Delayed results of nonspecific inhalation immunotherapy for atopic asthma with Ruzam


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the trial was to study the delayed efficiency and safety of therapy with Ruzam (an inhaled formulation) in adult patients with mild and moderate persistent atopic asthma.
The clinical, functional, and laboratory parameters of therapy (basic therapy in combination with Ruzam or placebo) were estimated in 63 patients with asthma 6 months after termination of a 2-week course of therapy. Therapeutic effectiveness was evaluated from the frequency of asthmatic attacks, needs for β2-agonists, the scope of basic therapy, and the degree of asthma symptoms according to patients' self-observation diaries, from peak flowmetry and spirometry readings, ACT scores, the level of allergic inflammatory markers, the values of bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and the frequency of acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI).
Within 6 months after termination of the course of inhaled Ruzam therapy, asthmatic attacks were absent and clinical and functional control remained in 30 (97%) patients. There was a reduction in the total scope of basic therapy: the latter was discontinued in 12 (39%), the dose of the inhaled corticosteroid was halved in 5 (16%). In the control group receiving placebo (n = 32), the frequency of attacks and the level of asthma control remained as before; moreover, the scope of basic therapy could not be reduced; it was increased in 8 (25%) patients. There was a further significant reduction of the level of eosinophil cationic protein in the serum and sputum-induced supernatant, which was found in the Ruzam-treated patients immediately after the termination of the course of inhaled Ruzam therapy. Furthermore, the frequency of ARVI considerably declined in them.

About the authors

Dmitriy Valentinovich Terekhov

ГОУ ДПО Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования, Москва

аспирант каф. клинической аллергологии; ГОУ ДПО Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования, Москва

N M Nenasheva

ГОУ ДПО Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования, Москва

ГОУ ДПО Российская медицинская академия последипломного образования, Москва

D V Terekhov

N M Nenasheva

References

  1. Айсанов З. Р., Калманова Е. Н. // Клинические рекомендации. Бронхиальная астма. - М., 2008. - С. 78-96.
  2. Белевский А. С., Княжеская Н. П., Новиков Ю. К. // Атмосфера. Пульмонол. и аллергол. - 2007. - № 1. - С. 43-47.
  3. Глобальная стратегия лечения и профилактики бронхиальной астмы (GINA) пересмотр 2006 г.: Пер. с англ. - М., 2007.
  4. Осипова Г. Л. // Атмосфера. Пульмонол. и аллергол. - 2002. - № 2. - С. 32-33.
  5. Официальный документ АТО/ЕРО. Ч. 1. Лечение бронхиальной астмы и ее обострений: стандартизированные конечные показатели для клинических исследований по астме и клинической практики // Пульмонология. - 2011. - № 1. - С. 19-39.
  6. Реброва О. Ю. Статистический анализ медицинских данных. - М., 2006.
  7. Чучалин А. Г. // Пульмонология. - 1993. - Приложение. - С. 61-62.
  8. American Thoracic Society Documents ATS/ERS: Recommendation for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005 // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. - 2005. - Vol. 171. - P. 912-930.
  9. Aziz I., Wilson A. M., Liworth B. J. // Chest. - 2000. - Vol. 118. - P. 1049-1058.
  10. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, GINA, upfated 2009. Accessed at http://www.ginasthma.org.
  11. Holgate S. T. et al. Asthma: Physiology, immunology, and treatment. - London, 2003. - P. 3-25.
  12. Pellegrino R. et al. // Eur. Respir. J. - 2005. - Vol. 26. - P. 948-968.

Copyright (c) 2011 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies