Equative-approximative markers in the Finno-Ugric languages: Interaction with quantitative scales and the development of ambiguity

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The paper is based on data from four Finno-Ugric languages (Udmurt, Hill Mari, Moksha, and Khanty). It deals with markers that can perform at least two functions: on the one hand, they can mark the standard of comparison in equative constructions; on the other hand, they can serve as approximative markers in quantified expressions. This paper considers distribution of such markers and proposes a possible way to analyze field and corpus data. I put forward and investigate hypotheses about the possible mechanism for the emergence of such polyfunctionality. Firstly, a detailed description of how such markers are distributed across languages and contexts is provided. I consider both quantitative and qualitative equative contexts. In addition, in this paper I claim that there is a third subtype of equatives — a parametric one, that has previously been described among qualitative equatives. The difference in the distribution of equative-approximative markers combined with standard and ad hoc measure nouns is discussed. We show that the first type of contexts belongs to approximative, and the second one — to equative, although the division is very vague. Secondly, the compatibility of such markers serving to disclaim precision about cardinal numerals (without any measure nouns within the construction) is considered. The data are discussed within the framework of the scalar approach. I show that cardinal numerals and measure nouns introduce different types of scales, which also affects the distribution of equative-approximative markers. After considering a number of hypotheses about whether elements of equative constructions can contribute to the reanalysis of equative indicators into markers of approximation, I conclude that equative-approximative ambiguity arises as a result of synchronic polysemy, rather than diachronic development of the equative markers.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maria Emilia Winkler

Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: maria.emilia.winkler@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Винклер 2023 — Винклер М.-Э. А. Конструкции с количественными модификаторами. Элементы горномарийского языка в типологическом освещении. Кашкин Е. В. (отв. ред.). М.: Буки Веди, 2023, 210–238. [Winkler M.-E. A. Constructions with numeral modifiers. Elementy gornomariiskogo yazyka v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Kashkin E. V. (ed.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2023, 210–238.]
  2. ГСУЯ 1962 — Перевощиков П. Н. (отв. ред.). Грамматика современного удмуртского языка. Фонетика и морфология. Ижевск: Удм. кн. изд-во, 1962. [Perevoshchikov P. N. (ed.). Grammatika sovremennogo udmurtskogo yazyka. Fonetika i morfologiya [Grammar of Modern Udmurt. Phonetics and morphology]. Izhevsk: Udmurt Book Publ., 1962.]
  3. ГСУЯ 1970 — Алатырев В. И. (ред.). Грамматика современного удмуртского языка. Синтаксис простого предложения. Ижевск: Удмуртия, 1970. [Alatyrev V. I. (ed.). Grammatika sovremennogo udmurtskogo yazyka. Sintaksis prostogo predlozheniya [Grammar of Modern Udmurt. Syntax of a simple sentence]. Izhevsk: Udmurtiya, 1970.]
  4. Кашкин 2018 — Кашкин Е. В. Определенное склонение. Элементы мокшанского языка в типологическом освещении. Толдова С. Ю., Холодилова М. А. (отв. ред.). М.: Буки Веди, 2018, 122–153. [Kashkin E. V. Definite declension. Elementy mokshanskogo v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Toldova S. Yu., Kholodilova M. A. (eds.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2018, 122–153.]
  5. Кашкин и др. 2018 — Кашкин Е. В., Сидорова М. А., Мордашова Д. Д., Гарейшина А. Р., Учитель И. К. Все ꞊ok: о семантике одной горномарийской энклитики. Малые языки в большой лингвистике. Сб. трудов конф. 2017. Семенова Кс. П. (ред.). М.: Буки Веди, 2018, 83–90. [Kashkin E. V., Sidorova M. A., Mordashova D. D., Gareishina A. P., Uchitel’ I. K. Everything is ꞊ok: On the semantics of one Hill Mari enclitic. Malye yazyki v bol’shoi lingvistike. Coll. of papers from the conf. 2017. Semenova X. P. (ed.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2018, 83–90.]
  6. Кашкин (ред.) 2023 — Кашкин Е. В. (отв. ред.). Элементы горномарийского языка в типологическом освещении. М.: Буки Веди, 2023. [Kashkin E. V. (ed.). Elementy gornomariiskogo yazyka v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2023.]
  7. Кошкарева (ред.) 2011 — Вальгамова С. И., Кошкарева Н. Б., Онина С. В., Шиянова А. А. Диалектологический словарь хантыйского языка (шурышкарский и приуральский диалекты). Кошкарева Н. Б. (общ. ред.). Екатеринбург: Баско, 2011. [Val’gamova S. I., Koshkareva N. B., Onina S. V., Shiyanova A. A. Dialektologicheskii slolvar’ khantyiskogo yazyka (shuryshkarskii i priural’skii dialekty) [Dialectological dictionary of Khanty (Shuryshkar and Obdorsk dialects)]. Ekaterinburg: Basko, 2011.]
  8. Николаева 1995 — Николаева И. А. Обдорский диалект хантыйского языка. М.; Гамбург: Mitteilungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica, 1995. [Nikolaeva I. A. Obdorskii dialect khantyiskogo yazyka [The Obdor dialect of Khanty]. Moscow; Hamburg: Mitteilungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica, 1995.]
  9. Падучева 2017 — Падучева Е. В. Референциальный статус именной группы. Материалы для проекта корпусного описания русской грамматики. На правах рукописи. М., 2017. [Paducheva E. V. Referencial’nyi status imennoi gruppy [Referentiality of a noun phrase]. Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoi grammatiki. As a manuscript. Moscow, 2017.] http://rusgram.ru/Референциальный_статус_именной_группы.
  10. Привизенцева 2018 — Привизенцева М. Ю. Эллипсис существительного. Элементы мокшанского языка в типологическом освещении. Толдова С. Ю., Холодилова М. А. (отв. ред.). М.: Буки Веди, 2018, 311–327. [Privizentseva M. Yu. Nominal ellipsis. Elementy mokshanskogo v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Toldova S. Yu., Kholodilova M. A. (eds.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2018, 311–327.]
  11. Саваткова 2002 — Саваткова А. А. Горное наречие марийского языка. Савария: Berzsenyi Dániel Főiskola, 2002. [Savatkova A. A. Gornoe narechie mariiskogo yazyka [The Hill variety of Mari]. Savariae: Berzsenyi Dániel Főiskola, 2002.]
  12. Сидорова 2018 — Сидорова М. А. Количественные конструкции. Элементы мокшанского языка в типологическом освещении. Толдова С. Ю., Холодилова М. А. (отв. ред.). М.: Буки Веди, 2018, 328–341. [Sidorova M. A. Constructions with numerals. Elementy mokshanskogo v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Toldova S. Yu., Kholodilova M. A. (eds.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2018, 328–341.]
  13. Синицына 2023 — Синицына Ю. В. Сравнительные конструкции. Элементы горномарийского языка в типологическом освещении. Кашкин Е. В. (отв. ред.). М.: Буки Веди, 2023, 648–681. [Sinitsyna Yu. V. Comparative constructions. Elementy gornomariiskogo yazyka v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Kashkin E. V. (ed.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2023, 648–681.]
  14. Синицына и др. (в печати) — Синицына Ю. В., Мордашова Д. Д., Винклер М.-Э. А. Модели полисемии сравнительного маркера kad’ в татышлинском говоре удмуртского языка. В печати. [Sinitsyna Yu. V., Mordashova D. D., Winkler M.-E. A. Models of polysemy of the comparative marker kad’ in Tatyshly Udmurt. In print.]
  15. Толдова, Холодилова (ред.) 2018 — Толдова С. Ю., Холодилова М. А. (отв. ред.). Элементы мокшанского языка в типологическом освещении. М.: Буки Веди, 2018. [Toldova S. Yu., Kholodilova M. A. (eds.). Elementy mokshanskogo v tipologicheskom osveshchenii [Elements of Moksha in a typological perspective]. Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2018.]
  16. Толдова 2018 — Толдова С. Ю. Дифференцированное кодирование прямого дополнения. Элементы мокшанского языка в типологическом освещении. Толдова С. Ю., Холодилова М. А. (отв. ред.). М.: Буки Веди, 2018, 574–607. [Toldova S. Yu. Differential object marking. Elementy mokshanskogo v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Toldova S. Yu., Kholodilova M. A. (eds.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2018, 574–607.]
  17. Холодилова 2018 — Холодилова М. А. Сравнительные конструкции. Элементы мокшанского языка в типологическом освещении. Толдова C. Ю., Холодилова М. А. (отв. ред.) М.: Буки Веди, 2018, 779–799. [Kholodilova M. A. Comparative constructions. Elementy mokshanskogo v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Toldova S. Yu., Kholodilova M. A. (eds.). Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2018, 779–799.]
  18. Цыганкин (ред.) 1980 — Цыганкин Д. В. (ред.). Грамматика мордовских языков. Фонетика. Графика. Орфография. Морфология. Саранск: Изд-во Мордов. ун-та, 1980. [Tsygankin D. V. (ed.). Grammatika mordovskikh yazykov. Fonetika. Grafika. Orfografiya. Morfologiya [Grammar of the Mordvin languages. Phonetics. Writing system. Orphography. Morphology]. Saransk: Mordovia Univ. Press, 1980.]
  19. Шеманаева 2008 — Шеманаева О. Ю. Конструкции размера в типологической перспективе. Автореф. дисс. … канд. филол. наук. М.: РГГУ, 2008. [Shemanaeva O. Yu. Konstructsii razmera v tipologicheskoi perspective [Constructions of size in a typological perspective]. Candidate diss. abstract. Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities, 2008.]
  20. Enç 1991 — Enç M. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 1991, 22(1): 1–25.
  21. Gil 1982 — Gil D. Distributive numerals. Ph.D. diss. Los Angeles: Univ. of California, 1982.
  22. Halm, Bende-Farkas 2019 — Halm T., Bende-Farkas A. The birth of an epistemic indefinite: vaegy in Transylvanian Hungarian. Talk at Diachronic Generative Syntax 21 (5–7 June 2019, Arizona State Univ.).
  23. Haspelmath 2017 — Haspelmath M. Equative constructions in world-wide perspective: A cross-linguistic perspective. Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Treis Y., Vanhove M. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2017, 9–32.
  24. Haspelmath, Buchholz 1998 — Haspelmath M., Buchholz O. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. van der Auwera J. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1998, 277–334.
  25. Henkelmann 2006 — Henkelmann P. Constructions of equative comparison. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 2006, 59(4): 370–398.
  26. König 1991 — König E. The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London; New York: Routledge, 1991.
  27. Krifka 2007 — Krifka M. Approximate interpretation of number words: A case for strategic communication. Cognitive foundations of interpretation. Bouma G., Krämer I., Zwarts J. (eds.). Amsterdam: Kloof Booksellers & Scientia Verlag, 2007, 111–126.
  28. Krifka 2009 — Krifka M. Approximate interpretations of number words: A case for strategic communication. Theory and evidence in semantics. Hinrichs E., Nerbonne J. (eds.). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2009, 109–132.
  29. Koptjevskaja‐Tamm 2009 — Koptjevskaja‐Tamm M. «A lot of grammar with a good portion of lexicon»: Towards a typology of partitive and pseudopartitive nominal constructions. Form and function of language research: Papers in honour of Christian Lehmann. Helmbrecht J., Nishina Y., Shin Y., Skopeteas S., Verhoeven E. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009, 329–347.
  30. Lasersohn 1999 — Lasersohn P. Pragmatic halos. Language, 1999, 75: 522–551.
  31. Partee, Borschev 2012 — Partee B., Borschev V. Dva stakana moloka: Substances and containers in genitive of measure constructions in Russian. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2012, 2: 140–166.
  32. Plank 2004a — Plank F. How to disclaim precision about numbers. Talk at Leipzig Numerals Workshop, 29–30 March 2004.
  33. Plank 2004b — Plank F. Inevitable reanalysis: From local adpositions to approximative adnumerals, in German and wherever. Studies in Language, 2004, 28: 165–201.
  34. Sauerland, Stateva 2007 — Sauerland U., Stateva P. Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: Evidence from approximators. Proceedings of SALT 17, 2007: 228–245.
  35. Schourup 1983 — Schourup L. C. Common discourse particles in English conversation. Columbus: Ohio State Univ., 1983.
  36. Sidorova, Sinitsyna 2018 — Sidorova M., Sinitsyna J. Approximative and comparative constructions with postpositional markers in Hill Mari: PP or NP? Talk at XV Conference on Typology and Grammar for Young Scholars, Institute for Linguistic Studies, St. Petersburg, 22–24 Nov. 2018.
  37. Stassen 2013 — Stassen L. Comparative constructions. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Dryer M. S., Haspelmath M. (eds.). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2013. http://wals.info/chapter/121.
  38. Treis 2018 — Treis Y. Comparative constructions: An introduction. Linguistic Discovery, 2018, 16(1): i–xxvi.
  39. Treis, Vanhove 2017 — Treis Y., Vanhove M. (eds.). Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2017.
  40. Zaroukian 2013 — Zaroukian E. Quantification and (un)certainty. Ph.D. diss. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ., 2013.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies