Structure and Kinetic Properties of a Molten FLiBe Mixture with Tritium

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

A study is performed of the self-diffusion of tritium and fluorine atoms, and the change in the structure of molten FLiBe upon raising the temperature of the system from 873 to 1073 K. The interaction between neutrons and both lithium and beryllium in molten-salt reactors (MSR) using FLiBe as a fuel salt results in the formation of large amounts of tritium. Tritium, which easily penetrates metallic structural materials at high temperatures, is a radionuclide hazard. Predictive models for the behavior of tritium in a molten fluoride salt must therefore be developed to solve the problem of MSR safety. The emergence of tritium in the system increases the average energy of interatomic bonds upon raising the temperature and concentration of tritium in the system. A rise in temperature is also accompanied by fluorine atoms creating a closer short-range order in the environment of tritium atoms. This is expressed in the formation of a high first peak of radial distribution function gT-F(r), an increase in the number of probable geometric neighbors, which is shown by Voronoi polyhedra, and fluorine atoms giving priority to fourth-order rotational symmetry in the environment of tritium atoms.

作者简介

A. Galashev

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch; Ural Federal University

Email: galashev@ihte.uran.ru
620137, Yekaterinburg, Russia; 620075, Yekaterinburg, Russia

A. Anisimov

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch

Email: galashev@ihte.uran.ru
620137, Yekaterinburg, Russia

A. Vorob’ev

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: galashev@ihte.uran.ru
620137, Yekaterinburg, Russia

参考

  1. Yu S.H., Liu Y.F., Yang P. et al. // NUCL. SCI. TECH. 2021. V. 32. № 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00844-0
  2. Nasser S.A., Shayan M.E., Ghasemzadeh F. et al. Nuclear Power Plants – The Processes from the Cradle to the Grave, 2021, 166 c. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90939
  3. Shishido H., Yusa N., Hashizume H. et al. // Fussion Sci. Technol. 2017. V. 68. P. 669–673. https://doi.org/10.13182/FST14-975
  4. Redkin A., Khudorozhkova A., Il’ina E. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2021. V. 341. P. 117215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117215
  5. Tkacheva O.Yu., Rudenko A.V., Kataev A.A. et al. // RUSS J NON-FERR MET+. 2022. V. 63. P. 272–283. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821222030117
  6. Dolan K., Zheng G., Sun K. et al. // Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2021. V. 131. P. 103576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103576
  7. Wang H., Yue B., Yan L. et al. // J. Mol. Liquids 2022. V. 345. № 117027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117027
  8. Stempien J.D., Ballinger R.G., Forsberg C.W. // Nucl. Eng. Design 2016. V. 310. P. 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.10.051
  9. Qin H., Wang C., Zhang D. et al. // Prog. Nucl. Energy 2019. V. 117. № 103064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103064
  10. Cantor S., Ward W.T., Moynihan C.T. // J. Chem. Phys. 1969. V. 50. P. 2874.
  11. Soler J.M., Artacho E., Gale J.D. et al. // J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2002. V. 14. P. 2745. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302
  12. Perdew J.P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996. V. 77. P. 3865.
  13. Nose S. // J. Chem. Phys. 1984. V. 81. P. 511.
  14. Karki B.B., Bhattari D., Stixrude L. // Phys. Rev. 2006. V. 73. № 174208.
  15. Галашев А.Е. // ЖФХ 2022. Т. 96. № 12. С. 1815. [Galashev A.E. Rus. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2022. V. 96. P. 2748.]
  16. Galashev A.Y., Zaikov Yu.P. // J. Appl. Electrochem. 2019. V. 49. P. 1027–1034.
  17. Philippi F., Welton T. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021. V. 23. P. 6993–7021. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP00216C
  18. Galashev A.Y. // Appl. Sci. 2023. V. 13. P. 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13021085
  19. Calderoni P., Sharpe P., Hara M. et al. // Fusion Eng. Design 2008. V. 83. P. 1331–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.05.016
  20. Lam S.T., Li Q.-J., Mailoa J. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021. V. 9. P. 1784–1794. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA10576G
  21. Pekar M. // ChemPhysChem. 2015. V. 16. P. 884–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201402778
  22. Galashev A.Y. // Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.12.029

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2.

下载 (778KB)
3.

下载 (395KB)
4.

下载 (233KB)
5.

下载 (140KB)
6.

下载 (130KB)
7.

下载 (68KB)
8.

下载 (38KB)
9.

下载 (31KB)
10.

下载 (31KB)
11.

下载 (40KB)

版权所有 © А.Е. Галашев, А.Ф. Анисимов, А.С. Воробьев, 2023

##common.cookie##