Когнитивная архитектура познавательной деятельности при ее моделировании и психофизиологической оценке
- Авторы: Разумникова О.М.1
-
Учреждения:
- Новосибирский государственный технический университет
- Выпуск: Том 54, № 3 (2023)
- Страницы: 90-104
- Раздел: Статьи
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0301-1798/article/view/138987
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0301179823030074
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GLHKRN
- ID: 138987
Цитировать
Аннотация
Описаны основные подходы к моделированию познавательной деятельности человека и нейронных механизмов, лежащих в ее основе. Приведена систематизация когнитивных архитектур и дан обзор таких популярных моделей как ACT-R, SOAR, CLARION и CHREST с примерами их практического применения в психологии и нейрофизиологии. Разработанные модели когнитивных функций позволяют давать прогнозы эффективности восприятия и селекции информации, какие знания и процедуры требуются для оптимального решения задачи, ожидаемую частоту ошибок при выполнении задания и какая функциональная система мозга используется для организации поведения. Совершенствование и дополнение существующих моделей когнитивной архитектуры рассматривается как перспектива развития когнитивной нейронауки, понимания закономерностей формирования естественного интеллекта и разработки искусственного интеллекта.
Об авторах
О. М. Разумникова
Новосибирский государственный технический университет
Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: razoum@mail.ru
Россия, 630073, г. Новосибирск
Список литературы
- Бондарко В.М., Данилова М.В., Красильников Н.Н., Леушина Л.И., Невская А.А., Шелепин Ю.Е. Пространственное зрение. Спб: Наука, 1999. 224 с.
- Глезер В.Д. Механизмы опознания зрительных образов. Л: Наука, 1966. 203 с.
- Глезер В.Д. Зрение и мышление. Спб: Наука, 1993. 248 с.
- Красильников Н.Н. Передача, прием и восприятие изображений. М.: Радио и связь, 1986. 246 с.
- Малашин Р.О. Принцип наименьшего действия в динамически конфигурируемых системах анализа изображений // Оптический журнал. 2019. Т. 86. № 11. С. 5–13.
- Шелепин Ю.Е. Введение в нейроиконику: СПб: Троицкий мост, 2017. 352 с.
- Anderson J.R. How can the human mind exist in the physical universe? New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2007.
- Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind // Psychological Review. 2004. V. 111. № 4. P. 1036–1060
- Anderson J.R., Farrell R., Sauers R. Learning to program in LISP // Cognitive Science. 1984. V. 8. P. 87–129.
- Anderson J.R., Lebiere C. The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 1998.
- Anderson J.R., Reder L.M. The fan effect: New results and new theories // J. Experimental Psychology: General. 1999. V. 128. P. 186–197.
- Bakaev M., Razumnikova O. What makes a UI Simple? Difficulty and complexity in tasks engaging visual-spatial working memory // Future Internet. 2021. V. 13. № 1. Ar. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13010021
- Borst J.P., Nijboer M., Taatgen N.A., van Rijn H., Anderson J.R. Using data-driven model-brain mappings to constrain formal models of cognition // PLoS One. 2015. V. 10. № 3. Ar. e0119673. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119673
- Bourguignon N.J., Braem S., Hartstra E., De Houwer J., Brass M. Encoding of novel verbal instructions for prospective action in the lateral prefrontal cortex: evidence from univariate and multivariate functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis // J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2018. V. 30. P. 1170–1184.
- Brass M., Liefooghe B., Braem S., De Houwer J. Following new task instructions: Evidence for a dissociation between knowing and doing // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017. V. 81. P. 16–28.
- Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems // Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009. V. 10. № 3. P. 186–198.
- Czerwinski M., Horvitz E., Wilhite S. A diary study of task switching and interruptions // In Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications. 2004. P. 175–182.
- De Groot A.D., Gobet F. Perception and memory in chess: Heuristics of the professional eye. Assen: Van Gorcum. 1996. 346 p.
- Demanet J., Liefooghe B., Hartstra E., Wenke D., De Houwer J., Brass M. There is more into ‘doing’ than ‘knowing’: the function of the right inferior frontal sulcus is specific for implementing versus memorising verbal instructions // Neuroimage. 2016. V. 141. P. 350–356.
- Duch W., Oentaryo R., Pasquier M. Cognitive Architectures: Where do we go from here? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Conference: Artificial General Intelligence. 2008. V. 171. P. 122–136.
- Engelhardt L.E., K. Harden P., Tucker-Drob E.M., Church J.A. The neural architecture of executive functions is established by middle childhood // Neuroimage. 2019. V. 185. P. 479–489.
- Everaert T., Theeuwes M., Liefooghe B., De Houwer J. Automatic motor activation by mere instruction // Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2014. V. 14. P. 1300–1309.
- Gobet F. Chunking Models of Expertise: Implications for Education // Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 2005. V. 19. P. 183–204.
- Gobet F., Lane P.C.R., Croker S., Cheng P.C.H., Jones G., Oliver I., Pine J.M. Chunking mechanisms in human learning // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2001. V. 5. P. 236–243.
- Gobet F., Lane P.C.R., Lloyd-Kelly M. Chunks, Schemata, and Retrieval Structures: Past and Current // Computational Models Front Psychol. 2015. V. 6. Ar. 1785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01785
- Gobet F., Simon H.A. Five seconds or sixty? Presentation time in expert memory // Cognitive Science. 2000. V. 24. № 4. P. 651–682.
- González-García C., Formica S., Wisniewski D., Brass M. Frontoparietal action-oriented codes support novel instruction implementation // NeuroImage. 2021. 226. Ar. 117608
- González-García C., Formica S., Liefooghe B., Brass M. Attentional prioritization reconfigures novel instructions into action-oriented task sets // Cognition 2020. V. 194. Ar. 104059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104059
- González-García C., Mas-Herrero E., de Diego-Balaguer R., Ruz M. Task-specific preparatory neural activations in low-interference contexts // Brain Struct. Funct. 2016. V. 221. № 8. P. 3997–4006.
- Hartstra E., Waszak F., Brass M. The implementation of verbal instructions: Dissociating motor preparation from the formation of stimulus–response associations // Neuroimage. 2012. V. 63. P. 1143–1153.
- Harrison J. Handbook of practical logic and automated reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 2009. 1305 p.
- Jones G., Gobet F., Pine J.M. Linking working memory and long-term memory: a computational model of the learning of new words. Dev Sci. 2007. V. 10. № 6. P. 853–873.
- Jones R.M., Laird J.E., Nielsen P.E., Coulter K., Kenny P., Koss F. Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation // AI Magazine. 1999. V. 20. № 1. P. 27–42.
- Jones G., Gobet F., Pine J.M. Linking working memory and long-term memory: A computational model of the learning of new words // Developmental Science. 2007. V. 10. № 6. P. 853–873.
- Jones G., Gobet F., Pine J.M. Computer simulations of developmental change: The contributions of working memory capacity and long-term knowledge // Cognitive Science. 2008. V. 32. № 7. P. 1148–1176.
- Katidioti I., Borst J.P., Taatgen N.A. What happens when we switch tasks: Pupil dilation in multitasking // J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2014. V. 20. P. 380–396
- Kahneman D.A. perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality // American psychologist. 2003. V. 58. № 9. P. 697–720.
- Kim N.Y., House R., Yun M.H., Nam C.S. Neural Correlates of Workload Transition in Multitasking: An ACT-R Model of Hysteresis Effect // Front Hum Neurosci. 2019. V. 12. Ar. 535.
- Kotseruba I., Tsostsos J.K. A review of 40 years of cognitive architecture research: Focus on perception, attention, learning and applications // arXiv preprint: 1610.08602. 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.08602
- Lane P.C.R., Gobet F., Smith R.L. Attention Mechanisms in the CHREST Cognitive Architecture. In: Paletta L., Tsotsos J.K. (eds) Attention in Cognitive Systems. WAPCV 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2009. V. 5395. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00582-4_14
- Lane P.C.R., Gobet F. Perception in chess and beyond: Commentary on Linhares and Freitas (2010)' // New Ideas in Psychology. 2011. V. 29. P. 156–161.
- Lebiere C., O’Reilly R., Jilk D., Taatgen N.A., Anderson J.R. The SAL integrated cognitive architecture. In A. Samsonovich (Ed.). Biologically inspired cognitive architectures: Papers from the AAAI 2008 Fall Symposium Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. 2009. P. 98–104.
- Lehman J.F., Laird J.E., Rosenbloom P.A. Gentle Introduction to Soar, An Architecture for Human Cognition // An Invitation to Cognitive Science. MIT Press. 2006. V. 4.
- Li Y., Wang Y., Yu F., Chen A. Large-scale reconfiguration of connectivity patterns among attentional networks during context-dependent adjustment of cognitive control // Hum Brain Mapp. 2021. V. 42. P. 3821–3832.
- Malakhova E.Yu. Information representation space in artificial and biological neural networks // J. Optical Technology. V. 87. № 10. P. 598–603.
- Malashin R. Principle of least action in dynamically configured image analysis systems // J. Optical Technology. 2019. V. 86. № 11. P. 678–685.
- Malashin R.O. Training an improved recurrent attention model using an alternative reward function // J. Optical Technology. 2021. V. 88. № 3. P. 127–130.
- Malashin D.O., Malashin R.O. Efficient hardware implementation of neural networks // Neural Networks and Neurotechnologies. Aleksandrov A.A., Alizade M.R., Andreeva G.O., Andreeva I.G., (Eds). St. Petersburg, 2019. P. 187–192.
- Martin L., Rosales J.H., Jaime K., Ramos F. Affective episodic memory system for virtual creatures: The first step of emotion-oriented memory // Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021. Ar. 7954140. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7954140
- Maxwell A., Thomas B.B.T., Yeo and M. D’Esposito. The modular and integrative functional architecture of the human brain // PNAS. 2015. Ar. E6798–E6807. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510619112
- Mill R.D., Ito T., Cole M. W. From connectome to cognition: The search for mechanism in human functional brain networks // Neuroimage. 2017. V. 160. P. 124–139.
- Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., Macko K.A. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways // Trends in Neurosci. 1983. V. 6. P. 414–417.
- Moreira J.F.G., McLaughlin K.A., Silvers J.A. Characterizing the Network Architecture of Emotion Regulation Neurodevelopment // Cerebral Cortex. 2021. V. 31. P. 4140–4150.
- Muhle-Karbe P.S., Duncan J., Baene W.De, Mitchell D.J., Brass M. Neural coding for instruction-based task sets in human frontoparietal and visual cortex // Cereb. Cortex. 2017. V. 27. P. 1891–1905.
- Newell A., Simon H. GPS, A Program that Simulates Human Thought. In: Computers and Thought, E.A. Feigenbaum, J. Feldman (Eds.), R. Oldenbourg KG., 1963. P. 109–124.
- Neves D.M., Anderson J.R. Knowledge compilation: Mechanisms for the automatization of cognitive skills. In: J. R. Anderson (Ed.) Cognitive skills and their acquisition Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1981. P. 57–84.
- Oh H., Yun Y., Myung R. Cognitive Modeling of Task Switching in Discretionary Multitasking Based on the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture // Appl. Sci. 2021. V. 11. Ar. 3967. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093967
- Palenciano A.F., González-García C., Arco J.E., Pessoa L., Ruz M. Representational organization of novel task sets during proactive encoding // J. Neurosci. 2019. V. 39. № 42. P. 8386–8397.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0725-19.2019
- Palenciano A.F., González-García C., Arco J.E., Ruz M. Transient and sustained control mechanisms supporting novel instructed behavior // Cereb. Cortex. 2019. V. 29. P. 3948–3960.
- Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. 1988. Elsevier Inc. 152 p.
- Prezenski S., Brechmann A., Wolff S., Russwinkel N.A. Cognitive Modeling Approach to Strategy Formation in Dynamic Decision Making // Front Psychol. 2017. V. 8. Ar.1335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01335
- Razumnikova O., Bakaev M. Ontology of frequency-spatial organization of brain activity reflecting the cognitive reserves // International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON). 2019. P. 0950–0954.
- Richards J.M., Gross J.J. Emotion regulation and memory: the cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool // J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 2000. V. 79. № 3. P. 410–424.
- Ritter F.E. Tehranchi F., Oury J.D. ACT-R: A cognitive architecture for modeling cognition WIREs // Cogn Sci. 2018. Ar. e1488 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1488
- Rumelhart D., McClelland J. Parallel distributed processing: Psychological and biological models. The MIT press. 1986. V. 2. 581 p.
- Schultz D.H., Cole M.W. Integrated Brain Network Architecture Supports Cognitive Task Performance // Neuron. 2016. V. 92. P. 278–279.
- Shine J.M., Bissett P.G., Bell P.T., Koyejo O., Balsters J.H., Gorgolewski K.J., Moodie C.A., Poldrack R.A. The dynamics of functional brain networks: Integrated network states during cognitive task performance // Neuron. 2016. V. 92. № 2. P. 544–554.
- Sun R. Anatomy of the Mind: Exploring Psychological Mechanisms and Processes with the Clarion Cognitive Architecture. Oxford University Press. 2016. 481 p.
- Sun R. The importance of cognitive architectures: An analysis based on clarion // J. Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. 2007. V. 19. № 2. P. 159–193
- Slovic P. Affect, Reason, Risk and Rationality // Notas Económicas. 2018. № 46. P. 1–10.
- Strannegård C., von Haugwitz R., Wessberg J., Balkenius C.A. Cognitive Architecture Based on Dual Process Theory. In: Kühnberger K.U., Rudolph S., Wang P. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2013. V. 7999. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39521-5_15
- Turner B.M., Forstmann B.U., Love B.C., Palmeri T.J., Van Maanen L. Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience // J Math Psychol. 2017. V. 76 (B). P. 65–79.
- van Vugt M.K. Cognitive architectures as a tool for investigating the role of oscillatory power and coherence in cognition // Neuroimage. 2014. V. 85. Pt 2. P. 685–693.
- Wickens C.D., Gutzwiller R.S., Santamaria A. Discrete task switching in overload: A meta-analyses and a model // Int. J. Hum. Comp. Stud. 2015. V. 79. P. 79–84.
- Woolgar A., Afshar S., Williams M.A., Rich A.N. Flexible coding of task rules in frontoparietal cortex: an adaptive system for flexible cognitive control // J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2015. V. 27. P. 1895–1911.