Использование данных дистанционного зондирования при моделировании водного и теплового режимов участков суши: обзор публикаций

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Открытый доступ Открытый доступ
Доступ закрыт Доступ предоставлен
Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Аннотация

Представлен обзор результатов оценки влажности поверхности почвы, ее влагозапасов и эвапотранспирации как элементов водного и теплового режимов участков поверхности суши различных пространственных масштабов при использовании данных дистанционного зондирования Земли разных спектральных диапазонов. В большинстве приводимых примеров такие оценки были получены с помощью моделей взаимодействия земной поверхности с атмосферой. Отдельный раздел посвящен результатам расчета влажности поверхности почвы и влагозапасов при использовании спутниковой информации микроволнового диапазона, в том числе данных радаров. Приведены результаты оценки влажности поверхности почвы с помощью нейронных сетей. Кратко описаны международные гидролого-атмосферные эксперименты, проводившиеся в рамках всемирных исследовательских проектов с целью получения информации о процессах влаго- и теплообмена между подстилающей поверхностью и приземным слоем атмосферы. Сделан обзор баз наземных, спутниковых и модельных данных, формировавшихся по результатам исследований по описанной тематике с середины 1980-х гг. Представлены перспективы дальнейших исследований, опирающихся на разработку новой мультиспектральной аппаратуры, создание новых баз данных и использование нового поколения спутников – микросателлитов глобального покрытия с датчиками высокого разрешения.

Об авторах

Е. Л. Музылев

Институт водных проблем РАН

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: muzylev@iwp.ru
Россия, 119333, Москва

Список литературы

  1. Волкова Е.В. Оценки параметров облачного покрова, осадков и опасных явлений погоды по данным радиометра AVHRR c МИСЗ серии NOAA круглосуточно в автоматическом режиме // Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса. 2013. Т. 10. № 3. С. 66–74.
  2. Волкова Е.В. Определение сумм осадков по данным радиометров SEVIRI/Meteosat-9,-10 и AVHRR/ NOAA для Европейской территории России // Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса. 2014. Т. 11. № 4. С. 163– 177.
  3. Волкова Е.В., Успенский А.Б. Оценки параметров облачного покрова и осадков по данным сканирующих радиометров полярно-орбитальных и геостационарных метеоспутников // Исследование Земли из космоса. 2015. № 5. С. 40–43.
  4. Волкова Е.В., Успенский С.А. Дистанционное определение температуры подстилающей поверхности, приземной температуры воздуха и эффективной температуры по спутниковым данным для юга Европейской территории России // Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса. 2016. Т. 13. № 5. С. 291–303.
  5. Кабелва Х.А. ECOCLIMAP – база данных для блока подстилающей поверхности ISBA в моделях атмосферы // Учен. зап. Рос. гос. гидрометеорол. ун-та. 2006. № 3. С. 54–60. http://elib.rshu.ru/files_books/pdf/3-5.pdf
  6. Митник Л.М., Митник М.Л., Заболотских Е.В. Спутник Японии GCOM-W1: моделирование, калибровка и первые результаты восстановления параметров океана и атмосферы // Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса. 2013. Т. 10. № 3. С. 135–141.
  7. Мотовилов Ю.Г., Старцева 3.П. Численное моделирование влагообмена между деятельным слоем почвы и атмосферой // Метеорология и гидрология. 1985. № 6. С. 85–3.
  8. Музылев Е.Л., Старцева З.П., Зейлигер А.М., Ермолаева О.С., Волкова Е.В., Василенко Е.В., Осипов А.И. Использование спутниковых данных о характеристиках подстилающей поверхности и метеорологических характеристиках при моделировании водного и теплового режимов большого сельскохозяйственного региона // Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса. 2019. Т. 16. № 3. С. 44–60. https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2019-16-3-44-60
  9. Музылев Е.Л., Старцева З.П., Успенский А.Б., Волкова Е.В., Василенко Е.В., Кухарский А.В., Зейлигер А.М., Ермолаева О.С. Использование данных дистанционного зондирования при моделировании водного и теплового режимов сельских территорий // Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса. 2017. Т. 14. № 6. С.108–136.
  10. Соловьев В.И., Успенский А.Б., Успенский С.А. Определение температуры земной поверхности по данным измерений уходящего теплового излучения с геостационарных метеорологических ИСЗ // Метеорология и гидрология. 2010. № 3. С. 5–17.
  11. Успенский А.Б., Щербина Г.И. Оценка температуры и излучательной способности поверхности суши по данным измерений уходящего теплового излучения с ИСЗ NOAA // Исследование Земли из космоса. 1996. № 5. С. 4–13.
  12. Abid N., Mannaerts C., Bargaoui Z. Sensitivity of actual evapotranspiration estimation using the SEBS model to variation of input parameters (LST, DSSF, aerodynamics parameters, LAI, FVC) // ISPRS Geospatial Week, Enschede, Netherlands, 2019. The Intern. Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2019. V. XLII-2/W13. P. 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1193-2019
  13. Anderson M.C., Norman J.M., Diak G.R., Kustas W.P., Mecikalski J.R. A Two-Source Time-Integrated Model for Estimating Surface Fluxes Using Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing // Remote Sens. Environ. 1997. V. 60. № 2. P. 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00215-5
  14. André J.-C., Goutorbe J.-P., Perrier A. HAPEX—MOBLIHY: A Hydrologic Atmospheric Experiment for the Study of Water Budget and Evaporation Flux at the Climatic Scale // Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 1986. V. 67. № 2. P. 138. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1986)067<0138:HAHAEF>2.0.CO;2
  15. Andreassian V., Bergström S., Chahinian N., Duan Q., Gusev Y.M., Littlewood I., Machevet T., Michel C., Montanary A., Moretti G., Moussa R., Nasonova O.N., O’Connor K., Paquet E., Perrin C., Rousseau A., Schaake J., Wagener T., Xie Z. Catalogue of the Models Used in MOPEX 2004/2005 // Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment – MOPEX / Eds V. Andreassian, A. Hall, N. Chahinian, J. Shaake. Wallingford, UK: IAHS Press, 2006. № 307. P. 41–93.
  16. Angelini L.P., Biudes M.S., Machado N.G., Geli H.M.E., Vourlitis G.L., Ruhoff A., de Souza Nogueira J. Surface Albedo and Temperature Models for Surface Energy Balance Fluxes and Evapotranspiration Using SEBAL and Landsat 8 over Cerrado-Pantanal, Brazil // Sensors. 2021. V. 21. P. 7196. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217196
  17. Attema E., Cafforio C., Gottwald M., Guccione P., Monti-Guarnieri A., Rocca F., Snoeij P. Flexible dynamic block adaptive quantization for Sentinel-1 SAR missions // IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2010. V. 7. № 4. P. 766–770.
  18. Attema E., Snoeij P., Monti-Guarnieri A., Rocca F., Guccione P., D’Aria D., Croci R., Olanda A. Sentinel-l Flexible Dynamic Block Adaptive Quantizer // Conference Paper. EUSAR 2010. Aachen, Germany, 2010. P. 344–349. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224233683
  19. Bartalis Z., Wagner W., Naeimi V., Hasenauer S., Scipal K., Bonekamp H., Figa J., Anderson C. Initial soil moisture retrievals from the METOP-A Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007. V. 34. № 20. L20401. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031088
  20. Bastiaanssen W.G.M., Menenti M., Feddes R.A., Holtslag A.A.M. A Remote Sensing Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL). Pt 1. Formulation // J. Hydrol. 1998. V. 212–213. P. 198–212.
  21. Bastiaanssen W.G.M., Pelgrum H., Wang J., Ma Y., Moreno J.F., Roerink G.J., van der Wal T. A Remote Sensing Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL). Pt 2. Validation // J. Hydrol. 1998. V. 212–213. P. 223–229.
  22. Bezerra B.G., Silva B.B., Santos C.A.C., Bezerra J.R.C. Actual evapotranspiration estimation using remote sensing: comparison of SEBAL and SSEB approaches // Adv. Remote Sens. 2015. V. 4. № 3. P. 234–247.
  23. Biancamaria S., Lettenmaier D.P., Pavelsky T.M. The SWOT Mission and Its Capabilities for Land Hydrology // Surv. Geophys. 2016. V. 37. P. 307–337.
  24. Biospheric Aspects of the Hydrological Cycle (BAHC) // Operation Plan / Rep. No. 27. Core Project Office. Berlin, Germany: Institut fűr Meteorologie, Freie Univ. Berlin, 1993. P. 1–103.
  25. Blyth E.M., Arora V.K., Clark D.B., Dadson S.J., De Kauwe M.G., Lawrence D.M., Melton J.R., Pongratz J., Turton R.H., Yoshimura K., Yuan H. Advances in Land Surface Modelling // Current Clim. Change Rep. 2021. V. 7. P. 45–71.
  26. Bolle H.J. Identification and observation of desertification processes with the aid of measurements from space: Results from the European Field Experiment in Desertification-threatened Areas (EFEDA) // Desertification in Developed Countries / Eds D.A. Mouat, S.F. Hutchinson Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1995. P. 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1635-7_7
  27. Bolle H.J., André J.C., Arrue J.L., Barth H.K., Bessemoulin P., Brasa A., de Bruin H.A.R., Cruces J., Dugdale G., Engman E.T., Evans D.L., Fantechi R., Fiedler F., van de Griend A., Imeson A.C., Jochum A., Kabat P., Kratzsch T., Lagouarde J.P., Langer I., Llamas R., Lopez-Baeza E., Melia Miralles J., Muniosguren L.S., Nerry F., Noilhan J., Oliver H.R., Roth R., Saatchi S.S., Sanchez Dias J., de Santa Olalla M., Shuttleworth W.J., Soegaard H., Stricker J., Thornes J., Vauclin M., Wickland D. EFEDA: European field experiment in a desertification-threatened area // Ann. Geophysicae. 1993. V. 11. P. 173–189.
  28. Brocca L., Hasenauer S., Lacava T., Melone F., Moramarco T., Wagner W., Dorigo W., Matgen P., Martínez-Fernández J., Llorens P., Latron J., Martin C., Bitte M. Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: An intercomparison and validation study across Europe // Remote Sens. Environ. 2011. V. 115. № 12. P. 3390–3408.
  29. Brown de Colstoun E.C., Defries R.S., Townshend J.R.G. Evaluation of ISLSCP Initiative II satellite-based land cover datasets and assessment of progress in land cover data for global model // J. Geophys. Res. 2006. V. 111. D22S07. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007453
  30. Brun P., Zimmermann N.E., Hari C., Pellissier L., Karger D.N. Global climate-related predictors at kilometer resolution for the past and future // Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2022. V. 14. P. 5573–5603. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5573-2022
  31. Burek P., van der Knijff J., de Roo A. LISFLOOD – Distributed Water Balance and Flood Simulation Model // Revised User Manual 2013. JCR Technical Report EUR 26162. Luxembourg: Luxembourg Publ. Office Eur. Union, 2013. 142 P. JRC78917. https://doi.org/10.2788/24982
  32. Cammalleri C., Anderson M.C., Gao F., Hain C.R., Kustas W.P. Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field scales over rainfed and irrigated agricultural areas using remote sensing data fusion // Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2014. V. 186. P. 1–11.
  33. Cenci L. Soil Moisture-Data Assimilation for Improving Flash Flood Predictions in Mediterranean Catchments. Case Study: ASCAT and Sentinel 1 Derived Products. Ph. D Thesis. Pavia: Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, 2016. 123 p.
  34. Cenci L., Laiolo P., Gabellani S., Campo L., Silvestro F., Delogu F., Boni G., Rudari R. Assimilation of H-SAF Soil Moisture Products for Flash Flood Early Warning Systems. Study case: Mediterranean Catchments // IEEE J. Select. Topics Appl. Earth Observ. Rem. Sens. 2016. V. 9. № 12. P. 5634–5646. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2598475
  35. Chen F. The Noah Land Surface Model in WRF. A short tutorial // LSM group meeting, 2007. NCAR, RAL, TIIMES, 2007. https://www.atmos.illinois.edu/ ~snesbitt/ATMS597R/notes/noahLSM-tutorial.pdf
  36. Cooley S.W., Ryan J.C., Smith L.C. Human alteration of global surface water storage variability // Nature. 2021. V. 591. P. 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03262-3
  37. Dai A. Historical and Future Changes in Streamflow and Continental Runoff: Natural and Human-Induced Impacts: a review // Terrestrial Water Cycle and Climate Change / Eds Q. Tang, T. Oki. Geophysical Monograph Ser. Wiley. 2016. Chapter 2. P. 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118971772.ch2
  38. Deng Y., Wang S., Bai X., Luo G., Wu L., Cao Y., Li H., Li C., Yang Y., Hu Z., Tian S. Variation trend of global soil moisture and its cause analysis // Ecol. Indicators. 2020. V. 110. 105939. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105939
  39. Dickinson R.E. Modeling evapotranspiration for three-dimensional global climate models // Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity / Eds J.E. Hanson, T. Takahashi Geophys. Monogr. Ser. Amer. Geophys. Union. Washington, D. C., USA, 1984. V. 29. P. 58–72.
  40. Dorigo W., Wagner W., Albergel C., Albrecht F., Balsamo G., Brocca L., Chung D., Ertl M., Forkel M., Gruber A., Haas E., Hamer P.D., Hirschi M., Ikonen J., de Jeu R., Kidd R., Lahoz W., Liu Y.Y., Miralles D., Mistelbauer T., Nicolai-Shaw N., Parinussa R., Pratola C., Reimer C., van der Schalie R., Seneviratne S.I., Smolander T., Lecomte P. ESA CCI soil moisture for improved earth system understanding: state-of-the art and future directions // Remote Sens. Environ. 2017. V. 203. P. 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.001
  41. Dorigo W.A., Wagner W., Hohensinn R., Hahn S., Paulik C., Xaver A., Gruber A., Drusch M., Mecklenburg S., van Oevelen P., Robock A., Jackson T. The International Soil Moisture Network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. V. 15. P. 1675–1698. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1675-2011
  42. Duan Q., Schaake J., Andreassian V., Franks S., Goteti G., Gupta H.V., Gusev Y.M., Habets F., Hall A., Hay L., Hogue T., Huang M., Leavesley G., Liang X., Nasonova O.N., Noilhan J., Oudin L., Sorooshian S., Wagener T., Wood E.F. Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops // J. Hydrol. 2006. V. 320. P. 3–17.
  43. Durand M., Gleason C.J., Garambois P.A., Bjerklie D., Smith L.C., Roux H., Rodriguez E., Bates P.D., Pavelsky T.M., Monnier J., Chen X., Di Baldassarre G., Fiset J.-M., Flipo N., Frasson R.P.d.M., Fulton J., Goutal N., Hossain F., Humphries E., Minear J.T., Mukolwe M.M., Neal J.C., Ricci S., Sanders B.F., Schumann G., Schubert J.E., Vilmin L. An intercomparison of remote sensing river discharge estimation algorithms from measurements of river height, width, and slope // Water Resour. Res. 2016. V. 52. P. 4527–4549. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018434
  44. Entekhabi D., Njoku E.G., O’Neill P.E., Kent H., Kellogg K.H., Crow W.T., Edelstein W.E., Entin J.K., Goodman S.D., Jackson T.J., Johnson J., Kimball J., Piepmeier J.R., Koster R.D., Martin N., McDonald K.C., Moghaddam M., Moran S., Reichle R., Shi J.C., Spencer M.W., Thurman S.W., Tsang L., Van Zyl J. The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission // Proc. IEEE. 2010. V. 98. № 5. P. 704–716.
  45. FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISS-CAS/JRC // Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2). Rome-Laxenburg: FAO, 2012. 43 p.
  46. Faroux S., Kaptué Tchuenté A.T., Roujean J.-L., Masson V., Martin E., Le Moigne P. ECOCLIMAP-II/ Europe: a twofold database of ecosystems and surface parameters at 1km resolution based on satellite information for use in land surface, meteorological and climate models // Geosci. Model Dev. 2013. № 6. P. 563–582. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-563-2013
  47. Fernández-Long M.E., Spescha L., Barnatán I., Murphy G. Modelo de balance hydrológico operative para el agro (BHOA). Rev. // Agronomía Ambiente. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Facultad de Agronomia UBA, 2012. V. 32. № 1–2. P. 31–47.
  48. Fisher R.A., Koven C.D. Perspectives on the Future of Land Surface Models and the Challenges of Representing Complex Terrestrial Systems // J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 2020. V. 12. № 4. e2018MS001453. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001453
  49. French A.N., Hunsaker D.J., Thorp K.R. Remote sensing of evapotranspiration over cotton using the TSEB and METRIC energy balance models // Rem. Sens. Environ. 2015. V. 158. P. 281–294.
  50. Global Climate Observing System (GCOS). https://gcos.wmo.int/en/home
  51. Goutorbe J.P., Lebel T., Dolman A.J., Gash J.H.C., Kabat P., Kerr Y.H., Monteny B., Prince S.D., Stricker J.N.M., Tinga A., Wallace J.S. An overview of HAPEX-Sahel: a study in climate and desertification // J. Hydrol. 1997. V. 188–189. P. 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03308-2
  52. GRACE-FO. https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/ satellite-missions/g/grace-fo
  53. Gruber A., Scanlon T., van der Schalie R., Wagner W., Dorigo W. Evolution of the ESA CCI Soil Moisture climate data records and their underlying merging methodology // Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2019. V. 11. P. 717–739. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-717-2019
  54. Häfliger V., Martin E., Boone A., Ricci S., Biancamaria S. Assimilation of Synthetic SWOT River Depths in a Regional Hydrometeorological Model // Water. 2019. V. 11. № 1. P. 78.
  55. Houser P.R., De Lannoy G.J.M., Walker J.P. Hydrologic Data Assimilation // Approaches to Managing Disaster. Assessing Hazards, Emergencies and Disaster Impacts / Ed. J. Tiefenbacher. Rijeka, Croatia: InTechOpen, 2012. Chapter 3. P. 41–65.
  56. H-SAF 2016. ASCAT H-SAF. http://hsaf.meteoam.it/ (дата обращения: 24.03.2016)
  57. Huffman G.J., Adler R.F., Morrissey M.M., Bolvin D.T., Curtis S., Joyce R., McGavock B., Susskind J. Global precipitation at one-degree daily resolution from multi-satellite observations // J. Hydrometeorol. 2001. V. 2. P. 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0036: GPAODD>2.0.CO;2g
  58. Huffman G.J., Bolvin D.T. Version 1.2. GPCP One-Degree Daily Precipitation Data Set Documentation. 2012. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/gpcp/daily-v1.2/ documentation/1DD_v1.2_doc.pdf
  59. Hutjes R.W.A., Kabat P., Running S.W., Shuttle-worth W.J., Field C., Bass B., da Silva Dias M.F., Avissar R., Becker A., Claussen M., Dolman A.J., Feddes R.A., Fosberg M., Fukushima Y., Gash J.H.C., Guenni L., Hoff H., Jarvis P.G., Kayane I., Krenke A.N., Liu C., Meybeck M., Nobre C.A., Oyebande L., Pitman A., Pielke Sr. R.A., Raupach M., Saugier E.D., Schulze E.D., Sellers P.J., Tenhunen J.D., Valentini R., Victoria R.L., Vörösmarty C.J. Biospheric Aspects of the Hydrological Cycle // J. Hydrol. 1998. V. 212–213. № 14. P. 1–21.
  60. ICESat2 mission. http://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov/icesat2/
  61. ICESat2. https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/i/icesat-2
  62. IGBP igbp.net
  63. ISD https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based- station/integrated-surface-database
  64. ISLSCP Initiative II Collection. Data set / Eds F.G. Hall, G.J. Collatz, B.W. Meeson, S.O. Los, E. Brown De Colstoun, D.R. Landis. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, 2011. http://daac.ornl.gov/. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1001
  65. ISMN http://www.ipf.tuwien.ac.at/insitu
  66. Karger D.N., Conrad O., Böhner J., Kawohl T., Kreft H., Soria-Auza R.W., Zimmermann N.E., Linder P., Kessler M. Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas // Sci. Data. 2017. V. 4. 170122. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122
  67. Kawanishi T., Sezai T, Ito Y., Imaoka K., Takeshima T., Ishido Y., Shibata A., Miura M., Inahata H., Spencer R.W. The Advanced AMSR-E. NASDA’s contribution to the EOS for Global Energy and Water Cycle Studies // IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003. V. 41. P. 184–194.
  68. Kerr Y.H., Imbernon J., Dedieu G., Hautecoeur O., Lagouarde J.-P., Seguin B. NOAA AVHRR and Its Uses for Rainfall and Evapotranspiration Monitoring // Int. J. Remote Sens. 1989. V. 10. P. 847–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903925
  69. Kerr Y.H., Waldteufel P., Wigneron J.P., Delwart S., Cabot F., Boutin J., Escorihuela M.-J., Font J., Reul N., Gruhier C., Juglea S.E., Drinkwater M.R., Hahne A., Martin-Neira M., Mecklenburg S. The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements of the Global Water Cycle // Proc. IEEE. 2010. V. 98. № 5. P. 666–687.
  70. Krenke A.N., Green A.M., Georgiadi A.G. KUREX-88 – Hydrology in atmospheric processes experiment // Proc. Ljubljana Symp. IAHS Publ. 1990. № 191. P. 5.1–5.17.
  71. Kuchment L.S., Startseva Z.P. Sensitivity of evapotranspiration and soil moisture in wheat fields to changes in climate and direct effects of carbon dioxide // Hydrol. Sci. J. 1991. V. 36. № 6. P. 631–643.
  72. KUREX-91 / Eds N.S. Goel, V. Kozoderov, D. Deering // Rem. Sens. Rev. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Harwood Acad. Publ., 1998. V. 17. № 1–4. 336 p.
  73. Laiolo P., Gabellani S., Campo L., Cenci L., Svestro F., Delogu F., Boni G., Rudari R., Puca S., Pisani A.R. Assimilation of Remote Sensing Observations into a Continuous Distributed Hydrological Model: Impacts on the Hydrological Cycle // Conference Paper. IGARSS-2015. New York, USA: IEEE Publ., 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326015
  74. Landsat https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/landsat- data-access
  75. Landsat-9 https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/
  76. Landsat 9. Data Users Handbook. Version 1.0. February 2022. LSDS-2082 // Sioux Falls. South Dakota, USA: EROS Center, 2022.
  77. LCD https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based- station/local-climatological-data
  78. Leng P., Li Z.-L., Duan S.-B., Gao M.-F., Huo H.-Y. A practical approach for deriving all-weather soil moisture content using combined satellite and meteorological data // ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 2017. V. 131. P. 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.013
  79. Levizzani V., Cattani E. Satellite Remote Sensing of Precipitation and the Terrestrial Water Cycle in a Changing Climate // Remote Sens. 2019. V. 11. № 19. P. 2301.
  80. Li X., Xin X., Peng Z., Zhang H., Li L., Shao S., Liua Q. Estimation of land surface heat fluxes based on visible infrared imaging radiometer suite data: case study in northern China // J. Appl. Rem. Sens. 2017. V. 11. № 4. 046012. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.046012
  81. Li Y., Yu K., Li J., Jin T., Chang X., Zhang Q., Yang S. Measuring Soil Moisture with Refracted GPS Signals // IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2022.3161409
  82. Li Z., Liu X., Ma T., Kejia D., Zhou Q., Yao B., Niu T. Retrieval of the surface evapotranspiration patterns in the alpine grassland–wetland ecosystem applying SEBAL model in the source region of the Yellow River, China // Ecol. Model. 2013. V. 270. P. 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.004
  83. Liang S., Cheng C., Jia K., Jiang B., Liu Q., Xiao Z., Yao Y., Yuan W., Zhang X., Zhao X., Zhou J. The Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) products suite // Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0341.1
  84. Liang S., Zhao X., Liu S., Yuan W., Cheng X., Xiao Z., Zhang X., Liu Q., Cheng J., Tang H., Qu Y., Bo Y., Qu Y., Ren H., Yu K., Townshend J. A long-term Global LAnd Surface Satellite (GLASS) data-set for environmental studies // Intern. J. Digital Earth. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2013.805262
  85. Liu Y.Y., Parinussa R.M., Dorigo W.A., De Jeu R.A.M., Wagner W., van Dijk A.I.J.M., McCabe M.F., Evans J.P. Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. V. 15. P. 425–436. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15- 425-2011
  86. López O., Houborg R., McCabe M.F. Evaluating the hydrological consistency of evaporation products using satellite-based gravity and rainfall data // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017. V. 21. № 1. P. 323–343. www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/323/2017/https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-323-2017
  87. Loveland T.R., Reed B.C., Brown J.F., Ohlen D.O., Zhu Z., Yang L., Merchant J.W. Development of a global landcover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data // Int. J. Remote Sens. 2000. V. 21. P. 1303–1330.
  88. Mallick K., Toivonen E., Trebs I., Boegh E., Cleverly J., Eamus D., Koivusalo H., Drewry D., Arndt S.K., Griebel A., Beringer J., Garcia M. Bridging Thermal Infrared Sensing and Physically-Based Evapotranspiration Modeling: From Theoretical Implementation to Validation Across an Aridity Gradient in Australian Ecosystems // Water Resour. Res. 2018. V. 54. № 5. P. 3409–3435. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021357
  89. Martens B., de Jeu R.A.M., Verhoest N.E.C., Schuurmans H., Kleijer J., Miralles D.G. Towards Estimating Land Evaporation at Field Scales Using GLEAM // Remote Sens. 2018. V. 10. № 11. P. 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111720
  90. Martens B., Miralles D.G., Lievens H., van der Schalie R., de Jeu R.A.M., Fernández-Prieto D., BeckH.E., Dorigo W.A., Verhoest N.E.C. GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture // Geosci. Model Dev. 2017. V. 10. P. 1903–1925. www.geosci-model-dev.net/10/1903/2017/https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017
  91. Masson V., Champeaux J.-L., Chauvin F., Meryguet C., Lacaze R. A Global Database of Land Surface Parameters at 1-km Resolution in Meteorological and Climate Models // J. Clim. 2003. V. 16. № 9. P. 1261–1282. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442-16.9.1261
  92. McCabe M.F., Rodell M., Alsdorf D.E., Miralles D.G., Uijlenhoet R., Wagner W., Lucieer A., Houborg R., Verhoest N.E.C., Franz T.E., Shi J., Gao H., Wood E.F. The future of Earth observation in hydrology // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017. V. 21. P. 3879–3914.
  93. Ménard C.B., Ikonen J., Rautiainen K., Aurela M., Arslan A.N., Pulliainen J. Effects of Meteorological and Ancillary Data, Temporal Averaging, and Evaluation Methods on Model Performance and Uncertainty in a Land Surface Model // J. Hydrometeorol. 2015. V. 16. P. 2559–2576. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0013.1
  94. Miralles D.G., Holmes T.R.H., de Jeu R.A.M., Gash J.H., Meesters A.G.C.A., Dolman A.J. Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. V. 15. P. 453–469. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-453-2011
  95. Miralles D.G., de Jeu R.A.M., Gash J.H., Holmes T.R.H., Dolman A.J. Magnitude and variability of land evaporation and its components at the global scale // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. V. 15. P. 967–981. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-967-2011
  96. Mitchell K.E., Lohmann D., Houser P.R., Wood E.F., Schaake J.C., Robock A., Cosgrove B.A., Sheffield J., Duan Q., Luo L., Higgins R.W., Pinker R.T., Tarpley J.D., Lettenmaier D.P., Marshall C.H., Entin J.K., Pan M., Shi W., Koren V., Meng J., Ramsay B.H., Bailey A.A. The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system // J. Geophys. Res. Atm. 2004. V. 109. Iss. D7. D07S9016. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003823
  97. MODIS ALBEDO http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/ALBEDO/index.html
  98. MODIS NDVI http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/ECOSYSTEM/
  99. Mu Q., Zhao M., Running S.W. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm // Remote Sens. Environ. 2011. V. 115. P. 1781–1800.
  100. Muzalevskiy K., Zeyliger A. Application of Sentinel-1B Polarimetric Observations to Soil Moisture Retrieval Using Neural Networks: Case Study for Bare Siberian Chernozem Soil // Remote Sens. 2021. V. 13. 3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173480
  101. Muzylev E., Startseva Z., Volkova E., Vasilenko E. Utilizing satellite data of several spectral ranges for modeling the processes of water and heat regime formation of vast territories // Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa. 2020. V. 17. № 6. P. 129–136. https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2020-17-6-129-136
  102. NCEI products https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products
  103. Ndou N.N., Palamuleni L.G., Ramoelo A. Modelling depth to groundwater level using SEBAL-based dry season potential evapotranspiration in the upper Molopo River Catchment, South Africa // Egypt. J. Rem. Sens. Space Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2017.08.003
  104. Nicolai-Shaw N., Zscheischler J., Hirschi M., Gudmundsson L., Seneviratne S.I. A drought event composite analysis using satellite remote-sensing based soil moisture // Remote Sens. Environ. 2017. V. 203. P. 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.014
  105. Niu G.Y., Yang Z.L., Mitchell K.E., Chen F., Ek M.B., Barlage M., Kumar A., Manning K., Niyogi D., Rosero E., Tewari M., Xia Y. The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP) 1. Model description and evaluation with local scale measurements // J. Geophys. Res. 2011. V. 116. D12109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139
  106. Oh Y., Sarabandi K., Ulaby F.T. An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces // IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1992. V. 30. № 2. P. 370–381.
  107. Oki T., Imaoka K., Kachi M. AMSR Instruments on GCOM-W1/2: Concepts and Applications // IEEE IGARSS-10. Honolulu, Hawaii, New York, USA: IEEE Publ., 2010. http://vigir.missouri.edu/~gdesouza/Research/Conference_CDs/IGARSS_2010/ pdfs/2907.pdf
  108. O’Neill K.P., Harden J.W., Trumbore S.E., Bentley M.O., Winston G., Stephens B.B., Black T.A. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) 1993 Field Notes, Thompson, Manitoba // Open-File Report 95-488. U.S. Geol. Survey. U.S. Department of the Interior. 66 p. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr95488
  109. OSCAR. https://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/
  110. Ottlé C., Vidal-Madjar D. Assimilation of Soil-Moisture Inferred from Infrared Remote Sensing in a Hydrological Model over the HAPEX-MOBILHY Region // J. Hydrol. 1994. V. 158. P. 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90056-6
  111. Overgaard J., Rosbjerg D., Butts M.B. Land-surface modeling in hydrological perspective – a review // Biogeosci. 2006. V. 3. P. 229–41.
  112. Panagos P., Van Liedekerke M., Jones A., Montanarella L. European Soil Data Centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements // Land Use Policy. 2012. V. 29. № 2. P. 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.003
  113. Peng J., Albergel C., Balenzano A., Brocca L., Cartus O., Cosh M.H., Crow W.T., Dabrowska-Zielinska K., Dadson S., Davidson M.W.J., de Rosnay P., Dorigo W., Gruber A., Hagemann S., Hirschi M., Kerr Y.H., Lovergine F., Mahecha M.D., Marzahn P., Mattia F., Musial J.P., Preuschmann S., Reichle R.H., Satalino G., Silgram M., van Bodegom P.M., Verhoest N.E.C., Wagner W., Walker J.P., Wegmüller U., Loew A. A roadmap for high-resolution satellite soil moisture applications – confronting product characteristics with user requirements // Remote Sens. Environ. 2021. V. 252. 112162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112162
  114. Picoli M.C.A., Simoes R., Chaves M., Santos L.A., Sanchez A., Soares A., Sanches I.D., Ferreira K.R., Queiroz G.R. CBERS Data Cube: A Powerful Technology for Mapping and Monitoring Brazilian Biomes // ISPRS Annals Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. V. V-3-2020. XXIV ISPRS Congress (2020 edition). P. 533–539. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-533-2020
  115. Pitman A.J. The Evolution of, and Revolution In, Land Surface Schemes Designed for Climate Models // Int. J. Clim. 2003. V. 23. P. 479–510.
  116. Rains D., Lievens H., De Lannoy G.J.M., McCabe M., de Jeu R.A.M., Miralles D.G. Sentinel-1 Backscatter Assimilation Using Support Vector Regression or the Water Cloud Model at European Soil Moisture Sites // IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2022. V. 19. 4013105. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3073484
  117. Rautiainen K., Parkkinen T., Lemmetyinen J., Schwank M., Wiesmann A., Ikonen J., Derksen C., Davydov S., Davydova A., Boike J., Langer M., Drusch M., Pulliainen J. SMOS prototype algorithm for detecting autumn soil freezing // Remote Sens. Environ. 2016. V. 180. 346360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.012
  118. Reichle R., Koster R., De Lannoy G., Crow W., Kimball J. SMAP Level 4 Surface and Root Zone Soil Moisture (L4_SM) Data Product. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document // Revision A. December 9. 2014. Greenbelt, MD, USA: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 2014. 66 p. https://smap.jpl.nasa.gov› 272_L4_SM_RevA_web
  119. Rodell M., Famiglietti J.S., Wiese D.N., Reager J.T., Beaudoing H.K., Landerer F.W., Lo M.-H. Emerging trends in global freshwater Emerging trends in global freshwater availability // Nature. 2018. May 31. V. 557. P. 651–659.
  120. Rodell M., Houser P.R., Jambor U., Gottschalk J., Mitchell K., Meng C.-J., Arsenault K., Cosgrove B., Radakovich J., Bosilovich M., Entin J.K., Walker J.P., Lohmann D., Toll D. The Global Land Data Assimilation System // Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 2004. № 3. P. 381–394.
  121. Rodríguez-Fernández N.J., Kerr Y.H., van der Schalie R., Al-Yaari A., Wigneron J.-P., de Jeu R., Richaume P., Dutra E., Mialon A., Drusch M. Long Term Global Surface Soil Moisture Fields Using an SMOS-Trained Neural Network Applied to AMSR-E Data // Remote Sens. 2016. V. 8. № 11. P. 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8110959
  122. Sabaghy S., Walker J.P., Renzullo L.J., Akbarn R., Chan S., Chaubell J., Das N., Dunbar R.S., Entekhabi D., Gevaert A., Jackson T.J., Loew A., Merlin O., Moghaddam M., Peng J.A., Peng J.Z., Piepmeier J., Rüdiger C., Stefan V., Wu X., Ye N., Yueh S. Comprehensive analysis of alternative downscaled soil moisture products // Remote Sens. Environ. 2020. V. 239. 111586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111586
  123. Schaake J., Cong S., Duan Q. The US MOPEX Data Set // Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment – MOPEX. IAHS Publ. No 307. 2006. P. 9–28.
  124. Schmugge T.J., Andre J.-C., Goutorbe J.-P. HAPEX-MOBILHY: results from the special observing period // Remote Sensing of the Biosphere. Proc. 1990 Tech. Symp. Optics, Electro-Optics, and Sensors (SPIE). Orlando, FL, USA, 1990. V. 1300. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.21397
  125. Schneider R., Godiksen P.N., Villadsen H., Madsen H., Bauer-Gottwein P. Application of CryoSat-2 altimetry data for river analysis and modeling // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017. V. 21. № 2. P. 751–764.
  126. Seguin B., Assad E., Freteaud J.-P., Imbernon J., Kerr Y.H., Lagouarde J.-P. Use of Meteorological Satellites for Water Balance Monitoring in Sahelian Regions // Int. J. Remote Sens. 1989. V. 10. P. 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903948
  127. Seguin B., Lagouarde J.-P., Savane M. The Assessment of Regional Crop Water Conditions from Meteorological Satellite Thermal Infrared Data // Remote Sens. Environ. 1991. V. 35. P. 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90007-S
  128. Sellers P.J. Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration // Int. J. Remote Sens. 1985. V. 6. № 8. P. 1335–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168508948283
  129. Sellers P.J., Hall F.G., Asrar G., Strebel D.E., Murphy R.E. The first ISLSCP field experiment (FIFE) // Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1988. V. 69. № 1. P. 22–27.
  130. Sellers P.J., Hall F.G., Asrar G., Strebel D.E., Murphy R.E. An Overview of the First International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE) // J. Geophys. Res. 1992. V. 97. № D17. P. 18345–18371.
  131. Sellers P., Hall F., Margolis H., Kelly B., Baldocchi D., den Hartog G., Cihlar J., Ryan M.G., Goodison B., Crill P., Ranson K.J., Lettenmaier D., Wickland D.E. The Boreal Ecosystem–Atmosphere Study (BOREAS): An Overview and Early Results from the 1994 Field Year // Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 1995. V. 76. № 9. P. 1549–1577. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076<1549:TBESAO>2.0.CO;2
  132. Sellers P.J., Mintz Y., Sud Y.C., Dalcher A. A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models // J. Atmos. Sci. 1986. V. 43. № 6. P. 505–531.
  133. Sellers P.J., Rasool S.I., Bolle H.J. A review of satellite data algorithms for studies of the land surface // Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1990. V. 71. № 10. P. 1429–1447.
  134. Serafini Y.V. Estimation of the Evapotranspiration Using Surface and Satellite Data // Int. J. Remote Sens. 1987. V. 8. P. 1547–1562. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168708954796
  135. Shi J., Dong X., Zhao T., Du J., Jiang L., Du Y., Liu H., Wang Z., Ji D., Xiong C. WCOM: The science scenario and objectives of a global water cycle observation mission // Proc. IGARSS-2014. Quebec City, Canada; New York, USA: IEEE Publ., 2014. P. 3646–3649. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947273
  136. Shi J., Dong X., Zhao T., Du Y., Liu H., Wang Z., Zhu D., Ji D., Xiong C., Jiang L. The Water Cycle Observation Mission (WCOM): Overview // Proc. IGARSS-2016. Beijing, China. New York, USA: IEEE Publ., 2016. P. 3430–3433. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729886
  137. Shi J., Zhao T., Cui Q., Yao P. Airborne and Spaceborne Passive Microwave Measurements of Soil Moisture // Observation and Measurement of Ecohydrological Processes, Ecohydrology / Eds X. Li, H. Vereecken. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag GmbH, 2019. Chapter. P. 71–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48297-1_3
  138. Shimoda H., Murakami H., Oki T., Honda Y., Igarashi T. Overview of GCOM // Proc. IGARSS-2011. Vancouver, Canada. New York, USA: IEEE Publ., 2011. P. 4134–4137. http://www.grss-ieee.org/wp-content/ uploads/2011/07/OverviewofGCOM.pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6050143
  139. Spennemann P.C., Fernández-Long M.E., Gattinoni N.N., Cammalleri C., Naumann G. Soil moisture evaluation over the Argentine Pampas using models, satellite estimations and in-situ measurements // J. Hydrol. Regional Studies. 2020. V. 31. 100723. P. 1–18.
  140. Startseva Z., Muzylev E., Volkova E., Uspensky A., Uspensky S. Water and heat regimes modelling for a vast territory using remote-sensing data // Int. J. Rem. Sens. 2014. V. 35. № 15. P. 5775–5799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.945003
  141. Stephens G., Polcher J., Zeng X., van Oevelen P., Poveda G., Bosilovich M., Ahn M.-H., Balsamo G., Duan Q., Hegerl G., Jakob C., Lamptey B., Leung R., Piles M., Su Z., Dirmeyer P., Findell K.L., Verhoef A., Ek M., L’Ecuyer T., Roca R., Nazemi A., Dominguez F., Klocke D., Bony S. The First 30 years of GEWEX // Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. Nov. 2022. 66 p. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0061.1
  142. Taconet O., Bernard L., Vidal-Madjar D. Evapotranspiration over agricultural region using a surface flux/temperature model based on NOAA-AVHRR data // J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 1986. V. 25. № 3. P. 284–307. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0284:EOAARU>2.0.CO;2
  143. Tapley B.D., Bettadpur S., Watkins M., Reigber C. The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004. V. 31. L09607. ftp://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/allData/ grace/L2/CSR/RL05/https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019920
  144. Tofigh S., Rahimi D., Zakerinejad R. A comparison of actual evapotranspiration estimates based on Remote Sensing approaches with a classical climate data driven method // AUC Geographica. 2020. V. 55. № 2. P. 165–182. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2020.12
  145. Wagner W., Hahn S., Kidd R., Melzer T., Bartalis Z., Hasenauer S., Figa-Saldan J., de Rosnay P., Jann A., Schneider S., Komma J., Kubu G., Brugger K., Aubrecht C., Zuger J., Gangkofner U., Kienberger S., Brocca L., Wang Y., Blöschl G., Eitzinger J., Steinnocher K., Zeil P., Rubel F. The ASCAT Soil Moisture Product: A Review of its Specifications, Validation Results, and Emerging Applications // Meteorol. Z. 2013. V. 22. № 1. P. 5–33.
  146. Wang W., Huang D., Wang X.-G., Liu Y.-R., Zhou F. Estimation of soil moisture using trapezoidal relationship between remotely sensed land surface temperature and vegetation index // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. V. 15. P. 1699–1712. www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/ 15/1699/2011/https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1699-2011
  147. Wang Y., Zhang S., Chang X. Evapotranspiration Estimation Based on Remote Sensing and the SEBAL Model in the Bosten Lake Basin of China // Sustainability. 2020. V. 12. P. 7293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187293
  148. Wie W., Pang S., Wang X., Zhou L., Xie B., Zhou J., Li C. Temperature Vegetation Precipitation Dryness Index (TVPDI)-based dryness-wetness monitoring in China // Rem. Sens. Environ. 2020. V. 248. 111957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111957
  149. WIGOS https://public.wmo.int/en/about-us/vision-and-mission/wmo-integrated-global-observing-system
  150. WIGOS Highway https://ane4bf-datap1.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wmod8_gcos/s3fs-public/2018_ 10_31_wigos-highway_uganda_0.pdf?ydrJDTLweQBhmZljgcUwuXLPT
  151. Wu K., Ryu D., Nie L., Shu H. Time-variant error characterization of SMAP and ASCAT soil moisture using Triple Collocation Analysis // Rem. Sens. Environ. 2021. V. 256. 112324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112324
  152. Wulfmeyer V., Turner D.D., Baker B., Banta R., Behrendt A., Bonin T., Brewer W.A., Buban M., Choukulkar A., Dumas E., Hardesty R.M., Heus T., Ingwersen J., Lange D., Lee T.R., Metzendorf S., Muppa S.K., Meyers T., Newsom R., Osman M., Raasch S., Santanello J., Senff C., Späth F., Wagner T., Weckwerth T. A New Research Approach for Observing and Characterizing Land-Atmoshere Feedback // Bull. Am. Met. Soc. 2018. № 8. P. 1639–1668.
  153. Xia T., Kustas W.P., Anderson M.C., Alfieri J.G., Gao F., McKee L., Prueger J.H., Geli H.M.E., Neale C.M.U., Sanchez L., Alsina M.M., Wang Z. Mapping evapotranspiration with high-resolution aircraft imagery over vineyards using one- and two-source modeling schemes // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016. V. 20. P. 1523–1545. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1523-2016
  154. Xia Y.L., Hao Z.C., Shi C.X., Li Y.H., Meng J., Xu T.R., Wu X.Y., Zhang B.Q. Regional and global land data assimilation systems: Innovations, challenges, and prospects // J. Meteorol. Res. 2019. V. 33. № 2. P. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-019-8172-4
  155. Xia Y., Mitchell K., Ek M., Sheffield J., Cosgrove B., Wood E., Luo L., Alonge C., Wei H., Meng J., Livneh B., Lettenmaier D., Koren V., Duan Q., Mo K., Fan Y., Mocko D. Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2). 1. Intercomparison and application of model products // J. Geophys. Res. Atm. 2012. V. 3. D03109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016048
  156. Yao P.P., Shi J.C., Zhao T.J., Lu H.L., Al-Yaari A. Rebuilding Long Time Series Global Soil Moisture Products Using the Neural Network Adopting the Microwave Vegetation Index // Remote Sens. 2017. V. 9. № 1. P. 35–61. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010035
  157. Ye N., Walker J.P., Wu X., de Jeu R., Gao Y., Jackson T.J., Jonard F., Kim E., Merlin O., Pauwels V.R.N., Renzullo L.J., Rüdiger C., Sabaghy S., von Hebel C., Yueh S.H., Zhu L. The Soil Moisture Active Passive Experiments: Validation of the SMAP Products in Australia // IEEE Transactions GeoSci. Remote Sens. 2021. V. 59. № 4. P. 2922–2939. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3007371
  158. Zeng J., Li Z., Chen Q., Bi H., Qiu J., Zou P. Evaluation of remotely sensed and reanalysis soil moisture products over the Tibetan Plateau using in-situ observations // Remote Sens. Environ. 2015. V. 163. P. 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.008. 10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.008
  159. Zhang K., Chao L.-J., Wang Q.-Q., Huang Y.-C., Liu R.-H., Hong Y., Tu Y., Qu W., Ye J.-Y. Using multi-satellite microwave remote sensing observations for retrieval of daily surface soil moisture across China // Water Sci. Engine. 2019. V. 12. № 2. P. 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2019.06.001
  160. Zhang K., Kimball J.S., Running S.W. A review of remote sensing based actual evapotranspiration estimation // WIREs Water. 2016. V. 3. № 6. P. 834–853. https://doi.org/, 2016https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1168
  161. Zhang Q., Fan K., Singh V.P., Sun P., Shi P. Evaluation of remotely sensed and reanalysis soil moisture against in situ observations on the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau // J. Geophys. Res. Atm. 2018. V. 123. P. 7132–7148. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027763
  162. Zhang Y., He B., Guo L., Liu J., Xie X. The relative contributions of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and runoff to terrestrial water storage changes across 168 river basins // J. Hydrol. 2019. V. 579. 124194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124194
  163. Zhang Y., Leuning R., Chiew F.H.S., Wang E., Zhang L., Liu C., Sun F., Peel M.C., Shen Y., Jung M. Decadal trends in evaporation from global energy and water balances // J. Hydrometeorol. 2012. V. 13. P. 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-012.1
  164. Zhao T., Hu L., Shi J., Lü H., Li S., Fan D., Wang P., Geng D., Kang C.S., Zhang Z. Soil moisture retrievals using L-band radiometry from variable angular ground-based and airborne observations // Remote Sens. Environ. 2020. V. 248. 111958.
  165. Zhao T., Shi J., Entekhabi D., Jackson T.J., Hu L., Peng Z., Yao P., Li S., Kang C.S. Retrievals of soil moisture and vegetation optical depth using a multi-channel collaborative algorithm // Remote Sens. Environ. 2021. V. 257. 112321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112321
  166. Zhao T., Shi J., Lv L., Xu H., Chen D., Cui Q., Jackson T.J., Yan G., Jia L., Chen L., Zhao K., Zheng X., Zhao L., Zheng C., Ji D., Xiong C., Wang T., Li R., Pan J., Wen J., Yu C., Zheng Y., Jiang L., Chai L., Lu H., Yao P., Ma J., Lv H., Wu,J., Zhao W., Yang N., Guo P., Li Y., Hu L., Geng D., Zhang Z. Soil moisture experiment in the Luan River supporting new satellite mission opportunities // Remote Sens. Environ. 2020. V. 240. 111680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111680
  167. Zhu B., Song X., Leng P., Sun C., Wang R., Jiang X. A Novel Simplified Algorithm for Bare Surface Soil Moisture Retrieval Using L-Band Radiometer // ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016. V. 5. № 8. P. 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5080143

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML
Скачать
2.

Скачать (177KB)
Метаданные
3.

Скачать (1MB)
Метаданные

© Е.Л. Музылев, 2023

Данный сайт использует cookie-файлы

Продолжая использовать наш сайт, вы даете согласие на обработку файлов cookie, которые обеспечивают правильную работу сайта.

О куки-файлах