Этологические основы взаимоотношений человека и карликовых свиней-компаньонов
- Авторы: Быстрова Н.А.1
-
Учреждения:
- Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А.Н. Северцова РАН
- Выпуск: Том 143, № 2 (2023)
- Страницы: 138-148
- Раздел: Статьи
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0042-1324/article/view/138939
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0042132423020047
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KMBEZJ
- ID: 138939
Цитировать
Аннотация
Содержание свиней в качестве лабораторных животных и животных-компаньонов стало возможным лишь в последние 70–80 лет (Bollen et al., 2010). В связи с этим актуальными стали проблемы эффективного управления их поведением и контроля за благополучием. Для успешного решения этих задач необходимо наличие структурированных и всесторонних данных об особенностях коммуникации свиней, их социального поведения и восприятия ими информации из внешней среды. В данной статье собрана и анализируется информация из немногочисленных в настоящее время актуальных публикаций об исследованиях, характеризующих работу органов чувств, специфику социального поведения и межвидовой коммуникации диких кабанов, домашних свиней продуктивных пород и карликовых домашних свиней.
Об авторах
Н. А. Быстрова
Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А.Н. Северцова РАН
Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: natasha.b.phd@gmail.com
Россия, Москва
Список литературы
- Баскин Л.М. Поведение копытных животных. М.: Наука, 1976. 295 с.
- Баскина С.Л. О чем думает лошадь и как научиться ее понимать. М.: Аквариум, 2008. 224 с.
- Бочаров В.И., Орлов А.П. Дрессировка служебных собак. М.: ДОСААФ, 1957. 199 с.
- Гладырь Е.А., Эрнст Л.К., Костюнина О.В. Изучение генома свиней (Sus scrofa) с использованием ДНК-маркеров // Сельскохоз. биол. 2009. № 2. С. 16–25.
- Дуров В.Л. Дрессировка животных. Психологические наблюдения над животными, дрессированными по моему методу (40-летний опыт). М.: Универсальное изд-во, 1924. 505 с.
- Животноводство, зоогигиена и ветеринарная санитария: учебник для учащихся средних специальных учебных заведений по специальности “Ветеринарная медицина” / Ред. В.А. Медведский. Витебск: ВГАВМ, 2006. 322 с.
- Зайцев В.А. Синхронизация поведения и индивидуальные дистанции в группах кабанов (Sus scrofa L.) // Журн. общ. биол. 1992. Т. 53. № 2. С. 243–257.
- Зайцев В.А. Вожаки, лидеры и разведчики у кабанов // Бюл. моск. общ. испыт. природы. Отд. биол. 1999. Т. 104. № 1. С. 10–17.
- Зубко В.Н. Служебное собаководство. М.: ДОСААФ, 1987. 382 с.
- Комлацкий В.И., Величко Л.Ф. Биологические основы производства свинины. Краснодар: КубГАУ, 2010. 175 с.
- Комлацкий В.И., Величко Л.Ф. Селекция свиней. Учеб. пособие. Краснодар: КубГАУ, 2019. 155 с.
- Комлацкий В.И., Величко Л.Ф., Величко В.А. Биология и этология. Учеб. пособие. Краснодар: КубГАУ, 2017. 130 с.
- Майнхардт Х. Моя жизнь среди кабанов. М.: Лесная промышленность, 1983. 129 с.
- Мотузко Н.С., Никитин Ю.И. Физиологические основы этологии сельскохозяйственных животных. Витебск: ВГАВМ, 2003. 50 с.
- Панкова Н.Л. Роль кабана (Sus scrofa) в динамике растительности водоемов Окского заповедника // Рос. журн. биол. инвазий. 2013. Т. 6. № 3. С. 69–87.
- Панкова Н.Л., Панков А.Б. О маркировочном поведении самцов дикого кабана Sus scrofa в естественных условиях // Тр. Окского гос. природ. биосфер. заповед. Вып. 39. Рязань: Рязан. обл. типография, 2020. С. 118–135.
- Adamczyk K., Górecka-Bruzda A., Nowicki J. et al. Perception of environment in farm animals – a review // Ann. Anim. Sci. 2015. V. 15. P. 565–589. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2015-0031
- Albiach-Serran A., Bräuer J., Cacchione T. et al. The effect of domestication and ontogeny in swine cognition (Sus scrofa scrofa and S. s. domestica) // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012. V. 141. P. 25–35.
- Alves L.K.S., Gameiro A.H., Schinckel A.P., Garbossa C.A.P. Development of a swine production cost calculation model // Animals. 2022. V. 12. P. 2229.
- Basic miniature pig care, 2019. https://petsontheshorevh.com/storage/app/media/Mini-Pig-Basic-Care-Client-Handout-1.pdf
- Benjamin M.E. Pig trucking and handling – stress and fatigued pig // Adv. Pork Prod. 2005. V. 16. P. 57–66.
- Bensoussan S., Cornil M., Meunier-Salaün M.-C., Tallet C. Piglets learn to use combined human-given visual and auditory signals to find a hidden reward in an object choice task // PLoS One. 2016. V. 11. Iss. 10. P. e0164988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164988
- Bensoussan S., Tigeot R., Lemasson A. et al. Domestic piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) are attentive to human voice and able to discriminate some prosodic features // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018. V. 210. P. 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.009
- Bensoussan S., Tigeot R., Meunier-Salaün M.-C., Tallet C. Broadcasting human voice to piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) modifies their behavioural reaction to human presence in the home pen and in arena tests // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020. V. 225. P. 104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104965
- Black N.J., Cheng T.-Y., Arruda A.G. Characterizing the connection between swine production sites by personnel movements using a mobile application-based geofencing platform // Prevent. Veterin. Med. 2022. V. 208. P. 105753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105753
- Blasetti A., Boitani L., Riviello M.C., Visalberghi E. Activity budgets and use of enclosed space by wild boars (Sus scrofa) in captivity // Zoo Biol. 1988. V. 7. P. 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430070108
- Bollen P.J.A., Hansen A.K., Alstrup A.K.O. The laboratory swine. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010. 138 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439815304
- Brajon S., Laforest J.-P., Bergeron R. et al. The perception of humans by piglets: recognition of familiar handlers and generalisation to unfamiliar humans // Anim. Cogn. 2015. V. 18. P. 1299–1316.
- Burghardt G.M., Albright J.D., Davis K.M. Motivation, development and object play: comparative perspectives with lessons from dogs // Behaviour. 2016. V. 153. P. 767–793.
- Caballero-Hernández A.I., Castrejón-Pineda F., Martínez-Gamba R. et al. Survival and viability of Ascaris suum and Oesophagostomum dentatum in ensiled swine faeces // Bioresour. Technol. 2004. V. 94. P. 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.12.008
- Chan W.Y., Cloutier S., Newberry R.C. Barking pigs: differences in acoustic morphology predict juvenile responses to alarm calls // Anim. Behav. 2011. V. 82. P. 767–774.
- Duffera M., Robarge W.P., Mikkelsen R.L. Estimating the availability of nutrients from processed swine lagoon solids through incubation studies // Bioresour. Technol. 1999. V. 70. P. 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00039-5
- Figueroa J., Solà-Oriol D., Manteca X., Pérez J.F. Social learning of feeding behaviour in pigs: effects of neophobia and familiarity with the demonstrator conspecific // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2013. V. 148. P. 120–127.
- Goumon S., Špinka M. Emotional contagion of distress in young pigs is potentiated by previous exposure to the same stressor // Anim. Cogn. 2016. V. 19. Iss. 3. P. 501–511.
- Goursot C., Düpjan S., Tuchscherer A. et al. Visual laterality in pigs: monocular viewing influences emotional reactions in pigs // Anim. Behav. 2019. V. 154. P. 183–192.
- Ha T.-H., Mahasti N.N.N., Lu M.-C., Huang Y.-H. Ammonium-nitrogen recovery as struvite from swine wastewater using various magnesium sources // Separ. Purific. Technol. 2022. V. 308. P. 122870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122870
- Hall I.R., Brown G.T., Zambonelli A. Taming the truffle: the history, lore, and science of the ultimate mushroom. Portland: Timber Press, 2007. 304 p.
- Heining P., Ruysschaert T. The use of minipig in drug discovery and development: pros and cons of minipig selection and strategies to use as a preferred nonrodent species // Toxicol. Pathol. 2016. V. 44. P. 467–473.
- Hemsworth P.H. Behavioural principles of pig handling // Livestock handling and transport / Ed. T. Grandin. Wallingford: CABI, 1993. P. 261–279.
- Hemsworth P.H., Gonyou H.W., Dziuk P.J. Human communication with pigs: the behavioural response of pigs to specific human signals // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1986. V. 15. Iss. 1. P. 45–54.
- Imeah B., Penz E., Rana M., Trask C. Economic analysis of new workplace technology including productivity and injury: the case of needle-less injection in swine // PLoS One. 2020. V. 15. P. e0233599.
- Kiley-Worthington M. The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular reference to their causation and function as displays // Behaviour. 1976. V. 56. P. 69–115.
- Klopfer F.D., Butler R.L. Color vision in swine // Am. Zool. 1964. V. 4. P. 294.
- Koba Y., Tanida H. How do miniature pigs discriminate between people? The effect of exchanging cues between a non-handler and their familiar handler on discrimination // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999. V. 61. Iss. 3. P. 239–252.
- Koba Y., Morita A., Rushen J. et al. Miniature pigs’ abilities to discriminate people based on their photographs // Jap. J. Anim. Psychol. 2012. V. 62. Iss. 1. P. 1–10.
- Maigrot A.-L., Hillmann E., Briefer E.F. Cross-species discrimination of vocal expression of emotional valence by Equidae and Suidae // BMC Biol. 2022. V. 20. Iss. 1. P. 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01311-5
- Marcet-Rius M., Cozzi A., Bienboire-Frosini C. et al. Selection of putative indicators of positive emotions triggered by object and social play in mini-pigs // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018. V. 202. P. 13–19.
- Marcet-Rius M., Fàbrega E., Cozzi A. et al. Are tail and ear movements indicators of emotions in tail-docked pigs in response to environmental enrichment? // Animals. 2019. V. 9. Iss. 7. P. 449.
- McCall C.A. A review of learning behavior in horses and its application in horse training // J. Anim. Sci. 1990. V. 68. P. 75–81.
- Mellor D.J. Updating animal welfare thinking: moving beyond the “Five freedoms” towards “A life worth living” // Animals. 2016. V. 6. Iss. 3. P. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021
- Meynhardt H. Schwarzwild-Report. Vier Jahre unter Wildschweinen. Berlin: Verlag J. Neumann-Neudamm, 1981. 208 S.
- Meynhardt H. Schwarzwild-Report. Mein Leben unter Wildschweinen. Leipzig, Radebeul: Verlag J. Neumann-Neudamm, 1990. 220 S.
- Miklósi A., Kubinyi E., Topál J. et al. A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do // Curr. Biol. 2003. V. 13. P. 763–766.
- The encyclopedia of applied animal behaviour and welfare / Eds D. Mills, J.N. Marchant-Forde, P.D. McGreevy et al. Wallingford: CABI, 2010. 684 p.
- Munksgaard L., De Passillé A.M., Rushen J. et al. Discrimination of people by dairy cows based on handling // J. Dairy Sci. 1997. V. 80. P. 1106–1112.
- Munksgaard L., De Passillé A.M., Rushen J., Ladewig J. Dairy cows’ use of colour cues to discriminate between people // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999. V. 65. Iss. 1. P. 1–11.
- Nawroth C., Ebersbach M., von Borell E. Are juvenile domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) sensitive to the attentive states of humans? The impact of impulsivity on choice behaviour // Behav. Proc. 2013. V. 96. P. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.002
- Nawroth C., Ebersbach M., von Borell E. Juvenile domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) use human-given cues in an object choice task // Anim. Cogn. 2014. V. 17. Iss. 3. P. 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0702-3
- Nawroth C., Ebersbach M., von Borell E. Are domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) able to use complex human-given cues to find a hidden reward? // Anim. Welf. 2016. V. 25. P. 185–190. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.2.185
- Neitz J., Jacobs G. Spectral sensitivity of cones in an ungulate // Vis. neurosci. 1989. V. 2. P. 97–100.
- Newberry R.C., Wood-Gush D.G.M. The development of some behaviour patterns in piglets under semi-natural conditions // Anim. Prod. 1988. V. 46. P. 103–109.
- Noonan G.J., Rand J.S., Priest J. et al. Behavioural observations of piglets undergoing tail docking, teeth clipping and ear notching // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994. V. 39. P. 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90156-2
- Ocepek M., Newberry R.C., Andersen I.L. Which types of rooting material give weaner pigs most pleasure? // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020. V. 231. P. 105070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105070
- Overall K.L. Clinical behavioral medicine for small animals. St. Louis: Mosby, 1997. 544 p.
- Puppe B., Schön P.C., Tuchscherer A., Manteuffel G. Castration-induced vocalisation in domestic piglets, Sus scrofa: complex and specific alterations of the vocal quality // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005. V. 95. P. 67–78.
- Reimert I., Bolhuis J.E., Kemp B., Rodenburg T.B. Indicators of positive and negative emotions and emotional contagion in pigs // Physiol. Behav. 2013. V. 109. P. 42–50.
- Roy R.C., Roy S. Swine communication // Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior / Eds J. Vonk, T. Shackelford. Cham: Springer, 2019. P. 6809–6813.
- Rybarczyk P., Rushen J., De Passillé A.M. Recognition of people by dairy calves using colour of clothing // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003. V. 81. Iss. 4. P. 307–319.
- Schrader L., Todt D. Vocal quality is correlated with levels of stress hormones in domestic pigs // Ethology. 2010. V. 104. Iss. 10. P. 859–876.
- Starling M.J., Branson N., Cody D., McGreevy P.D. Conceptualising the impact of arousal and affective state on training outcomes of operant conditioning // Animals (Basel). 2013. V. 3. Iss. 2. P. 300–317.
- Swindle M., Smith A.C. Comparative anatomy and physiology of the pig // Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 1998. V. 25. P. 11–21.
- Tallet C., Linhart P., Policht R. et al. Encoding of situations in the vocal repertoire of piglets (Sus scrofa): a comparison of discrete and graded classifications // PLoS One. 2013. V. 8. Iss. 8. P. e71841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071841
- Tanida H., Nagano Y. The ability of miniature pigs to discriminate between a stranger and their familiar handler // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998. V. 56. Iss. 2–4. P. 149–159.
- Tanida H., Miura A., Tanaka T., Yoshimoto T. The role of handling in communication between humans and weanling pigs // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994. V. 40. Iss. 3–4. P. 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90063-9
- Tanida H., Miura A., Tanaka T., Yoshimoto T. Behavioral response to humans in individually handled weanling pigs // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995. V. 42. Iss. 4. P. 249–259.
- Terlouw E.M.C., Porcher J. Repeated handling of pigs during rearing. I. Refusal of contact by the handler and reactivity to familiar and unfamiliar humans // J. Anim. Sci. 2005. V. 83. Iss. 7. P. 1653–1663.
- Tynes V.V. Miniature pet pig behavioral medicine // Vet. Clin. North Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2021. V. 24. P. 63–86.
- Viscardi A.V., Hunniford M., Lawlis P. et al. Development of a piglet grimace scale to evaluate piglet pain using facial expressions following castration and tail docking: a pilot study // Front. Vet. Sci. 2017. V. 4. P. 11.
- Wang J., Ben W.W., Yang M. et al. Dissemination of veterinary antibiotics and corresponding resistance genes from a concentrated swine feedlot along the waste treatment paths // Environ. Int. 2016. V. 92–93. P. 317–323.
- Warren-Smith A., McGreevy P. The use of blended positive and negative reinforcement in shaping the halt response of horses (Equus caballus) // Anim. Welfare. 2007. V. 16. P. 481–488.
- Weary D.M., Braithwaite L.A., Fraser D. Vocal response to pain in piglets // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998. V. 56. P. 161–172.
- Wondrak M., Conzelmann E., Veit A., Huber L. Pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) categorize pictures of human heads // Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018. V. 205. P. 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.009
- Yang H.Y., Galang K.G., Gallegos A. et al. Sling training with positive reinforcement to facilitate porcine wound studies // JID Innov. 2021. V. 1. P. 100016.
Дополнительные файлы
![](/img/style/loading.gif)