The State Governance in the Coming Digital Age: Implications for China

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The digital transformation, as the main trend in this coming Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0.), is not only leading a new round of economic and industrial transformation, but also reshaping society and fundamentally transforming state governance.How to manage the state governance in this digital age is becoming the vital question for many countries in the post COVID-19 era. How to adjust the state governance rules and methods in accordance with the emerging digital technologies to boost the socio-economic growth and development?This article provides the analysis of state governance in the digital age both at theoretical and practical levels, from Chinese perspective. It focuses on the governance changes that digital transformation brings with the traditional institutionalism, defines the state of the coming digital era, observes China’s state governance transformation in this process, and finally offers the implications of “Chinese model” in terms of state-led development in this digital age. The main research methodologies mainly contain analytical, comparative, and inductive.

Sobre autores

Guo Cheng

Nanjing University of Science and Technology; Patrice Lumumba RUDN University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: asaf-today@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4927-6596
China, Nanjing; Russia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Bai Z.L. & Liu J. China’s governance model and system in transition. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies. 2020. 9(1). Pp. 65–82. doi: 10.1080/24761028.2020.1744229
  2. Governance in the 21st Century. OECD. 2001. https://www.oecd.org/futures/17394484.pdf (accessed 05.05.2023)
  3. Farrell H. 2018. The Shared Challenges of Institutional Theories: Rational Choice, Historical Institutionalism, and Sociological Institutionalism. In: Glückler, J., Suddaby, R., Lenz, R. (eds) Knowledge and Institutions. Knowledge and Space, vol. 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_2
  4. Seth A., Turner J.H. 2011. The Old Institutionalism Meets the New Institutionalism. Sociological Perspectives. 54(3). Pp. 283–306.
  5. Thelen K. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 1999. 2. Pp. 369–404.
  6. Fioretos O. Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. International Organization. 2011. 65 (2). Pp. 367–399.
  7. Polanyi K. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. 2nd ed. Foreword by Joseph E. Stiglitz; introduction by Fred Block. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 9780807056431
  8. Ampuja M., Koivisto J. From ‘Post-Industrial’ to ‘Network Society’ and Beyond: The Political Conjunctures and Current Crisis of Information Society Theory. 2014. Triple C. 12(2). Pp. 447–463. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v12i2.568
  9. Hauer T. Technological determinism and new media. International Journal of English, Literature and Social Science. 2017. 2(2). Pp. 1–4.
  10. Cheng G. China’s Digital Silk Road in the age of the digital economy: Political analysis. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2022. 22(2). Pp. 271–287. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-271-287
  11. Digital technologies for a new future. eLAC. United Nations. 2022. https://cepal.org/sites/default/ files/publication/files/46817/S2000960_en.pdf (accessed 10.05.2023)
  12. Lin Y. A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecommunications Policy. 2018. 42(10). Pp. 800–809.
  13. Zhongguo shuzijingji fazhan baogao. (Report on China’s Digital economy Development). CAICT. 2022. http://www.caict.ac.cn/english/research/whitepapers/202208/P020220819505049573088.pdf (In Chin.). (accessed 05.05.2023)
  14. Чэн Го. Цифровая экономика в 13-й и 14-й пятилетках КНР: последствия. Новые горизонты экономики КНР в 14-й пятилетке (2021–2025 гг.); сост. П.Б.Каменнов, А.Д.Александрова; отв. ред. А.В.Островский. М.: ИКСА РАН, 2022. С. 198–211.
  15. Kapás J. Industrial revolutions and the evolution of the firm’s organization: an historical perspective. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management. 2008. 2(2). Pp. 15–33.
  16. Zhang J. Z. et al. The Impact of Digital Economy on the Economic Growth and the Development Strategies in the post-COVID-19 Era: Evidence From Countries Along the “Belt and Road”. Front. Public Health 10:856142. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856142
  17. Ding C.H. et al. Digital Economy, Technological Innovation and High-Quality Economic Development: Based on Spatial Effect and Mediation Effect. Sustainability 2022. 14(1). p. 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010216
  18. China’s Digital Economy: a Leading Global Force. McKinsey Global Institute. 2017. https://mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/China/Chinas%20digital%20economy%20A%20leading%20global%20force/MGI-Chinas-digital-economy-A-leading-global-force.ashx
  19. Crémer J., Montjoye Y., Schweitzer H. Competition Policy for the Digital Era. European Commission. 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0419345enn.pdf
  20. China - Country Commercial Guide. International Trade Administration. 2023. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/china-ecommerce (accessed 13.05.2023)
  21. Li B., Zhang S. Research on the development path of China’s digital trade under the background of the digital economy. Journal of Internet and Digital Economics. 2022. 2 (1). Pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDE-10-2021-0010
  22. China’s digital economy grew to 50.2t yuan in 2022: report. Xinhua. 2023. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202304/28/WS644b3433a310b6054fad05ef.html (accessed 16.05.2023)
  23. Li H. The Chinese Model of Development and Its Implications. World Journal of Social Science Research. 2015. 2(2). Pp. 128–138.
  24. Sauerland D. Ideologies, Institutions, and the New Institutionalism. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol. 11. Oxford: Elsevier. 2015. Pp. 561–572.
  25. Collier P. 2017. Culture, Politics, and Economic Development. Annual Review of Political Science. 20. Pp. 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-024720
  26. Eshan W. The Global Ranking of 5G Standard Essential Patents is Released: Huawei No. 1 Xiaomi Enters The Top Ten For The First Time. Gamingdeputy. May 9, 2023. https://www.gamingdeputy.com/the-global-ranking-of-5g-standard-essential-patents-is-released-huawei-no-1-xiaomi-enters-the-top-ten-for-the-first-time-yqqlm/ (accessed 23.05.2023)
  27. Chang C. China’s Tech Giants Signal the First Steps in a Bumpy Recovery. The New York Times. May 19, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/19/technology/alibaba-baidu-tencent-q1-earnings.html (accessed 23.05.2023)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies