Kinetics of the Thermal Decomposition of Oil Residue and Its SARA Fractions in the Presence of Vegetable Oil

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Dynamic thermogravimetry was used to study the thermal degradation of the oil residue of Usinskaya oil and its saturated, aromatic, resin, and asphaltene (SARA) fractions in the presence of sunflower oil. Thermolysis experiments were carried out in an atmosphere of pure argon. Based on the data of thermogravimetric analysis, the activation energies of the thermal degradation of the oil residue, resins, asphaltenes, saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons, and their mixtures with sunflower oil were calculated in the temperature range of a maximum weight loss rate. It was shown that the addition of 10.0 wt % sunflower oil to the oil residue and its components led to a decrease in the activation energy. This fact indicates that the sunflower oil additive affected the mechanism of thermal degradation of crude oil and its components. The greatest change in the activation energy was observed for asphaltenes: ΔЕа = 48.4 kJ/mol.

About the authors

S. V. Boyar

Institute of Petroleum Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: bsv@ipc.tsc.ru
Tomsk, 634055 Russia

M. A. Kopytov

Institute of Petroleum Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: kma@ipc.tsc.ru
Tomsk, 634055 Russia

References

  1. Scheffer B., van Koten M.A., Robschlager K.W., de Boks F.C. // Catalysis Today. 1998. V. 43. P. 217.
  2. Castañeda L.C., Muñoz J.A.D., Ancheyta J. // Catalysis Today. 2014. V. 220–222. P. 248.
  3. Пахманова О.А., Антонов С.В., Дементьев К.И., Герзелиев И.М., Хаджиев С.Н. // Нефтехимия. 2012. Т. 52. № 6. С. 432. [Petroleum Chemistry, 2012, vol. 52, no. 6, p. 401. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544112060096]
  4. Gonçalves M.L.A., Teixeira M.A.G., Pereira R.C.L., Mercury R.L.P., Matos J.R. // J. Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2001. V. 64. P. 697.
  5. Trejo F., Rana M.S., Ancheyta J. // Catalysis Today. 2010. V. 150. P. 272.
  6. Юсевич А.И., Тимошкина М.А., Грушова Е.И. // Нефтехимия. 2010. Т. 50. № 3. С. 241. [Petroleum Chemistry, 2010, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 231. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544110030084]
  7. Kopytov M.A., Boyar S.V., Golovko A.K. // AIP Conference Proceedings. 2018. V. 2051. № 020131.
  8. Копытов М.А., Головко А.К. // Нефтехимия. 2017. Т. 57. № 1. С. 41. [Petroleum Chemistry, 2017, vol. 57, no. 1, p. 39. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544116090139]https://doi.org/10.7868/S0028242116060137
  9. Доронин В.П., Потапенко О.В., Липин П.В., Сорокина Т.П., Булучевская Л.А. // Нефтехимия. 2012. Т. 52. № 6. С. 422. [Petroleum Chemistry, 2012, vol. 52, no. 6, p. 392. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544112060059]
  10. Boyar S.V., Kopytov M.A. // AIP Conference. Proceedings. 2022. V. 2509. № 020031.
  11. Бойцова А.А., Байталов Ф., Строкин С.В. // Деловой журнал Neftegaz.ru. 2020. V. 99. № 3. P. 46.
  12. Тимошкина М.А., Юсевич А.И., Михаленок С.Г., Прокопчук Н.Р. // Нефтехимия. 2014. Т. 54. № 2. С. 113. [Petroleum Chemistry, 2014, vol. 54, no. 2, p. 111. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544114020121]https://doi.org/10.7868/S0028242114020129
  13. Opfermann J.R., Kaisersberger E., Flammersheim H.J. // Thermochimica Acta. 2002. V. 391. P. 119–127.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (82KB)
3.

Download (280KB)
4.

Download (257KB)
5.

Download (196KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 С.В. Бояр, М.А. Копытов

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies