Annual Carbon Budget of Biogenic Greenhouse Gases under Mixed Land Use: Lgov District as a Model Object of the Central Chernozem Zone, Russia

D. V. Karelin; Карелин Д. В.; O. E. Sukhoveeva; Суховеева О. Э.; M. V. Glagolev; Глаголев М. В.; A. S. Dobryanskiy; Добрянский А. С.; A. F. Sabrekov; Сабреков А. Ф.; I. V. Zamotaev; Замотаев И. В.

doi:10.31857/S0032180X23600038

Annual Carbon Budget of Biogenic Greenhouse Gases under Mixed Land Use: Lgov District as a Model Object of the Central Chernozem Zone, Russia

Authors: Karelin D.V.¹, Sukhoveeva O.E.¹, Glagolev M.V.², Dobryanskiy A.S.¹, Sabrekov A.F.³, Zamotaev I.V.¹
Affiliations:
1. Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Lomonosov Moscow State University
3. Ugra State University
Issue: No 8 (2023)
Pages: 911-924
Section: ФИЗИКА ПОЧВ
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0032-180X/article/view/138148
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X23600038
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OIHACP
ID: 138148

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

A comprehensive study of the net carbon balance of Lgov administrative district (Kursk oblast) in the Chernozem zone of the European part of Russia is carried out. The data sources included field estimates of carbon dioxide and methane exchange between soil and atmosphere, above- and below-ground phytomass stocks, simulation models parameterized on these data, official statistical and meteorological information, and published scientific data. Watered filtration fields of waste disposal sites of sugar industry are responsible for 26% of CH₄ emissions from the territory of the district, although they occupy only 0.04% of its area. The maximum of CO₂ emission is found at volumetric soil moisture of 30%, whereas, with exceeding this value, methane emission begins to rise linearly, reaching a maximum on the open surface of water reservoirs, and among them – on watered filtration fields. Another significant local source of methane is compost storages (22%). However, water reservoirs and ponds are the largest source of CH₄ (43%). Amongst the net sources of CO₂ the combustion of fossil fuels by transport and agriculture machinery predominates (22.3%). In contrast to methane, which emission is mainly determined by powerful point sources, the input of net fluxes of CO₂ positively correlates with their area. Currently observed low rate net CO₂ flux in the district area (–6.4 g C m^–2 per year), is decisively overlapped by local methane sources (+95 g C (CO₂-eq.) m^–2 per year). The influence of the types of land use and methods of calculation on the C-balance of the territory in study, and a way of its transformation into a carbon-neutral state are discussed.

Keywords

Haplic Chernozem, methane, carbon dioxide, GHGs balance

References

Гарькуша Д.Н., Федоров Ю.А., Тамбиева Н.С. Крукиер М.Л., Калманович И.В. Оценка эмиссии метана водными объектами Ростовской области // Известия вузов. Северо-Кавказский регион. Сер. Естественные науки. 2015. № 3. С. 83–89.
Гречушникова М.Г., Школьный Д.И. Оценка эмиссии метана водохранилищами России // Водное хозяйство России. 2019. № 2. С. 58–71.
Замотаев И.В., Грачева Р.Г., Михеев П.В., Конопляникова Ю.В. Формирование и трансформация почв в районах размещения отходов сахарной индустрии (обзор) // Почвоведение. 2022. № 8. С. 949–961. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X22080159
Коледа К.В., Дудук А.А., Брукиш Д.А., Бояр Д.М., Витковский Г.В., Емельянова В.Н., Золотарь А.К. Современные технологии возделывания сельскохозяйственных культур: рекомендации. Гродно: ГГАУ, 2010. 340 с.
Копьев С.Ф., Качанов Н.Ф. Основы теплогазоснабжения и вентиляции. М.: Стройиздат, 1964. 228 с.
Люри Д.И., Горячкин С.В., Караваева Н.А., Денисенко Е.А., Нефедова Т.Г. Динамика сельскохозяйственных земель России в ХХ веке и постагрогенное восстановление растительности и почв. М.: ГЕОС, 2010. 416 с.
Методические указания и руководство по количественному определению объема выбросов парниковых газов организациями, осуществляющими хозяйственную и иную деятельность на территории Российской Федерации, утвержденные приказом Минприроды России от 30.06.2015. № 300. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/420287801 (дата обращения 11.01.2023 г.).
Распоряжение Минтранса России от 14.03.2008 № АМ-23-р (ред. от 30.09.2021) “О введении в действие методических рекомендаций "Нормы расхода топлив и смазочных материалов на автомобильном транспорте”. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_ 76009/(дата обращения 11.01.2023 г.).
Типовые нормы выработки и расхода топлива на сельскохозяйственные механизированные работы. Ч. I. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_ 103596/ (дата обращения 11.01.2023 г.).
Типовые нормы выработки и расхода топлива на сельскохозяйственные механизированные работы. Ч. II. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_ 136074/ (дата обращения 11.01.2023 г.).
Титлянова А.А., Шибарева С.В. Продуктивность травяных экосистем: справочник. М.: Изд-во МБА, 2020. 100 с.
Aragão L., Poulter B., Barlow J.B., Anderson L.O., Malhi Y., Saatchi S., Phillips O.L., Gloor E. Environmental change and the carbon balance of Amazonian forests // Biological Reviews. 2014. V. 89. P. 913–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12088
Bezyk Y., Sówka I., Górka M. Assessment of urban CO2 budget: anthropogenic and biogenic inputs // Urban Climate. 2021. V. 39. P. 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100949
Dolman J., Shvidenko A., Schepaschenko D., Ciais P., Tchebakova N., Chen T., van der Molen M.K., Belelli Marchesini L., Maximov T.C., Maksyutov S., Schulze E.-D. An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion methods // Biogeosciences. 2012. V. 9. P. 5323–5340. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5323-2012
Friedlingstein P., Jones M.W., O’Sullivan M., Andrew R.M., Bakker D.C.E., Hauck J., Le Quéré C. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2021 // Earth System Science Data. 2022. V. 14. P. 1917–2005. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
Gar’kusha D.N., Fedorov Y.A., Tambieva N.S. Emission of methane from the soils of Rostov oblast // Arid Ecosystems. 2011. V. 1. P. 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096111040056
Gilhespy S.L., Anthony S., Cardenas L., Chadwick D., del Prado A., Li C., Misselbrook T., Rees R.M. et al. First 20 years of DNDC (DeNitrification DeComposition): Model evolution // Ecological modelling. 2014. V. 292. P. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.09.004
IPCC 2006: Annex 2. Summary of equations. 2006 IPC-C Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme / Eds. Eggleston H.S. et al. Japan: IGES, 2006. 34 p.
IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / Eds. Pachauri R.K., Meyer L.A. Geneva: IPCC, 2014. 151 p.
Karelin D., Goryachkin S., Zazovskaya E., Shishkov V., Pochikalov A., Dolgikh A., Sirin A. et al. Greenhouse gas emission from the cold soils of Eurasia in natural settings and under human impact: Controls on spatial variability // Geoderma Regional. 2020. V. 22. P. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00290
Karelin D.V., Lyuri D.I., Goryachkin S.V., Lunin V.N., Kudikov A.V. Changes in the carbon dioxide emission from soils in the course of postagrogenic succession in the chernozems forest-steppe // Eurasian Soil Science. 2015. V. 48. P. 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229315110095
Karelin D.V., Zamolodchikov D.G., Shilkin A.V., Popov S.Yu., Kumanyaev A.S., Lopes de Gerenyu V.O., Tel’nova N.O., Gitarskiy M.L. The effect of tree mortality on CO2 fluxes in an old-growth spruce forest // Eur. J. Forest Res. 2021. V. 140. P. 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01330-3
Kull S., Kurz W.A., Rampley G., Banfield G.E., Schivatcheva R.K., Apps M.J. Operational-scale Carbon Budget Model of The Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3) Version 1.0: User’s Guide. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 2007. 319 p.
Kurganova I.N., Lopes de Gerenyu V.O., Kudeyarov V.N., Zhiengaliyev A.T. Carbon budgets in the steppe ecosystems of Russia // Doklady Earth Sciences. 2019. V. 485. P. 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X19040238
Li C., Frolking S., Frolking T.A. A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity // J. Geophys. Res. 1992. V. 97. P. D9. P. 9759–9776.
Lloyd J., Kolle O., Fritsch H., de Freitas S.R., Silva Dias M.A.F., Artaxo P., Nobre A.D. et al. An airborne regional carbon balance for Central Amazonia // Biogeosciences. 2007. V. 4. P. 759–768. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-759-2007
Luyssaert S., Inglima I., Jung M., Richardson A.D., Reichstein M., Papale D., Piao S.L. et al. CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database // Global Change Biology. 2007. V. 13. P. 2509–2537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01439.x
Sabrekov A.F., Glagolev M.V., Kleptsova I.E., Machida T., Maksyutov S.S. Methane emission from bog complexes of the west Siberian taiga // Eurasian Soil Science. 2013. V. 46. P. 1182–1193. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314010098
Sarzhanov D.A., Vasenev V.I., Vasenev I.I., Sotnikov Y.L., Ryzhkov O.V., Morin T. Carbon stocks and CO2 emissions of urban and natural soils in Central Chernozemic region of Russia // Catena. 2017. V. 158. P. 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.06.021
Schmidt M., Reichenau T.G., Fiener P., Schneider K. The carbon budget of a winter wheat field: An eddy covariance analysis of seasonal and inter-annual variability // Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2012. V. 165. P. 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.012
Schulze E.D., Ciais P., Luyssaert S., Schrumpf M., Janssens I.A., Thiruchittampalam B., Theloke J., Saurat M. et al. The European carbon balance. Part 4: Integration of carbon and other trace-gas fluxes // Global Change Biology. 2010. V. 16(5). P. 1451–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02215.x
Sukhoveeva O.E., Karelin D.V. Application of the Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model to retrospective analysis of the carbon cycle components in agrolandscapes of the central forest zone of European Russia // Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2019. V. 12. P. 213–226. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2018-85
Sukhoveeva O.E., Zolotukhin A.N., Karelin D.V. Climate-determined changes of organic carbon stocks in the arable chernozem of Kursk region // Arid Ecosystems. 2020. V. 10. P. 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096120020122
Sushko S.V., Ananyeva N.D., Ivashchenko K.V., Kudeyarov V.N. Soil CO2 emission, microbial biomass, and basal respiration of chernozems under different land uses // Eurasian Soil Science. 2019. V. 52. P. 1091–1100. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319090096
Terentieva I.E., Sabrekov A.F., Ilyasov D., Ebrahimi A., Glagolev M.V., Maksyutov S. Highly dynamic methane emission from the west Siberian boreal floodplains // Wetlands. 2019. V. 39. P. 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1088-4
Wright L.A., Kemp S., Williams I. ‘Carbon footprinting’: towards a universally accepted definition // Carbon Management. 2011. V. 2. P. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.39
Zhang H., Wang L. Species diversity and carbon sequestration oxygen release capacity of dominant communities in the Hancang river basin, China // Sustainability. 2022. V. 14. P. 5405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095405