Nifedipine-retard alone and incombination with metoprolol: comparative efficacy andsafety in patients with arterial hypertension


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To compare efficacy and safety of nifedipin-retard (cordaflex-retard, Egis, Hungary) used in
monotherapy and in combination with metoprolol (egilok, Egis, Hungary) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH).
Material and methods. The study included 20 patients with AH stage I-II (12 males, 8 females,
mean age 57.3 years, mean duration of the disease 8.6 years). Nifedipin-retard was given in a daily
dose 40 mg/day (20 mg twice a day) in monotherapy and 20 mg/day in combination with metoprolol
which was administered 50 mg twice a day (a daily dose 100 mg/day). The control examination consisted of a physical examination, measurement of arterial pressure (AP) by Korotkov, registration of
heart rate, ECG, 24-h AP monitoring, echocardiography.
Results. By 24-h AP monitoring, a 4-week treatment with nifedipin-retard alone resulted in lowering
of systolic arterial pressure. The combined treatment produced a more pronounced fall both in systolic
and diastolic pressure. Diastolic left-ventricular function improved in combined therapy. Side effects
observed in nifedipin-retard monotherapy got much more weaker when this drug combined with metoprolol.
Conclusion. Combination of nifedipin-retard with metoprolol provides better clinical response and tolerance than monotherapy with nifedipin-retard.

About the authors

O Yu Isaikina

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

V M Gorbunov

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

G F Andreeva

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

N A Dmitrieva

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

S Yu Martsevich

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

ГНИЦ профилактической медицины Минздрава РФ

References

  1. Gong L., Zhang W., Zhu J. et al. Shanghai Trial Of Nifedipine in the Elderly (STONE). J. Hypertens. 1996; 14: 1237-1245.
  2. Hansson L., Zanchetti A., Carruthers S. G. et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet 1998; 351: 1755-1762.
  3. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evalua- tion, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Commitee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch. Intern. Med. 1997; 157: 2413-2446.
  4. World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines subcommitee. J. Hypertens 1999; 17: 151.
  5. Профилактика, диагностика и лечение первичной артериальной гипертонии в Российской Федерации (ДАГ-1). Клин, фармакол. и фармакотер. 2000; 3: 5-31.
  6. ANAES Agence Nationale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation en Sante Recommandations. 2000. 1-17.
  7. White W. В., Dey H. M., Schulman P. Assessment of the daily pressure load as a determine of cardiac function in patients with mild-to moderate hypertension. Am. Heart J. 1989; 118: 782-795.
  8. Strauer B. E., Schwartzkopff B. Objectives of high blood pressure treatment: left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic function, and coronary reserve. Am. J. Hypertens. 1998; 11: 879-881.

Copyright (c) 2003 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies