Treating patients with acute myeloid leukemias (AML) according to the protocol of the AML-01.10 Russian multicenter randomized trial: the Coordinating Center's results


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

AIM. To make a randomized comparison of 2 consolidation treatment options (two patient groups): 2 cycles of cytarabine in average (1g/m2 in Group 2) and standard (100 mg/m2 in Group 1) doses in combination with idarubicin (8-12 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2), after two 7+3 induction cycles of daunorubicin (60 mg/m2) and subsequent 6 cycles of maintenance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In January 2010 to October 2013, a Russian multicenter trial was conducted to treat patients with acute myeloid leukemias (AML) in accordance with the AML-01.10 protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01587430). The trial enrolled 243 AML patients from 21 centers, including 71 patients (median age 38 years) from the State Hematology Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; 35 and 36 patients were randomized to Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The randomized groups were balanced by basic clinical and laboratory parameters. Favorable, intermediate, and high cytogenetic prognoses were in 14 (21.9%), 40 (62.5%), and 10 (15.6%) patients, respectively. RESULTS. Prior to treatment, 2 patients died; one patient refused treatment. Fifty-eight (85.3%) of the 68 patients achieved complete remission (CR); early deaths was in 2 (2.9%) and resistance in 8 (11.8%). Four (6.9%) patients died during CR. Protocol deviations (doses, intervals, and the number of cycles) were recorded in 12 (20.7%) of the 58 patients. Other 8 (11.8%) patients were switched to low-dose cytarabine because of complications, withdrawn from the protocol and not included into the analysis of randomized comparison. Twenty allogeneic bone marrow transplantations (allo-BMT) (7 related, 12 unrelated, and 1 haploidentical) were performed; of them 15 allo-BMTs were done during first CR. In the 68 patients, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 45.6%; relapse-free survival (RFS) was 41.5%. OS was 64.6% in Group 1 and 58.3% in Group 2; RFS was 62 and 38.8% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p>0.5). In the favorable, intermediate, and high prognosis groups, OS was 79.5, 60, and 31.1% and RFS was 81.8, 41.3, and 33.3%, respectively (p=0.1). The consolidation treatment option unchanged survival rates in the above risk groups. Unachieved CR after the first cycle considerably decreased RFS (33.9% versus 60%) and served as an indication for allo-BMT during first CP (RFS without BMT was 0; that with BMT was 78%). CONCLUSION. No differences were found between both consolidation options according to long-term RESULTS. Protocol deviations were recorded in one-third of the patients. While implementing the protocol, the efficiency of treatment was high. Allo-BMT during first CR substantially increased RFS if CP was not achieved after the first cycle.

About the authors

E N Parovichnikova

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

Email: elenap@blood.ru
125167 Москва, Новый Зыковский пр-д, д. 4

V V Troitskaia

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

G A Kliasova

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

L A Kuz'mina

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

A N Sokolov

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

E V Paramonova

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

G M Galstian

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

S A Kessel'man

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

M Iu Drokov

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

V A Vasil'eva

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

T N Obukhova

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

S M Kulikov

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

V G Savchenko

ФГБУ Гематологический научный центр Минздрава России, Москва

References

  1. Савченко В.Г., Паровичникова Е.Н., Менделеева Л.П. и др. Многоцентровая кооперация - основа прогресса в лечении лейкозов. Тер арх 2005; 7: 5-11.
  2. Паровичникова Е.Н., Савченко В.Г., Клясова Г.А. и др. Токсичность различных протоколов лечения острых миелоидных лейкозов взрослых: результаты четырех российских многоцентровых исследований. Тер арх 2010; 7: 5-11.
  3. Паровичникова Е.Н., Клясова Г.А., Соколов А.Н. и др. Первые результаты лечения острых миелоидных лейкозов взрослых по протоколу ОМЛ 01.10 Научно-исследовательской группой центров России. Тер арх 2012; 7: 10-15.
  4. Buchner T., Schlenk RF., Schaich M. et al. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Different Treatment Strategies Versus a Common Standard Arm-Combined Prospective Analysis by the German AML Intergroup. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (29): 3604-3610.
  5. Othus M., Kantarjian H., Petersdorf S. et al. Declining rates of treatment-related mortality in patients with newly diagnosed AML given 'intense' induction regimens: a report from SWOG and MD Anderson. Leukemia 2013 Jun 13. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.176. [Epub ahead of print].
  6. Cheson B.D., Bennett J.M., Kopecky K.J. et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21 (24): 4642-4649.
  7. Ben De Pauw´a Thomas J., Walsh´a J., Peter Donnelly et al. Revised Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1813-1821.

Copyright (c) 2014 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies