Clinical and endoscopic features and treatment problems in patients with duodenal ulcer after its perforation
- Authors: Liubskaia LA1, Kolesnikova II.1, Grigor'eva I.V1
-
Affiliations:
- Тверская государственная медицинская академия Минздрава России
- Issue: Vol 85, No 12 (2013)
- Pages: 51-54
- Section: Editorial
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0040-3660/article/view/31378
- ID: 31378
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
AIM: To compare clinical and endoscopic findings and standard therapy results in duodenal ulcer disease (DUD) patients with and without a history of perforated ulcer/MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients with recurrent DUD, including 61 patients with uncomplicated DUD (Group 1) and 52 patients with a history of perforated ulcer (Group 2) were examined. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) and 24-hour pH-metry were performed in addition to physical examination. Ulcer scarring was evaluated during control EGDS/RESULTS: 75% of the patients with uncomplicated DUD were observed to have classical pain syndrome and the pain was milder, more extensive, and food-unrelated in the patients who had sustained perforation. Decreased appetite was more common in uncomplicated DUD (35%). EGDS showed that complicated DUD was accompanied by a significantly higher detection rate of erosive esophagitis (20%), gastritis (52%), duodenitis (25%), multiple ulcers (28%), and larger ulcer sizes. 35% of the patients who had experienced duodenal ulcer perforation exhibited an inadequate antisecretory effect of standard omeprazole doses, which was followed by the increase in ulcer scarring time by an average of 1.2 days/CONCLUSION: In the patients with perforated DUD, the history was typified by less pronounced, more extended, and food-unrelated pain, esophageal and gastroduodenal erosive damages, multiple ulcerative defects, large ulcer sizes than in those with uncomplicated DUD, as well as resistance to standard omeprazole dose in one third of the cases, and delayed ulcer scarring.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
L A Liubskaia
Тверская государственная медицинская академия Минздрава России
Email: lubawa32@mail.ru
I Iu Kolesnikova
Тверская государственная медицинская академия Минздрава России
Iu V Grigor'eva
Тверская государственная медицинская академия Минздрава России
References
- Афендулов С.А., Журавлев Г.Ю., Краснолуцкий Н.А. Лечение прободной язвы. М 2005.
- Утешев Н.С., Гуляев А.А., Ярцев П.А., Забавская О.А. Лечение больных с перфоративными пилородуоденальными язвами. Хирургия. 2003; 12: 48-51.
- Стандарты. Диагностика и терапия кислотозависимых заболеваний, в том числе ассоциированных с Helicobacter pylori (Третье Московское соглашение, 4 февраля 2005 г.). Экспер и клин гастроэнтерол 2005; 3: 3-6.
- Евсеев М.А., Ивахов Г.Б., Головин Р.А. Стратегия антисекреторной терапии у больных с кровоточащими и перфоративными гастродуоденальными язвами. Хирургия 2009; 3: 46-52.
- pH-метрия пищевода и желудка при заболеваниях верхних отделов пищеварительного тракта. Под ред. акад. РАМН Ф.И. Комарова. М: Медпрактика 2005.
- Burget D.W., Chiverton S.C., Hunt R.H. Is there an optimal degree of acid supression for healing of duodenal ulcer? A model of the relationship between ulcer healing and acid suppression. Gastroenterology 1990; 99: 345-351.
![](/img/style/loading.gif)