Conjugation and Connectivity of Multi-Level Regionalization Projects: The Example of BRICS – SACU
- Authors: Medvedev I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 65-74
- Section: BRICS today
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0321-5075/article/view/286345
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0321507525030089
- ID: 286345
Cite item
Abstract
The expansion of BRICS with the inclusion of four new members in the organization – Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, the UAE and, potentially, Saudi Arabia – marked the emergence of a new expanded BRICS+ format that actualized the study of regionalization processes in those regions that until recently were relatively weakly involved in global, macro-regional and regional processes of change associated with digital transformation, the formation of new industries, markets and institutions of cooperation. Using the coefficient of trade and economic connectivity and the trade index of propensity to export, the article presents an overview of the key trends, sectoral structure and dynamics of foreign direct investment in the SACU countries. It is shown that the inclusion of new members in BRICS can intensify trade between SACU countries and third countries, where the development of connectivity contributes to the expansion of markets and an increase in interregional trade, including those countries that previously did not trade with BRICS+ countries or did so only on a small scale.
About the authors
Ilya V. Medvedev
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: Ilya13092@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3754-0409
Center for post-Soviet Studies Moscow, Russia
References
- Morozkina A., Skryabina V. 2021. BRICS and Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Prospects for Trade with Least Developed Countries. International Organisations Research Journal. Vol. 16, № 1, pp. 85–106. (In Russ). doi: 10.17323/1996–7845–2021–01–04
- Kostyunina G.M. 2020. Directions and results of the formation of the African Continental Free Trade Area. Russian Foreign Economic Journal. № 4. Pp. 33–47. (In Russ.)
- Vardomsky L.B. 2019. Eurasian integration: some results and possible development scenarios. Russian Foreign Economic Journal. № 4. Pp. 110–124. (In Russ.)
- Ryzhova N. P. 2013. The Role of Institutions in International Economic Integration. Spatial Economics. № 1. Pp. 72–88. (In Russ.)
- The Caspian Region in the Processes of Regionalization of Eurasia: Collective Scientific Report. 2023. Ed. L.B.Vardomsky. Moscow. 74 p. (In Russ.)
- Pylin A.G. 2019. Problems of increasing the connectivity of post-Soviet Eurasian integration. Society and Economy. № 11. Pp. 57–69. (In Russ.)
- Medvedev I.V. 2024. Conjugation of BRICS and EAEU integration projects in the context of Russian economic development. Society and Economy. № 3. Pp. 121–131. (In Russ.)
- Goulielmos M.A. 2023. India’s 2023 “Economic Corridor” versus the “21st Century Chinese Maritime Silk Road”: A Modern David against a Recent Goliath? Modern Economy. № 14. Pp. 1734–1757.
- Mikic M., Gilbert J. 2009. Trade Statistics in Policymaking: A Handbook of Commonly Used Trade Indices and Indicators. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN ESCAP). https://artnet.unescap.org/publications/books-reports/trade-statistics-policymaking-handbook (accessed 26.07.2024)
- Medvedev I.V. Digital agenda of the EAEU in the context of expanding partnership with the BRICS countries. World of Transformations. № 2. Pp. 155–173. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files


