Journal of Volcanology and Seismology

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical and experimental studies, communications, and reports on volcanic, seismic, geodynamic, and magmatic processes occurring in the areas of island arcs and other active regions of the Earth. In particular, the journal looks at present-day land and submarine volcanic activity; Neogene–Quaternary volcanism; mechanisms of plutonic activity; the geochemistry of volcanic and postvolcanic processes; geothermal systems in volcanic regions; and seismological monitoring. In addition, the journal surveys earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and techniques for predicting them. Previously focused on translation, the journal now has the aim to become an international publication and accepts manuscripts originally submitted in English from all countries, along with translated works. The peer review policy of the journal is independent of the manuscript source, ensuring a fair and unbiased evaluation process for all submissions.

Peer review and editorial policy

The journal follows the Springer Nature Peer Review Policy, Process and Guidance, Springer Nature Journal Editors' Code of Conduct, and COPE's Ethical Guidelines for Peer-reviewers.

Approximately 10% of the manuscripts are rejected without review based on formal criteria as they do not comply with the submission guidelines. Each manuscript is assigned to at least two peer reviewers. The journal follows a single-blind reviewing procedure. The period from submission to the first decision is up to 40 days. The approximate rejection rate is 15%. The final decision on the acceptance of a manuscript for publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editors-in-Chief, Coordinating Editors, or Meeting of the Editorial Board.

If Editors, including the Editor-in-Chief, publish in the journal, they do not participate in the decision-making process for manuscripts where they are listed as co-authors.

Special issues published in the journal follow the same procedures as all other issues. If not stated otherwise, special issues are prepared by the members of the editorial board without guest editors.
 

Current Issue

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Access granted  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Vol 13, No 6 (2019)

Article

Long-Term Earthquake Prediction (LTEP) for the Kuril–Kamchatka island arc, June 2019 to May 2024; Properties of Preceding Seismicity from January 2017 to May 2019. The Development and Practical Application of the LTEP Method
Fedotov S.A., Solomatin A.V.
Abstract

This paper is concerned with results from ongoing work using the method of long-term earthquake prediction (LTEP) for the Kuril–Kamchatka island arc based on the seismic gap and seismic cycle patterns. We highlight the most important lines of research in the LTEP method during the preceding decade. A long-term forecast is provided using the basic method for the next 5 years, June 2019 through May 2024, for the most active part of the earthquake-generating zone in the region. The 20 segments of that zone have forecasts for the next 5 years, including the phases of the seismic cycle, the normalized rate of low-magnitude earthquakes (А10), the magnitudes of moderate-size earthquakes that are expected to occur with probabilities of 0.8, 0.5, and 0.15, the maximum expected magnitudes and probabilities of great (М ≥ 7.7) earthquakes. This study continues the well-known work of S.A. Fedotov by examining space–time features of the regional seismic process for the period beginning 2017, including the great Near Islands (Aleutian) earthquake of July 17, 2017, M = 7.7. The results, as obtained here, corroborate a close relationship between the seismic process occurring in the segments that pose the highest earthquake hazard according to the LTEP and the great earthquakes in the region itself and in the adjacent seismic areas, as well as emphasizing a very high earthquake hazard for several areas at the Kuril–Kamchatka island arc; Thus it is necessary to continue and expand the ongoing work in earthquake strengthening and enhancing the level of seismic safety in those areas under the highest hazard, including the administrative center of Kamchatka Krai, the town of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky.

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2019;13(6):349-362
pages 349-362 views
On the Metallogeny at the Pacific Volcanic Belts
Sidorov A.A., Volkov A.V., Galyamov A.L.
Abstract

This paper discusses currently interesting aspects of metallogeny at the Pacific volcanic belts (PVBs); these consist of complex volcanogenic–plutonic features related to the evolution of the marginal-sea lithosphere, which exhibits a remarkable mineralization peculiarity. We show that as time has passed, the ideas of a metallogenetic homogeneity of the PVBs received a new substantiation from the standpoint of plate tectonics. We show the metallogenetic value of the Ag/Au ratio in ore deposits at the PVBs. We consider the relationships between porphyritic epithermal and pyritaceous complex mineralizing systems, as well as regenerated and rejuvenated epithermal deposits. The global metallogenetic homogeneity of the Pacific ore belt suggests a wide occurrence of analogues of the American volcanogenic deposits in its Asian half, including the Russian Northeast. The bulk of the Okhotsk–Chukchi Volcanic Belt (OChVB), namely, the Uda–Murgali island arc belt, equally as the Uyandina–Yasachnaya and Oloi belts, are similar in geological structure not only to the Japanese green tuff province, but also to the other Pacific volcanic belts of the island arc type; hence, they are very likely to contain the entire diversity of deposits that belong to the complex pyritaceous ore–formation type.

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2019;13(6):363-375
pages 363-375 views
Mineral Phase Paragenesis in Explosive Ejecta Discharged by Recent Eruptions in Kamchatka and on the Kuril Islands. Part 2. Accessory Minerals of the Tolbachik Type Diamonds
Silaev V.I., Karpov G.A., Anikin L.P., Vergasova L.P., Filippov V.N., Tarasov K.V.
Abstract

The explosive atmospheric electrogenic paragenesis we studied was found to contain over 100 mineral species, varieties, and non-crystalline phases (carbonaceous minerals, phases and compounds, native metals and alloys, carbides, silicides, nitrides, halides, chalcogenides, oxides, silicates and alumosilicates, and oxysalts. The paragenesis is characterized by an abnormally low level of mineralogical organization, which indicates a deep origin of the material in the explosive facies of volcanic eruptions, including carbonaceous minerals, phases, and organic compounds.

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2019;13(6):376-388
pages 376-388 views
The Geothermal Resources of Kamchatka and the Immediate Prospects of their Extraction
Kiryukhin A.V., Sugrobov V.M.
Abstract

The probable geothermal reserves of Kamchatka are sufficient to produce 3900 MW of electrical energy. Analogous reserves for heat production are estimated as 1350 MWT (thermal units). The TOUGH2 thermohydrodynamic simulation of extraction for the identified productive geothermal reservoirs with established permeability–capacity and energy properties allows us to predict the following: (1) a possible increase in electrical power production based on the already available areas in the Mutnovsky field to reach up to 105 MW and up to 11 MW in the Pauzhetka field using binary technologies; (2) a possible increase in the production of thermal energy from the Paratunka field using submersible pumps to reach up to 216 MWT, which can supply sufficient heat to the centralized heat systems in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky.

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2019;13(6):389-402
pages 389-402 views
The Structure and Evolution of the East Greenland Continental Margin before Spreading on the Kolbeinsey Ridge
Usenko S.V., Prokhorova T.V.
Abstract

An analysis of deep structure for the East Greenland margin (Blosseville Kyst – Liverpool Land) and the Jan Mayen microcontinent yielded a common crustal model for the time before their dispersal. The joint model presents a visual picture of the net result from the Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic rifting phases. Beginning from the Devonian, a graben-like depression approximately 180 km wide has existed between Liverpool Land and the Jan Mayen Ridge. The depression resulted from downwarping of the crystalline basement that was not compensated by sedimentation. The sea basin was approximately 2 km deep at the end of the Devonian. The joint deep crustal section (from west to east) clearly shows three depths to the top of the upper mantle that can be fitted by dome-like surfaces superposed on one another. We interpret these surfaces as temperature fronts resulting from the formation of mantle plumes that took place during different epochs (Paleozoic, Mesozoic–Cenozoic, and Late Cenozoic). A basement high was identified beneath the edge of the present-day Blosseville Kyst and Liverpool Land shelf; the high correlates with the axis of a positive free-air gravity anomaly. East of the high, a continent–ocean boundary is tentatively identified along the axis of the anomaly. The present-day phase in the geological evolution of the Greenland–Norwegian region north of Iceland is characterized by a higher thermal state of the lithosphere and by intraplate tectonic occurrences.

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2019;13(6):403-414
pages 403-414 views
A Project for an Atlas of Aftershocks Following Large Earthquakes
Guglielmi A.V., Zavyalov A.D., Zotov O.D.
Abstract

The Omori law for repeated underground shocks after a large earthquake is written here in the form of a nonlinear differential equation. We define a coefficient of deactivation for the rupture zone after the main shock. Two advantages of the new formulation are pointed out. First, there is now an interesting possibility for a natural incorporation of exogenous and endogenous factors that affect the rupture zone. We highlight endogenous triggers in the form of a circumnavigating seismic echo and free oscillations of the Earth excited by the main shock. The other advantage consists in the fact that the differential equation for aftershocks enables us to formulate the inverse problem for the physics of the rupture zone. The inverse problem reduces to the determination of the coefficient of deactivation based on observed aftershock frequency. Examples are given to illustrate the solution of the inverse problem. We propose to develop an atlas of aftershocks based on the solution of the inverse problem for the rupture zone that is “cooling” after a large earthquake.

Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2019;13(6):415-419
pages 415-419 views

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies