The Effect of Temperature on the Volume Properties of L-Lysine in Aqueous and Aqueous Buffer Solutions
- 作者: Tyunina E.1, Tarasova G.1
-
隶属关系:
- Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Krestov Institute of Chemistry of Solutions,” Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 卷 97, 编号 6 (2023)
- 页面: 778-785
- 栏目: ФИЗИЧЕСКАЯ ХИМИЯ РАСТВОРОВ
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0044-4537/article/view/136608
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723060274
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KCYPPN
- ID: 136608
如何引用文章
详细
The behavior of L-lysine (Lys) in water and an aqueous buffer solution is studied by densimetry as the temperature varies from 288.15 to 313.15 K with an interval of 5 K. Based on the experimental density values of amino-acid solutions, the apparent molar volumes and partial molar volumes of Lys are determined at an infinite dilution in water and buffer solution at each temperature. The effects of temperature, medium, and amino-acid concentration on volumetric characteristics are revealed. The partial molar extensibility and their derivatives with respect to temperature, the values of which indicate the structurally destructive behavior of Lys in the studied solutions, are determined. It is found that the structurally destructive effects of Lys are enhanced in an aqueous buffer solution. It is shown that the partial molar volumes of amino-acid transfer from water to the buffer solution have positive values in the studied temperature range. The results obtained are discussed on the basis of various types of molecular interactions between a solute and a solvent using the Gurney model.
作者简介
E. Tyunina
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Krestov Institute of Chemistry of Solutions,” Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: tey@isc-ras.ru
153045, Ivanovo, Russia
G. Tarasova
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Krestov Institute of Chemistry of Solutions,” Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: tey@isc-ras.ru
153045, Ivanovo, Russia
参考
- Основы биохимии. В 3-х томах / Под ред. Ю.А. Овчинникова. М.: Мир, 1981. Т. 1. С. 115.
- Тюкавкина Н.А., Бауков Ю.И., Зурабян С.Э. Биоорганическая химия. М.: “ГЭОТАР-Медиа”, 2011. 416 с.
- Scheraga H.A. // Pure and Appl. Chem. 1982. V. 54. № 8. P. 1495.
- Makhatadze G.I., Privalov P.L. // Biophys. Chem. 1994. V. 51. P. 291.
- Kaliman I., Nemukhin A., Varfolomeev S. // J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010. V. 6. P. 184.
- Fedotova M.V., Kruchinin S.E. // J. Mol. Liq. 2012. V. 169. P. 1.
- Rai A.K., Fei W., Lu Zh. et al. // Theor. Chem, Acc. 2009. V. 124. P. 37.
- Urry D.W., Urry K.D., Szaflarski W. et al. // Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009. V. 15. P. 2833.
- Ashton L.A., Bullock J. // J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1982. V. 1. № 78. P. 1177.
- Tyunina E.Yu., Badelin V.G. // J. Solution Chem. 2016. V. 45. P. 475.
- Asgharzadeh S., Shareghi B., Farhadian S. // Inter. J. Biolog. Macromol. 2019. V. 131. P. 548.
- Ivanov E.V., Lebedeva E.Yu., Kravchenko A.N. // J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 2017. V. 115. P. 148.
- Kumar A., Chane P.S. // Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2019. V. 281. P. 933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.023
- Tao M., Zhu M., Wu Ch., Hi Zh. // Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2015. V. 10. P. 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2014.08.012
- Bregier-Jarzebowska R., Hoffmann S.K., Ƚomozik L. et al. // Polyhedron. 2019. V. 173. P. 114137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2019.114137
- Karimi M., Yazdi F.T., Mortazavi S.A. et al. // Polimer Testing. 2020. V. 83. P. 106338.
- Lin L., Gu Y., Li C. et al. // Food Control. 2018. V. 91. P. 76.
- Han F., Chalikian T.V. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003. V. 125. P. 7219. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja030068p
- Zhao H. // Biophys. Chem. 2006. V. 122. P. 157.
- Banipal T.S., Singh K. // J. Solution Chem. 2007. V. 36. P. 1635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-007-9212-8
- Jolicoeur C., Riedl B., Desrochers D. et al. // J. Solution Chem. 1986. V. 15. P. 109.
- Gurney R.W. Ionic processes in solution. New York: McGraw Hill, 1953.
- Tyunina E.Yu., Badelin V.G., Mezhevoi I.N. // J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 2019. V. 131. P. 40.
- Mannar N., Bavoh C.B., Baharudin A.H. et al. // Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2017. V. 454. P. 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.?uid.2017.09.012
- Yasuda Y., Tochio N., Sakurai M. et al. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 1998. V. 43. P. 205. https://doi.org/10.1021/je9701792
- Siddique J.A., Naqvi S. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2010. V. 55. P. 2930. https://doi.org/10.1021/je100190e
- Banipal T.S., Singh K., Banipal P.K. // J. Solution Chem. 2007. V. 36. P. 1635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-007-9212-8
- Tyunina E.Yu., Mezhevoi I.N., Stavnova A.A. // J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 2121. V. 161. P. 106552
- Chemistry and biochemistry of the amino acids. / Ed. By G.C. Barret. London-N.Y.: Chapman and Hall, 1985
- Васильев В.П., Бородин В.А., Козловский Е.В. Применение ЭВМ в химико-аналитических расчетах. М.: Высшая школа, 1993. 112 с.
- Круглов В.О., Бугаевский А.А. Математика в химической термодинамике. Новосибирск: Наука, 1980. С. 36.
- Brinkley S.R., Jr. // J. Chem. Phys. 1947. V. 15. P. 107.
- Meshkov A.N., Gamov G.A. // Talanta. 2019. V. 198. P. 200.
- Franks F. Water: A comprehensive treatise. V. 3. New York: Plenum Press, 1973.
- Kumar H., Kaur K. // J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 2012. V. 5. P. 86.
- Iqbal M., Chaudhary M.A. // J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 2010. V. 42. P. 951.
- Romero C.M., Esteso M.A., Trujillo G.P. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2018. V. 63. № 11. P. 4012. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00236
- Тюнина Е.Ю., Баделин В.Г., Курицына А.А. // Журн. физ. химии. 2020. Т. 94. № 4. С. 557.
- Singh S.K., Kishore N. // J. Solution Chem. 2003. V. 32. P. 117.
- Kyte J., Doolittle R. // J. Mol. Biol. 1982. V. 157. P. 105.
- Rodríguez D.M., Romero C.M. // J. Mol. Liq. 2017. V. 233. V. 487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.02.118
- Kumar H., Behal I. // J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 2016. V. 102. P. 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2016.06.026
- John R., Tangde V.M., Khaty N.T. et al. // J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 2022. V. 99. P. 100370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jics.2022.100370
- Hepler L.G. // Can. J. Chem. 1969. V. 47. P. 4613.