi sub’ekt: otsutstvuiushchii tsentr politicheskoi ontologii [The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology], Moscow, Delo Publishing, RANEPA, 2014, pp. 508–527.
Supplementary files
