BINOCULAR IMPLANTATION OF NEW DIFFRACTIVE TRIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS FOR PRESBYOPIA CORRECTION


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. Evaluation of the visual and functional results of bilateral implantation of the diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL), the incidence of adverse optical phenomena and the degree of patient satisfaction. Methods. A prospective, open-label study included 82 patients (164 eyes) with presbyopia who underwent cataract phacoemulsification (n = 128) or refractive lensectomy (n = 36) with bilateral implantation of a new multifocal IOL AT LISA tri 839MP. The mean age of the patients was 61.2 ± 11.8 (32-84) years. The period of observation of patients was from 6 to 36 (18.3 ± 3.9) months. Results. After 1 year of follow-up, the increase in UCNVA was observed from 0.19 ± 0.17 to 0.89 ± 0.21, UCIVA from 0.18 ± 0.20 to 0.78 ± 0.17, UCDVA from 0.26 ± 0, 23 to 0.9 ± 0.12 (p <0.05). The increase in BCNVA was from 0.49 ± 0.23 to 0.99 ± 0.07, BCIVA from 0.44 ± 0.27 before and 0.96 ± 0.11 and BCDVA from 0.58 ± 0.25 to 1.0 ± 0.04 (p <0.05). The greatest visual acuity (0.0 logMAR for OU) was noted with a defocus of 0, which corresponds to the point of clear vision in the distance. At -1.0 D (the point of clear vision at an average distance) and -2.5 D (the point of clear vision near), a high visual acuity (0.04 and 0.09 logMAR, respectively) was noted, which indicates a good vision correction in all investigated distances. The frequency of achieving SE in the range ± 0.5 D was 92.7%. The primary endpoint of the study (BCDVA = 1.0) in the long-term follow-up period was 95.1%. In all cases, high patient satisfaction and a low incidence of undesirable side effects were noted (glare, halo, difficulty in driving). Conclusion. Implantation of the trifocal IOL AT LISA tri 839MP leads to a good level of functional vision restoration at near, average and far distance after cataract surgery and clear lens removal.

About the authors

K. B Pershin

«Eximer» eye center

Moscow, 109147, Russian Federation

N. F Pashinova

«Eximer» eye center

Moscow, 109147, Russian Federation

Alexander Iu. Tsygankov

«Eximer» eye center

Email: alextsygankov1986@yandex.ru
кандидат медицинских наук, научный референт медицинского директора сети офтальмологических клиник «Эксимер», 109147, г. Москва Moscow, 109147, Russian Federation

O. P Miyovich

«Eximer» eye center

Moscow, 109147, Russian Federation

I. A Likh

«Eximer» eye center

Novosibirsk, 630005, Russian Federation

E. P Gurmizov

«Eximer» eye center

St.-Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation

References

  1. Воскресенская А.А., Поздеева Н.А., Паштаев Н.П., Батьков Е.Н., Треушников В.М., Чередник В.И. Первый опыт имплантации трехфокальных дифракционно-рефракционных интраокулярных линз. Вестник офтальмологии. 2011; 127(6): 14-8
  2. Gatinel D., Pagnoulle C., Houbrechts Y., Gobin L. Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2011; 37(11): 2060-2067. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.047.
  3. Valle P. J., Oti J. E., Canales V. F., Cagigal M. P. Visual axial PSF of diffractive trifocal lenses. Optics Express. 2005; 13(7): 2782-2792. doi: 10.1364/opex.13.002782.
  4. Mojzis P., Peña-García P., Liehneova I., Ziak P., Alió J. L. Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2014; 40(1): 60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.025.
  5. Law E. M., Aggarwal R. K., Kasaby H. Clinical outcomes with a new trifocal intraocular lens. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014; 24(4): 501-508. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000407.
  6. Alió J. L., Montalbán R., Peña-García P., Soria F. A., Vega-Estrada A. Visual outcomes of a trifocal aspheric diffractive intraocular lens with microincision cataract surgery. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2013; 29(11): 756-761. doi: 10.3928/1081597x-20131021-05.
  7. Cochener B., Vryghem J., Rozot P., et al. Visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a fully diffractive trifocal lens. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2012; 6(1): 1421-7. doi: 10.2147/opth.s32343.
  8. Lesieur G. Outcomes after implantation of a trifocal diffractive IOL. Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie. 2012; 35(5): 338-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.09.012.
  9. Madrid-Costa D., Ruiz-Alcocer J., Ferrer-Blasco T., García-Lázaro S., Montés-Micó R. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2013; 29(11): 749-54. doi: 10.3928/1081597x-20131021-04.
  10. Gatinel D., Houbrechts Y. Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013; 39(7): 1093-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.048.
  11. Montés-Micó R., Madrid-Costa D., Ruiz-Alcocer J., Ferrer-Blasco T., Pons Á.M. In vitro optical quality differences between multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013; 39(6): 928-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.038.
  12. De Vries N. E., Webers C. A. B., Touwslager W. R. H., et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2011; 37(5): 859-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.032.
  13. Alba-Bueno F., Vega F., Millán M. S. Halos and lenses: origin and interpretation. Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. 2014; 89: 397-404.
  14. Першин К.Б., Пашинова Н.Ф., Цыганков А.Ю., Мийович О.П. Сравнительный анализ результатов имплантации би- и трифокальных ИОЛ для коррекции пресбиопии. Катарактальная и рефракционная хирургия. 2016; 16(2): 23-9.
  15. Темиров Н.Э., Темиров Н.Н. Субъективные ощущения пациентов после имплантации различных моделей мультифокальных интраокулярных линз. Катарактальная и рефракционная хирургия. 2015; 15(1): 43-8.
  16. Sheppard A. L., Shah S., Bhatt U., Bhogal G., Wolffsohn J. S. Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013; 39(3): 343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.017

Copyright (c) 2018 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies