Glass or plastic? Influence of funnel material on the efficiency of nematode extraction using the Baermann method

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. D. Loginova

Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: loginova_ad@ipae.uran.ru
Russian Federation, 620144, Ekaterinburg

References

  1. Yeates G.W., Gaugler R., Bilgrami A. Ecological and behavioural adaptations // Nematode Behaviour / Eds. Gaugler R. and Bilgrami A. L. 2004. Chapter 1. P. 1–24.
  2. Van Den Hoogen J., Geisen S., Routh D. et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale // Nature. 2019. V. 572. № 7768. P. 194–198.
  3. Yeates G. W. Nematodes as soil indicators: functional and biodiversity aspects // Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2003. V. 37. № 4. P. 199–210.
  4. Maurya S., Abraham S., Somasundaram S. et al. Indicators for assessment of soil quality: a mini-review // Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2020. V. 192. № 9. P. 1–22.
  5. Bongers T., Ferris H. Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1999. V. 14. № 6. P. 224–228.
  6. Bezooijen J.V. Methods and techniques for nematology. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2006. 112 p.
  7. Cesarz S., Schulz A.E., Beugnon R. et al. Testing soil nematode extraction efficiency using different variations of the Baermann funnel method // Soil Organisms. 2019. V. 91. № 2. P. 61.
  8. Viglierchio D., Schmitt R.V. On the methodology of nematode extraction from field samples: Baermann funnel modifications // Journal of Nematology. Society of Nematologists. 1983. V. 15. № 3. P. 438.
  9. Sultonovich B.K., Jamalova F.A., Mamarasulova N.I. et al. A comparative study of nematoda-fauna of pastural plants in forest biotopes // Acad. Globe: Inderscience Research. 2022. V. 3. № 5. P. 41–45.
  10. Karmezi M., Bataka A., Papachristos D. et al. Nematodes in the pine forests of northern and central greece // Insects. 2022. V. 13. № 2. P. 194.
  11. Gorny A.M., Ye W., Cude S. et al. Soybean root-knot nematode: a diagnostic guide // Plant Health Progress. 2021. V. 22. № 2. P. 164–175.
  12. Van Sinh N., Kato R., Linh D. et al. Influence of rice husk biochar on soil nematode community under upland and flooded conditions: A microcosm experiment // Agronomy. 2022. V. 12. № 2. P. 378.
  13. Tintori S.C., Sloat S.A., Rockman M.V. et al. Rapid Isolation of Wild Nematodes by Baermann Funnel // J. of Visualized Experiments. 2022. P. 179.
  14. Ptatscheck C., Gansfort B., Traunspurger W. The extent of wind-mediated dispersal of small metazoans, focusing nematodes // Scientific Reports. 2018. V. 8. № 1. P. 1–10.
  15. Goncharov A.A., Gorbatova A.S., Sidorova A.A. Mathematical modelling of the interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Fusarium species (Fusarium spp.) // Ecological Modelling. 2022. V. 465. P. 109856.
  16. Team R.C.R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing // http://www. R-project. org/. 2021.
  17. Груздева Л.И., Матвеева Е.М., Коваленко Т.Е. Фауна почвенных нематод различных типов леса заповедника «Кивач» // Труды Карельского научного центра РАН. 2006. № 10. С. 14–21.
  18. Сущук А.А., Матвеева Е.М., Калинкина Д.С. Почвенные нематоды лесных биоценозов особо охраняемых природных территорий Республики Карелия // Труды Карельского научного центра РАН. 2017. № 4. С. 49–61.
  19. Рахлеева А.А., Семенова Т.А., Стриганова Б. Р. и др. Динамика зоомикробных комплексов при разложении растительного опада в ельниках южной тайги // Почвоведение. 2011. № 1. С. 44–55.
  20. Li S., Song M., Jing S. Effects of different carbon inputs on soil nematode abundance and community composition // Applied Soil Ecology. 2021. V. 163. P. 103915.
  21. Кудрин А.А., Сущук А.А. Методы исследования сообществ почвенных нематод // Russ. J. of Ecosystem Ecology. 2022. Т. 7. № 2. С. 44–71.
  22. DeRosa R.L., Schader P.A., Shelby J.E. Hydrophilic nature of silicate glass surfaces as a function of exposure condition // J. of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2003. V. 331. № 1–3. P. 32–40.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Prefabricated construction of glass (a) and plastic (b) funnels for nematode extraction by the Berman method.

Download (80KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. The effect of the funnel and horizon material on the number of extracted nematodes (a); the number of nematodes washed off the walls of the funnels (b); the total number of nematodes (extracted and washed away) (c); the percentage of nematode losses (d) (the number is calculated for the dry mass of the soil, n = 120). The gray fill is the organic horizon, the white one is the organomineral horizon. Identical letters mean that there are no statistically significant differences according to the Tukey criterion (p < 0.05): capital letters are used when comparing variants for the organic horizon, and lowercase letters are used for the organomineral one. The horizontal line is the median, the boundaries of the box are the interquartile span, the whiskers are the span, the point is the outlier.

Download (166KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies