Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute coronary syndrome (data from Russian Federal Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its complications remains high, despite significant advances in the treatment of coronary heart disease and its complications. One of the most life - threatening complications of ACS is cardiogenic shock (CS). CS is an extreme degree of acute heart failure and develops on average in 5-8% of patients hospitalized with ACS. In the present work, we analyzed data from Russian Federal ACS Registry - frequency of CS occurrence, treatment methods, and outcomes of ACS complicated by CS. Aim. Assess the quality of medical care in patients with ACS, which complicated by CS, and its compliance with current clinical guidelines. Materials and methods. Data from patients with ACS were exported from the Russian Federal ACS Registry. The study analyzed the data of 29.736 patients with ACS entered into the registry system in the period from 01.01.2018 to 31.12.2018. Of the 29.736 patients with ACS, 824 patients were diagnosed with CS. To assess the quality of care provided to patients with ACS and CS, the main clinical gguidelines were used. Results. The group of 824 patients with ACS and CS was analyzed. Among them patients with ACS with ST segment elevation prevailed - 77.8% (n=641). According to Russian Federal ACS Registry 44.3% (n=365) of patients with ACS and CS received conservative treatment, of which 58.6% (n=108) were with ACS with ST segment elevation. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 39% (n=321) of patients, of whom 89.4% (n=271) of patients with ACS with ST segment elevation. According to the data of this study, thrombolytic therapy was performed in 26.5% (n=218) of patients. Conclusion. The data obtained demonstrated that patients with ACS and CS did not receive optimal medical care and their treatment does not fully comply with modern clinical guidelines.

About the authors

O V Sagaydak

Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

Email: olesyasagaydak@gmail.com
к.м.н., н.с. отд. гипертонии НИИ клинической кардиологии им. А.Л. Мясникова ФГБУ «НМИЦ кардиологии» Минздрава России; ORCID: 0000-0002-2534-8463 Moscow, Russia

E V Oschepkova

Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

д.м.н., проф., г.н.с. отд. гипертонии НИИ клинической кардиологии им. А.Л. Мясникова ФГБУ «НМИЦ кардиологии» Минздрава России, ORCID: 0000-0003-4534-9890 Moscow, Russia

I E Chazova

Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

акад. РАН, проф., д.м.н., директор НИИ клинической кардиологии им. А.Л. Мясникова, руководитель отд. гипертонии НИИ клинической кардиологии им. А.Л. Мясникова ФГБУ «НМИЦ кардиологии» Минздрава России, ORCID: 0000-0002-9822-4357 Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Гиляревский С.Р., Резван В.В., Кузьмина И.М. и др. Тактика ведения больного с кардиогенным шоком, обусловленным острым инфарктом миокарда: доказательные основы и реальная практика. Журнал им. Н.В. Склифосовского «Неотложная Медицинская помощь». 2014;1:38-44.
  2. Reynolds H.R, Hochman J.S. Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation. 2008;117:686-97. doi: 10.1161/circulation aha.106.613596
  3. Babaev A, Frederick P.D, Pasta D.J, et al. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 2005;294:448-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.4.448
  4. Goldberg R.J, Samad N.A, Yarzebski J, et al. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1162-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904153401504
  5. Holmes D.R.Jr, Bates E.R, Kleiman N.S, et al. Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. The GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:668-74. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00215-P
  6. Holmes D.R.Jr, Berger P.B, Hochman J.S, et al. Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation. 1999;100:2067-73. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.100.20.2067
  7. Jeger R.V, Radovanovic D, Hunziker P.R, et al. Ten - year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:618-26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00005
  8. Hochman J.S, Sleeper L.A, Webb J.G, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM19 9908263410901
  9. Webb J.G, Sleeper L.A, Buller C.E, et al. Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shock? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1084-90. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00876-7
  10. Goldberg R.J, Spencer F.A, Gore J.M, et al. Thirty - year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population - based perspective. Circulation. 2009;119:1211-9. doi: 10.1161/circulation aha.108.814947
  11. Hochman J.S, Sleeper L.A, White H.D, et al. One - year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 2001;285:190-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.2.190
  12. Kohsaka S, Menon V, Lowe A.M, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1643-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.14. 1643
  13. Довгалевский П.Я., Гриднев В.И., Посненкова О.М., Киселев А.Р., Дмитриев В.А., Попова Ю.В. Ощепкова Е.В. Руководство пользователя информационно - аналитической системы «Федеральный регистр больных с острым коронарным синдромом». Кардио-ИТ. 2014;1(2):0203. doi: 10.15275/cardioit.2014.0203
  14. Manesh R Patel, Gregory J Dehmer, John W Hirshfeld, Peter K Smith, John A Spertus. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization Focused Update. J Amer College of Cardiology. 2012;59(9):857-81; doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011. 12.001
  15. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes M.J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio A.L.P, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen M.J, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-77. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
  16. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J.P, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, Bax J.J, Borger M.A, Brotons C, Chew D.P, Gencer B, Hasenfuss G, Kjeldsen K, Lancellotti P, Landmesser U, Mehilli J, Mukherjee D, Storey R.F, Windecker S. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ ehv320
  17. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet J.P, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kappetein A.P, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann F.J, Richter D.J, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini G.G, Taggart D.P, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278
  18. Руда М.Я., Аверков О.В., Панченко Е.П., Явелов И.С. Рекомендации Общества специалистов по неотложной кардиологии. Диагностика и лечение больных с острым коронарным синдромом без подъема сегмента ST электрокардиограммы. Часть 1. Кардиология. 2017;57(8):80-100. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2017.8.10023
  19. Levine G.N, Bates E.R, Blankenship J.C, Bailey S.R, Bittl J.A, Cercek B, Chambers C.E, Ellis S.G, Guyton R.A, Hollenberg S.M, Khot U.N, Lange R.A, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa I.D, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu B.K, Ting H.H. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124(23):e574-651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ba622
  20. Manesh R. Patel, Gregory J. Dehmer, John W. Hirshfeld, Peter K. Smith, John A. Spertus. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization Focused Update. J Amer College of Cardiology. 2012;59(9):857-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.1 2.001
  21. Сагайдак О.В., Ощепкова Е.В., Попова Ю.В., Киселев А.Р., Коносова И.Д., Гриднев В.И. Подходы к оптимизации временных показателей оказания медицинской помощи больным с острым коронарным синдромом в системе Федерального регистра острого коронарного синдрома и мониторинга Минздрава России. Кардиологический вестник. 2017;15(4):96-101.
  22. Van Diepen S, Katz J.N, Albert N.M, et al. On behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017; Sep 18 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525
  23. Shaefi S, O’Gara B, Kociol R.D, Joynt K, Mueller A, Nizamuddin J, Mahmood E, Talmor D, Shahul S. Effect of cardiogenic shock hospital volume on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e001462. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001462
  24. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F.J, Ferenc M, Olbrich H.G, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Böhm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K. IABP-SHOCK II Trial Investigators. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1287-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410
  25. Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow W.S, Mujib M, Palaniswamy C, Sule S, Jain D, Gotsis W, Ahmed A, Frishman W.H, Fonarow G.C. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000590. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000590
  26. Harjola V.P, Lassus J, Sionis A, Køber L, Tarvasmäki T, Spinar J, Parissis J, Banaszewski M, Silva-Cardoso J, Carubelli V, Di Somma S, Tolppanen H, Zeymer U, Thiele H, Nieminen M.S, Mebazaa A. CardShock Study Investigators; GREAT Network. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short - term mortality in cardiogenic shock (published correction appears in Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17:984) Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:501-9. doi: 10.1002/ejh f.260
  27. Мартынчик С.А., Филатенкова С.В. Медико - экономическая оценка и обоснование технологий и программ бюджетирования стационарной помощи при ишемической болезни сердца (краткий обзор литературы). Электронный журнал «Социальные аспекты здоровья населения». 2012; 2(24). Доступно по ссылке (ссылка активна на 28.01.2019): http://vestnik. mednet.ru/ content/view/395/30/lang,ru/
  28. Vaitkus P.T, Witmer W.T, Brandenburg R.G, Wells S.K, Zenhnacker J.B. Economic Impact of Angioplasty Salvage Techniques, With an Emphasis on Coronary Stents: A Method Incorporating Costs, Revenues, Clinical Effectiveness and Payer Mix. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30:894-900. doi: 10.1 016/S0735-1097(97)00251-9

Copyright (c) 2019 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies