The Influence of Anxiety Level and Degree of Autonomic Dysfunction on the Selective Attention in the Emotional Stroop Test

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In the experimental task of the emotional Stroop test, the influence of the level of personal and situational anxiety and the degree of dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system on selective attention was assessed. A group of 49 healthy girls performed the task of determining the valence of facial expressions of anger, fear, disgust and joy, complicated by the imposition of words on the images of faces and names of emotions congruent or incongruent to facial expressions. Based on the results of the questionnaires (Spielberger questionnaire, Wein questionnaire and questionnaire of somatic manifestations of depression), using the method of cluster analysis, the subjects were divided into groups differing in 1) the level of anxiety and 2) the degree of autonomic dysfunction. It was shown that in groups of girls with increased anxiety and in groups with pronounced autonomic dysfunction, higher values of the Stroop effect are recorded compared to subjects with a low level of these characteristics. In this case, an increase in anxiety is associated with high values of interference in the Stroop test with the emotion of fear associated with the «self-defense system», and an increase in autonomic dysfunction is associated with high values of interference in the Stroop test with the emotion of disgust associated with the «disease prevention» system.

About the authors

E. S Mikhailova

Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the RAS

Email: esmikhailova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5098-1909
Dr. Sci. (Biology), Principal researcher Moscow, Russian Federation

A. B Kushnir

Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the RAS

Email: naya.kushnir@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4627-9484
Junior Researcher Moscow, Russian Federation

N. Yu Gerasimenko

Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the RAS

Email: nataliagerasimenko@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3864-4509
PhD in Biology, Head of the laboratory Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions // J. Exp. Psychol. 1935. V. 18. № 6. P. 643.
  2. MacLeod C.M. The Stroop task: The «gold standard» of attentional measures // J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1992. V. 121. № 1. P. 12.
  3. Song S., Zilverstand A., Song H. et al. The influence of emotional interference on cognitive control: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies using the emotional Stroop task // Sci. Rep. 2017. V. 7. № 1. P. 2088.
  4. Braem S., Bugg J.M., Schmidt J.R. et al. Measuring adaptive control in conflict tasks // Trends Cogn. Sci. 2019. V. 23. № 9. P. 769.
  5. Algom D., Chajut E. Reclaiming the Stroop Effect back from control to input-driven attention and perception // Front. Psychol. 2019. V. 10. P. 1683.
  6. Стародубцев А.С., Аллахвердов М.В. Роль конфликта ответов и семантического конфликта в возникновении эффекта Струпа // Российский журнал когнитивной науки. 2019. Т. 6. № 4. С. 24.
  7. Hershman R., Sapir A., Keha E. et al. The contribution of difficulty of an irrelevant task to task conflict // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2025. V. 78. № 5. P. 956.
  8. Schouppe N., De Houwer J., Ridderinkhof K.R., Notebaert W. Conflict: Run! Reduced Stroop interference with avoidance responses // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2012. V. 65. № 6. P. 1052.
  9. Kalanthroff E., Henik A., Derakshan N., Usher M. Anxiety, emotional distraction, and attentional control in the Stroop task // Emotion. 2016. V. 16. № 3. P. 293.
  10. Pollatos O., Herbert B.M., Wankner S. et al. Autonomic imbalance is associated with reduced facial recognition in somatoform disorders // J. Psychosom. Res. 2011. V. 71. № 4. P. 232.
  11. Favre P., Polosan M., Pichat C. et al. Cerebral correlates of abnormal emotion conflict processing in euthymic bipolar patients: A functional MRI Study // PloS One. 2015. V. 10. № 8. P. e0134961.
  12. Banich M.T. The Stroop Effect occurs at multiple points along a cascade of control: Evidence from cognitive neuroscience approaches // Front. Psychol. 2019. V. 10. P. 2164.
  13. Parris B.A., Hasshim N., Wadsley M. et al. The loci of Stroop effects: A critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection // Psychol. Res. 2022. V. 86. № 4. P. 1029.
  14. Сысоева Т.А. Эмоциональный эффект Струпа и его связь с эмоциональным интеллектом // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2010. Т. 7. № 4. С. 117.
  15. Klein R.J., Liu T., Diehl D., Robinson M.D. The personality-related implications of Stroop performance: Stress-contingent self-control in daily life // J. Res. Pers. 2017. V. 70. P. 156.
  16. Bar-Haim Y., Lamy D., Pergamin L. et al. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study // Psychol. Bull. 2007. V. 133. № 1. P. 1.
  17. Holmes A., Nielsen M.K., Tipper S., Green S. An electrophysiological investigation into the automaticity of emotional face processing in high versus low trait anxious individuals // Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2009. V. 9. № 3. P. 323.
  18. Wu Y., Ma S., He X. et al. Trait anxiety modulates the temporal dynamics of Stroop task switching: An ERP study // Biol. Psychol. 2021. V. 163. P. 108144.
  19. Becker E.S., Rinck M., Margraf J., Roth W.T. The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders: General emotional or disorder specificity? // J. Anxiety Disord. 2001. V. 15. № 3. P. 147.
  20. Chechko N., Augustin M., Zvyaginisev M. et al. Brain circuitries involved in emotional interference task in major depression disorder // J. Affect. Disord. 2013. V. 149. № 1–3. P. 136.
  21. Williams J.M.G., Watts F.N., MacLeod C., Mathews A. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 1988. 226 p.
  22. Алипов Н.Н., Белякова-Бородина А.И., Гордеев С.А. и др. Исследование вегетативного статуса и эмоционально-личностной сферы студентов-медиков 2 курса // Вестник неврологии, психиатрии и нейрохирургии. 2015. Т. 1. С. 38.
  23. Алипов Н.Н., Гордеев С.А., Присуха Н.С. и др. Взаимосвязь между изменениями уровня тревожности и выраженности вегетативной дисфункции у студентов медиков 2-го курса за период летних каникул // Вестник неврологии, психиатрии и нейрохирургии. 2016. Т. 1. С. 82.
  24. Алипов Н.Н., Гордеев С.А., Присуха Н.С. и др. Психовегетативный профиль у студентов–медиков младших курсов: результаты трехлетнего исследования // Вестник неврологии, психиатрии и нейрохирургии. 2017. Т. 12. С. 25.
  25. Вегетативные расстройства: Клиника, диагностика, лечение / Под ред. Вейн А.М. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство, 2003. 752 с.
  26. Гордеев С.А., Ковров Г.В., Посохов С.И., Катенко С.В. Психофизиологические особенности пароксизмальных расстройств неэпилептической природы // Журн. высш. нервн. деят. им. И.П. Павлова. 2014. Т. 64. № 1. С. 41.
  27. Чутко Л.С., Сурушкина С.Ю., Яковенко Е.А. и др. Нарушения когнитивного контроля у пациентов с соматоформными расстройствами и их лечение // Журн. Неврол. и психиатр. им. С.С. Корсакова. 2019. Т. 119. № 4. С. 32.
  28. Huang W.-L., Liao S.-C., Gau S.S.-F. Association between Stroop tasks and heart rate variability features in patients with somatic symptom disorder // J. Psychiatr. Res. 2021. V. 136. P. 246.
  29. Charash M., McKay D. Attention bias for disgust // J. Anxiety Disord. 2002. V. 16. № 5. P. 529.
  30. Spielberger C., Gorsuch R., Lushene R. et al. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y1 Y2). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.
  31. Beck A.T., Ward C.H., Mendelson M. et al. An inventory for measuring depression // AMA Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1961. V. 4. P. 561.
  32. Langner O., Dotsch R., Bijlsma G. et al. Presentation and validation of the Radboud Face Database // Cogn. Emot. 2010. V. 24. P. 1377.
  33. Etkin A., Egner T., Peraza D.M. et al. Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala // Neuron. 2006. V. 51. № 6. P. 871.
  34. Rey G., Desseilles M., Favre S. et al. Modulation of brain response to emotional conflict as a function of current mood in bipolar disorder: Preliminary findings from a follow-up state-based fMRI study // Psychiatry Res. 2014. V. 223. № 2. P. 84.
  35. Ekman P., Levenson R.W., Friesen W.V. Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions // Science. 1983. V. 221. № 4616. P. 1208.
  36. Smith C.A., Lazarus R.S. Emotion and adaptation // Handbook of personality: Theory and research / Ed. Pervin L.A. New York: The Guilford Press, 1990. P. 609.
  37. Joyal M., Wensing T., Levasseur-Moreau J. et al. Characterizing emotional Stroop interference in posttraumatic stress disorder, major depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis // PloS One. 2019. V. 14. № 4. P. e0214998.
  38. Lago T.R., Blair K.S., Alvarez G. et al. Threat-of-shock decreases emotional interference on affective stroop performance in healthy controls and anxiety patients // Eur. J. Neurosci. 2022. V. 55. № 9–10. P. 2519.
  39. Mogg K., Bradley B. Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness // Cogn. Emot. 2010. V. 13. P. 713.
  40. Rossignol M., Philippot P., Douilliez C. et al. The perception of fearful and happy facial expression is modulated by anxiety: An event-related potential study // Neurosci. Lett. 2005. V. 377. № 2. P. 115.
  41. Fox E., Russo R., Bowles R., Dutton K. Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? // J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2001. V. 130. № 4. P. 681.
  42. Georgiou G.A., Bleakley C., Hayward J. et al. Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces // Vis. Cogn. 2005. V. 12. № 1. P. 145.
  43. Rief W., Broadbent E. Explaining medically unexplained symptoms-models and mechanisms // Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2007. V. 27. № 7. P. 821.
  44. Lim S.-L., Kim J.-H. Cognitive processing of emotional information in depression, panic, and somatoform disorder // J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2005. V. 114. № 1. P. 50.
  45. Oaten M., Stevenson R.J., Case T.I. Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism // Psychol. Bull. 2009. V. 135. № 2. P. 303.
  46. Neuberg S., Kenrick D., Schaller M. Human Threat Management Systems: Self-Protection and Disease Avoidance // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011. V. 35. № 4. P. 1042.
  47. Vermeulen N., Godefroid J., Mermillod M. Emotional modulation of attention: Fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink // PloS One. 2009. V. 4. № 11. P. e7924.
  48. Rozin P., Fallon A.E. A perspective on disgust // Psychol. Rev. 1987. V. 94. № 1. P. 23.
  49. Gray J.A. The psychology of fear and stress. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 422 p.
  50. Krusemark E.A., Li W. Do all threats work the same way? Divergent effects of fear and disgust on sensory perception and attention // J. Neurosci. 2011. V. 31. № 9. P. 3429.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).