The informative value of CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T-cell count and cHIS scale as predictors of severe COVID-19 when using interleukin-6 receptor blockers in the in-hospital setting

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Clinical and laboratory signs of hyperinflammatory response in COVID-19 may serve as prognostic markers of the disease scenario. In real-world practice, there is an unmet need to determine the optimal timing of identifying predictors of SARS-CoV-2 adverse outcomes in the context of patient stratification to improve the effectiveness of anti-IL-6R therapy. Lymphopenia has a high informative value for the adverse prognosis of the COVID-19 course; however, the informative value of CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ T-cell count remains questionable. In addition to lymphocyte phenotyping, a six-criterion additive scale (cHIS) was used in the study.

Aim. To study the informative value of CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ T-cell phenotyping and cHIS scale as predictors of severe COVID-19 when using IL-6R blockers.

Materials and methods. A single-center, bi-directional study included 179 patients with SARS-CoV-2-induced community-acquired pneumonia with severe acute inflammation and progressing respiratory failure. Data were obtained from electronic patient records. Anti-IL-6R was administered in addition to standard therapy in the cohorts. The following disease outcomes were used to determine the informative value of the studied parameters: mortality and hospital discharge. Inflammatory markers were measured before and after administering anti-IL-6R, followed by monitoring. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 25.0). The quantitative indices were described using the median and interquartile range. Quantitative indices were compared using nonparametric methods: Mann–Whitney U-test, Kruskal–Wallis test. The groups were compared by qualitative characteristics using Pearson's chi-square test. Correlation analysis of quantitative indicators was performed using Spearman rank correlation. For additional analysis of the cHIS scale, odds ratio and decision tree methods were used. Differences were considered statistically significant at р0,05.

Results. Immunophenotyping of lymphocytes as a predictor of the severe SARS-CoV-2 requires further research. The cHIS scale may be implemented in routine clinical practice due to its high predictive value. A cHIS score of ≥2 on the first day of admission is a critical threshold for intensification and revision of therapy. The prognosis with cHIS is logically relevant in the first three days of hospitalization.

Conclusion. The main result of the study is the definition of target groups of patients with community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia for the IL-6R-blockers, considering the timing of their effective use in real clinical practice.

About the authors

Tatiana S. Kruglova

City Clinical Hospital №52

Author for correspondence.
Email: surckova.t@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4949-9178

врач – аллерголог-иммунолог, зав. отд-нием аллергологии и иммунологии

Russian Federation, Moscow

Daria S. Fomina

City Clinical Hospital №52; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: surckova.t@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5083-6637

канд. мед. наук, врач – аллерголог-иммунолог, рук. центра аллергологии и иммунологии, доц. каф. клинической иммунологии и аллергологии

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Sen A, Nigam A, Vachher M. Role of Polypeptide Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of COVID-19. Int J Pept Res Ther. 2022;28(2):59. doi: 10.1007/s10989-022-10366-5
  2. Масчан М.А., Новичкова Г.А. Гемофагоцитарный лимфогистиоцитоз. ВСП. 2009;3. Режим доступа: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gemofagotsitarnyy-limfogistiotsitoz-1. Ссылка активна на 28.04.2022 [Maschan MA, Novichkova GA. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. VSP. 2009;3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gemofagotsitarnyy-limfogistiotsitoz-1. Accessed: 28.04.2022 (in Russian)].
  3. McGonagle D, Sharif K, O'Regan A, Bridgewood C. The Role of Cytokines including Interleukin-6 in COVID-19 induced Pneumonia and Macrophage Activation Syndrome-Like Disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(6):102537. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102537
  4. Schijns V, Lavelle EC. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 disease by controlled modulation of innate immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2020;50(7):932-8. doi: 10.1002/eji.202048693
  5. Buckley LF, Wohlford GF, Ting C, et al. Role for Anti-Cytokine Therapies in Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(8):e0178. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000178
  6. Lin L, Lu L, Cao W, Li T. Hypothesis for potential pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection – a review of immune changes in patients with viral pneumonia. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):727-32. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1746199
  7. Zheng Z, Peng F, Xu B, et al. Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020;81(2):e16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020,04.021
  8. Nasir N, Tajuddin S, Khaskheli S, et al. Clinical outcomes of immunomodulatory therapies in the management of COVID-19: A tertiary-care experience from Pakistan. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0262608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262608
  9. Salama C, Han J, Yau L, et al. Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 Pneumonia. New Eng J Med. 2021;384(1):20-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030340
  10. Hermine O, Mariette X, Tharaux PL, et al. Effect of Tocilizumab vs Usual Care in Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 and Moderate or Severe Pneumonia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(1):32-40. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6820
  11. Perrone F, Piccirillo MC, Ascierto PA, et al. Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The single-arm TOCIVID-19 prospective trial. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02573-9
  12. Clinical management of COVID-19: Living guideline, 15 September 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/teams/health-care-readiness/covid-19. Accessed: 23.11.2022.
  13. Временные методические рекомендации «Профилактика, диагностика и лечение новой коронавирусной инфекции (COVID-19)». Версия 4 (27.03.2020). M.: Министерство здравоохранения РФ, 2020 [Vremenniie metodicheskiie rekomendatsii “Profilaktika, diagnostika i lecheniie novoi koronavirusnoi infektsii (COVID-19)”. Versiia 4 (27.03.2020). Moscow: Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RF, 2020 (in Russian)].
  14. Круглова Т.С., Фомина Д.С., Потешкина Н.Г., и др. Критерии оптимального применения блокаторов рецепторов интерлейкина-6 у пациентов с COVID-19. Терапевтический архив. 2021;93(11):1316-24 [Kruglova TS, Fomina DS, Poteshkina NG, et al. Criteria for the optimal use of interleukin-6 receptor blockers in patients with COVID-19. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv (Ter. Arkh.). 2021;93(11):1316-24 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2021.11.201248
  15. Melo AKG, Milby KM, Caparroz ALMA, et al. Biomarkers of cytokine storm as red flags for severe and fatal COVID-19 cases: A living systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253894
  16. Nishiga M, Wang DW, Han Y, et al. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:543-58. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0413-9
  17. Rezaei M, Marjani M, Mahmoudi S, et al. Dynamic changes of lymphocyte subsets in the course of covid-19. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000514202
  18. Liu Z, Long W, Tu M, et al. Lymphocyte subset (CD4+, CD8+) counts reflect the severity of infection and predict the clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81:318-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020,03.054
  19. Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(5):2620-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI137244
  20. Lu Q, Wang Z, Yin Y, et al. Association of peripheral lymphocyte and the subset levels with the progression and mortality of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2020;7:558545. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.558545
  21. Webb BJ, Peltan ID, Jensen P, et al. Clinical criteria for COVID-19-associated hyperinflammatory syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2(12):e754-63. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30343-X
  22. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30-566-3
  23. Cavalli G, De Luca G, Campochiaro C, et al. Interleukin-1 blockade with high-dose anakinra in patients with COVID-19, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and hyperinflammation: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e325-31. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30127-2

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. сHIS dependency and O2 (l) requirement.

Download (105KB)
3. Fig. 2. Chart of cHIS scores on the first day of hospitalization for survivors and deceased.

Download (84KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dependency of the number of survivors and deaths on the median cHIS on the first day of hospitalization.

Download (76KB)
5. Fig. 4. Effect of cHIS change on survival on day 1 of hospitalization.

Download (62KB)
6. Fig. 5. Effect of cHIS change on survival on 3rd day of hospitalization.

Download (70KB)
7. Fig. 6. Effect of cHIS change on survival on 5th day of hospitalization.

Download (63KB)
8. Fig. 7. Decision tree depending on cHIS value on the 3rd and 5th day of hospitalization.

Download (57KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies