Fun on The Bridge: notes on parable, play and politics
- Autores: Serebryakov A.1
-
Afiliações:
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Edição: Volume 34, Nº 5 (2024)
- Páginas: 13-40
- Seção: A RUPTURE AND AN EVENT
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-5377/article/view/291410
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2024-5-13-37
- ID: 291410
Citar
Resumo
The article proposes a reading of Franz Kafka’s parable The Bridge, in which the narrator’s transformations into a bridge and his conflict with a stranger are treated as descriptions of play interactions. Based on the works of Walter Benjamin, Roger Caillois, Johan Huizinga, Eugen Fink, Donald Winnicott, Giorgio Agamben and other theorists, the main properties of play and its relationship with operations belonging to the sphere of ritual that organize and regulate reality are demonstrated through the examples from the short story. Play as a spontaneous activity (paidia) is configured through separation from everyday routine and creation of independent time and space where gratuitous freedom of the participants is affirmed. In the course of its unfolding, the impulse of spontaneous gaiety is transformed, producing the rules and conditions for the continuation of play, but at the same time also being confronted with external regulation.
Particular emphasis in the article is placed on the specifics of the mimicry play and its connection with the mimetic faculty — the creation of connections between things, the establishment of similarities and relationships. Mimicry, like the one that allows the narrator of Kafka’s novella to appear as a bridge, implies the transformation of the player herself, of becoming the other, while the role chosen by the player is not determined and not regulated from outside. As an eventful and localized practice, play inevitably ends and the world of fun and spontaneous action collapses. However, this defeat implies the hope of a renewal of play and the knowledge that in our experience there is a possibility for something fundamentally different. At the end of the article the author suggests to compare the philosophical descriptions of play with the concept of democratic politics by Jacques Rancière. Play and politics of the powerless can be seen as structurally similar, though not identical, phenomena in which the mimetic faculty is directed towards transforming the order of things.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral

Sobre autores
Artem Serebryakov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: aserebryakov@eu.spb.ru
Rússia, St. Petersburg
Bibliografia
- Adorno Th. Esteticheskaia teoriia [Ästhetische Theorie], Moscow, Respublika, 2001.
- Adorno Th. Zametki o Kafke [Aufzeichnungen zu Kafka]. In: Kafka F. Protsess [Der Prozeß], St. Petersburg, Amphora, 2000, pp. 297–331.
- Agamben G. Homo sacer. Chrezvychainoe polozhenie [Stato di eccezione. Homo sacer], Moscow, Europe, 2011.
- Agamben G. In Playland. Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience, London, Verso, 1993, pp. 65–87.
- Agamben G. Stasis. Grazhdanskaia voina kak politicheskaia paradigma. Homo sacer, II, 2. [Stasis. La guerra civile come paradigma politico. Homo sacer, II, 2], St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’, 2021.
- Aristotle. Poetika [Poetics]. Soch.: V 4 t. [Works: In 4 vols], Moscow, Mysl’, 1983, vol. 4, pp. 645–680.
- Aristotle. Politika [Politics]. Soch.: V 4 t. [Works: In 4 vols], Moscow, Mysl’, 1983, vol. 4, pp. 375–644.
- Barthes R. Igrushki [Jouets]. Mifologii [Mythologies], Moscow, Academic Project, 2008, pp. 121–123.
- Bataille G. Kafka [Kafka]. Literatura i zlo [La Littérature et le Mal], Moscow, Moscow University Press, 1994, pp. 104–118.
- Becker S., Hummel C., Sander G. Literaturwissenschaft. Eine Einführung: Reclams Studienbuch Germanistik, Stuttgart, Reclam, 2018.
- Benjamin W. Frants Kafka [Franz Kafka], Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2000.
- Benjamin W. O mimeticheskoi sposobnosti [Über das mimetische Vermögen]. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniia [Doctrine of the Similar. Media Aesthetic Works], Moscow, RSUH Press, 2012, pp. 171–187.
- Benjamin W. Ozareniia [Illuminationen], Moscow, Martis, 2000.
- Benjamin W. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility. Second Version. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media, Cambridge, London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008, pp. 19–55.
- Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii [Lehre vom Ähnlichen]. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniia [Doctrine of the Similar. Media Aesthetic Works], Moscow, RSUH Press, 2012, pp. 164–170.
- Buck-Morss S. The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin & The Arcades Project, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1989.
- Caillois R. Igry i liudi. Stat’i i esse po sotsiologii kul’tury [Les jeux et les hommes], Moscow, OGI, 2007.
- Caillois R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral’noe [Le mythe et l’homme. L’Homme et le sacré], Moscow, OGI, 2003.
- Camus A. Nadezhda i absurd v tvorchestve Frantsa Kafki [L’espoir et l’Absurde dans l’œuvre de Franz Kafka]. Buntuiushchii chelovek: Filosofiia. Politika. Iskusstvo [L’Homme révolté], Moscow, Politizdat, 1990, pp. 93–100.
- Deleuze G. Kritika i klinika [Critique et clinique], St. Petersburg, Machina, 2002.
- Deleuze G., Guattari F. Kafka: za maluiu literaturu [Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure], Moscow, Institute for General Humanitarian Studies, 2015.
- Derrida J. Before the Law. Acts of Literature, New York, London, Routledge, 1992, pp. 181–221.
- Derrida J. Prizraki Marksa. Gosudarstvo dolga, rabota skorbi i novyi internatsional [Spectres de Marx: l’état de la dette, le travail du deuil et la nouvelle Internationale], Moscow, Logos-altera, Ессе homo, 2006.
- Descartes R. Razmyshleniia o pervoi filosofii [Meditationes de prima philosophia]. Soch.: V 2 t. [Works: In 2 vols], Moscow, Mysl’, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 3–72.
- Fink E. Osnovnye fenomeny chelovecheskogo bytiia [Grundphänomene des menschlichen Daseins], Moscow, Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsiia”, 2017.
- Gross R. V. Fallen Bridge, Fallen Woman, Fallen Text. The Literary Review, 1983, vol. 26, pp. 577–587.
- Hansen M. Cinema and Experience: Siegfried Kracauer, Walter Benjamin, and Theodor W. Adorno, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 2012.
- Horkheimer M., Adorno Th. Dialektika Prosveshcheniia. Filosofskie fragmenty [Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente], Moscow, St. Petersburg, Medium, Iuventa, 1997.
- Huizinga J. Homo ludens. Chelovek igraiushchii [Homo ludens. Playing Man], Moscow, Ivan Limbakh Publishing House, 2011.
- Kafka F. Protsess. Zamok: [Romany]. Novelly i pritchi. Aforizmy. Pis’mo ottsu. Zaveshchanie [Process. The Castle: [Novels]. Novels and parables. Aphorisms. Letter to My Father. Testament], Moscow, AST, 2008.
- Koelb C. The Turn of the Trope: Kafka’s “Die Brücke”. Modern Austrian Literature, 1989, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 57–70.
- Mishara A. L. Kafka, Paranoic Doubles and the Brain: Hypnagogic vs. Hyper-reflexive Models of Disrupted Self in Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Anomalous Conscious States. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2010, vol. 5, art. 13.
- Namwali Serpell C. Of Being Bridge. The Comparatist, 2012, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 4–23.
- Nancy J.-L. Neproizvodimoe soobshchestvo [La Communauté désœuvrée], Moscow, Vodolei, 2011.
- Podoroga V. Mimesis. Materialy po analiticheskoi antropologii literatury: V 2 t. [Mimesis. The Analytic Anthropology of Literature: In 2 vols], Moscow, Cultural revolution, 2006, vol. 1.
- Podoroga V. Parabola. Frants Kafka i konstruktsiia snovideniia [Parabola. Franz Kafka and the Construction of Dreams], Moscow, IPhRAS Publishers, Cultural revolution, 2020.
- Rancière J. Desiat’ tezisov o politike [Ten Theses on Politics]. Na kraiu politicheskogo [Aux bords du politique], Moscow, Praxis, 2006, pp. 193–221.
- Rancière J. Emansipirovannyi zritel [Le Spectateur émancipé], Nizhnii Novgorod, Krasnaia lastochka, 2018.
- Rancière J. Nesoglasie: Politika i filosofiia [La Mésentente: Politique et philosophie], St. Petersburg, Machina, 2013.
- Rancière J. Razdeliaia chuvstvennoe [Le partage du sensible], St. Petersburg, EUPRESS, 2007.
- Schepers G. Kafka’s The Bridge. Humanities, 2002, vol. 33, pp. 77–87.
- Schiller F. Pis’ma ob esteticheskom vospitanii cheloveka [Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen]. Sobr. soch.: V 7 t. [Works: In 7 vols], Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury, 1957, vol. 6, pp. 251–358.
- Schmitt C. Poniatie politicheskogo [Der Begriff Des Politischen], St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2016.
- Schuman R. Kafka and Wittgenstein: The Case for an Analytic Modernism, Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press, 2015.
- Snoek A. Agamben’s Joyful Kafka: Finding Freedom Beyond Subordination, New York, Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.
- Spahr B. L. Franz Kafka: The Bridge and the Abyss. Modern Fiction Studies, 1962, no. 8, pp. 3–15.
- Sutton-Smith B. The Ambiguity of Play, Cambridge, London, Harvard University Press, 2001.
- Timofeeva O. V. Proizvedenie-snovidenie Kafki v interpretatsii V. A. Podorogi [Kafka’s Dream Work in Valery Podoroga’s Interpretation]. New Literary Observer, 2021, no. 6 (172), pp. 27–36.
- Winnicott D. Igra i real’nost’ [Playing and Reality], Moscow, Institute for General Humanitarian Studies, 2002.
- Zenkin S. N. Ben’iamin, Bodler i mimesis [Benjamin, Baudelaire and mimesis]. Sharl’ Bodler & Val’ter Ben’iamin: Politika & Estetika: Kollektivnaia monografiia [Charles Baudelaire & Walter Benjamin: Politics & Aesthetics: A Collective Monograph] (ed. S. L. Fokin), Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2015, pp. 9–20.
- Zenkin S. N. Rozhe Kaiua: igra, iazyk, sakral’noe [Roger Caillois: Play, Language, the Sacred]. In: Caillois R. Igry i liudi. Stat’i i esse po sotsiologii kul’tury [Les jeux et les hommes], Moscow, OGI, 2007, pp. 7–30.
Arquivos suplementares
