Person Walking: Walkability as a Factor of Production of Urban Everyday Life

封面

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The subject of the article is a walk as a specific practice of a person's daily life in a city, as well as the phenomenon of walkability: the feature of an environment to be suitable for a person to move on foot. The article notes that the term walkability itself is new and is used mainly in the field of Urban Studies. At the same time, the phenomenon itself — a person's walk in the space of the city — was comprehended much earlier in the context of philosophy, social theory and socio-political thought. Based on the work of Walter Benjamin, Michel de Certeau, Guy Debord, it is shown that the origin of the aimless walk is chronologically connected with the Modern era, and in terms of the organization of the habitat, it correlates with a certain stage in the development of cities. The article also analyze a number of political aspects of walkability; in particular, it is noted that the nature of power spatiality in the urban environment largely determines its accessibility / inaccessibility for pedestrians, determines the routes of a person’s movement around the city, marks the boundaries of “places of memory”, and so on. It is concluded that increasing the level and quality of walkability in modern cities is not only expedient from a utilitarian, urban planning point of view, but also politically fair in relation to a person — a resident of these cities.

作者简介

Veronika Sharova

RAS Institute of Philosophy

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7405-2992
12/1Goncharnaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Беньямин В. Бодлер. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2015.
  2. Беньямин В. Париж, столица XIX столетия // Беньямин В. Озарения / пер. Н.М. Берновской, Ю.А. Данилова, С.А. Ромашко. М.: Мартис, 2000.
  3. Бичурин Н.Я. Описание Пекина / пер. с кит. СПб.: Тип. А. Смирдина. 1829.
  4. Бретон А., Супо Ф. Прозрачное зеркало // Вавилон: Вестник молодой литературы / пер. с фр. Д. Галь, М. Осокина и О. Ассовски. Вып. 2 (18). М.: АРГО-РИСК, 1993. С. 68‒71.
  5. Дебор Г.-Э. Психогеография. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2017.
  6. Джекобс Дж. Смерть и жизнь больших американских городов / пер. с англ. Л. Мотылева. М.: Новое издательство, 2011.
  7. Жертвы Стены. Berlin.de. Das offizielle Hauptstadtportal. URL: https://www.berlin.de/mauer/ru/istorija/shertwy-steny/#:~:text=С%201961%20по%201989%20год,из%20ГДР%3B%2030%20человек%20с (дата обращения: 27.06.2023).
  8. Заявление Общественного движения «Архнадзор». 25.10.2011. URL: https://www.archnadzor.ru/2011/10/25/kitajskij-zabor/#more-8603 (дата обращения: 15.06.2023).
  9. Оже М. От города воображаемого к городу-фикции // Художественный журнал. 1999. № 24. URL: www.guelman.ru/xz/362/xx24/x2402.htm (дата обращения: 20.06.2023)
  10. Оже М. Не-места. Введение в антропологию гипермодерна / пер. с франц. А.Ю. Коннова. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2017.
  11. Серто М. де. Изобретение повседневности. Т 1. Искусство делать / пер. с фр. Д. Калугина, Н. Мовниной. СПб.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2013.
  12. Серто М. де. По городу пешком // Социологическое обозрение. 2008. Т. 7, № 2. С. 24–38.
  13. Терборн Й. Города власти. Город, нация, народ, глобальность / пер. с англ. А. Королева; под науч. ред. В. Данилова; М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2020.
  14. Трубина Е.Г. Город в теории: опыты осмысления пространства. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2010.
  15. Юрчак А. Это было навсегда, пока не кончилось. Последнее советское поколение / предисл. А. Беляева; пер. с англ. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2014.
  16. Assmann A. Erinnerung, Identität, Emotionen: Die Nation neu denken. Blatter.de. März 2020. URL: https://www.blaetter.de/ausgabe/2020/maerz/erinnerung-identitaet-emotionen-die-nation-neu-denken (date of access: 20.06.2023).
  17. Bartzokas-Tsiompras A., Photis Y.N. What matters when it comes to “Walk and the city”? Defining a weighted GIS-based walkability index. Transport Research Procedia. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 523–530.
  18. Baobeid A., Koç M., Al-Ghamdi S.G. Walkability and Its Relationships With Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2021. Vol. 7. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218 (date of access: 10.06.2023).
  19. Bekiaris E., Tsami M., Panou M. A “Greening Mobility” framework towards sustainability. Transport Research Procedia. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 131–136.
  20. Bischoff P. Surveillance camera statistics: which cities have the most CCTV cameras? URL: https://www.comparitech.com/vpn-privacy/the-worlds-most-surveilled-cities/ (date of access: 15.06.2023).
  21. Golan Y., Wilkinson N., Henderson J.M., Weverka A. Gendered walkability: Building a daytime walkability index for women. Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2019. N 12(1). URL: https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/1472 (date of access: 12.06.2023).
  22. Kärrholm M., Johansson M., Lindelöw D., Ferreira I.A. Interseriality and Different Sorts of Walking: Suggestions for a Relational Approach to Urban Walking. Mobilities. 2017. N 12:1. P. 20‒35.
  23. Lefebvre H. Rhythmanalysis. Space, Time and Everyday Life. Transl. from French by: Elden S., Moore G. London, New York: Continuum, 2004.
  24. Liao B., van den Berg P.E.W., van Wesemael P.J.V, Arentze T.A. How Does Walkability Change Behavior? A Comparison between Different Age Groups in the Netherlands. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. N 17(2): 540.
  25. Manzelat R.R., Emadi M.I., Kamali A.J. City Sustainability: the Influence of Walkability on Built Environments. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 97–104.
  26. McEwan I. A Tale of Two Cities. The Guardian. 22.10.2005. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/oct/22/featuresreviews.guardianreview31 (date of access: 29.06.2023).

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

##common.cookie##