Influence of Internal Microarchitecture on the Shape of Individual Implants Made from Vinylidene Fluoride Copolymer by 3D Printing with High-Temperature Crystallization
- Authors: Vorobyev A.O.1, Kulbakin D.E.2, Chistyakov S.G.1, Mitrichenko A.D.2, Dubinenko G.E.1, Akimchenko I.O.1, Gogolev A.S.1, Choynzonov E.L.2, Bouznik V.M.1, Bolbasov E.N.1,3
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
- Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 42, No 11 (2023)
- Pages: 9-15
- Section: ХИМИЧЕСКЯ ФИЗИКА ПОЛИМЕРНЫХ МАТЕРИАЛОВ
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0207-401X/article/view/233190
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23110109
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VDJXMX
- ID: 233190
Cite item
Abstract
The healing potential of individual polymer implants for the reconstruction of extensive craniofacial
defects after cancer resection is largely determined by the internal architecture of the implant. The architecture
of an implant during polymer crystallization could affect the structure and shape of the implant at the
micro and macro levels. In this study, the relationship between the internal architecture (triply periodic minimum
surface structure (gyroid), cube, grid, and honeycomb) and shape changes of individual implants by
3D printing with a vinylidene fluoride-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer after crystallization is examined at a
filling density of 70%. Using the method of differential scanning calorimetry, it is established that crystallization
leads to the rearrangement of the crystalline structure of the implant into electrically active (ferroelectric)
crystalline phases. Moreover, the type of internal architecture affects the change in the shape of the
implant after crystallization. The results of the computed tomography show that structures with a triply periodic
minimum surface (gyroid) provide the minimal deformation of the implant during crystallization, which
makes such structures optimal for manufacturing implants for replacing bone defects in the zygomatic-orbital
complex.
About the authors
A. O. Vorobyev
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
D. E. Kulbakin
Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
S. G. Chistyakov
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
A. D. Mitrichenko
Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
G. E. Dubinenko
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
I. O. Akimchenko
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
A. S. Gogolev
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
E. L. Choynzonov
Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
V. M. Bouznik
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia
E. N. Bolbasov
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University; Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: Ftoroplast@tpu.ru
Tomsk, Russia; Tomsk, Russia
References
- Кульбакин Д.Е., Чойнзонов Е.Л., Буякова С.П. и др. // Голова и шея. 2018. V. 6. № 4. Р. 64. https://doi.org/10.25792/HN.2018.6.4.64-69
- Жуков А.М., Солодилов В.И., Третьяков И.В., Буракова Е.А., Юрков Г.Ю. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 49. № 1. С. 64; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22090138
- Иванова Т.А., Голубева Е.Н. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 6. С. 35; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X2206005X
- Тертышная Ю.В., Лобанов А.В., Хватов А.В. // Хим. физика. 2020. Т. 39. № 11. С. 52; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X20110138
- Badaraev A.D., Koniaeva A., Krikova S.A. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020. V. 504; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144068
- Akimchenko I.O., Dubinenko G.E., Rutkowski S. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021. V. 119. № 20; https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0070365
- Kapat K., Shubhra Q.T.H., Zhou M. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mat. 2020. V. 30. № 44; https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201909045
- Kochervinskii V.V. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 1996. V. 65. № 10. P. 936; https://doi.org/10.1070/RC1996v065n10ABEH000328
- Li Y., Tang S., Pan M.W. et al. // Macromolecules. 2015. V. 48. № 23. P. 8565; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01895
- Inoue M., Tada Y., Suganuma K. et al. // Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2007. V. 92. P. 1833; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.07.003
- Lovinger A.J., Johnson G.E., Bair H.E. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 1984. V. 56. P. 2412; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334303
- Murata Y. // Polym. J. 1987. V. 19. P. 337; https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.19.337
- Rammohan A.V., Lee T., Tan V.B.C. // Intern. J. Appl. Mech. 2015. V. 7. № 3; https://doi.org/10.1142/S1758825115500489
- Dong Z., Zhao X. // Eng. Regen. 2021. V. 2. P. 154; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2021.09.004