Representation of women in regional parliaments: testing the model of traditional gender roles

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The reasons for the limited women’s representation in the parliaments of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are studied. Statistics show that in some Russian regions the proportion of women deputies in regional assemblies is higher than in the others. The classical point of view states that women’s participation in politics as people’s representatives is determined by gender norms and roles. Assessments of the influence of traditional gender roles were carried out based on Russian statistics. Information on the subjects of the Russian Federation was used in analysis. The regression analysis (step-by-step regression method) was used as a research method. The theoretical and methodological basis of the work is the theory of gender roles by A. Eagly. The conducted research refutes the formulated hypothesis. Traditional gender views have at most indirect influence on the parliamentary representation of women, mediated by the procedure of selection of candidates by political parties and civil society organizations. Provisions of the “resource” model of women’s political activism also weren’t confirmed. It is shown that the share of women deputies in the legislatures of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation which use the system of party lists during the election is less than in regional legislative bodies formed according to the majority or mixed electoral system.

About the authors

Ruslan S. Mukhametov

Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Email: muhametov.ru@mail.ru
Yekaterinburg, Russia

References

  1. Айвазова С.Г. (2002) Гендерные исследования современных политических процессов в России // Женщина в российском обществе. № 2-3. С. 24-32.
  2. Здравомыслова Е.А., Темкина А.А. (2003) Государственное конструирование гендера в советском обществе // Журнал исследований социальной политики. № 3/4. С. 299-321.
  3. Козлова Н., Монахова Ю. (2019) Женщины-депутаты представительных органов Приволжского федерального округа: опыт анализа политических биографий // Вестник Пермского университета. Сер. Политология. № 2. С. 57-69. doi: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-2-57-69.
  4. Кон И.С. (2008) Мужская роль и гендерный порядок // Вестник общественного мнения. Данные. Анализ. Дискуссии. № 2. С. 37-43.
  5. Кочкина Е.В. (2013) Законодательство о выборах в Государственную Думу Федерального Собрания РФ, 1993-2013 гг.: гендерные ограничения и возможности квотирования. М.: Вариант. 153 с.
  6. Мухаметов Р.С. (2021а) Влияние величины избирательных округов на гендерный состав муниципального депутатского корпуса // Общественные науки и современность. № 5. С. 43-55. doi: 10.31857/S086904990017284-4.
  7. Мухаметов Р.С. (2021b) Высокое представительство женщин в парламенте и пропорциональная избирательная система: работает ли эта взаимосвязь в России? // Сравнительная политика. № 2. С. 82-93. doi: 10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10021.
  8. Рябова Т.Б., Овчарова О.Г. (2016) Гендерная политология в России: достижения, проблемы и перспективы // Женщина в российском обществе. № 1. С. 3-23.
  9. Рябова Т.Б. (2008) Пол власти: гендерные стереотипы в современной российской политике. Иваново: Иван.гос. ун-т. 246 с.
  10. Рябова Т.Б., Рябов О.В. (2020) "…Слышу речь не мальчика, но мужа": о гендерно-возрастных стереотипах в политике // Женщина в российском обществе. № 4. С. 5-13. doi: 10.21064/WinRS.2020.4.1.
  11. Силласте Г.Г. (2022) Мировой гендерный ландшафт и страновой гендерный порядок в условиях глобальной трансформации социальных систем // Век глобализации. № 3. С. 112-131.
  12. Силласте Г.Г. (2019) Социальные транзиции и формирование нового гендерного порядка // Женщина в российском обществе. № 2. С. 3-16. doi: 10.21064/WinRS.2019.2.1.
  13. Хасбулатова О.А. (2001) Гендерные стереотипы в политической культуре: специфика российского опыта // Женщина в российском обществе. № 3-4. С. 17-24.
  14. Шведова Н.А. (2018) Гендерный аспект президентской кампании 2016 года в США // Американский ежегодник. № 2017. С. 57-65.
  15. Adams K. (2011) Moving towards Gender Parity: Female Representation in National Legislatures, 2001 and 2011 // International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences. Vol. 6. No. 3. Рр. 55-74.
  16. Adebayo S., Olawa B., Osasogie O. (2015) Quality of Family Relationships: The Contributions of Family Structures and Gender - Role Orientations // Social and Natural Sciences Journal. Vol. 9. No. 1. Рр. 1-4. doi: 10.12955/snsj.v9i1.718.
  17. Atkeson L. (2003) Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement // The Journal of Politics. Vol. 65. No. 4. Рр. 1040-1061. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00124.
  18. Bos A., Greenlee J., Holman M., Oxley Z., Lay J. (2022) This One's for the Boys: How Gendered Political Socialization Limits Girls' Political Ambition and Interest // American Political Science Review. Vol. 116. No. 2. Рр. 484-501. doi: 10.1017/S0003055421001027.
  19. Burns N., Schlozman K., Verba S. (2001) The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 453 р.
  20. Dolan J., Deckman M., Swers M. (2010) Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. New York: Pearson. 448 р.
  21. Eagly A., Wood W. (1999) The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior // American Psychologist. Vol. 54. No. 6. Рр. 408-423. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408.
  22. Eagly A., Wood W. (2012) Social Role Theory // In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd. Рр. 458-476. doi: 10.4135/9781446249222.n49.
  23. Eagly A., Wood W., Diekman A. (2000) Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal // In: The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Рр. 123-174.
  24. Golosov G. (2014) Is Electoral Authoritarianism Good for Women's Representation? Evidence from the 1999-2011 Regional Legislative Elections in Russia // Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 30. No. 1. Рр. 51-66. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.831653.
  25. Golosov G. (2001) Political Parties, Electoral Systems and Women's Representation in the Regional Legislative Assemblies of Russia, 1995-1998 // Party Politics. Vol. 7. No. 1. Рр. 45-68. doi: 10.1177/1354068801007001003.
  26. Inglehart R., Norris P. (2001) Women and Democracy: Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation // Journal of Democracy. Vol. 12. No. 3. Рр. 126-140. DOI: 10.1353/ jod.2001.0054.
  27. Judge T., Livingston B. (2008) Is the Gap More Than Gender? A Longitudinal Analysis of Gender, Gender Role Orientation, and Earnings // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 93. No. 5. Рр. 994-1012. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.994.
  28. Kunovich S., Paxton Р. (2005) Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women's National Political Representation // American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 111. No. 2. Рр. 505-552. doi: 10.1086/444445.
  29. Lawless J., Fox R. (2003) Family Structure, Sex-role Socialization, and the Decision to Run for Office // Women & Politics. Vol. 24. No. 4. Рр. 19-48. doi: 10.1300/J014v24n04_02.
  30. McIntyre S., Montgomery D., Srinivasan V., Weitz B. (1983) Evaluating the Statistical Significance of Models Developed by Stepwise Regression // Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. 20. No. 1. Рp. 1-11.
  31. Moser R., Rybalko M. (2022) Representation of Women and Ethnic Minorities in the Russian State Duma 1993-2021 // Russian Politics. Vol. 7. No. 2. Рр. 311-339. doi: 10.30965/24518921-00604022.
  32. Moser R.G. (2001) The Effects of Electoral Systems on Women's Representation in Post-Communist States // Electoral Studies. Vol. 20. No. 3. Рр. 353-369. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00024-X.
  33. Norris P., Lovenduski J. (1995) Political Recruitment. Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 320 р.
  34. Paxton Р., Kunovich S. (2003) Women's Political Presentation: The Importance of Ideology // Social Forces. Vol. 82. No. 1. Рр. 87-113. doi: 10.1353/sof.2003.0105.
  35. Riabov O. (2020) The Symbol of the Motherland and in the Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power in Contemporary Russia // Nationalities Papers. Vol. 48. No. 4. Рр. 752-767. doi: 10.1017/nps.2019.14.
  36. Riabova T., Riabov O. (2019) The "Rape of Europe": 2016 New Year's Eve Sexual Assaults in Cologne in Hegemonic Discourse of Russian Media // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. Vol. 52. No. 2. Рр. 145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.04.004.
  37. Ross M. (2008) Oil, Islam, and Women // American Political Science Review. Vol. 102. No. 1. Рр. 107-123. doi: 10.1017/S0003055408080040.
  38. Salmond R. (2006) Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians // Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 31. No. 2. Рр. 175-204. doi: 10.3162/036298006x201779.
  39. Temkina A., Zdravomyslova E. (2003) Gender Studies in Post-Soviet Society: Western Frames and Cultural Differences // Studies in East European Thought. Vol. 55. No. 1. Рp. 51-61.
  40. Thames F. (2017) Understanding the Impact of Electoral Systems on Women's Representation // Politics & Gender. Vol. 13. No. 3. Рр. 379-404. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X16000325.
  41. Valentova M. (2016). How Do Traditional Gender Roles Relate to Social Cohesion? Focus on Differences between Women and Men // Social Indicators Research. Vol. 127. No. 1. Рр. 153-178. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0961-2.
  42. Wilkinson L., Dallal G. (1981) Tests of Significance in Forward Selection Regression with an F-to-Enter Stopping Rule // Technometrics. Vol. 23. No. 4. Рр. 377-380.
  43. Yoon M. (2004) Explaining Women's Legislative Representation in Sub-Saharan Africa // Legislative Studies Quarterly. Vol. 29. No. 3. Рр. 447-468. doi: 10.3162/036298004X201258.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies