Vulnerable Buoyancy: A New View on Emotional Regulation Under Uncertainty

Capa

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Stress is often accompanied by high uncertainty, which makes it difficult or ineffective to make the right decisions. Affective-personal regulation of the decision-making process has been poorly studied to date, and the variables characterizing different aspects of emotional regulation have not been presented in a single complex of their interactions in relation to human uncertainty. In multiple decision-making regulation, the relevant variables can interact with each other, which can be reflected in the effectiveness of problem solving or decision-making. The aim of the article was to develop a model that links the variables of empathy (cognitive and affective), subclinical narcissism and tolerance for uncertainty with latent factors of Self-efficacy of human decisions and Vulnerable buoyancy. Vulnerable buoyancy is a new concept that allows us to consider emotional regulation under conditions of uncertainty not as stability, but rather as a dynamic system of self-regulation that positively determines the effectiveness of decision-making. The Dirty Dozen, Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy, The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale, and The New Tolerance-intolerance to Uncertainty Questionnaire were used on a sample of n = 446. A correlation analysis was carried out and a structural model was built, which allowed: to substantiate the selection of an integrative latent variable Vulnerable buoyancy; to take a fresh approach to the relationship of narcissism with other variables of the emotional-personal sphere, which, according to the literature, are quite contradictory; to demonstrate the different roles of affective and cognitive empathy, manifesting Self-efficacy in problem solving (cognitive empathy) and Vulnerable buoyancy (affective empathy).

Sobre autores

Tatiana Kornilova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

11, build. 9 Mokhovaya Str., Moscow 125009, Russian Federation

Yulia Krasavtseva

Lomonosov Moscow State University

11, build. 9 Mokhovaya Str., Moscow 125009, Russian Federation

Bibliografia

  1. Белоусова А.И., Гейвандова М.Я. Когнитивная и аффективная эмпатия: апробация опросника на российской выборке // Вестн. Моск. гос. обл. ун-та. Сер.: Психол. науки. 2021. Т. 31(2). С. 6–20. doi: 10.18384/2310-7235-2021-2-6-20
  2. Злобина М.В., Первушина О.Н. Интолерантность к неопределенности и депрессия // Reflexio. 2017. Т. 10(2). С. 126–141. DOI: 0.25205/2658-4506-2017-10-2-126-141
  3. Знаков В.В. Психология возможного: Новое направление исследований понимания. 2-е изд. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2022.
  4. Корнилова Т.В. Интеллектуально-личностный потенциал человека в условиях неопределенности и риска. СПб.: Нестор-История, 2016.
  5. Корнилова Т.В. Новый опросник толерантности к неопределeнности // Психол. журн. 2010. Т. 31(1). С. 74–86.
  6. Корнилова Т.В. Эмпатия в структурах интеллектуально-личностного потенциала: единство интеллекта и аффекта // Психол. журн. 2022. Т. 43(3). С. 57–68. doi: 10.31857/S020595920020496-1
  7. Корнилова Т.В., Корнилов С.А., Чумакова М.А., Талмач М.С. Методика диагностики личностных черт «Темной триады»: апробация опросника «Темная дюжина» // Психол. журн. 2015. Т. 36(2). С. 99–112.
  8. Корнилова Т.В., Павлова Е.М. Шкала интеллектуальной оценки риска и ее связь с готовностью к риску и эмоциональным интеллектом // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2020. Т. 28(4). С. 59–78. doi: 10.17759/cpp.2020280404
  9. Красавцева Ю.В., Корнилова Т.В. Нарциссизм как «светлый» аспект в Темной Триаде // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2019. Т. 27(4). С. 65–80. doi: 10.17759/cpp.2019270405
  10. Красавцева Ю.В., Корнилова Т.В. Эмоциональный и академический интеллект как предикторы стратегий в игровой задаче Айова (IGT) // Психол. журн. 2018. Т. 39(3). С. 29–43. doi: 10.7868/S0205959218030030
  11. Нуркова В.В. Эмпатия-отождествление и эмпатия-моделирование: о культурном конструировании двух модусов совместной деятельности // Вопр. психологии. 2020. Т. 66(3). С. 3–13.
  12. Barlow D.H., Sauer-Zavala S., Carl J.R. et al. The Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Neuroticism: Back to the Future. Clinical Psychological Science. 2014. Vol. 2. P. 344–365. doi: 10.1177/2167702613505532
  13. Bogacheva N., Kornilova T., Pavlova E. Cognitive Representations of Medical Risks of Practicing Medical Doctors in Russia: Assessment and Correlates. Behavioral Sciences. 2020. Vol. 10, N 6. doi: 10.3390/bs10010006
  14. Byrne K.A., Worthy D.A. Do Narcissists Make Better Decisions? An Investigation of Narcissism and Dynamic Decision-making Performance. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013. Vol. 55. P. 112–117. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.020
  15. Craparo G., Magnano P., Paolillo A. et al. The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The development of a New Scale to Measure a New Construct. Current Psychology. 2018. Vol. 37, N 4. P. 966–981. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9673-x
  16. Cuff B., Brown S.J, Taylor L., Howat D. Empathy: A Review of the Concept. Emotion Review. 2014. Vol. 7. P. 144–153. doi: 10.1177/1754073914558466
  17. Damasio A.R. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrowand the Feeling Brain. Florida: Harcourt, 2003.
  18. Davis M.H. Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983. Vol. 44, N 1. P. 113–126.
  19. Evans D. Risk Intelligence: How to Live with Uncertainty. London: Atlantic Books, 2012.
  20. Han P.K.J., Strout T.D., Gutheil C. et al. How Physicians Manage Medical Uncertainty: A Qualitative Study and Conceptual Taxonomy. Medical Decision Making. 2021. Vol. 41, N 3. P. 275–291. doi: 10.1177/0272989С21992340
  21. Hancock J., Mattick K. Tolerance of Ambiguity and Psychological Well‐being in Medical Training: A Systematic Review. Medical Еducation. 2020. Vol. 54, N 2. P. 125–37. doi: 10.1111/medu.14031
  22. Hojat M., DeSantis J., Shannon S. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy: A Nationwide Study of Measurement Properties, Underlying Components, Latent Variable Structure, and National Norms in Medical Students. Advances in Health Sciences Educational. 2018. Vol. 23, N 5. Р. 899–920. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9839-9
  23. Hoffman M.L. Empathy and Moral Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805851
  24. Huang S. A Review of the Relationship Between EFL Teachers’ Academic Buoyancy, Ambiguity Tolerance, and Hopelessness. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831258
  25. Gross J.J. Emotion Regulation Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. Handbook of Emotion Regulation, ed. by J.J. Gross. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford, 2014. P. 3–20.
  26. Jauk Е., Weigle E., Lehmann K. et al. The Relationship Between Grandiose and Vulnerable (Hypersensitive) Narcissism. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01600
  27. Jonason P., Kroll C.H. A Multidimensional View of the Relationship Between Empathy and the Dark Triad. Journal of Individual Differences. 2015. Vol. 36, N 3. P. 150–156. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/A000166
  28. Jonason P.K., Webster G.D. The Dirty Dozen: A Concise Measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment. 2010. Vol. 22, N 2. P. 420–432. doi: 10.1037/a0019265
  29. Frenkel-Brunswick E. Intolerance of Ambiguity as an Emotional and Perceptual Personality Variable. Journal of Personality. 1949. Vol. 11, N 1. P. 108–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x
  30. Furnham A. A Content, Correlation and Factor Analytic Study of Four Tolerance of Ambiguity Questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences. 1994. Vol. 16, N 3. P. 403–410.
  31. Furnham A., Marks J. Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature. Psychology. 2013. Vol. 4, N 9. P. 717–728. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.49102
  32. Furnham A., Richards S.C., Paulhus D.L. The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10 Year Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2013. Vol. 7, N 3. P. 199–216. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12018
  33. Kajonius P.J., Björkman T. Individuals with Dark Traits Have the Ability but Not the Disposition to Empathize. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020. Vol. 155, N 2. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109716
  34. Kornilova T.V., Novikova M.A. Self-assessed Intelligence, Psychometric Intelligence, Personality, and Academic Fchievement: Two Structural Models. Educational Achievement: Teaching Strategies, Psychological Factors and Economic Impact, ed. by M. Gowda, A. Khanderia. New York: Nova Science Publishers Hauppauge, 2013. P. 197–211.
  35. Lee S.A., Gibbons J. The Dark Triad and Compassion: Psychopathy and Narcissism's Unique Connections to Observed Suffering. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017. Vol. 116. P. 336–342. doi: 10.1016/J.PAID.2017.05.010
  36. Miao Ch., Humphrey R.H., Qian Sh., Pollack J.M. The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Meta-analytic Review. Journal of Research in Personality. 2018. Vol. 78. P. 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.004
  37. Michels M., Schulze R. Emotional Intelligence and the Dark Triad: A Meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021. Vol. 180. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110961
  38. Mobbs A.E.D. An Atlas of Personality, Emotion and Behaviour. PLoS One. 2020. Vol. 15, N 1. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227877
  39. Pajevic М., Vukosavljevic-Gvozden Т., Stevanovic N. et al. The Relationship Between the Dark Tetrad and a Two-dimensional View of Empathy. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. Vol. 123. P. 125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.009
  40. Paulhus D.L., Williams K.M. The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality. 2002. Vol. 36, N 6. P. 556–563. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566 (02) 00505-6
  41. Petrides K.V., Vernon P.A., Schermer J.А., Veselka L. Trait Emotional Intelligence and the Dark Triad Traits of Personality. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2011. Vol. 14, N 1. P. 35–41. doi: 10.1375/twin.14.1.35
  42. Powell P.A. Individual Differences in Emotion Regulation Moderate the Associations Between Empathy and Affective Distress. Motivation and Emotion. 2018. Vol. 42, N 4. P. 602–613. doi: 10.1007/s11031-018-9684-4
  43. Reniers R.L., Corcoran R., Drake R. et al. The QCAE: A Guestionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2011. Vol. 93, N 1. P. 84–95. DOI: 10.1080 / 00223891.2010.528484
  44. Rhodewalt F., Madrian J.C., Cheney Sh. Narcissism, Self-Knowledge Organization, and Emotional Reactivity: The Effect of Daily Experiences on Self-esteem and Affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1998. Vol. 24, N 1. P. 75–87. doi: 10.1177/0146167298241006
  45. Rogoza R., Cieciuch J. Dark Triad Traits and Their Structure: An Empirical Approach. Current Psychology. 2018. Vol. 39, Iss. 4. P. 1287–1302. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-9834-6
  46. Rogoza R., Kowalski С.М. Assessing the Dark Triad with the Dirty Dozen Measure. Shining Light on the Dark Side of Personality, ed by P.K. Jonason. S.l.: Hogrefe Publ., 2021. Р. 207–214.
  47. Rogoza R., Kowalski C.M., Saklofsky D.H. et al. Systematizing Dark Personality Traits Within Broader Models of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 2022. Vol. 186. DOI: 10.1016/ j.paid.2021.111343
  48. Schipper M., Petermann F. Relating Empathy and Emotion Regulation: Do Deficits in Empathy Trigger Emotion Dysregulation? Social Neuroscience. 2013. Vol. 8, N 1. P. 101–107. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.761650
  49. Slovic P., Finucane M.L., Peters E. et al. The Affect Heuristic. The European Journal of Operational Research. 2007. Vol. 177. P. 1333–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
  50. Stanwix S., Walker B.R. The Dark Tetrad and Advantageous and Disadvantageous Risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021. Vol. 168. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110338
  51. Stephens G.C. Sarkar| M., Lazarus M.D. “A whole lot of uncertainty”: A Qualitative Study Exploring Clinical Medical Students' Experiences of Uncertainty Stimuli. Medical Education. 2022. Vol. 56. P. 736–746. doi: 10.1111/medu.14743
  52. Szabó Е., Bereczkei Т. Different Paths to Different Strategies? Unique Associations Among Facets of the Dark Triad, Empathy, and Trait Emotional Intelligence. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 2017. Vol. 13, N 4. P. 306–313. doi: 10.5709/acp-0230-7
  53. Taleb N.N. Antifragile. Things that Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House, 2013.
  54. Turner I.N., Foster J.D., Webster G.D. The Dark Triad's Inverse Relations with Cognitive and Emotional Empathy: High-powered Tests with Multiple Measures. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019. Vol. 139. P. 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.030
  55. Urbonaviciute G., Hepper E.G. When is Narcissism Associated with Low Empathy? A Meta-analytic Review. Journal of Research in Personality. 2020. Vol. 89. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104036

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies