Semantics of the northern khanty salient article: definiteness, salience, and obviation

Capa

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Uralic possessive agreement markers often function as determiners. This paper presents a case study of the Northern Khanty (Kazym dialect) 2sg Possessive that developed into a “salient article”. The Salient Article is definite as it requires informational uniqueness and familiarity, but its distribution is narrower than the distribution of previously described definite determiner types. It is most commonly used with topical Subjects and in noun phrases with demonstratives, but its use is not obligatory across the board in these cases and is not limited to them. Furthermore, the Salient Article is subject to a constraint that is similar to the proximate uniqueness constraint of languages with obviation systems like the Algonquian: there may be at most one noun phrase with a Salient Article per clause (with the exception of noun phrases with demonstratives). I consider and reject two possible syntactic accounts of such distribution and instead propose a tentative semantic analysis that derives all the observed facts: the Salient Article marks the most salient discourse referent in the given context. (I understand salience as a graded property that a referent has to the extent that the referent is being attended to by the addressee following Roberts and Barlew). This study thus supplies another argument for the hypothesis that salience is an important dimension to determiner semantics cross-linguistically.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Stepan Mikhailov

HSE University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: stepanmihajlov@gmail.com
Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Aissen 1997 — Aissen J. On the syntax of obviation. Language, 1997, 73(4): 705–750.
  2. Aissen 2001 — Aissen J. The obviation hierarchy and morphosyntactic markedness. Linguistica Atlanti-ca, 2001, 23: 1–34.
  3. Aristova 2023 — Aristova M. Linguistic situation and language shift in the Kazym Khanty-speaking com-munity. MA thesis. Moscow: HSE Univ., 2023.
  4. Arkoh, Matthewson 2013 — Arkoh R., Matthewson L. A familiar definite article in Akan. Lingua, 2013, 123: 1–30.
  5. Bárány, Nikolaeva 2021 — Bárány A., Nikolaeva I. On adjoined possessors. Linguistic Inquiry, 2021, 52(1): 181–194.
  6. Barlew 2014 — Barlew J. Salience, uniqueness, and the definite determiner -te in Bulu. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 2014, 24: 619–639.
  7. Bliss 2017 — Bliss H. A. Dependencies in syntax and discourse: Obviation in Blackfoot and beyond. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria, 2017, 27(1): 1–26.
  8. Bombi 2018 — Bombi C. Definiteness in Akan: Familiarity and uniqueness revisited. Proc. of the 28th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conf. Maspong S., Stefánsdóttir B., Blake K., Davis F. (eds.). Cam-bridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018, 141–160.
  9. Bruening 2001 — Bruening B. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passama-quoddy. Ph.D. diss. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
  10. Bruening 2009 — Bruening B. Algonquian languages have A-movement and A-agreement. Linguistic Inquiry, 2009, 40(3): 427–445.
  11. Christophersen 1939 — Christophersen P. The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Co-penhagen: E. Munksgaard, 1939.
  12. Clark 1975 — Clark H. H. Bridging. Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Schank R. C., Nash-Webber B. L. (eds.). Cambridge (MA): Association for Computational Linguistics, 1975, 169–174.
  13. Coppock 2022 — Coppock E. On definite descriptions: Can familiarity and uniqueness be distinguished Linguistics meets philosophy. Altshuler D. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022, 109–136.
  14. Coppock, Beaver 2015a — Coppock E., Beaver D. Novelty and familiarity for free. Proc. of the 20th Am-sterdam Colloquium. Brochhagen T., Roelofsen F., Theiler N. (eds.). Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, 2015, 50–59.
  15. Coppock, Beaver 2015b — Coppock E., Beaver D. Definiteness and determinacy. Linguistics and Phi-losophy, 2015, 38(5): 377–435.
  16. Diessel 2006 — Diessel H. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 2006, 17(4): 463–489.
  17. É. Kiss 2018 — É. Kiss K. Possessive agreement turned into a derivational suffix. Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics. Bartos H., Den Dikken M., Bánréti Z., Váradi T. (eds.). Cham: Springer, 2018, 87–105.
  18. É. Kiss, Tánczos 2018 — É. Kiss K., Tánczos O. From possessor agreement to object marking in the evolution of the Udmurt -jez suffix: A grammaticalization approach to morpheme syncretism. Lan-guage, 2018, 94(4): 733–757.
  19. Fraurud 2001 — Fraurud K. Possessives with extensive use: A source of definite articles Dimensions of possession. Baron I., Herslund M., Sørensen F. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001, 243–267.
  20. Frege 1892 — Frege G. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 1892, 100(1): 25–50.
  21. Givón 2001a — Givón T. Syntax: An introduction. Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.
  22. Givón 2001b — Givón T. Syntax: An introduction. Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.
  23. Goddard 1990 — Goddard I. Aspects of the topic structure of Fox narratives: Proximate shifts and the use of overt and inflectional NPs. International Journal of American Linguistics, 1990, 56(3): 317–340.
  24. Grosz et al. 1995 — Grosz B. J., Joshi A. K., Weinstein S. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 1995, 21(2): 203–225.
  25. Gundel et al. 1993 — Gundel J. K., Hedberg N., Zacharski R. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 1993, 69(2): 274–307.
  26. Halliday 1985 — Halliday M. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
  27. Halm 2018 — Halm T. From possessive suffix to affective demonstrative suffix in Hungarian: A gram-maticalization analysis. Morphology, 2018, 28(2–3): 359–396.
  28. Haspelmath 2010 — Haspelmath M. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language, 2010, 86(3): 663–687.
  29. Heim 1982 — Heim I. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. diss. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, 1982.
  30. Heim 1991 — Heim I. Artikel und Definitheit. Semantik. Von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1991, 487–535.
  31. Heim 2019 — Heim I. Definiteness and indefiniteness. Semantics — noun phrases and verb phrases. Portner P., von Heusinger K., Maienborn C. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2019, 33–69.
  32. Kaksin 2010 — Kaksin A. D. Kazymskii dialekt khantyiskogo yazyka [Kazym dialect of the Khanty lan-guage]. Khanty-Mansiysk: Informational Publishing Center of the Yugra State Univ., 2010.
  33. Kaplan 1989 — Kaplan D. Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and episte-mology of demonstratives and other indexicals. Themes from Kaplan. Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1989, 481–563.
  34. Karttunen 1976 — Karttunen L. Discourse Referents. Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground. McCawley J. D. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1976, 363–385.
  35. Koshkareva 2002 — Koshkareva N. B. Kommunikativnaya paradigma khantyiskogo predlozheniya (na materiale kazymskogo dialekta) [Communicative paradigm of Khanty sentence (based on the Kazym dialect data)]. Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Koshkareva N. B., Ok-tyabr’skaya I. V. (eds.) No. 12. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Univ., 2002, 29–44.
  36. Kratzer 2009 — Kratzer A. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pro-nouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 2009, 40(2): 187–237.
  37. Kripke 1980 — Kripke S. A. Naming and necessity. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Univ. Press, 1980.
  38. Kuznetsova 2003 — Kuznetsova A. Kumulyatsiya grammaticheskikh znachenii v agglyutinativnykh pokazatelyakh: deikticheskie funktsii posessiva v ural’skikh yazykakh [Cumulation of grammatical values in agglutinating markers: Deictic functions of the possessive in the Uralic languages]. Mezhdunarodnyi simpozium po deikticheskim sistemam i kvantifikatsii v yazykakh Evropy i severnoi i tsentral’noi Azii: sbornik statei. Suihkonen P., Comrie B. (eds.). Izhevsk: Udmurt State Univ.; Leip-zig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2003, 249–259.
  39. Lambrecht 1994 — Lambrecht K. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.
  40. Lewis 1979 — Lewis D. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1979, 8: 339–359.
  41. Link 1983 — Link G. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach. Meaning, use, and interpretation of language. Bäuerle R., Schwarze Ch., von Stechow A. (eds.). Ber-lin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1983, 302–323.
  42. Marantz 1992 — Marantz A. Case and licensing. Proc. of ESCOL ’91: The Eastern States Conf. on Lin-guistics (University of Maryland, Baltimore, Oct. 11–13, 1991). Westphal G., Ao B., Chae H.-R. (eds.). Columbus: Ohio State Univ., 1992, 234–253.
  43. Matthewson 2004 — Matthewson L. On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics, 2004, 70(4): 369–415.
  44. McCarthy 2008 — McCarthy J. J. Doing optimality theory: Applying theory to data. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.
  45. Mikhailov 2021a — Mikhailov S. Against monosemic approaches to Northern Khanty extended posses-sives. Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters, 2021, 4(1): 118–146.
  46. Mikhailov 2021b — Mikhailov S. K. 2-v-1: dve posessivnye konstruktsii v odnoi paradigme severno-khantyiskikh suffiksov [2-in-1: Two possessive constructions in one Northern Khanty paradigm of suffixes]. Malye yazyki v bol’shoi lingvistike. No. 3. Semenova Ks. P. (ed.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2021, 106–117.
  47. Mikhailov 2023 — Mikhailov S. K. Severnokhantyiskaya posessivnost’ i tipologiya determinatsii [Northern Khanty possessives and determiner typology]. Rodnoi yazyk, 2023, 2: 6–51.
  48. Muñoz 2019 — Muñoz P. The proprial article and the semantics of names. Semantics and Pragmatics, 2019, 12: 1–36.
  49. Muravyev 2022a — Muravyev N. A. Obviatsiya v kazymskom khantyiskom [Obviation in Kazym Khanty]. Field report. Ms. 2022.
  50. Muravyev 2022b — Muravyev N. A. Severnokhantyiskii kak yazyk s chertami akkuzativnogo i ierarkhi-cheskogo kodirovaniya [Northern Khanty as a language with the features of accusative and hierar-chical alignment]. Ural-Altaic Studies, 2022, 46(3): 43–62.
  51. Muravyev, Zhornik 2023 — Muravyev N. A., Zhornik D. O. Parametricheskaya model’ zaloga v ob-sko-ugorskikh yazykakh [Parametric model of the voice in the Ob-Ugric languages]. Vestnik ugrovedenia, 2023, 13(1): 112–124.
  52. Nikolaeva 2001 — Nikolaeva I. Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics, 2001, 39: 1–49.
  53. Nikolaeva 2003 — Nikolaeva I. Possessive affixes in the pragmatic structuring of the utterance: Evi-dence from Uralic. Mezhdunarodnyi simpozium po deikticheskim sistemam i kvantifikatsii v yazykakh Evropy i severnoi i tsentral’noi Azii: sbornik statei. Suihkonen P., Comrie B. (eds.). Izhevsk: Udmurt State Univ.; Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2003, 130–145.
  54. Nikolaeva, Bárány 2019 — Nikolaeva I., Bárány A. Proximate possessors. Prominent internal possessors. Bárány A., Bond. O., Nikolaeva I. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2019, 228–258.
  55. Prince 1992 — Prince E. F. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. Discourse description. Thompson S. A., Mann W. C. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1992, 295–325.
  56. Reinhart 1981 — Reinhart T. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 1981, 27(1): 53–94.
  57. Roberts 2003 — Roberts C. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2003, 26(3): 287–350.
  58. Roberts 2011 — Roberts C. Solving for interpretation. Workshop on Meaning and Understanding at the Centre for Advanced Study, Oslo. Ms. 2011.
  59. Roberts 2012 — Roberts C. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 2012, 5: 1–69.
  60. Roberts 2019 — Roberts C. Topics. Semantics — Sentence and information structure. Portner P., Maien-born C., von Heusinger K. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2019, 381–412.
  61. Roberts 2022 — Roberts C. Coherence, salience and anaphora. The 2016 NASSLLI/Rutgers workshop on Coherence and Anaphora, organized by D. Altshuler and S. Cumming. Ms., 2022.
  62. Russell 1905 — Russell B. On denoting. Mind, 1905, 14: 479–493.
  63. Sámmol Ánte 2022 — Sámmol Ánte L. S. Proto-Uralic. The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages. Bakró-Nagy M., Laakso J., Skribnik E. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2022, 3–27.
  64. Schwarz 2009 — Schwarz F. Two types of definites in natural language. Ph.D. diss. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, 2009.
  65. Schwarz 2019 — Schwarz F. Weak vs. strong definite articles: Meaning and form across languages. Def-initeness across languages. Aguilar-Guevara A., Pozas Loyo J. Vázquez-Rojas Maldonado V. (eds.). Berlin: Language Science Press, 2019, 1–37.
  66. Serdobolskaya 2017 — Serdobolskaya N. V. Invariant opredelennosti i differentsirovannoe markirovanie pryamogo dopolneniya v besermyanskom udmurtskom [The invariant of definiteness and differential object marking in Beserman Udmurt]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 2017, 13(3): 76–122.
  67. Serdobolskaya et al. 2019 — Serdobolskaya N., Usacheva M., Arkhangelskiy T. Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt. Possession in languages of Europe and North and Central Asia. Johanson L., Mazzitelli L. F., Nevskaya I. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019, 291–311.
  68. Simonenko 2017 — Simonenko A. Towards a semantic typology of specific determiners. Proc. of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium. Cremers A., van Gessel T., Roelofsen F. (eds.). Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, 2017, 425–434.
  69. Stalnaker 1974 — Stalnaker R. Pragmatic presuppositions. Semantics and philosophy. Munitz M. K., Unger P. K. (eds.). New York: New York Univ. Press, 1974, 197–219.
  70. Strawson 1950 — Strawson P. F. On referring. Mind, 1950, 59: 320–344.
  71. Strawson 1964 — Strawson P. F. Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria, 1964, 30(2): 96–118.
  72. Sudo 2012 — Sudo Y. On the semantics of phi features on pronouns. Ph.D. diss. Cambridge (MA): Mas-sachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012.
  73. Zúñiga 2006 — Zúñiga F. Deixis and alignment: Inverse systems in indigenous languages of the Americas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies