Role of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic types of left bundle branch block in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To assess the value of the complex analysis of electrocardiographic (ECG) variants and echocardiographic (echo) manifestation of left bundle branch block (LBBB) in predicting the success of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Materials and methods. The study included 39 patients (mean age 61.49±9.0 years) on sinus rhythm with LBBB, QRS duration ≥130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, heart failure (HF) NYHA II-IV despite optimal pharmacological therapy during 3 month. All patients had undergone CRT-D implantation. Depending on presence or absence of ECG-criteria, proposed by D.G. Strauss et al., patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 group - strict LBBB, proposed by D.G. Strauss et al. (n=29) and 2 group - other patients (n=10). In addition to standard echocardiography, global longitudinal 2-dimensional strain (GLS) and LBBB contraction pattern have been performed initially and in 6 months after implantation. Response to CRT was defined as decrease in LV end-systolic volume by >15% after 6 months of follow-up. Results and discussion. Typical LBBB echo contraction pattern was detected in 25 patients (64% of all included). These patients had more pronounced longitudinal dissynchrony and a more expressed global longitudinal strain before CPT-D implantation (p<0.05). 27 patients (69% of all included) were included in the "response" group, the remaining 12 patients (31% of all included) - the "non-response" group. In the "response" group the morphology of the QRS complex was significantly more likely to meet the criteria, proposed by D.G. Strauss et al., than other variants (23 vs. 6, respectively, p=0.02), and the echo contraction pattern of this patients more often corresponded to "typical" LBBB (24 vs. 1, p=0.001). All patients, who had the ECG criteria, proposed by D.G. Strauss et al., and echo "typical" LBBB contraction pattern, responded on CPT. Moreover, the proportion of these patients in the "response" group was rather high - 81.5% (22 of 27 patients). Conclusion. ECG criteria LBBB, proposed by D.G. Strauss et al., identify patients with delayed transseptal interventricular conduction due to complete LBBB, what is a good target for CPT. Evaluation of the echo contraction pattern based on the definition of longitudinal myocardial deformation by means of a two-dimensional strand technology allows predicting the success of CPT in patients with LBBB. Patients with «typical» LBBB contraction pattern show more pronounced global longitudinal strain and larger longitudinal dissynchrony compared with other patients, and it explains their better response to CPT. Complex analysis of strict LBBB ECG criteria and echo contraction pattern are promising parameters in predicting beneficial response to CRT in patients with HF.

About the authors

S Yu Kashtanova

A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: sv.kashtanova88@gmail.com
аспирант отд. клинической электрофизиологии и рентгенохирургических методов лечения нарушений ритма сердца Moscow, Russia

N A Mironova

A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

к.м.н., с.н.с. отд. клинической электрофизиологии и рентгенохирургических методов лечения нарушений ритма сердца Moscow, Russia

V N Shitov

A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

м.н.с. отд. ультразвуковых методов исследования Moscow, Russia

E M Gupalo

A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

к.м.н., м.н.с. отд. клинической электрофизиологии и рентгенохирургических методов лечения нарушений ритма сердца Moscow, Russia

V G Kiktev

A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

к.м.н., с.н.с. отд. клинической электрофизиологии и рентгенохирургических методов лечения нарушений ритма сердца Moscow, Russia

M A Saidova

A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

д.м.н., проф., руководитель отд. ультразвуковых методов исследования Moscow, Russia

S P Golitsyn

A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

д.м.н., проф., руководитель отд. клинической электрофизиологии и рентгенохирургических методов лечения нарушений ритма сердца Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Беленков Ю.Н., Мареев В.Ю. Лечение сердечной недостаточности в 21 веке: достижение, вопросы и уроки доказательной медицины. Кардиология. 2008;48(2):6-16
  2. Padelettia L, Giaccardia M, Turrenia F, et al. Influence of QRS prolongation on the natural history of CHF. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2004;6 (Suppl D):D79-D82. doi: 10.1016/j.ehjsup.2004.05.023
  3. Tabrizi F, Englund A, Rosenqvist M, et al. Influence of left bundle branch block on long - term mortality in a population with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2449-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm262
  4. Барт Б.Я., Ларина В.Н., Бродский М.С. Ремоделирование сердца и прогноз больных с хронической сердечной недостаточностью при наличии полной блокады левой ножки пучка Гиса. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2011;(6):4-8.
  5. Goldenberg I, Moss A.J, Hall W.J, et al. Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation. 2011;124:1527-36. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.014324
  6. Zareba W, Klein H, Cygankiewicz I, et al., for the MADIT-CRT Investigators. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation. 2011;123:1061-72. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.960898
  7. Van Deursen C.J, Blaauw Y, Witjens M.I, et al. The value of the 12-lead ECG for evaluation and optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in daily clinical practice. J Electrocardiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;47(2):202-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.01.007
  8. Strauss D.G, Selvester R.H, Wagner G.S. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 15;107(6):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.010
  9. Tian Y, Zhang P, Li X, et al. True complete left bundle branch block morphology strongly predicts good response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2013;15:1499-506. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut049
  10. Никифоров В.С., Никищенкова Ю.В. Cовременные возможности speckle tracking эхокардиографиии в клинической практике. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2017;13(2):248-55 doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2017-13-2-248-255
  11. Marechaux S, Menet A, Guyomar Y, Ennezat P-V, Raphaëlle A, Guerbaai R.N, Graux P, Tribouilloy C. Role of echocardiography before cardiac resynchronization therapy: new advances and current developments. Echocardiography. 2016;33(11):1745-52. doi: 10.1111/echo.13334
  12. Brunet-Bernard A, Marechaux S, Fauchier L, et al. Combined score using clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters to predict left ventricular remodeling in patients having had cardiac resynchronization therapy six months earlier. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:2045-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.050
  13. Risum N, Strauss D, Sogaard P, et al. Left bundle - branch block: the relationship between electrocardiogram electrical activation and echocardiography mechanical contraction. Am Heart J. 2013 Aug;166(2):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.005
  14. Risum N, Tayal B, Hansen T.F, et al. Identification of Typical Left Bundle Branch Block Contraction by Strain Echocardiography Is Additive to Electrocardiography in Prediction of Long-Term Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC. 2015 Aug 11;66(6):631-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.020
  15. Алехин М.Н. Ультразвуковые методики оценки деформации миокарда и их клиническое значение. Клиническое значение показателей деформации и вращения миокарда (лекция 3). Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2012;(1):95-114
  16. Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F, Carbucicchio C, Goette A, Geller C, Kloss M, Klein H. Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle - branch block. Circulation. 2004 Mar 1;109(9):1133-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000118502.91105.f6
  17. Ставцева Ю.В., Виллевальде С.В., Свешников А.В., Кобалава Ж.Д. Основные патогенетические аспекты и клиническое значение механической диссинхронии. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2014;10(2):220-30 doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2014-10-2-220-230
  18. Tian Y, Zhang P, Li X, Gao Y, Zhu T, Wang L, Li D, Wang J, Yuan C, Guo J. True complete left bundle branch block morphology strongly predicts good response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2013;15:1499-506. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut049
  19. Migliore F, Baritussio A, Stabile G, Reggiani A, D’Onofrio A, Palmisano P, Bertaglia E. Prevalence of true left bundle branch block in current practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. J Cardiovasc Med. 2016;17(7):462-8. doi: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000000297

Copyright (c) 2018 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies