Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice. Preliminary results

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To compare the features of the course of the disease and the therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who meet the criteria of difficult-to-treat RA (D2T).

Materials and methods. The study included 505 RA patients (ACR/EULAR 2010). Rheumatologist experts discussed all patients, since the treatment of RA ware perceived as problematic and/or insufficient. All patients had at least one of the following signs: the activity of the disease is no lower than moderate; the inability to reduce the dose of glucocorticoids to low; rapid radiological progression; RA symptoms causing a decrease in quality of life. The D2T group included 35 patients with true inefficiency or intolerance of two or more of bDMARDs/tsDMARDs of different mechanism of action. The control group (K) included patients with RA who already had experience of taking at least one class of bDMARDs/tsDMARDs (n=291).

Results. On average, every 15 patients (7%) with RA met the EULAR criteria for D2T. The median age of patients in the D2T group was 45 years, which is less than in K (Me 54 [43; 62] years; p=0.046). The duration of RA in both groups was comparable. The severity of articular destruction in D2T was higher than in K (stage IV in 40% and 23%, respectively). Positivity for the RF and ACPA in D2T was less common than in K (60% and 85.9%; 60% and 76.6%, respectively). The presence of systemic manifestations of RA was more typical for K than for D2T (28.6% and 63%, p=0.0001). In the group of D2T patients, the number of previously taken DMARDs was higher than in K (p=0.002). Methotrexate was more often prescribed as the first DMARDs in both groups (in 62.9 and 65.7%, respectively). Initiation of bDMARDs/tsDMARDs therapy in D2T was more often performed by TNF-a inhibitors (OR 2.8; p=0.003) and co-stimulation blocker – abatacept (OR 4.6; p=0.004), and in control – by B-cell inhibitor rituximab (OR 6.9; p<0.0001).

Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that in Russia, as well as abroad, the principle of RA treatment “treat to target” has not yet become widespread, and the development of adequate therapy takes too much time.

About the authors

Elena A. Galushko

Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology

Author for correspondence.
Email: egalushko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2776-4276

д-р мед. наук, вед. науч. сотр. лаб. эволюции ревматоидного артрита ФГБНУ «НИИ ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой»

Russian Federation, Moscow

Andrey V. Gordeev

Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology

Email: egalushko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9820-8851

д-р мед. наук, проф., вед. науч. сотр. лаб. эволюции ревматоидного артрита ФГБНУ «НИИ ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой»

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena V. Matyanova

Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology

Email: egalushko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2135-5524

канд. мед. наук, науч. сотр. лаб. эволюции ревматоидного артрита ФГБНУ «НИИ ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой»

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yury A. Olyunin

Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology

Email: egalushko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8665-7980

д-р мед. наук, вед. науч. сотр. лаб. эволюции ревматоидного артрита ФГБНУ «НИИ ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой»

Russian Federation, Moscow

Evgeny L. Nasonov

Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: egalushko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1598-8360

акад. РАН, д-р мед. наук, проф., науч. рук. ФГБНУ «НИИ ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой», зав. каф. ревматологии ФГАОУ ВО «Первый МГМУ им. И.М. Сеченова» (Сеченовский Университет)

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Насонов Е.Л. Фармакотерапия ревматоидного артрита: российские и международные рекомендации. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2016;54(5):557-71 [Nasonov EL. Pharmacotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis: Russian and International guidelines. A pilot study. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(5):557-71 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2016-557-571
  2. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):685-99. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655
  3. Насонов Е.Л., Олюнин Ю.А., Лила А.М. Ревматоидный артрит: проблемы ремиссии и резистентности к терапии. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2018;56(3):263-71 [Nasonov EL, Olyunin YuA, Lila AM. Rheumatoid arthritis: the problems of remission and therapy resistance. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(3):263-71 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2018-263-271
  4. Buch MH. Defining refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(7):966-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212862
  5. De Hair MJH, Jacobs JWG, Schoneveld JLM, van Laar JM. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: an area of unmet clinical need. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(7):1135-44. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex349
  6. Гордеев А.В., Олюнин Ю.А., Галушко Е.А., и др. Труднолечимый ревматоидный артрит. Какой он? Современная ревматология. 2021;15(5):7-11 [Gordeev AV, Olyunin YuA, Galushko EA, et al. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. What is it? Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2021;15(5):7-11 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2021-5-7-11
  7. Nagy G, Roodenrijs NMT, Welsing PWJ, et al. EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(1):31-5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217344
  8. Roodenrijs NMT, de Hair MJH, van der Goes M, et al. Characteristics of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: results of an international survey. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(12):1705-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213687
  9. Roodenrijs NMT, Kedves M, Hamar A, et al. Diagnostic issues in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2020 EULAR recommendations for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2021;7(1):e001511. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001511
  10. Buch MH, Eyre S, McGonagle D. Persistent inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanisms in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(1):17-33. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00541-7
  11. Насонов Е.Л. Фармакотерапия ревматоидного артрита: новая стратегия, новые мишени. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2017;55(4):409-19 [Nasonov EL. Pharmacotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis: New strategy, new targets. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(4):409-19 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-409-419
  12. Dougados M, Soubrier M, Antunez A, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis and evaluation of their monitoring: results of an international, cross-sectional study (COMORA). Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):62-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis2013-204223
  13. Гордеев А.В., Галушко Е.А., Савушкина Н.М., и др. Оценка мультиморбидного профиля (CIRS) при ревматоидном артрите. Первые результаты. Современная ревматология. 2019;13(3):10-6 [Gordeev AV, Galushko EA, Savushkina NM, et al. Assessing the multimorbid profile (CIRS) in rheumatoid arthritis. First results. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2019;13(3):10-6 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2019-3-10-16
  14. Ajeganova S, van Steenbergen HW, van Nies JA, et al. Disease modifying anti rheumatic drug-free sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: an increasingly achievable outcome with subsidence of disease symptoms. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(5):867-73. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207080
  15. Nagy G, van Vollenhoven RF. Sustained biologic-free and drug free remission in rheumatoid arthritis, where are we now? Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:181. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0707
  16. Авдеева А.С., Кусевич Д.А. Роль лабораторных биомаркеров в прогнозировании эффективности терапии ритуксимабом при ревматоидном артрите (новые данные). Научно-практическая ревматология. 2017;55(3):295-303 [Avdeeva AS, Kusevich DA. The role of laboratory biomarkers in predicting the efficiency of rituximab therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: New evidence. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2017;55(3):295-303 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-295-303
  17. Martin-Mola E, Balsa A, Garcia-Vicuna R, et al. Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies and their value for predicting responses to biologic agents: a review. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36(8):1043-63. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3506-3
  18. Conigliaro P, Triggianese P, Chimenti MS, et al. Factors predicting 2 years of remission and low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with TNF inhibitors. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017;19(8):467-72.
  19. Демидова Н.В., Галушко Е.А., Глухова С.И., и др. Отмена адалимумаба при достижении стойкой ремиссии у пациентов с ревматоидным артритом. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2018;56(3):316-20 [Demidova NV, Galushko EA, Glukhova SI, et al. Adalimumab discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after achieving sustained remission. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2018;56(3):316-20 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2018-316-320
  20. Насонов Е.Л., Лила А.М. Ингибиторы Янус-киназ при иммуновоспалительных ревматических заболеваниях: новые возможности и перспективы. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2019;57(1):8-16 [Nasonov EL, Lila AM. Janus kinase inhibitors in immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases: new opportunities and prospects. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2019;57(1):8-16 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2019-8-16

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. bDMARDs/tsDMARDs therapy before and during the observed hospitalization.

Download (164KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies