Геополимерные материалы: проблемы, достижения и перспективы (обзор)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

В обзоре проанализировано состояние исследований в области разработки геополимерных материалов, представляющих собой продукты щелочной активации алюмосиликатного сырья. Рассмотрены химическая природа процесса формирования геополимеров, основные стадии их получения, факторы, влияющие на прочностные характеристики, а также перспективные направления применения геополимерных материалов. Оценено современное состояние исследований в Российской Федерации и перспективы развития данного направления с учетом имеющегося научно-технического задела и сырьевой базы. Выделены наиболее значимые направления развития работ по получению геополимерных материалов.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Юлия Александровна Аликина

Институт химии силикатов им. И. В. Гребенщикова

Author for correspondence.
Email: morozowa_u_a@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1133-2951

к.х.н.

Russian Federation, 199034, г. Санкт-Петербург, наб. Макарова, д. 2

Андрей Александрович Алексеев

Институт химии силикатов им. И. В. Гребенщикова

Email: morozowa_u_a@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1582-3248
Russian Federation, 199034, г. Санкт-Петербург, наб. Макарова, д. 2

Ольга Юрьевна Голубева

Институт химии силикатов им. И. В. Гребенщикова

Email: morozowa_u_a@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4042-0718

д.х.н.

Russian Federation, 199034, г. Санкт-Петербург, наб. Макарова, д. 2

References

  1. Davidovits J. Geopolymers: Ceramic-like inorganic polymers // J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 2017. V. 8. N 3. P. 335–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.4416/JCST2017-00038
  2. Zandifaez P., Nezhad A. A., Zhou H., Dias-da-Costa D. A systematic review on energy-efficient concrete: Indicators, performance metrics, strategies, and future trends // Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2024. V. 194. ID 114306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114306
  3. Tamta S., Chaudhury R., Sharma U., Thapliyal P. C., Singh L. P. Low-CO2 emission strategies to achieve net zero target in cement sector // J. Clean. Prod. 2023. ID 137466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137466
  4. Farooq F., Jin X., Faisal Javed M., Akbar A., Izhar Shah M., Aslam F., Alyousef R. Geopolymer concrete as sustainable material: A state of the art review // Constr. Build. Mater. 2021. V. 306. ID 124762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124762
  5. Nehdi M. L., Marani A., Zhang L. Is net-zero feasible: Systematic review of cement and concrete decarbonization technologies // Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2024. V. 191. ID 114169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114169
  6. Oh D. Y., Noguchi T., Kitagaki R., Park W. J. CO2 emission reduction by reuse of building material waste in the Japanese cement industry // Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2014. V. 38. P. 796–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.036
  7. Chen C., Habert G., Bouzidi Y., Jullien A. Environmental impact of cement production: Detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation // J. Clean. Prod. 2010. V. 18. P. 478–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.014
  8. Carreño-Gallardo C., Tejeda-Ochoa A., Perez-Ordonez O. I., Ledezma-Sillas J. E., Lardizabal-Gutierrez D., Prieto-Gomez C., Valenzuela-Grado J. A., Hernandez F. R., Herrera-Ramirez J. M. In the CO2 emission remediation by means of alternative geopolymers as substitutes for cements // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018. V. 6. P. 4878–4884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.07.033
  9. Jwaida Z., Dulaimi A., Mashaan N., Othuman Mydin M. A. Geopolymers: The green alternative to traditional materials for engineering applications // Infrastructures. 2023. V. 8. N 6. ID 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8060098
  10. Alam O., Qiao X. An in-depth review on municipal solid waste management, treatment and disposal in Bangladesh // Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020. V. 52. ID 101775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101775
  11. Dahanni H., Ventura A., Le Guen L., Dauvergne M., Orcesi A., Cremona C. Life cycle assessment of cement: Are existing data and models relevant to assess the cement industryʹs climate change mitigation strategies? A literature review // Constr. Build. Mater. 2024. V. 411. ID 134415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134415
  12. Ochoa W. A. A., Málaga M. A. S., Tapia A. B., Calabokis O. P., Nuñez de la Rosa Y. E., Viscarra Chirinos G. E., Pinto Lavayén S. N. Evaluation of compressive and bending strength of a geopolymer based on lateritic clays as an alternative hydraulic binder // Materials. 2024. V. 17. N 2. ID 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020307
  13. Mugahed Amran Y. H., Alyousef R., Alabduljabbar H., El-Zeadani M. Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete: A review // J. Clean. Prod. 2019. V. 251. ID 119679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119679
  14. Esparham A., Ghalatian F. The features of geopolymer concrete as a novel approach for utilization in green urban structures // J. Compos. Compd. 2022. V. 4. P. 89–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jcc.4.2.4
  15. Lopes A., Lopes S., Pinto I. Influence of curing temperature on the strength of a metakaolin-based geopolymer // Materials. 2023. V. 16. N 23. ID 7460. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16237460
  16. Davidovits J. Geopolymer cement review 2013 // Geopolymer Institute: сайт. 2013. https://www.geopolymer.org/library/technical-papers/21-geopolymer-cement-review-2013/
  17. Mostazid M. I. Acid resistance of geopolymer concrete — literature review, knowledge gaps, and future development // J. Brilliant Eng. 2023. V. 4. ID 4875. http://dx.doi.org/10.36937/ben.2023.4875
  18. Albitar M., Mohamed A., Visintin P., Drechsler M. Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes // Constr. Build. Mater. 2017. V. 136 P. 374–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.056
  19. Farooq F., Jin X., Faisal Javed M., Akbar A., Izhar Shah M., Aslam F. Alyousef R. Geopolymer concrete as sustainable material: A state of the art review // Constr. Build. Mater. 2021. V. 306. ID 124762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124762
  20. Voney V., Odaglia P., Brumaud C., Dillenburger B., Habert G. From casting to 3D printing geopolymers: A proof of concept // Cem. Concr. Res. 2021. V. 143. ID 106374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106374
  21. Huang G., Ji Y., Li J., Hou Z., Jin C. Use of slaked lime and Portland cement to improve the resistance of MSWI bottom ash-GBFS geopolymer concrete against carbonation // Constr. Build. Mater. 2018. V. 166. P. 290–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.089
  22. Kurtoglu A. E., Alzeebaree R., Aljumaili O., Nis A., Gulsan M. E., Humur G., Cevik A. Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash and slag based geopolymer concrete // Adv. Concr. Constr. 2018. V. 6. ID 345. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/acc.2018.6.4.345
  23. Mehta A., Siddique R. Sustainable geopolymer concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash: Strength and permeability properties // J. Clean. Prod. 2018. V. 205. P. 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.313
  24. Venkatesan R. P., Pazhani K. C. Strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete made with ground granulated blast furnace slag and black rice husk ash // KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2016. V. 20. P. 2384–2391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0564-0
  25. Adak D., Sarkar M., Mandal S. Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete // Constr. Build. Mater. 2017. V. 135. P. 430–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.111
  26. Jiang X., Xiao R., Zhang M., Hu W., Bai Y., Huang B. A laboratory investigation of steel to fly ash-based geopolymer paste bonding behavior after exposure to elevated temperatures // Constr. Build. Mater. 2020. V. 254. ID 119267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119267
  27. Mehta A., Siddique R. Sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete // Constr. Build. Mater. 2017. V. 146. P. 136–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.077
  28. Nuaklong P., Sata V., Chindaprasirt P. Properties of metakaolin-high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled aggregate from crushed concrete specimens // Constr. Build. Mater. 2018. V. 161. P. 365–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.152
  29. Mucsi G., Szabó R., Ambrus M., Kovács B. The development of fly ash-red mud based geopolymer // Anal. Tech. Szeged. 2018. V. 12. N 1. P. 30–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2018.1.30-38
  30. Saba M., Perez G., Coma J., Polls M. Geopolymer as an innovative material for green roofs — a state-of-the-art Review // E3S Web Conf. 2023. V. 436. ID 08017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343608017
  31. Palomo A., Krivenko P., Garcia-Lodeiro I., Kavalerova E., Maltseva O., Fernández-Jiménez A. A review on alkaline activation: New analytical perspectives // Mater. De Construcción. 2014. V. 64. ID e022. https://dx.doi.org/10.3989/mc.2014.00314
  32. Aldred J., Day J. Is geopolymer concrete a suitable alternative to traditional concrete? // Proceedings of the 37th conf. on our world in concrete & structures. Singapore, 29–31 august 2012. P. 1–14.
  33. Almutairi A. L., Tayeh B. A., Adesina A., Isleem H. F., Zeyad A. M. Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review // Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021. V. 15. ID e00733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733
  34. Sbahieh S., McKay G., Al-Ghamdi S. G. Comprehensive analysis of geopolymer materials: Properties, environmental impacts, and applications // Materials. 2023. V. 16. ID 7363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16237363
  35. Imtiaz L., Rehman S. K. U., Ali Memon S., Khizar Khan M., Faisal Javed M. A review of recent developments and advances in eco-friendly geopolymer concrete // Appl. Sci. 2020. V. 10. ID 7838. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10217838
  36. Davidovits J. Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials // J. Therm. Anal. 1989. V. 35. P. 429–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01904446
  37. Provis J. L., Bernal S. A. Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials // Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2014. V. 44. P. 299–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515
  38. De Oliveira L. B., de Azevedo A. R. G., Marvila M. T., Pereira E. C., Fediuk R., Vieira C. M. F. Durability of geopolymers with industrial waste // Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022. V. 16. ID e00839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00839
  39. Duxson P., Fernández-Jiménez A., Provis J. L., Lukey G. C., Palomo A., Van Deventer J. S. J. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art // J. Mater. Sci. 2007. V. 42. P. 2917–2933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
  40. Singh N. B., Middendorf B. Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview // Constr. Build. Mater. 2020. V. 237. ID 117455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455
  41. Garcia-Lodeiro I., Palomo A., Fernández-Jiménez A. An overview of the chemistry of alkali-activated cement-based binders: Handbook of alkali-activated cements, Mortars and Concretes / Eds F. Pacheco-Torgal, J. A. Labrincha, C. Leonelli, A. Palomo, P. Chindaprasirt. Cambridge, UK: Elsevier, 2015. P. 19–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9781782422884.1.19
  42. Wu Y., Lu B., Yi Z., Du F., Zhang Y. The properties and latest application of geopolymers // IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019. V. 472. ID 012029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/472/1/012029
  43. Davidovits J. Geopolymer chemistry and sustainable development. The polysialate terminology: A very useful and simple model // The international workshop on geopolymer cements and concrete for the promotion and understanding of green-chemistry. Australia, 2005. P. 9–15.
  44. Castillo H., Collado H., Droguett T., Sánchez S., Vesely M., Garrido P., Palma S. Factors affecting the compressive strength of geopolymers: A review // Minerals. 2021. V. 11. ID 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11121317
  45. Negahban E., Bagheri A., Sanjayan J. Investigation of abrasion resistance of geopolymer concrete cured in ambient temperature for pavement applications // Road Materials and Pavement Design. 2023. V. 24. N 11. P. 2641–2662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2022.2161934
  46. Petermann J. C., Saeed A., Hammons M. I. Alkali-activated geopolymers: A literature review // Eng. Mater. Sci. 2010. ID. 99. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada559113
  47. Rangan B. V. Engineering properties of geopolymer concrete (Geopolymers). Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publ., 2009. P. 211–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9781845696382.2.211
  48. Cheah C. B., Samsudin M. H., Ramli M., Part W. K., Tan L. E. The use of high calcium wood ash in the preparation of ground granulated blast furnace slag and pulverized fly ash geopolymers: A complete microstructural and mechanical characterization // J. Clean. Prod. 2017. V. 156. P. 114–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.026
  49. Глуховский В. Д. Грунтосиликаты. Киев: Госстройиздат УССР, 1959. C. 127.
  50. Shi C., Jiménez A. F., Palomo A. New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement // Cem. Concr. Res. 2011. V. 41. P. 750–763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016
  51. Fernández-Jiménez A., Vallepu R., Terai T., Palomo A., Ikeda K. Synthesis and thermal behavior of different aluminosilicate gels // J. Non-Cryst. Solids. V. 2006. N 352. P. 2061–2066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.03.037
  52. Duxson P., Provis J. L., Lukey G. C., Van Deventer J. S. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of «green concrete» // Cem. Concr. Res. 2007. V. 37. P. 1590–1597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018
  53. Duxson P., Provis J. L., Lukey G. C., Mallicoat S. W., Kriven W. M., Van Deventer J. S. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties // Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005. V. 269. N 1–3. P. 47–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060
  54. Van Deventer J. S. J., Provis J. L., Duxson P., Lukey G. C. Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products // J. Hazard. Mater. 2007. V. 139. P. 506–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.044
  55. Poulesquen A., Frizon F., Lambertin D. Rheological behavior of alkali-activated metakaolin during geopolymerization // J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2011. V. 357. N 21. P. 3565–3571. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jnoncrysol.2011.07.013
  56. Steins P., Poulesquen A., Diat O., Frizon F. Structural evolution during geopolymerization from an early age to consolidated material // Langmuir. 2012. V. 28. N 22. P. 8502–8510. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300868v
  57. Yatsenko E. A., Goltsman B. M., Novikov Y. V., Trofimov S. V., Ryabova A. V., Smoliy V. A., Klimova L. V. Recycling of coal combustion waste through production of foamed geopolymers with improved strength // Sustainability. 2023. V. 15. ID 16296. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su152316296
  58. Zhang B., Yu T., Guo H., Chen J., Liu Y., Yuan P. Effect of the SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio on the microstructure and properties of clay-based geopolymers: A comparative study of kaolinite-based and halloysite-based geopolymers // Clays Clay Miner. 2022. V. 70. P. 882–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42860-023-00223-x
  59. Герасимов А. М., Устинов И. Д., Зырянова О. В. Использование глиносодержащих отходов в качестве пуццолановых добавок // Зап. Горн. ин-та. 2023. Т. 260. С. 313–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2023.33 [Gerasimov A. M., Ustinov I. D., Zyryanova O. V. Use of clay-containing waste as pozzolanic additives // J. Mining Inst. 2023. N 260. P. 313–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2023.33].
  60. Khizar M. S., Reddy M., Kavuri N. C., Khed V. C. Possibilities of bentonite based geopolymer concrete: A review // AIP Conf. Proceedings. 2023. V. 2759. N 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0144106
  61. Khawaji M. Hydration, microstructure, and properties of fly ash-based geopolymer: A review // Mater. Sci. Poland. 2023. V. 41. N 2. P. 263–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/msp-2023-0006
  62. Driouich A., El Hassani S. A., Sor N. H., Zmirli Z., Mydin M. A. O., Aziz A., Chaair H. Mix design optimization of metakaolin-slag-based geopolymer concrete synthesis using RSM // Results Eng. 2023. V. 20. ID 101573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101573
  63. Freire C. B., dos Santos B. L. D., de Miranda I. L. F., Rodrigues M. A., Lameiras F. S. Influence of the kaolinite calcination conditions on the compressive strength of geopolymer // KnE Eng. 2020. P. 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/keg.v5i4.6790
  64. Kütük N. Çetinkaya S. Alkaline activation synthesis by graphite/calcite mortar and the effect of experimental conditions on compressive strength // J. Australas. Ceram. Soc. 2023. V. 59. N 5. P. 1349–1359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41779-023-00915-6
  65. Slaný M., Kuzielová E., Žemlička M., Matejdes M., Struhárová A., Palou M. T. Metabentonite and metakaolin-based geopolymers/zeolites: Relation between kind of clay, calcination temperature and concentration of alkaline activator // J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2023. V. 148. P. 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12267-1
  66. Jaimes J. E., Montaño A. M., González C. P. Geopolymer derived from bentonite: Structural characterization and evaluation as a potential sorbent of ammonium in waters // J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2020. V. 1587. N 1. ID 012008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1587/1/012008
  67. Baykara H., Mendoza Solorzano M. D. L., Delgado Echeverria J. J., Cornejo M. H., Tapia-Bastidas C. V. The use of zeolite-based geopolymers as adsorbent for copper removal from aqueous media // R. Soc. Open Sci. 2022. V. 9. N 3. ID 211644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211644
  68. Nikolov A., Rostovsky I., Nugteren H. Geopolymer materials based on natural zeolite // Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2017. V. 6. P. 198–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2017.03.001
  69. Чекмарев А. С., Сео Д. К., Скорина Т. В., Чекмарева Г. Д. Получение геополимерных материалов с применением природных компонентов // Вестн. Казан. технол. ун-та. 2012. Т. 15. № 20. С. 50–55. https://www.elibrary.ru/pjexrb
  70. Lahoti M., Narang P., Tan K. H., Yang E.-H. Mix design factors and strength prediction of metakaolin-based geopolymer // Ceram. Int. 2017. V. 43. P. 11433–11441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.006
  71. Chen X., Mondal P. Effects of NaOH amount on condensation mechanism to form aluminosilicate, case study of geopolymer gel synthesized via sol-gel method // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 96. P. 589–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10971-020-05360-6
  72. Duxson P., Lukey G. C., Separovic F., van Deventer J. S. J. Effect of alkali cations on aluminum incorporation in geopolymeric gels // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005. V. 44. P. 832–839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0494216
  73. Lahoti M., Yang E.-H., Tan K. H. Influence of mix design parameters on geopolymer mechanical properties and microstructure // Advances in bioceramics and porous ceramics II. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. V. 37. P. 21–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119321811.ch3
  74. Gado R. A., Hebda M., Łach M., Mikuła J. Alkali activation of waste clay bricks: Influence of the silica modulus, SiO2/Na2O, H2O/Na2O molar ratio, and liquid/solid ratio // Materials. 2020. V. 13. ID 383. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13020383
  75. Duxson P., Provis J., Lukey G. C., Mallicoat S. W., Kriven W. M., Van Deventer J. S. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties // Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005. V. 269. P. 47–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060
  76. Wan Q., Rao F., Song S., García R. E., Estrella R. M., Patiño C. A. L., Zhang Y. Geopolymerization reaction, microstructure and simulation of metakaolin-based geopolymers at extended Si/Al ratios // Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017. V. 79. P. 45–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.014
  77. Perera D. S., Uchida O., Vance E. R., Finnie K. S. Influence of curing schedule on the integrity of geopolymers // J. Mater. Sci. 2007. V. 42. P. 3099–3106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0533-6
  78. Steveson M., Sagoe-Crentsil K. Relationships between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers // J. Mater. Sci. 2005. V. 40. P. 2023–2036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1226-2
  79. Zribi M., Samet B., Baklouti S. Effect of curing temperature on the synthesis, structure and mechanical properties of phosphatebased geopolymers // J. Non Cryst. Solids. 2019. V. 511. ID 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.032
  80. Heah C., Kamarudin H., Al Bakri A. M., Binhussain M., Luqman M., Nizar I. K., Ruzaidi C., Liew Y. M. Effect of curing profile on kaolin-based geopolymers // Phys. Procedia. 2011. V. 22. P. 305–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.048
  81. Cheng H., Lin K.-L., Cui R., Hwang C.-L., Chang Y.-M., Cheng T.-W. The effects of SiO2/Na2O molar ratio on the characteristics of alkali-activated waste catalyst–metakaolin based geopolymers // Constr. Build. Mater. 2015. V. 95. P. 710–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.028
  82. Singh G. B., Subramaniam K. V. Evaluation of sodium content and sodium hydroxide molarity on compressive strength of alkali activated low-calcium fly ash // Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017. V. 81. P. 122–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.001
  83. Tian X., Xu W., Song S., Rao F., Xia L. Effects of curing temperature on the compressive strength and microstructure of copper tailing-based geopolymers // Chemosphere. 2020. V. 253. ID 126754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126754
  84. Muñiz-Villarreal M. S., Manzano-Ramírez A., Sampieri-Bulbarela S., Gasca-Tirado J. R., Reyes-Araiza J. L., Rubio-Ávalos J. C., Pérez-Bueno J. J., Apatiga L. M., Zaldivar-Cadena A., Amigó V. The effect of temperature on the geopolymerization process of a metakaolin-based geopolymer // Mater. Lett. 2011. V. 65. P. 995–998. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.matlet.2010.12.049
  85. Ghafoor M. T., Khan Q. S., Qazi A. U., Sheikh M. N., Hadi M. Influence of alkaline activators on the mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature // Constr. Build. Mater. 2021. V. 273. ID 121752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121752
  86. Al-Zboon K., Al-Harahsheh M., Hani F. B. Fly ash-based geopolymer for Pb removal from aqueous solution // J. Hazard. Mater. 2011. V. 188. P. 414–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.133
  87. Gharzouni A., Joussein E., Samet B., Baklouti S., Rossignol S. Effect of the reactivity of alkaline solution and metakaolin on geopolymer formation // J. Non Cryst. Solids. 2015. V. 410. P. 127–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.021
  88. Nematollahi B., Sanjayan J. Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer // Mater. Des. 2014. V. 57. P. 667–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.064
  89. Duxson P., Mallicoat S., Lukey G., Kriven W., van Deventer J. The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers // Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007. V. 292. P. 8–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.05.044
  90. Liew Y.-M., Heah C.-Y., Mustafa A. B. M., Kamarudin H. Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review // Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016. V. 83. P. 595–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.002
  91. Xia M., Sanjayan J. Method of formulating geopolymer for 3D printing for construction applications // Mater. Des. 2016. V. 110. P. 382–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.136
  92. Ma S., Zhang Z., Liu X. Comprehensive understanding of aluminosilicate phosphate geopolymers: A critical review // Materials. 2022. V. 15. ID 5961. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15175961
  93. Perera D. S., Hanna J. V., Davis J., Blackford M. G., Latella B. A., Sasaki Y., Vance E. R. Relative strengths of phosphoric acid-reacted and alkali-reacted metakaolin materials // J. Mater. Sci. 2008. V. 43. P. 6562–6566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2913-6
  94. Tchakouté H. K., Rüscher C. H. Mechanical and microstructural properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer cements from sodium waterglass and phosphoric acid solution as hardeners: A comparative study // Appl. Clay Sci. 2017. V. 140. P. 81–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15082957
  95. Lin H., Liu H., Li Y., Kong X. Properties and reaction mechanism of phosphoric acid activated metakaolin geopolymer at varied curing temperatures // Cem. Concr. Res. 2021. V. 144. ID 106425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106425
  96. Zribi M., Baklouti S. Phosphate-based geopolymers: A critical review // Polym. Bull. 2022. V. 79. N 9. P. 6827–6855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03829-0
  97. Cheremisina O. V., Gorbacheva A. A., Balandinsky D. A., Luo Yinzhou, Ponomareva M. A. Synergistic effect of a mixture of ethoxyphosphoric esters and sodium oleate in aqueous solutions // Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024. V. 685. ID 133314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133314
  98. Ranjbar N., Kuenzel C., Gundlach C., Kempen P., Mehrali M. Halloysite reinforced 3D-printable geopolymers // Cement and Concrete Composites. 2023. V. 136. ID 104894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104894
  99. Kozub B., Pławecka K., Figiela B., Korniejenko K. Geopolymer fly ash composites modified with cotton fibre // Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2023. V. 121. N 2. P. 60–70. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.8487
  100. Wong L. S. Durability performance of geopolymer concrete: A review // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. ID 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050868
  101. Калинкин А. М., Калинкина Е. В., Кругляк Е. А., Иванова А. Г. Применение механоактивации для получения геополимерных материалов на основе золоотходов сжигания угля с добавками карбонатных минералов // Тр. Кольского науч. центра РАН. Сер.: Технические науки. 2023. Т. 14. № 4. С. 168–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.31241/FNS.2020.17.045
  102. Azunna S. U., Aziz F. N., Al-Ghazali N. A., Rashid R. S., Bakar N. A. Review on the mechanical properties of rubberized geopolymer concrete // Clean. Mater. 2024. ID 100225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2024.100225
  103. Medri V., Fabbri S., Dedecek J., Sobalik Z., Tvaruzkova Z., Vaccari A. Role of the morphology and the dehydroxylation of metakaolins on geopolymerization // Appl. Clay Sci. 2010. V. 50. N 4. P. 538–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.10.010
  104. Osman A. Y., Irshidat M. R. Development of sustainable geopolymer composites for repair application: Workability and setting time evaluation // Mater. Today: Proc. 2023 (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.683
  105. Wan Q., Rao F., Song S., León-Patiño C. A. Geothermal clay-based geopolymer binders: Synthesis and microstructural characterization // Appl. Clay Sci. 2017. V. 146. P. 223–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.047
  106. Chairunnisa N., Haryanti N. H., Nurwidayati R., Pratiwi A. Y., Arnandha Y., Saputra Y., Hazizah N. Characteristics of fly ash as a constituent material for geopolymer // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023. V. 2623. N 1. ID 012005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2623/1/012005
  107. Ma J., Zhang H., Wan D., Wang H., Chen G. Rheological properties of cement paste containing ground fly ash based on particle morphology analysis // Crystals. 2022. V. 12. ID 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040524
  108. Churchman G. J., Pasbakhsh P. Natural mineral nanotubes: Properties and applications. 1st. Ed. Florida: CRC Press, 2015. P. 498. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18107
  109. Joussein E., Petit S., Churchman J., Theng B., Righi D., Delvaux B. Halloysite clay minerals — a review // Clay Miner. 2005. V. 40. P. 383–426. https://doi.org/10.1180/0009855054040180
  110. Yuan P., Thill A., Bergaya F. Nanosized tubular clay minerals: Halloysite and imogolite. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016. P. 778.
  111. Ouattara S., Sorgho B., Sawadogo M., Sawadogo Y., Seynou M., Blanchart P., Gomina M., Zerbo, L. Development and characterization of geopolymers based on kaolinitic clay // Sci. J. Chem. 2021. V. 9. ID 160. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20210906.15
  112. Ghosh M., Karmakar D., Basu S., Jha S. N., Bhattacharyya D., Gadkari S. C., Gupta S. K. Effect of size and aspect ratio on structural parameters and evidence of shape transition in zinc oxide nanostructures // J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2014. V. 75. P. 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2013.11.007
  113. Liu J., Doh J., Dinh H. L., Ong D. E. L., Zi G., You I. Efect of Si/Al molar ratio on the strength behavior of geopolymer derived from various industrial waste: A current state of the art review // Constr. Build. Mater. 2022. V. 329. ID 127134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2022.127134
  114. Golubeva O. Yu., Alikina Yu. A., Kalashnikova T. A. Influence of hydrothermal synthesis conditions on the morphology and sorption properties of porous aluminosilicates with kaolinite and halloysite structures // Appl. Clay Sci. 2020. V. 199. ID 105879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2020.105879
  115. Golubeva O. Yu., Alikina Yu. A., Khamova T. V., Vladimirova E. V., Shamova O. V. Aluminosilicate nanosponges: Synthesis, properties, and application prospects // Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 60. N 22. P. 17008–17018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02122
  116. Golubeva O. Yu. Alikina Yu. A. Brazovskaya E. Yu. Vasilenko N. M. Adsorption properties and hemolytic activity of porous aluminosilicates in a simulated body fluid // ChemEng. 2022. V. 6. ID 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering6050078
  117. Golubeva O. Y., Alikina Y. A., Brazovskaya E. Y. Particles morphology impact on cytotoxicity, hemolytic activity and sorption properties of porous aluminosilicates of kaolinite group // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. ID 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152559
  118. Wang K., Le H. The development of cement-based, intumescent and geopolymer fire-retardation coatings for metal structures: A review // Coatings. 2023. V. 13. ID 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030495
  119. Łach M., Róg G., Ochman K., Pławecka K., Bąk A., Korniejenko K. Assessment of adhesion of geopolymer and varnished coatings by the pull-off method // Eng. 2022. V. 3. P. 42–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/eng3010005
  120. Novotný J., Jaskevič M., Mamoń F., Mareš J., Horký R., Houška P. Manufacture and characterization of geopolymer coatings deposited from suspensions on aluminium substrates // Coatings. 2022. V. 12. ID 1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111695
  121. Łach M., Bąk A., Pławecka K., Hebdowska-Krupa M. Possibility of using a geopolymer containing phase change materials as a sprayed insulating coating — Preliminary results // Emerg. Sci. Innovation. 2024. V. 2. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46604/emsi.2023.11989
  122. Jamaludin L., Razak R. A., Abdullah M. M. A. B., Vizureanu P., Bras A., Imjai, T., Sandu A. V., Rahim S. Z. B. A., Yong H. C. The suitability of photocatalyst precursor materials in geopolymer coating applications: A review // Coatings. 2022. V. 12. ID 1348. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings12091348
  123. Jamaludin L., Razak R. A., Al Bakri Abdullah M. M., Vizureanu P., Sandu A. V., Abd Rahim S. Z., Ahmad R. Solid-to-liquid ratio influenced on adhesion strength of metakaolin geopolymer coating paste added photocatalyst materials // Coatings. 2023. V. 13. ID 236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020236
  124. Ettahiri Y., Bouargane B., Fritah K., Akhsassi B., Pérez-Villarejo L., Aziz A., Bouna L., Benlhachemi A., Novais R. M. A state-of-the-art review of recent advances in porous geopolymer: Applications in adsorption of inorganic and organic contaminants in water // Constr. Build. Mater. 2023. V. 395. ID 132269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132269
  125. Innocentini M. D., Botti R. F., Bassi P. M., Paschoalato C. F., Flumignan D. L., Franchin G., Colombo P. Lattice-shaped geopolymer catalyst for biodiesel synthesis fabricated by additive manufacturing // Ceram. Int. 2019. V. 45. P. 1443–1446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.239
  126. Sharma S., Medpelli D., Chen S., Seo D. K. Calcium-modified hierarchically porous aluminosilicate geopolymer as a highly efficient regenerable catalyst for biodiesel production // RSC Adv. 2015. V. 5. P. 65454–65461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA01823D
  127. Falah M., MacKenzie K. J. D. Synthesis and properties of novel photoactive composites of P25 titanium dioxide and copper (I) oxide with inorganic polymers // Ceram. Int. 2015. V. 41. P. 13702–13708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.198
  128. Sazama P., Bortnovsky O., Dědeček J., Tvarůžková Z., Sobalík Z. Geopolymer based catalysts — new group of catalytic materials // Catal. Today. 2011. V. 164. P. 92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.09.008
  129. Cantarel V., Motooka T., Yamagishi I. Geopolymers and their potential applications in the nuclear waste management field-a bibliographical study // JAEA Rev. 2017. V. 14. P. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.11484/jaea-review-2017-014
  130. Kudłacik-Kramarczyk S., Drabczyk A., Figiela B., Korniejenko K. Geopolymers: Advanced materials in medicine, energy, anticorrosion and environmental protection // Materials. 2023. V. 16. ID 7416. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16237416
  131. Pangdaeng S., Sata V., Aguiar J. B., Pacheco-Torgal F., Chindaprasirt J., Chindaprasirt P. Bioactivity enhancement of calcined kaolin geopolymer with CaCl2 treatment // Sci. Asia. 2016. V. 42. P. 407–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2016.42.407
  132. Forsgren J., Pedersen C., Strømme M., Engqvist H. Synthetic geopolymers for controlled delivery of oxycodone: Adjustable and nanostructured porosity enables tunable and sustained drug release // PLoS ONE. 2011. V. 6. ID e17759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017759
  133. Jämstorp E., Strømme M., Frenning G. Modeling structure–function relationships for diffusive drug transport in inert porous geopolymer matrices // J. Pharm. Sci. 2011. V. 100. P. 4338–4348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22636
  134. Radhi H. A. A., Ahmad M. A. Biological test of porous geopolymer as a bone substitute // J. Med. Chem. Sci. 2023. V. 6. P. 710–719. https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2023.4.2
  135. Faza Y., Harmaji A., Takarini V., Hasratiningsih Z., Cahyanto A. Synthesis of porous metakaolin geopolymer as bone substitute materials // Key Eng. Mater. 2019. V. 829. P. 182–187. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.829.182
  136. Ngo T. D., Kashani A., Imbalzano G., Nguyen K. T., Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges // Composites. Part B. 2018. V. 143. P. 172–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  137. Archez J., Texier-Mandoki N., Bourbon X., Caron J. F., Rossignol S. Shaping of geopolymer composites by 3D printing // J. Build. Eng. 2021. V. 34. ID 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101894
  138. Zhong H., Zhang M. 3D printing geopolymers: A review // Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022. V. 128. ID 104455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104455
  139. Panda B., Unluer C., Tan M. J. Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing // Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018. V. 94. P. 307–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.002
  140. Bong S. H., Xia M., Nematollahi B., Shi C. Ambient temperature cured «just-add-water» geopolymer for 3D concrete printing applications // Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021. V. 121. ID 104060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104060
  141. Buswell R. A., De Silva W. L., Jones S. Z., Dirrenberger J. 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research // Cem. Сoncr. Res. 2018. V. 112. P. 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006
  142. Li V. C., Bos F. P., Yu K., McGee W., Ng T. Y., Figueiredo S. C., Nefsb K., Mechtcherined V., Nerellad V. N., Pane J., van Zijlf G. P. A. G., Kruger P. J. On the emergence of 3D printable engineered, strain hardening cementitious composites (ECC/SHCC) // Cem. Concr. Res. 2020. V. 132. ID 106038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106038
  143. Le T. T., Austin S. A., Lim S., Buswell R. A., Gibb A. G., Thorpe T. Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete // Mater. Struct. 2012. V. 45. P. 1221–1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z
  144. Lv C., Shen H., Liu J., Wu D., Qu E., Liu S. Properties of 3D printing fiber-reinforced geopolymers based on interlayer bonding and anisotropy // Materials. 2022. V. 15. ID 8032. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15228032
  145. Łach M., Kluska B., Janus D., Kabat D., Pławecka K., Korniejenko K., Guigou M. D., Choińska M. Effect of fiber reinforcement on the compression and flexural strength of fiber-reinforced geopolymers // Appl. Sci. 2021. V. 11. ID 10443. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110443
  146. Кожухова Н. И. Опыт производства ячеистых бетонов на основе геополимерных вяжущих // Вестн. БГТУ им. В. Г. Шухова. 2023. № 4. С. 8–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.34031/2071-7318-2023-8-4-8-23
  147. Lazorenko G., Kasprzhitskii A., Shaikh F., Krishna R. S., Mishra J. Utilization potential of mine tailings in geopolymers: Physicochemical and environmental aspects // Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021. V. 147. P. 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.028
  148. Lazorenko G., Kasprzhitskii A. Geopolymer additive manufacturing: A review // Addit. Manuf. 2022. V. 55. ID 102782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102782
  149. Ерошкина Н. А., Коровкин М. О. Геополимерные строительные материалы на основе промышленных отходов: моногр. Пенза: ПГУАС, 2014. C. 128.
  150. Yatsenko E. A., Goltsman B. M., Novikov Y. V., Trofimov S. V., Ryabova A. V., Smoliy V. A., Klimova L. V. Recycling of coal combustion waste through production of foamed geopolymers with improved strength // Sustainability. 2023. V. 15. N 23. ID 16296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316296
  151. Kozhukhova N. I., Chizhov R. V., Zhernovsky I. V., Strokova V. V. Structure formation of geopolymer perlite binder vs. type of alkali activating agent // Int. J. Pharm. Technol. 2016. V. 8. N. 3. P. 15338–15348. https://www.elibrary.ru/xfphgn
  152. Kozhukhova N., Kozhukhova M., Teslya A., Nikulin I. The effect of different modifying methods on physical, mechanical and thermal performance of cellular geopolymers as thermal insulation materials for building structures // Buildings. 2022. V. 12. N 2. ID 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020241
  153. Kozhukhova N., Zhernovsky I., Fomina E., Bondareva E. Effect of phase and nano-sized heterogeneity of vitreous phase in low-calcium aluminosilicates on strength properties of geopolymer binders // 5th Int. symp. on nanotechnology in construction NICOM5. Chicago, USA, 2015. P. 24–25.
  154. Lazorenko G., Kasprzhitskii A., Kruglikov A., Mischinenko V., Yavna V. Sustainable geopolymer composites reinforced with flax tows // Ceram. Int. 2020. V. 46. N 8. P. 12870–12875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.184
  155. Lazorenko G., Kasprzhitskii A., Yavna V., Mischinenko V., Kukharskii A., Kruglikov A., Yalovega G. Effect of pre-treatment of flax tows on mechanical properties and microstructure of natural fiber reinforced geopolymer composites // Environ. Technol. Innovation. 2020. V. 20. ID 101105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101105
  156. Lazorenko G., Kasprzhitskii A., Mischinenko V., Kruglikov A. Fabrication and characterization of metakaolin-based geopolymer composites reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils // Mater. Lett. 2022. V. 308. ID 131146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131146
  157. Лазоренко Г. И. Технологии стабилизация глинистых грунтов с применением наноматериалов // Инж. вестн. Дона. 2018. № 1. С. 107–120. https://www.elibrary.ru/utlawm
  158. Lazorenko G., Kasprzhitskii A., Mischinenko V. Rubberized geopolymer composites: Effect of filler surface treatment // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021. V. 9. N 4. ID 105601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105601
  159. Белоусов П. Е., Крупская В. В. Бентонитовые глины России и стран ближнего зарубежья // Георесурсы. 2019. Т. 21. № 3. С. 79–90. https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2019.3.79-90. [Belousov P. E., Krupskaya V. V. Bentonite clays of Russia and neighboring countries // Georesursy = Georesources. 2019. V. 21. N 3. P. 79–90. https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2019.3.79-90].
  160. Ситнова М. Обзор рынка каолина в СНГ // Горный информационно-аналитический бюллетень (науч.-техн. журн). 2007. № 10. С. 375–380. https://www.elibrary.ru/ibzyyh
  161. Смирнов П. В. Результаты комплексных исследований вещественного состава диатомитов Ирбитского месторождения // Изв. ТПУ. Инжиниринг георесурсов. 2016. Т. 327. № 6. С. 93–104.
  162. Парфенова Л. М., Бозылев В. В., Шведов А. П., Высоцкая М. Н. Режимы и способы активации золошлаковых отходов теплоэлектростанций // Вестн. Полоцкого ГУ. Сер. F. Строительство. Прикл. науки. 2016. №. 8. С. 57–60. https://www.elibrary.ru/xhndgr

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Geopolymer materials obtained on the basis of natural kaolinite, bentonite, fly ash and synthetic kaolinite (authors’ materials).

Download (217KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the formation of different morphologies of aluminosilicates of the kaolinite subgroup.

Download (162KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Micrographs of kaolinite particles with different morphologies: a — spheres (authors’ material), b — plates (authors’ material), c — sponges [116], [1] d — tubes [117]. [2]

Download (443KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Scheme II

Download (104KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies