Microglia Cell Line SIM-A9 Features – New Data

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

SIM-A9 is a line of spontaneously immortalized mouse microglia cells obtained from newborn C57BL/6 mice’s cerebrum. The aim of this work is to characterize SIM-A9 line by the ratio of cells with the resting and activated microglia phenotype, to analyze the expression of stem/progenitor cell markers CD133 and nestin, growth factors receptors CSF-1R and EGFR, and the karyotype of this line. The light microscopy, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry and RT/PCR were used to analyze the morphology, phenotype, and gene expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the mFISH method was used to analyze the karyotype. It was shown for the first time that SIM-A9 cells express a high level of TSPO protein, CD68, CD11b and CD45 markers on the surface membrane of cells, which corresponds to the phenotype of activated microglia. Despite this, the cells of this line respond with additional activation to LPS stimulation, which leads to an increase in the pro-inflammatory cytokine genes IL-1β, TNFα, IL-6 expression and a high level of active oxygen and nitrogen metabolites formation. It was shown that SIM-A9 cells express stem and progenitor cells markers, CD133+ and nestin, which allows us to consider the cells of this line as early poorly differentiated progenitor cells, despite their phenotype corresponding to activated microglia. It was also found that SIM-A9 cells express receptors of two growth factors CSF-1 and EGF, CSF-1R and EGFR, which indicates the possibility of SIM-A9 cells proliferation stimulation by two alternative mechanisms under the action of the corresponding factors. SIM-A9 cells have a hypotetraploid karyotype with a large number of structural and quantitative chromosome anomalies.

About the authors

D. A. Shaposhnikova

National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”

Author for correspondence.
Email: dasha-shap13@mail.ru
Russia, 123182, Moscow

E. Yu. Moskaleva

National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”

Email: dasha-shap13@mail.ru
Russia, 123182, Moscow

Yu. P. Semochkina

National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”

Email: dasha-shap13@mail.ru
Russia, 123182, Moscow

O. V. Vysotskaya

National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”

Email: dasha-shap13@mail.ru
Russia, 123182, Moscow

O. V. Komova

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

Email: dasha-shap13@mail.ru
Russia, 141980, Dubna

E. A. Nasonova

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

Email: dasha-shap13@mail.ru
Russia, 141980, Dubna

I. V. Koshlan

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

Email: dasha-shap13@mail.ru
Russia, 141980, Dubna

References

  1. Москалева Е.Ю., Родина А.В., Семочкина Ю.П., Высоцкая О.В. 2022. Анализ маркеров окислительного повреждения нейронов и нейровоспаления в отдаленный период после γ-облучения головы мышей в разных дозах Радиационная биология. Радиоэкология. Т. 62 № 2. С. 171. (Moskaleva E.Yu., Rodina A.V., Semochkina Ju.P., Vysotskaya O.V. 2022. Analysis of neurons damage and level of neuroinflammation late after γ-irradiation of mice head at different doses. Radiacionnaja biologija. Radioekologija. V. 62 № 2. Р. 171.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869803122020059
  2. Новиков В.Е., Левченкова О.С., Пожилова Е.В. 2014. Роль активных форм кислорода в физиологии и патологии клетки и их фармакологическая регуляция. Обзоры по клинической фармакологии и лекарственной терапии. Т. 12. № 4. С. 13. (Novikov V.E., Levchenkova O.S., Pozhilova Y.V. 2014. Role of reactive oxygen species in cell physiology and pathology and their pharmacological regulation. Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. Vol. 12. № 4. P. 13.) https://doi.org/10.17816/RCF12413-21
  3. Askew K., Li K., Olmos-Alonso A., Garcia-Moreno F., Liang Y., Richardson P., Tipton T., Chapman M.A., Riecken K., Beccari S., Sierra A., Molnár Z., Cragg M.S., Garaschuk O., Perry V.H., Gomez-Nicola D. 2017. Coupled proliferation and apoptosis maintain the rapid turnover of microglia in the adult brain. Cell Rep. V. 18. P. 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.041
  4. Bachiller S., Jiménez-Ferrer I., Paulus A., Yang Y., Swanberg M., Deierborg T., Boza-Serrano A. 2018. Microglia in neurological diseases: a road map to brain-disease dependent-inflammatory response. Front. Cell Neurosci. V. 12. P. 488. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00488
  5. Becher B., Antel J.P. 1996. Comparison of phenotypic and functional properties of immediately ex vivo and cultured human adult microglia. Glia. V. 18. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199609)18:1<1::AID-GLIA1>3.0.CO;2-6
  6. Bennett M.L., Bennett F.C., Liddelow S.A., Ajami B., Zamanian J.L., Fernhoff N.B., Mulinyawe S.B., Bohlen C.J., Adil A., Tucker A., Weissman I.L., Chang E.F., Li G., Grant G.A., Hayden Gephart M.G., Barres B.A. 2016. New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 113. P. 1738. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525528113
  7. Bernal A., Arranz L. 2018. Nestin-expressing progenitor cells: function, identity and therapeutic implications. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. V. 75. P. 2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2794-z
  8. Blasi E., Barluzzi R., Bocchini V., Mazzolla R., Bistoni F. 1990. Immortalization of murine microglial cells by a v-raf/v-myc carrying retrovirus. J. Neuroimmunol. V. 27. P. 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5728(90)90073-V
  9. Bohnert S., Seiffert A., Trella S., Bohnert M., Distel L., Ondruschka B., Monoranu C.M. 2020. TMEM119 as a specific marker of microglia reaction in traumatic brain injury in postmortem examination. Int. J. Legal Med. V. 134. P. 2167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02384-z
  10. Bonsack F., Sukumari-Ramesh S. 2018. TSPO: an evolutionarily conserved protein with elusive functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. V. 19. P. 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061694
  11. Cornforth M.N. 2001. Analyzing radiation-induced complex chromosome rearrangements by combinatorial painting. Radiat. Res. V. 155. P. 643. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9432-8_15
  12. Coniglio S.J., Eugenin E., Dobrenis K., Stanley E.R., West B.L., Symons M.H., Segall J.E. 2012. Microglial stimulation of glioblastoma invasion involves epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling. Mol. Med. V. 18. P. 519. https://doi.org/10.2119/molmed.2011.00217
  13. Coskun V., Wu H., Blanchi B., Tsao S., Kim K., Zhao J., Biancotti J.C., Hutnick L., Krueger R.C. Jr., Fan G., de Vellis J., Sun Y.E. 2008. CD133+ neural stem cells in the ependyma of mammalian postnatal forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 105. P. 1026. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710000105
  14. Douglas M.R., Morrison K.C., Jacques S.J., Leadbeater W.E., Gonzalez A.M., Berry M., Logan A., Ahmed Z. 2009. Off-target effects of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists mediate retinal ganglion cell disinhibited axon growth. Brain. V. 132. P. 3102. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp240
  15. Elmore M.R., Najafi A.R., Koike M.A., Dagher N.N., Spangenberg E.E., Rice R.A., Kitazawa M., Matusow B., Nguyen H., West B.L., Green K.N. 2014. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron. V. 82. P. 380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.040
  16. Eyo U.B., Dailey M.E. Microglia: key elements in neural development, plasticity, and pathology. 2013. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. V. 8. P. 494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-013-9434-z
  17. Fischer O.M., Hart S., Ullrich A. 2006. Dissecting the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transactivation pathway. Methods Mol. Biol. V. 327. P. 85. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-012-X:85
  18. Green K.N., Crapser J.D., Hohsfield L.A. 2020. To kill a microglia: A case for CSF1R inhibitors. Trends Immunol. V. 41. P. 771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2020.07.001
  19. Hagan N., Kane J.L., Grover D., Woodworth L., Madore C., Saleh J., Sancho J., Liu J., Li Y., Proto J., Zelic M., Mahan A., Kothe M., Scholte A.A., Fitzgerald M. 2020. CSF1R signaling is a regulator of pathogenesis in progressive MS. Cell Death Dis. V. 11. P. 904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03084-7
  20. Han J., Chitu V., Stanley E.R., Wszolek Z.K., Karrenbauer V.D., Harris R.A. 2022. Inhibition of colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) as a potential therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative diseases: opportunities and challenges. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. V. 79. P. 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04225-1
  21. Huang Y., Xu Z., Xiong S. 2018. Repopulated microglia are solely derived from the proliferation of residual microglia after acute depletion. Nat. Neurosci. V. 21. P. 530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0090-8
  22. Jenkins S.J., Ruckerl D., Thomas G.D., Hewitson J.P., Duncan S., Brombacher F., Maizels R.M., Hume D.A., Allen J.E. 2013. IL-4 directly signals tissue-resident macrophages to proliferate beyond homeostatic levels controlled by CSF-1. J. Exper. Med. V. 210. P. 2477. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20121999
  23. Jones S., Rappoport J.Z. 2014. Interdependent epidermal growth factor receptor signalling and trafficking. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. V. 51. P. 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2014.03.014
  24. Jurga A.M., Paleczna M., Kuter K.Z. 2020. Overview of general and discriminating markers of differential microglia phenotypes. Front. Cell Neurosci. V. 14. P. 198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.00198
  25. Kalm M., Andreasson U., Björk-Eriksson T., Zetterberg H., Pekny M., Blennow K., Pekna M., Blomgren K. 2016. C3 deficiency ameliorates the negative effects of irradiation of the young brain on hippocampal development and learning. Oncotarget. V. 7. P. 19382. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8400
  26. Lei F., Cui N., Zhou C., Chodosh J., Vavvas D.G., Paschalis E.I. 2020. CSF1R inhibition by a small-molecule inhibitor is not microglia specific; affecting hematopoiesis and the function of macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 22. P. 23336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922788117
  27. Lively S., Schlichter L.C. 2018. Microglia responses to pro-inflammatory stimuli (LPS, IFNγ + TNFα) and reprogramming by resolving cytokines (IL-4, IL-10). Front. Cell Neurosci. V. 12. P. 215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00215
  28. Liu G.J., Middleton R.J., Hatty C.R., Kam W.W., Chan R., Pham T., Harrison-Brown M., Dodson E., Veale K., Banati R.B. 2014. The 18 kDa translocator protein, microglia and neuroinflammation. Brain Pathol. V. 24. P. 631. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12196
  29. Mansour H.M., Fawzy H.M., El-Khatib A.S., Khattab M.M. 2022. Repurposed anti-cancer epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: mechanisms of neuroprotective effects in Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen. Res. V. 17. P. 1913. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.332132
  30. Michalczyk K., Ziman M. 2005. Nestin structure and predicted function in cellular cytoskeletal organisation. Histol. Histopathol. V. 20. P. 665. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-20.665
  31. Muñoz-Garcia J., Cochonneau D., Télétchéa S., Moranton E., Lanoe D., Brion R., Lézot F., Heymann M.F., Heymann D. 2021. The twin cytokines interleukin-34 and CSF-1: masterful conductors of macrophage homeostasis. Theranostics. V. 11. P. 1568. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.50683
  32. Nagamoto-Combs K., Kulas J., Combs C.K. 2014. A novel cell line from spontaneously immortalized murine microglia. J. Neurosci. Methods. V. 15. P. 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.05.021
  33. Onyango I.G., Jauregui G.V., Čarná M., Bennett J.P. Jr., Stokin G.B. 2021. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomedicines. V. 9. P. 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050524
  34. Pannell M., Economopoulos V., Wilson T.C., Kersemans V., Isenegger P.G., Larkin J.R., Smart S., Gilchrist S., Gouverneur V., Sibson N.R. 2020. Imaging of translocator protein upregulation is selective for pro-inflammatory polarized astrocytes and microglia. Glia. V. 68. P. 280. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23716
  35. Prater K.E., Aloi M.S., Pathan J.L., Winston C.N., Chernoff R.A., Davidson S., Sadgrove M., McDonough A., Zierath D., Su W., Weinstein J.R., Garden G.A. 2021. A Subpopulation of microglia generated in the adult mouse brain originates from Prominin-1-expressing progenitors. J. Neurosci. V. 41. P. 7942. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1893-20.2021
  36. Qu W.S., Liu J.L., Li C.Y., Li X., Xie M.J., Wang W., Tian D.S. 2015. Rapidly activated epidermal growth factor receptor mediates lipopolysaccharide-triggered migration of microglia. Neurochem. Int. V. 90. P. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2015.07.007
  37. Qu W.S., Tian D.S., Guo Z.B., Fang J., Zhang Q., Yu Z.Y., Xie M.J., Zhang H.Q., Lü J.G., Wang W. 2012. Inhibition of EGFR/MAPK signaling reduces microglial inflammatory response and the associated secondary damage in rats after spinal cord injury. J. Neuroinflammation. V. 9. P. 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-178
  38. Ramprasad M.P., Terpstra V., Kondratenko N., Quehenberger O., Steinberg D. 1996. Cell surface expression of mouse macrosialin and human CD68 and their role as macrophage receptors for oxidized low density lipoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 93. P. 14833. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14833
  39. Sasaki Y., Ohsawa K., Kanazawa H., Kohsaka S., Imai Y. 2001. Iba1 is an actin-cross-linking protein in macrophages/microglia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. V. 286. P. 292. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5388
  40. Stanley E.R., Chitu V. 2014. CSF-1 receptor signaling in myeloid cells. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol. V. 6. P. a021857. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021857
  41. Stansley B., Post J., Hensley K. 2012. A comparative review of cell culture systems for the study of microglial biology in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation. V. 9. P. 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-115
  42. Takamori Y., Mori T., Wakabayashi T., Nagasaka Y., Matsuzaki T., Yamada H. 2009. Nestin-positive microglia in adult rat cerebral cortex. Brain Res. V. 1270. P. 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.014
  43. Waller R., Baxter L., Fillingham D.J., Coelho S., Pozo J.M., Mozumder M., Frangi A.F., Ince P.G., Simpson J.E., Highley J.R. 2019. Iba-1-/CD68+ microglia are a prominent feature of age-associated deep subcortical white matter lesions. PLoS One. V. 25. P. e0210888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210888
  44. Wohl S.G., Schmeer C.W., Friese T., Witte O.W., Isenmann S. 2011. In situ dividing and phagocytosing retinal microglia express nestin, vimentin, and NG2 in vivo. PLoS One. V. 6. P. e22408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022408
  45. Wong A.M., Patel N.V., Patel N.K., Wei M., Morgan T.E., de Beer M.C., de Villiers W.J., Finch C.E. 2005. Macrosialin increases during normal brain aging are attenuated by caloric restriction. Neurosci. Lett. V. 390. P. 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.07.058
  46. Yan P., Wu X., Liu X., Cai Y., Shao C., Zhu G. 2019. A Causal relationship in spinal cord injury rat model between microglia activation and EGFR/MAPK detected by overexpression of microRNA-325-3p. J. Mol. Neurosci. V. 68. P. 181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01297-w
  47. Yang Y., Sun Y., Hu R., Yan J., Wang Z., Li W., Jiang H. 2021. Morphine promotes microglial activation by upregulating the EGFR/ERK signaling pathway. PLoS One. V. 16 P. e0256870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256870

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (397KB)
3.

Download (125KB)
4.

Download (200KB)
5.

Download (1MB)
6.

Download (126KB)
7.

Download (526KB)
8.

Download (327KB)
9.

Download (1MB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Д.А. Шапошникова, Е.Ю. Москалева, Ю.П. Сёмочкина, О.В. Высоцкая, О.В. Комова, Е.А. Насонова, И.В. Кошлань

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies