Computational investigations of low-emission burner facilities for char gas burning in a power boiler


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Various variants for the structure of low-emission burner facilities, which are meant for char gas burning in an operating TP-101 boiler of the Estonia power plant, are considered. The planned increase in volumes of shale reprocessing and, correspondingly, a rise in char gas volumes cause the necessity in their cocombustion. In this connection, there was a need to develop a burner facility with a given capacity, which yields effective char gas burning with the fulfillment of reliability and environmental requirements. For this purpose, the burner structure base was based on the staging burning of fuel with the gas recirculation. As a result of the preliminary analysis of possible structure variants, three types of early well-operated burner facilities were chosen: vortex burner with the supply of recirculation gases into the secondary air, vortex burner with the baffle supply of recirculation gases between flows of the primary and secondary air, and burner facility with the vortex pilot burner. Optimum structural characteristics and operation parameters were determined using numerical experiments. These experiments using ANSYS CFX bundled software of computational hydrodynamics were carried out with simulation of mixing, ignition, and burning of char gas. Numerical experiments determined the structural and operation parameters, which gave effective char gas burning and corresponded to required environmental standard on nitrogen oxide emission, for every type of the burner facility. The burner facility for char gas burning with the pilot diffusion burner in the central part was developed and made subject to computation results. Preliminary verification nature tests on the ТP-101 boiler showed that the actual content of nitrogen oxides in burner flames of char gas did not exceed a claimed concentration of 150 ppm (200 mg/m3).

About the authors

P. V. Roslyakov

Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI, National Research University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: RoslyakovPV@mpei.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Krasnokazarmennaya 14, Moscow, 111250

I. V. Morozov

Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI, National Research University)

Email: RoslyakovPV@mpei.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Krasnokazarmennaya 14, Moscow, 111250

M. N. Zaychenko

Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI, National Research University)

Email: RoslyakovPV@mpei.ru
Russian Federation, ul. Krasnokazarmennaya 14, Moscow, 111250

V. T. Sidorkin

ENTEH Engineering AS

Email: RoslyakovPV@mpei.ru
Estonia, Elektriku 3, Kohtla-Järve, 30328


Copyright (c) 2016 Pleiades Publishing, Inc.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies