Three-Dimensional Numerical Modeling of Lava Dynamics Using the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Lava domes and lava flows are major manifestations of effusive volcanic eruptions. Less viscous lava tends to flow long distances, depending on the volcanic slope topography, the eruption rate, and the viscosity of the erupted magma. When magma is highly viscous, its eruption to the surface leads to the formation of lava domes and their growth. The meshless smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method is used in this paper to simulate lava dynamics. We describe the SPH method and present a numerical algorithm to compute lava dynamics models. The numerical method is verified by solving a model of cylindrical dam-break fluid flow, and the modelled results are compared to the analytical solution of the axisymmetric thin-layer viscous current problem. The SPH method is applied to study three models of lava advancement along the volcanic slope, when the lava viscosity is constant, depends on time and on the volume fraction of crystals in the lava. Simulation results show characteristic features of lava flows, such as lava channel and tube formation, and lava domes, such as the formation of a highly viscous carapace versus a less viscous dome core. Finally, the simulation results and their dependence on a particle size in the SPH method are discussed.

作者简介

I. Starodubtsev

Krasovsky Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural Federal University

Email: alik.ismail-zadeh@kit.edu
Russia, 620990, Yekaterinburg, Sofia Kovalevskaya str., 16; Russia, 620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira str., 19

Y. Starodubtseva

Krasovsky Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alik.ismail-zadeh@kit.edu
Russia, 620990, Yekaterinburg, Sofia Kovalevskaya str., 16

I. Tsepelev

Krasovsky Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: alik.ismail-zadeh@kit.edu
Russia, 620990, Yekaterinburg, Sofia Kovalevskaya str., 16

A. Ismail-Zadeh

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Applied Geosciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: alik.ismail-zadeh@kit.edu
Germany, 76131, Karlsruhe, Adenauerring str., 20b

参考

  1. Ahrens J., Jourdain S., O’Leary P., Patchett J., Rogers D.H., Petersen M. An image-based approach to extreme scale in situ visualization and analysis // SC '14: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Compu-ting, Networking, Storage and Analysis. 2014. P. 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2014.40
  2. Bender J., Koschier D. Divergence-free smoothed particle hydrodynamics // Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGGRAPH Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, SCA ’15, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery. 2015. P. 147–155.
  3. Bender J., Koschier D. Divergence-free SPH for incompressible and viscous fluids // IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2017. V. 23. № 3. P. 1193–1206.
  4. Benz W., Asphaug E. Simulations of brittle solids using smoothed particle hydrodynamics // Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995. V. 87. P. 253–265.
  5. Blake S. Viscoplastic models of lava domes / Ed. J.H. Fink // Lava Flows and Domes; Emplacement Mechanisms and Hazard Implications. N.Y.: Springer, 1990. P. 88–126.
  6. Brookshaw L. A method of calculating radiative heat diffusion in particle simulations // Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 1985. V. 6. № 2. P. 207–210.
  7. Chandrasekhar S. Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961. 652 p.
  8. Cordonnier B., Lev E., Garel F. Benchmarking lava-flow models / Eds A.J.L. Harris, T. De Groeve, F. Garel, S.A. Carn // Detecting, Modelling and Responding to Effusive Eruptions. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 426. 2015. P. 425. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP426.7
  9. Costa A. Viscosity of high crystal content melts: Dependence on solid fraction // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005. V. 32. P. L22308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL0243033
  10. Costa A., Caricchi L., Bagdassarov N. A model for the rheology of particle-bearing suspensions and partially molten tocks // Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 2009. V. 10. № 3. P. Q03010.
  11. Gel’fand I.M., Shilov G.E. Generalized Functions. V. 1. Properties and Operations. Providence: AMS Chelsea Publishing, 1964. 423 p.
  12. Gingold R., Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodyna-mics: theory and application to non-spherical stars // Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 1977. V. 181. P. 375–389.
  13. Griffiths R.W. The dynamics of lava flows // Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2000. V. 32. P. 477–518.
  14. Hale A.J., Wadge G. Numerical modeling of the growth dynamics of a simple silicic lava dome // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003. V. 30. № 19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018182
  15. Harnett C.E., Thomas M.E., Purvance M.D., Neuberg J. Using a discrete element approach to model lava dome emplacement and collapse // J. Volcanol. Geother. Res. 2018. V. 359. P. 68–77.
  16. Hérault A., Bilotta G., Vicari A., Rustico E., Del Negro C. Numerical simulation of lava flow using a GPU SPH model // Ann. Geophys. 2011. V. 54. P. 600–620.
  17. Huppert H.E. The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface // J. Fluid Mech. 1982. V. 121. P. 43–58.
  18. Husain T., Elsworth D., Voight B., Mattioli G., Jansma, P. Influence of conduit flow mechanics on magma rheology and the growth style of lava domes // Geophys. J. Int. 2018. V. 213. P. 1768–1784.
  19. Husain T., Elsworth D., Voight B., Mattioli G., Jansma P. Morphologic variation of an evolving dome controlled by the extrusion of finite yield strength magma // J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2019. V. 370. 51–64.
  20. Ismail-Zadeh A., Tackley P. Computational Methods for Geodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 313 p.
  21. Ihmsen M., Cornelis J., Solenthaler B., Horvath C., Teschner M. Implicit incompressible SPH // IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2014a. V. 20. P. 426–435.
  22. Ihmsen M., Orthmann J., Solenthaler B., Kolb A., Teschner M. SPH fluids in computer graphics / Eds S. Lefebvre, M. Spagnuolo // Eurographics State of the Art Reports. 2014b. P. 21–42.
  23. Jeffrey D., Acrivos A. The rheological properties of suspensions of rigid particles // AIChE J. 1976. V. 22. P. 417–432.
  24. Lejeune A., Richet P. Rheology of crystal-bearing silicate melts: An experimental study at high viscosity // J. Geophys. Res. 1995. V. 100. P. 4215–4229.
  25. Lister J. Viscous flows down an inclined plane from point and line sources // J. Fluid Mech. 1992. V. 242. P. 631–653
  26. Liu G.R., Liu M.B. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003. 472 p.
  27. Lucy L. A numerical approach to the testing of fission hypo-thesis // Astronomical Journal. 1977. V. 82. P. 1013–1024.
  28. Mardles E. Viscosity of suspensions and the Einstein equation // Nature. 1940. V. 145. P. 970.
  29. Melnik O., Sparks R.S.J. Nonlinear dynamics of lava dome extrusion // Nature. 1999. V. 402. P. 37–41.
  30. Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics // Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1992. V. 30. P. 543–574.
  31. Starodubtsev I., Vasev P., Starodubtseva Y., Tsepelev I. Numerical simulation and visualization of lava flows // Scientific Visualization. 2022. V. 14. № 5. P. 66–76. https://doi.org/10.26583/sv.14.5.05
  32. Starodubtseva Y., Starodubtsev I., Ismail-Zadeh A., Tsepelev I., Melnik O., Korotkii A. A method for magma viscosity assessment by lava dome morphology // J. Volcanol. Seismol. 2021. V. 15. № 3. P. 159–168. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0742046321030064
  33. Stasiuk M.V., Jaupart C., Sparks R.S.J. On the variations of flow rate in non-explosive lava eruptions // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1993. V. 114. P. 505–516.
  34. Tsepelev I., Ismail-Zadeh A., Melnik O., Korotkii A. Nume-rical modelling of fluid flow with rafts: An application to lava flows // J. Geodyn. 2016. V. 97. P. 31–41.
  35. Tsepelev I., Ismail-Zadeh A., Starodubtseva Y., Korotkii A., Melnik O. Crust development inferred from numerical models of lava flow and its surface thermal measurements // Ann. Geophys. 2019. V. 61. № 2. P. VO226. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7745
  36. Tsepelev I., Ismail-Zadeh A., Melnik O. Lava dome morphology inferred from numerical modelling // Geophys. J. Inter. 2020. V. 223. № 3. P. 1597–1609.
  37. Tsepelev I.A., Ismail-Zadeh A.T., Melnik O.E. Lava dome evolution at Volcán de Colima, México during 2013: Insights from numerical modeling // J. Volcanol. Seismol. 2021. V. 15. № 6. P. 491–501.
  38. Vasev P., Porshnev S., Forghani M., Manakov D., Bakhterev M., Starodubtsev I. Constructing 3D scenes of scientific visua-lization using CinemaScience Format // Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision (GraphiCon 2021), Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, September 27–30, 2021 / Eds V. Galaktionov, A. Voloboy, A. Bondarev // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2021. V. 3027. P. 296‒307. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3027/paper29.pdf.
  39. Vasev P., Bakhterev M., Manakov D., Porshnev S., Forghani M. On expressiveness of visualization systems' interfaces // Scientific Visualization. 2022. V. 14 № 5. P. 77–95. https://doi.org/10.26583/sv.14.5.06
  40. Weiler M., Koschier D., Brand M., Bender J. A physically consistent implicit viscosity solver for SPH fluids // Computer Graphics Forum. 2018. V. 37. № 2. P. 145‒155. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13349
  41. Zago V., Bilotta G., Hérault A. et al. Semi-implicit 3D SPH on GPU for lava flows // Journal of Computational Physics. 2018. V. 375. P. 854–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.07.060
  42. Zeinalova N., Ismail–Zadeh A., Melnik O.E., Tsepelev I., Zobin V.M. Lava dome morphology and viscosity inferred from data-driven numerical modeling of dome growth at Volcán de Colima, Mexico during 2007‒2009 // Frontiers in Earth Science. 2021. V. 9. P. 735914. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2021.735914/full.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2.

下载 (975KB)
索引源数据
3.

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
4.

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
5.

下载 (4MB)
索引源数据
6.

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
7.

下载 (964KB)
索引源数据
8.

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
9.

下载 (2MB)
索引源数据
10.

下载 (3MB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © И.С. Стародубцев, Ю.В. Стародубцева, И.А. Цепелев, А.Т. Исмаил-Заде, 2023

##common.cookie##