The comparison of functional result of treatment of patients after arthroplasty of coxofemoral joint using hard friction pairs


如何引用文章

全文:

详细

The article presents comparison of functions of mounted femoral endoprosthesis with hard friction pairs in two groups of patients of younger and middle age. In the first group the hard friction pair “ceramics-ceramics” with diameter of head 36 mm was used. In the second group hard friction pair “titanium nitride-titanium nitride” with diameters of heads from 44 to 52 mm were used. The purpose of study was to compare functional results depending on size of head of endoprosthesis and to determine indications for application of big heads. The results were evaluated according Harris hip scope. The statistical analysis of obtained data established no reliable difference between the groups. However, evaluation of range of motions of joints established significant higher range of motions in patients with mounted heads of big diameter. The given advantage can be actual for patients sportsmen and those individuals whose profession and style of life require greater physical activity.

作者简介

A. Skoroglyadov

The N.I. Pirogov Russian national research medical university Minzdrav of Russia; The municipal clinical hospital № 64

Кафедра травматологии, ортопедии и ВПХ педиатрического факультета Moscow, Russia

A. But-Gusaim

The N.I. Pirogov Russian national research medical university Minzdrav of Russia; The municipal clinical hospital № 64

Кафедра травматологии, ортопедии и ВПХ педиатрического факультета Moscow, Russia

I. Sirotin

The N.I. Pirogov Russian national research medical university Minzdrav of Russia; The municipal clinical hospital № 64

Кафедра травматологии, ортопедии и ВПХ педиатрического факультета Moscow, Russia

Vladimir Mkrtchyan

The N.I. Pirogov Russian national research medical university Minzdrav of Russia; The municipal clinical hospital № 64

Email: volodia89.89@mail.ru
doctor Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Kamath A.F., Sheth N.P., Hosalkar H.H., Babatunde O.M., Lee G.C., Nelson C.L. Modern total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 21 years. J. Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(3): 402-8.
  2. Москалев В.П., Конилов Н.В., Шапиро К.И. и др. Медицинские и социальные проблемы эндопротезирования суставов конечностей. СПб.: Морсар АВ; 2001.
  3. Неверов В.А., Закари С.М. Ревизионное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава. СПб.: Образование; 1997.
  4. Сидоренко О.А. Социально-гигиенические особенности заболеваемости и оценка эффективности лечения больных с патологией крупных суставов: Автореф. дисс. ... канд. мед. наук. Новосибирск; 2002.
  5. Cai P., Hu Y., Xie J. Large-diameter Delta ceramic-on-ceramic versus common-sized ceramic-inpolyethylene bearings in THA. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(9): 1307-13.
  6. Rathi P., Pereira G.C., Giordani M., Di Cesare P.E. The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. Am. J. Orthop. (Belle Mead NJ). 2013; 42(8): E53-9.
  7. Rodriguez J.A., Rathod P.A. Large diameter heads: is bigger always better? J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012; 94(11 Suppl A): 52-4.
  8. McMinn D.J. Development of metal/metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int. 2003; 13(1): 41-53.
  9. Migaud H., Putman S., Combes A., Berton C., Bocquet D., Vasseur L. et al. Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So. HSS J. 2012; 8(3): 262-9.
  10. Mazen Al Hajjar. Wear of Hard-on-Hard Hip Prostheses: Infl uence of Head Size, Surgical Position, Material and Function: Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Mechanical Engineering Leeds. UK; 2012.
  11. Bozic K.J., Browne J., Dangles C.J., Manner P.A., Yates A.J.Jr., Weber K.L. Modern metal-on-metal hip implants. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2012; 20(6): 402-6.
  12. Van Raay J.J.A.M., Rozing P.M., Van Blitterswijk C.A., Van Haastert R.M., Koerten H.K. Biocompatibility of wear-resistant coatings in orthopaedic surgery in vitro testing with human fi broplast cell cultures. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 1995; 6(2): 80-4.
  13. Karel J. Hamelynck, Ron G. Woering. Ceramic Surface Engineered Metal-on-Metal Hips system for Tatal Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty. White Paper Published. 2009; August: 1-8.
  14. Harman M.K., Banks S.A., Hodge W.A. Wear analysis of a retrieved hip implant with titanium nitride coating. J. Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(8): 938-45.

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2015


 


##common.cookie##