Esophagoprotective therapy in patients with erosive esophagitis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the advantages of using combined therapy of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and esophagoprotector in comparison with basic therapy of PPIs for 4 weeks based on the results of changes in the endoscopic picture.To compare the effectiveness of 4-week PPI therapy and 4-week combination therapy with PPI and esophagoprotector Alfasoxx (sodium hyaluronate, chondroitin sulfate, poloxomer 407) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) of any degree according to the Los Angeles Endoscopic Classification.

Materials and methods. 81 patients with EE A–C according to the Los Angeles endoscopic classification (1994) was enrolled in the study on the basis of the clinic of Peter the Great, Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University. By computer randomization, patients were divided into the control group – 40 patients (pantoprazole 40 mg 1 time per day) and the intervention group – 41 patients (pantoprazole 40 mg 1 time per day + Alfasoxx 1 sachet qid). The therapy was carried out for 4 weeks. In all patients before and after therapy, the frequency and severity of the main symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were assessed, esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed.

Results. The advantage of combination therapy over standard PPI monotherapy in patients with EE was revealed. According to the results of the control endoscopy, healing of erosions of the esophageal mucosa was observed in 39 out of 41 (95.1%) patients in the intervention group and 32 out of 39 (82.1%) in the control group. The proportion of patients who showed an improvement in the endoscopic picture before and after treatment for 4 weeks by at least 1 level according to the Los Angeles classification was significantly higher in the comparison group – 41 patients (100%), while in the control group 33 patients (85%); p<0.009. After treatment, the combination therapy group had a lower incidence (p<0.01) and severity of heartburn (p<0.01). The same results are demonstrated by combination therapy regarding the symptom – belching of air: in the study group after treatment, this symptom occurred less frequently (p=0.014), its severity was significantly less than in the control group (p<0.01). There was a statistically significant decrease in the need for on-demand antacid therapy in the study group.

Conclusion. In this study involving 81 patients with erosive GERD, the benefits of combination therapy were demonstrated. The addition of Alfasoxx medical device to PPI therapy increases the clinical and endoscopic efficacy of therapy. This positive effect is associated with the esophagoprotective properties of the drug, based on unique pharmacodynamic characteristics. Combination therapy for GERD is preferred in patients with EE. Studies have shown the expediency of using Alfasoxx in case of insufficient effectiveness of classical acid-suppressive therapy for GERD.

About the authors

Natalia V. Bakulina

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: topalova.julias@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4075-4096

д-р мед. наук, зав. каф. внутренних болезней, клинической фармакологии и нефрологии ФГБОУ ВО «СЗГМУ им. И.И. Мечникова»

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey V. Tikhonov

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: sergeyvt2702@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5720-3528

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Yulia G. Topalova

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: topalova.julias@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3999-6848
SPIN-code: 1301-6443

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Tatyana A. Ilchishina

SM-Clinic

Email: ita17@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2327-5248

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Roman V. Vasiliev

Network of Multidisciplinary Clinics “OSNOVA”

Author for correspondence.
Email: veterenar4ik@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8289-4420
SPIN-code: 6091-3975

Ph.D. biol. Sci., Associate Professor 

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Ивашкин В.Т., Маев И.В., Трухманов А.С., и др. Рекомендации Российской гастроэнтерологической ассоциации по диагностике и лечению гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2020;30(4):70-97 [Ivashkin VT, Maev IV, Trukhmanov AS, et al. Recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association in Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2020;30(4):70-97 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-4-70-97
  2. Richter JE, Friedenberg FK. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. In: Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. Ed. by M Feldman, LS Friedman, LJ Brandt. 10th ed., 2015.
  3. Маев И.В., Юренев Г.Л., Вьючнова Е.С., и др. Гастроэзофагеальная рефлюксная болезнь. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2019 [Maev IV, Iurenev GL, V'iuchnova YS, et al. Gastroezofageal'naia refliuksnaia bolezn'. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019 (in Russian)].
  4. Chatila AT, Nguyen MTT, Krill T, et al. Natural history pathophysiology and evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. DisMon. 2020;66(1):100848. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2019.02.001
  5. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Up-date on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63(6):871-80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269
  6. Лазебник Л.Б., Машарова А.А., Бордин Д.С., и др. Многоцентровое исследование «Эпидемиология гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни в России» (МЭГРЕ): первые итоги. Экспериментальная и клиническая гастроэнтерология. 2009;(6):4-12 [Lazebnik LB, Masharova AA, Bordin DS, et al. Mnogotsentrovoe issledovanie “Epidemiologiia gastroezofageal'noi refliuksnoi bolezni v Rossii“ (MEGRE): pervye itogi. Eksperimental'naia i klinicheskaia gastroenterologiia. 2009;(6):4-12 (in Russian)].
  7. Bor S, Lazebnik LB, Kitapcioglu G, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Moscow. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(2):159-65. doi: 10.1111/dote.12310
  8. Тихонов С.В., Симаненков В.И., Бакулина Н.В., и др. Коррекция пищевого поведения у пациентов с эрозивным рефлюкс-эзофагитом. Вестник Северо-Западного государственного медицинского университета им. И.И. Мечникова. 2021;13(1):71-84 [Tikhonov SV, Simanenkov VI, Bakulina NV, et al. Correction of eating behavior in patients with erosive reflux esophagitis. Herald of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov. 2021;13(1):71-84 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17816/mechnikov63311
  9. Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF, et al. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1383-91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045
  10. Rettura F, Bronzini F, Campigotto M, et al. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Management Update. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:765061. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765061: 29.0
  11. Kahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G, Smout AJ. Management of the patient with incomplete response to PPI therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27(3):401-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.06.005
  12. Sigterman KE, van Pinxteren B, Bonis PA, et al. Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(5):CD002095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002095.pub5
  13. Sifrim D, Zerbib F. Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2012;61(9):1340-54. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301897
  14. Savarino V, Dulbecco P, de Bortoli N, et al. The appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): Need for a reappraisal. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;37:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.10.007
  15. Маев И.В., Бакулин И.Г., Бакулина Н.В., и др. Клинико-эндоскопические характеристики ГЭРБ у пациентов с ожирением. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2021;17(4):12-20 [Mayev IV, Bakulin IG, Bakulina NV, et al. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of GERD in obese patients. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2021;17(4):12-20 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2021-17-4-12-20
  16. Симаненков В.И., Маев И.В., Ткачева О.Н., и др. Синдром повышенной эпителиальной проницаемости в клинической практике. Мультидисциплинарный национальный консенсус. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2021;20(1):2758 [Simanenkov VI, Maev IV, Tkacheva ON, et al. Syndrome of increased epithelial permeability in clinical practice. Multidisciplinary national Consensus. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2021;20(1):2758 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.15829/1728-8800-2021-2758
  17. Кукес В.Г. Клиническая фармакология: учебник. 6-е изд. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2021 [Kukes VG. Klinicheskaia farmakologiia: uchebnik. 6 ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2021 (in Russian)].
  18. Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(1):27-56. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538
  19. Бакулина Н.В., Тихонов С.В., Лищук Н.Б. Альфазокс – инновационное медицинское изделие с доказанным эзофагопротективным потенциалом. Гастроэнтерология. Хирургия. Интенсивная терапия. Consilium Medicum. 2019;2:17-23 [Bakulina NV, Tikhonov SV, Lishchuk NB. Alfasoxx is an innovative nonprescription medication with proven esophagoprotective potential. Gastroenterology. Surgery. Intensive Care. Consilium Medicum. 2019;2:17-23 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.26442/26583739.2019.2.190404
  20. Guelfi G, Stefanetti V, Zampini D, et al. Gold nanoparticles approach to detect chondroitin sulphate and hyaluronic acid urothelial coating. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09872-0
  21. Di Simone MP, Baldi F, Vasina V, et al. Barrier effect of Esoxx(®) on esophageal mucosal damage: experimental study on ex-vivo swine model. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2012;5:103-7. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S31404
  22. Березина О.И., Валитова Э.Р., Быстровская Е.В., Бордин Д.С. Комбинированная терапия гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезни. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2021;17(16):32-9 [Berezina OI, Valitova ER, Bystrovskaya EV, Bordin DS. Combined Therapy of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2021;17(16):32-9 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2021-17-16-32-39
  23. Матошина И.В., Ливзан М.А., Федорин М.М., Лаптева И.В. Эффективность комбинированной терапии больных эрозивной гастроэзофагеальной рефлюксной болезнью. РМЖ. Медицинское обозрение. 2021;5(6):366-72 [Matoshina IV, Livzan MA, Fedorin MM, Lapteva IV. Efficacy of combined therapy in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(6):366-72 (in Russian). doi: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-6-366-372
  24. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenter. 2006;101(8):1900-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x
  25. Orlando RC. The integrity of the esophageal mucosa. Balance between offensive and defensive mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24(6):873-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.08.008
  26. Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA, Orlando RC. Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux – damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(5):1200-5. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8898633
  27. Hershcovici T, Fass R. Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease that does not respond well to proton pump inhibitors. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26(4):367-78. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833ae2be
  28. Dumortier G, Grossiord JL, Agnely F, Chaumeil JC. A review of poloxamer 407 pharmaceutical and pharmacological characteristics. Pharm Res. 2006;23(12):2709-28. doi: 10.1007/s11095-006-9104-4
  29. Fakhari A, Corcoran M, Schwarz A. Thermogelling properties of purified poloxamer 407. Heliyon. 2017;3(8):e00390. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00390
  30. Stern R, Asari AA, Sugahara KN. Hyaluronan fragments: an information-rich system. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85(8):699-715. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.05.009
  31. Vigetti D, Karousou E, Viola M, et al. Hyaluronan: biosynthesis and signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840(8):2452-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.02.001
  32. Kim Y, Kessler SP, Obery DR, et al. Hyaluronan 35kDa treatment protects mice from Citrobacter rodentium infection and induces epithelial tight junction protein ZO-1 in vivo. Matrix Biol. 2017;62:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.11.001
  33. Volpi N. Anti-inflammatory activity of chondroitin sulphate: new functions from an old natural macromolecule. Inflammopharmacology. 2011;19(6):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s10787-011-0098-0
  34. Guelfi G, Stefanetti V, Zampini D, et al. Gold nanoparticles approach to detect chondroitin sulphate and hyaluronic acid urothelial coating. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09872-0

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of erosion healing in the study and control groups according to the Los Angeles classification (1994).

Download (91KB)
3. Fig. 2. Distribution of patients according to the severity of clinical symptoms before and after therapy.

Download (172KB)
4. Fig. 3. Distribution of patients according to the frequency of occurrence of clinical symptoms before and after therapy.

Download (191KB)
5. Fig. 4. Dynamics of the mean score of symptom severity during therapy.

Download (115KB)
6. Fig. 5. Dynamics of the average frequency of symptoms during therapy.

Download (112KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies