Comparison of Taste Reception and Feeding Behavior of the Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Cichlidae) of Different Age

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Comparison of specimens of the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus of two age groups did not show any significant differences. L-cysteine, L-lysine and citric acid have an attractive taste for juveniles (age 1.5 months, body length 6.5–7.0 cm, weight 5–7 g); L-cysteine and citric acid have an attractive taste for adult fish (4 months, 12–15 cm, 45–50 g). The other eight L-amino acids have an indifferent taste for fish of both age groups. Based on the data obtained and the results of other studies, a hypothetical scheme is proposed, according to which the fastest functional transformations of taste reception in fish ontogeny occur after the start of exogenous feeding of larvae and are completed before maturation. Fish of both age groups rarely re–grasp pellets flavored with taste substances, but juveniles spend much more time on pellets orosensory evaluation, up to 1.4–1.6 times. Regardless of the fish age, such an assessment requires more time if the testing of pellets ends with their ingestion. The differences may indicate an undeveloped stereotype of feeding behavior in juveniles of Nile tilapia.

About the authors

A. O. Kasumyan

Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Email: alex_kasumyan@mail.ru
Россия, Москва

A. D. Levina

Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: alex_kasumyan@mail.ru
Россия, Москва

References

  1. Виноградская М.И., Касумян А.О. 2019. Вкусовая привлекательность водных организмов для нильской тиляпии Oreochromis niloticus (Cichlidae, Perciformes) // Вопр. ихтиологии. Т. 59. № 3. С. 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0042875219030226
  2. Девицина Г.В., Кажлаев А.А. 1992. Развитие хемосенсорных органов у сибирского осетра Acipenser baerii и севрюги A. stellatus // Там же. Т. 32. № 5. С. 167–175.
  3. Касумян А.О. 2011. Функциональное развитие хемосенсорных систем в онтогенезе рыб // Онтогенез. Т. 42. № 3. С. 205–213.
  4. Касумян А.О., Виноградская М.И. 2019. Вкусовая привлекательность желчных веществ для рыб // Вопр. ихтиологии. Т. 59. № 4. С. 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0042875219040118
  5. Касумян А.О., Кажлаев А.А. 1993. Поведенческие ответы ранней молоди сибирского осетра Acipenser baerii и севрюги A. stellatus (Acipenseridae) на вещества, вызывающие основные типы вкусовых ощущений // Там же. Т. 33. № 3. С. 427–436.
  6. Касумян А.О., Прокопова О.М. 2001. Вкусовые предпочтения и динамика вкусового поведенческого ответа у линя Tinca tinca (Cyprinidae) // Там же. Т. 41. № 5. С. 670–685.
  7. Касумян А.О., Сидоров С.С. 2001. Вкусовая чувствительность молоди озерного гольца Salvelinus namaycush (Salmonidae) // Вопр. рыболовства. Прилож. 1. С. 121–125.
  8. Касумян А.О., Сидоров С.С. 2005. Вкусовые предпочтения кумжи Salmo trutta трех географически изолированных популяций // Вопр. ихтиологии. Т. 45. № 1. С. 117–130.
  9. Касумян А.О., Сидоров С.С., Пащенко Н.И., Немчинов А.В. 1992. Экстраоральная и интраоральная вкусовая чувствительность молоди русского осетра Acipenser gueldenstaedtii к аминокислотам // ДАН СССР. Т. 322. № 1. С. 193–195.
  10. Певзнер Р.А. 1985. Ультраструктурная организация вкусовых рецепторов костно-хрящевых рыб. III. Личинки в период желточного питания // Цитология. Т. 27. № 11. С. 1240–1246.
  11. Appelbaum S. 1980. Versuche zur Geschmacksperzeption einiger Süßwasserfische im larvalen und adulten Stadium // Arch. Fischereiwiss. V. 31. № 2. P. 105–114.
  12. Atkinson C.J.L., Martin K.J., Fraser G.J., Collin S.P. 2016. Morphology and distribution of taste papillae and oral denticles in the developing oropharyngeal cavity of the bamboo shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum // Biol. Open. V. 5. № 12. P. 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.022327
  13. Clements K.D., Raubenheimer D. 2006. Feeding and nutrition // The physiology of fishes. Boca Raton: CRC Press. P. 47–82.
  14. Døving K.B., Kasumyan A. 2008. Chemoreception // Fish Larval Physiology. Boca Raton: CRC Press. P. 331–394. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429061608-15
  15. Elsheikh E.H., Nasr E.S., Gamal A.M. 2012. Ultrastructure and distribution of the taste buds in the buccal cavity in relation to the food and feeding habit of a herbivorous fish: Oreochromis niloticus // Tissue Cell. V. 44. № 3. P. 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2012.02.002
  16. Finger T.E., Drake S.K., Kotrschal K. et al. 1991. Postlarval growth of the peripheral gustatory system in the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus // J. Comp. Neurol. V. 314. № 1. P. 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903140106
  17. Forestell C.A., Mennella J.A. 2015. The ontogeny of taste perception and preference throughout childhood // Handbook of olfaction and gustation. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. P. 795–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118971758.ch36
  18. Getachew T. 1987. A study on an herbivorous fish, Oreochromis niloticus L., diet and its quality in two Ethiopian Rift Valley lakes, Awasa and Zwai // J. Fish. Biol. V. 30. № 4. P. 39–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05767.x
  19. Getachew T. 1993. The composition and nutritional status of the diet of Oreochromis niloticus L. in Lake Chamo, Ethiopia // Ibid. V. 42. № 6. P. 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00396.x
  20. Getachew T., Fernando C.H. 1989. The food habits of an herbivorous fish (Oreochromis niloticus Linn.) in Lake Awasa, Ethiopia // Hydrobiologia. V. 174. № 3. P. 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008157
  21. Hansen A., Reutter K., Zeiske E. 2002. Taste bud development in the zebrafish, Danio rerio // Dev. Dyn. V. 223. № 4. P. 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10074
  22. He J.-Y., Tian L.-X., Lemme A. et al., 2013. Methionine and lysine requirements for maintenance and efficiency of utilization for growth of two sizes of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) // Aquacult. Nutr. V. 19. № 4. P. 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12012
  23. Hughes R.N. 1997. Diet selection // Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. P. 134–162.
  24. Hughes S.G. 1991. Response of first-feeding spring chinook salmon to four potential chemical modifiers of feed intake // Prog. Fish. Cult. V. 53. № 1. P. 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1991)053<0015:CRO-FFS>2.3.CO;2
  25. Hughes S.G. 1993. Single-feeding response of chinook salmon fry to potential feed intake modifiers // Ibid. V. 55. № 1. P. 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1993)055<0040:SFRO-CS>2.3.CO;2
  26. Iwai T. 1980. Sensory anatomy and feeding of fish larvae // Proc. conf. «Fish behavior and its use in the capture and culture of fishes». V. 5. Manila: ICLARM. P. 124–145.
  27. Kapsimali M., Barlow L.A. 2013. Developing a sense of taste // Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. V. 24. № 3. P. 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.11.002
  28. Kasumyan A.O. 1992. Development of olfactory and taste responses to chemical signals in acipenserid fishes // Chemical signals in vertebrates VI. Boston: Springer. P. 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9655-1_22
  29. Kasumyan A. 2018. Olfaction and gustation in Acipenseridae, with special references to the Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baerii // The Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii, Brandt, 1869). V. 1. Biology. Cham: Springer. P. 173–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61664-3_10
  30. Kawamura G., Washiyama N. 1989. Ontogenetic changes in behavior and sense organ morphogenesis in largemouth bass and Tilapia nilotica // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. V. 118. № 2. P. 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1989)118<0203:OCIBAS>2.3.CO;2
  31. Keast A. 1978. Trophic and spatial interrelationships in the fish species of an Ontario temperate lake // Environ. Biol. Fish. V. 3. № 1. P. 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006306
  32. Khallaf E.A., Alne-na-ei A.A. 1987. Feeding ecology of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus) and Tilapia zillii (Gervias) in a Nile canal // Hydrobiologia. V. 146. № 1. P. 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007577
  33. Levina A.D., Mikhailova E.S., Kasumyan A.O. 2021. Taste preferences and feeding behavior in the facultative herbivore fish, Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus // J. Fish Biol. V. 98. № 5. P. 1385–1400. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14675
  34. Linnér J., Brännäs E. 1994. Behavioral response to commercial food of different sizes and self-initiated food size selection by Arctic char // Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. V. 123. № 3. P. 416–422. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1994)123%3C0416:BR-TCFO%3E2.3.CO;2
  35. Mennella J.A., Reed D.R, Roberts K.M. et al. 2014. Age-related differences in bitter taste and efficacy of bitter blockers // PLoS ONE. V. 9. № 7. Article e103107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103107
  36. Moriarty D.J.W., Moriarty C.M. 1973. Quantitative estimation of the daily ingestion of phytoplankton by Tilapia nilotica and Haplochromis nigripinnis in Lake George, Uganda // J. Zool. V. 171. № 1. P. 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb07513.x
  37. Morrison C.M., Miyake T., Wright J.R., Jr. 2001. Histological study of the development of the embryo and early larva of Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae) // J. Morphol. V. 247. № 2. P. 172–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4687(200102)247:2<172::AI-D-JMOR1011>3.0.CO;2-H
  38. Northcutt R.G. 2005. Taste bud development in the channel catfish // J. Comp. Neurol. V. 482. № 1. P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20425
  39. Pavlidis P., Gouveris H., Anogeianaki A. et al. 2013. Age-related changes in electrogustometry thresholds, tongue tip vascularization, density, and form of the fungiform papillae in humans // Chem. Senses. V. 38. № 1. P. 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjs076
  40. Philippart J.-Cl., Ruwet J.-Cl. 1982. Ecology and distribution of tilapias // Proc. conf. “The biology and culture of tilapias”. V. 7. Manila: ICLARM. P. 15–59.
  41. Ringler N.H. 1994. Fish foraging: adaptations and patterns // Advances in fish biology. Delhi: Hindustan Publ. Corp. P. 33–59.
  42. Rønnestad I., Yúfera M., Ueberschär B. et al. 2013. Feeding behaviour and digestive physiology in larval fish: current knowledge, and gaps and bottlenecks in research // Rev. Aquacult. V. 5. № s1. P. S59–S98. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12010
  43. Sataeva V.V., Kasumyan A.O. 2022. Orosensory preferences and feeding behavior of Cladistia: a comparison of gray bichir Polypterus senegalus and saddle bichir P. endlicherii (Polypteridae) // J. Ichthyol. V. 62. № 7. P. 1501–1520. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003294522204021X
  44. Smith I.P., Metcalfe N.B., Huntingford F.A. 1995. The effects of food pellet dimensions on feeding responses by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in a marine net pen // Aquaculture. V. 130. № 2–3. P. 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00207-5
  45. Steiner J.E. 1979. Human facial expression in response to taste and smell stimulation // Adv. Child Dev. Behav. V. 13. P. 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60349-3
  46. Stradmeyer L., Metcalfe N.B., Thorpe J.E. 1988. Effect of food pellet shape and texture on the feeding response of juvenile Atlantic salmon // Aquaculture. V. 73. № 1–4. P. 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(88)90056-7
  47. Temple E.C., Laing D.G., Hutchinson I., Jinks A.L. 2002. Temporal perception of sweetness by adults and children using computerized time-intensity measures // Chem. Senses. V. 27. № 8. P. 729–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/27.8.729
  48. Trewavas E. 1983. Tilapiine fishes of the genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis and Danakilia // Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ. № 878. 583 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.123198
  49. Xie S., Zhang L., Wang D. 2003. Effects of several organic acids on the feeding behavior of Tilapia nilotica // J. Appl. Ichthyol. V. 19. № 4. P. 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00451.x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (2KB)
3.

Download (209KB)
4.

Download (61KB)
5.

Download (273KB)
6.

Download (323KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 А.О. Касумян, А.Д. Левина

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies