The surgery correction of presbyopia: the modern possibilities


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article presents review of actual publications' data concerning surgical correction of presbyopia. The data is presented related to social significance of presbyopia alongside with other disorders of refraction. The techniques applying monovision include thermokeratoplasty and such its modification as laser and radio-frequency thermokeratoplasty. All of them have number of deficiencies. The exdmer-laser ablation of cornea in the form of Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) or Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are considered as kerato-refractional techniques of correction of presbyopia. The femtosecond laser intrastromal correction of presbyopia (INTRACOR) is also labeled as kerato-refractional technique of correction of presbyopia and it is based on making intrastromal concentric rings in the central optical zone of cornea. The deficiency of INTRACOR is a relatively high cost of procedure due to application of femtosecond laser. The implantation of inlays (artificial devices) into cornea permits correcting presbyopia with less financial expenses. However, there are number of contraindications for implementing. The Tornton and Schachar operations are referred to the group of sclerotic operations of correcting presbyopia. However, nowadays these interventions are practically out of application. The implantation of intraocular lenses, including accommodating, multi-focal and monofocal by the principle of monovision ones, can be considered as the most adequate mode of correction of presbyopia. The advantages and disadvantages of implantation of various types of intraocular lenses are considered in detail.

About the authors

Kirill B. Pershin

The clinic «Excimer» of «Modern medical technologies»; Institute of post-graduate training of the Federal medical biological agency of Russia

Email: kpershin@mail.ru
doctor of medical sciences, RANS academician, professor of chair of ophthalmology the institute of post-graduate training of the Federal medical biological agency of Russia, medical director of «Excimer» opthalmologic clinics network 109147, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Мушкова И.А., Антонова Е.Г. Инфракрасная кератопластика (ЛТК) в коррекции аномалий рефракции. В кн.: Лазерно-оптические технологии в биологии и медицине: Тезисы докладов международной конференции. Минск; 2004: 26.
  2. Ayoubi M.G., Leccisotti A., Goodall E.A., McGilligan V.E., Moore T.C. Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis versus conductive keratoplasty to obtain monovision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2010; 36 (6): 997-1002.
  3. Баталина Л.В. Клинико-функциональное исследование динамики состояния органа зрения после проведения ЛАСИК при миопии: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2002.
  4. Alió J.L., Chaubard J.J., Caliz A., Sala E., Patel S. Correction of presbyopia by technovision central multifocal LASIK (PresbyLASIK). J. Refract. Surg. 2006; 22 (5): 453-60.
  5. Gifford P., Kang P., Swarbrick H., Versace P. Changes to corneal aberrations and vision after Presbylasik refractive surgery using the MEL 80 Platform. J. Refract. Surg. 2014; 30 (9): 598-603.
  6. Holzer M.P., Mannsfeld A., Ehmer A., Auffarth G.U. Early outcomes of INTRACOR femtosecond laser treatment for presbyopia. J. Refract. Surg. 2009; 25 (10): 855-61.
  7. Taneri S., Oehler S. Keratectasia after treating presbyopia with INTRACOR followed by SUPRACOR enhancement. J. Refract. Surg. 2013; 29 (8): 573-6.
  8. Holzer M.P., Knorz M.C., Tomalla M., Neuhann T.M., Auffarth G.U. Intrastromal femtosecond laser presbyopia correction: 1-year results of a multicenter study. J. Refract. Surg. 2012; 28 (3): 182-8.
  9. Fitting A., Menassa N., Auffarth G.U., Holzer M.P. Effect of intrastromal correction of presbyopia with femtosecond laser (INTRACOR) on mesopic contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmologe. 2012; 109 (10): 1001-7.
  10. George O. Waring IV. Correction of presbyopia with a small aperture corneal inlay. J. Refract. Surg. 2011; 27 (11): 842-5.
  11. Schwiegerling J.T. Eye axes and their relevance to alignment of corneal refractive procedures. J. Refract. Surg. 2013; 29 (8): 515-6.
  12. Seyeddain O., Hohensinn M., Riha W., Nix G., Rückl T., Grabner G. et al. Small-aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: 3-year follow-up. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2012; 38 (1): 35-45.
  13. Thornton S.P. Anterior ciliary sclerotomy (ACS): a procedure to reverse presbyopia. In: Sher N.A., ed. Surgery for Hyperopia and Presbyopia. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1997: 33-6.
  14. Schachar R.A. The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia. The scleral expansion band procedure. In: Agarwal A., ed. Presbyopia: a Surgical Textbook. NJ. SLACK Incorporated; 2002: 37-49.
  15. Малюгин Б.Э., Багров С.Н., Новиков C.B., Узунян Д.Г., Радованович Л.В. Хирургическое лечение пресбиопии методом супрацилиарной склеротомии. В кн.: Федоровские чтения 2002: Материалы II научно-практической конференции. М.; 2002: 236-8.
  16. Антонян С.А. Клинико-функциональные результаты коррекции пресбиопии с использованием различных хирургических подходов: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2009.
  17. Weghaupt H., Pieh S., Skorpik C. Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 1998; 24 (5): 663-5.
  18. Dick H.B., Krummenauer F., Schwenn O., Krist R., Pfeiffer N. Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106 (10): 1878-86.
  19. Braga-Mele R., Chang D., Dewey S., Foster G., Henderson B.A., Hill W. et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2014; 40 (2): 313-22.
  20. Тахтаев Ю.В. Интраокулярная коррекция аметропий и пресбиопии: Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. СПб.; 2008.
  21. Yoon S.Y., Song I.S., Kim J.Y., Kim M.J., Tchah H. Bilateral mixand-match versus unilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation: long-term comparison. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2013; 39 (11): 1682-90.
  22. Win-Hall D.M., Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurements in prepresbyopic eyes using an autorefractor and an aberrometer. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2008; 34 (5): 774-84.
  23. Hunter J.J., Campbell M.C., Geraghty E. Optical analysis of an accommodating intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2006; 32 (2): 269-78.
  24. McLeod S.D., Vargas L.G., Portney V., Ting A. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 1: Optical and biomechanical principles and design considerations. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2007; 3 (1): 37-46.
  25. Ossma I.L., Galvis A., Vargas L.G., Trager M.J., Vagefi M.R., McLeod S.D. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2007; 33 (1): 47-52.
  26. Larkin H. DUAL-OPTIC IOL Patients exhibit latent accommodation at three years. EUROTIMES. 2010; 16 (5): 24.
  27. Matteo Piovella, Lynda Charters. Dual-optic lens accommodates vision at all distances. Ophthalmology Times. April 01, 2014. Available at: http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/content/tags/abbott-medical-optics/dual-optic-lens-accommodates-vision-all-distan?page=full.
  28. Alio J. New Technology IOL: where innovations lies. Eye World. Feb. 2015; 58. Available at: http://www.eyeworld.org/article.php?sid=7639.
  29. Alió J.L., Ben-nun J., Rodríguez-Prats J.L., Plaza A.B. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2009; 35 (10): 1671-8.
  30. Kohl J.C., Werner L., Ford J.R., Cole S.C., Vasavada S.A., Gardiner G.L. et al. Long-term uveal and capsular biocompatibility of a new accommodating intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2014; 40 (12): 2113-9.
  31. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2008; 91 (3): 279-95.
  32. Fine H. Refractive Surgery and IOLs - future trends. In: Chang D., ed. Mastering refractive IOLs: the art and science. SLACK Inc.; 2008.
  33. Kohnen T., Koch D., eds. Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Springer Inc.; 2005.
  34. Fine H., Hoffman R.S., Packer M. Optimizing refractive lens exchange with bimanual microincision phacoemulsification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2004; 30: 550-4.
  35. de Groot J.H., van Beijma F.J., Haitjema H.J., Dillingham K.A., Hodd K.A., Koopmans S.A. et al. Injectable intraocular lens material based upon hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2001; 2 (3): 628-34.
  36. Myers R.I., Krueger R.R. Novel approaches to correction of presbyopia with laser modification of the crystalline lens. J. Refract. Surg. 1998; 14 (2): 136-9.
  37. Krueger R.R., Kuszak J., Lubatschowski H., Myers R.I., Ripken T., Heisterkamp A. First safety study of femtosecond laser photodisruption in animal lenses: tissue morphology and cataractogenesis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2005; 31 (12): 2386-94.
  38. Stachs O., Schumacher S., Hovakimyan M., Fromm M., Heisterkamp A., Lubatschowski H. et al. Visualization of femtosecond laser pulse-induced microincisions inside crystalline lens tissue. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2009; 35 (11): 1979-83.
  39. Капица С.П. Сколько людей жило, живет и будет жить на земле. Очерк теории роста человечества. М.; 1999.

Copyright (c) 2016 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies