Study of the Effect of Inverse Magnetostriction in Ferromagnet/Ferroelectric Heterostructures Using Ab Initio Calculations

I. I. Gumarova; Гумарова И. И.; K. V. Evseev; Евсеев К. В.; A. A. Kamashev; Камашев А. А.; R. F. Mamin; Мамин Р. Ф.

doi:10.31857/S0023476123600544

Study of the Effect of Inverse Magnetostriction in Ferromagnet/Ferroelectric Heterostructures Using Ab Initio Calculations

作者: Gumarova I.¹^,2, Evseev K.¹, Kamashev A.¹, Mamin R.¹
隶属关系:
1. Zavoisky Kazan Physical-Technical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 420029, Kazan, Russia
2. Kazan Federal University, Institute of Physics, 420008, Kazan, Russia
期: 卷 68, 编号 5 (2023)
页面: 809-816
栏目: ПОВЕРХНОСТЬ, ТОНКИЕ ПЛЕНКИ
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0023-4761/article/view/137436
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023476123600544
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DNYSRJ
ID: 137436

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

Fe/BaTiO3, Fe/SrTiO3, Co/BaTiO3, and Co/SrTiO3 heterostructures, which exhibit magnetoelectric effect, have been investigated. It is shown that the magnetic properties of thin ferromagnetic films can be controlled using an external electric field. The structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of the heterostructures have been investigated applying ab initio calculation methods. It is shown that, using the inverse piezoelectric effect, one can reduce the absolute value of the ferromagnet magnetization vector. This approach may be a basis for controlling the properties of one of the ferromagnetic layers of a superconducting spin valve and, as a consequence, the superconducting properties of the valve.

参考

Ota S., Ando A., Chiba D. // Nat. Electron. 2018. V. 1. P. 124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0022-3
Makarov D., Melzer M., Karnaushenko D., Shmidt O.G. // Appl. Phys. Rev. 2016. V. 3. P. 011101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938497
Jia C., Zhao X., Lai Y.H. et al. // Nano Energy. 2019. V. 60. P. 476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.053
Liy Y., Yang T., Zhang Y. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2019. V. 31. P. 1902783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0022-3
Won S.S., Seo H., Kawahara M. et al. // Nano Energy. 2019. V. 55. P. 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.068
Yao J., Song X., Gao X. et al. // ACS Nano. 2018. V. 12. P. 6767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b01936
Lu N., Zhang P., Zhang Q. et al. // Nature. 2017. V. 546. P. 124. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22389
Cao D., Wang F., Jiang Z. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2016. V. 51. P. 3297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9656-y
Leksin P.V., Garif’yanov N.N., Garifullin I.A. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010. V. 97. P. 102505. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1007.2511
Тихомирова Н.А., Баранов А.И., Гинзберг А.В. и др. // Письма в ЖЭТФ. 1983. Т. 38. С. 365. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1007.2511
Тихомирова Н.А., Донцова Л.И., Гигзберг А.В. и др. // ФТТ. 1988. Т. 30. С. 724. https://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=ftt&paperid=4418&option_lang=rus
Zhao Y., Peng R., Guo Y. et al. // Adv. Functional Mater. 2021. V. 31. P. 2009376. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202009376
Tsymbal E.Y., Duan C.G., Jaswal S.S. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. V. 31. P. 047201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.047201
Duan C.G., Jaswal S.S., Tsymbal E.Y. // Phys. Rev. 2006. V. 97. P. 047201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.047201
Sahoo S., Srinivas P., Duan C.G. et al. // Phys. Rev. 2007. V. 76. P. 092108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.092108
Muller K.A., Burkard H. // Phys. Rev. 1979. V. 19. P. 3593. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.19.3593
Hohenberg P., Kohn W. // Phys. Rev. B. 1964. V. 136. P. 864. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
Perdew J.P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996. V. 77. P. 3865. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
Kohn W., Sham L.J. // Phys. Rev. A. 1965. V. 140. P. 1133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
Blöchl P.E. // Phys. Rev. 1994. V. 50. P. 17953. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
Kresse G., Furthmüller J. // Comp. Mater. Sci. 1996. V. 6. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
Kresse G., Furthmüller J. // Phys. Rev. 1996. V. 54. P. 11169. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
Kresse G., Joubert D. // Phys. Rev. B. 1999. V. 59. P. 1758. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
MedeA, version 3.6; Inc. San Diego, USA.
Monkhorst H.J., Pack J.D. // Phys. Rev. 1976. V. 13. P. 5188. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
Blöchl P.E., Jepsen O., Andersen O.K. // Phys. Rev. 1994. V. 49. P. 16223. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223
Methfessel M., Paxton A.T. // Phys. Rev. 1989. V. 40. P. 3616. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616
Dudarev S.L., Botton G.A., Savrasov S.Y. et al. // Phys. Rev. 1998. V. 57. P. 1505. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505
Calderon C.E., Plata J.J., Toher C. // Comp. Mater. Sci. 2015. V. 108. P. 233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.019
Oleinik I.I., Tsymbal E.Y., Pettifor D.G. // Phys. Rev. 2001. V. 65. P. 020401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.115503