Geologiâ rudnyh mestoroždenij

In the Uralian Fold Belt, there are quite numerous and well-studied porphyry copper (±Mo) deposits corresponding to the traditional “diorite” (most) or “monzonite” (Talitsa, Verkhneuralskoe) models. Along with them, there are relatively small but gold-rich massifs of porphyric granitoids, including the large Yubileinoe porphyry Au–Cu deposit, which is located at the southernmost extremity of the Urals. In this study, two main types of regional hydrothermal–metasomatic alteration were distinguished based on applying quantitative petrography and areal multielement geochemical studies in the scale of the ore district: (1) an earlier synvolcanic secondary alteration of volcanics, similar to those observed in volcanic massive sulfide-bearing fields (albitization, propylitic, and listvenitic alteration) and (2) a later plutonogenic alteration of the porphyry type. The plutonogenic hydrothermal–metasomatic (HM) complex is represented by K-feldspathization, hornfels and skarn alteration at the progressive phase, and propylitization, sericitization, and beresitization at the regressive phase. They are caused by hydrothermal alteration in the apical part of the stock, composed of the mineralizing Frasnian granite porphyry complex that hosts the Yubileinoe gold deposit. A lateral series of geochemical zonality (from the periphery of volcanotectonic structures to their center) has been established for the volcanogenic stage of hydrothermal activity: CrNiCo → PbZnCuCrNi → AuAg (CrNi) → BaAuAg. A large positive anomaly of the lithochalcophilic type was found for the HM plutonogenic complex in the ore field of the Yubileinoe deposit. The concentric zonality of this anomaly is characterized by the development of Ag, W, Sn, Pb, As, and Sb halos at its periphery, and Au, Cu, Bi and Mo at its focus (“core”). The stable and radiogenic isotope geochemical data for most of the porphyry copper deposits of the Urals indicate the predominant mantle source of their rocks and ore matter. Their paleotectonic position is reconstructed as a mature stage of intraoceanic island arcs. Unlike many other porphyry objects in the Urals, the totality of geochemical, isotope–geochemical and geological features of the Yubileinoe deposit indicate the predominantly crustal magma source. According to these features, this deposit is closer to Andean-type porphyry deposits, and its position can be reconstructed as an active margin of the Mugodzhar microcontinent, i.e., a suprasubduction regime, transitional from a mature island arc to the marginal continental one. According to the complex of features, this deposit in the Urals is a close analogue of the porphyry gold deposits of the Maricunga Belt in Chile. The magmatic complexes from the Silurian (Wenlock) to the Devonian (Frasnian) age, which are parental to the porphyry gold–copper systems of the Urals, correspond to the early phase of the Wilson cycle. This phase is the most ore-productive with the formation of giant Cr and Fe–Ti–V deposits associated with ultramafic–mafic complexes. It is likely that the differentiation of mafic magmas in the large-volume chambers occurring in the lower part of the lithosphere causes the appearance (as an extreme member) of diorite melts with a noticeable enrichment in gold and copper.

The results of a comprehensive detailed study of the vein structure, mineral zoning of veins, and mineral typomorphism of the Shakhtama deposit obtained on the basis of new samples from poorly studied horizons are given. The results obtained show that the Mo resources of the deposit are far from being exhausted, and the typomorphic features of ore minerals indicate that base metal mineralization associated with Au (Ag), also continues to a depth, along with Mo. The presence of rare Sr mineral, svanbergite, in the Shakhtamа deposit and the typomorphic properties of ore minerals testify in favor of the near-surface origin of the exposed mineralization. The succession of mineral formation has been established. Based on the study of ore and metasomatic zonality, fluid inclusions and isotopic data, as well as the composition of structural impurities in molybdenite, conclusions were made of the formation conditions of ore mineralization in a porphyry ore-forming system.

The results of studying the epithermal deposits of Kamchatka, one of the most promising gold-mining provinces of the Russian Federation, are generalized. The deposits are divided into acid–sulfate (Ac-Sul) and adularia–sericite (Ad-Ser) types (Heald et al., 1987). The disadvantages of the scheme, which is the most popular in the English-language literature and is based on the sulfidation state of mineral parageneses in ores (LS, IS, and HS types), are shown. The classification that we proposed includes differences in mineral associations in circum–ore metasomatites, which are determined by the acidity–alkalinity and an oxidation state of mineral-forming fluids, and are clearly diagnosed at the first stages of studying the deposits. Kamchatka epithermal deposits of the Ad-Ser-type are associated with andesite volcanism of the volcanic belts. Gold ore associations are concentrated in quartz, carbonate–quartz, and adularia–quartz veins, as well as in sericitized metasomatites, which are replaced by argillizites and propylites towards the periphery. The Ad-Ser-type is characterized by combination with polysulfide (Pb, Zn) (Amethyst, Kumroch, Vilyuchinskoe deposits), sulfosalt (Ag, Sb, As, Bi, Sn) (Ozernovskoe, Baranyevskoe), and selenide (Ag, Se) (Amethyst, Asachinskoe, Rodnikovoe) assemblages. Low-fineness native gold (220–310‰) is typical of the early polysulfide assemblage. With an increase in the fugacity of Te and Se, the gold fineness increases to 510–740‰, and with the progressive activity of Sb, As and Bi and the formation of sulfosalt associations, it reaches 998‰. The homogenization temperatures of primary fluid inclusions in quartz from gold-bearing associations of the Ad-Ser-type are 260–250°C; the minerals crystallize from solutions containing no more than 3 wt % NaCl eq. Maletoyvayam, the only Ac-Sul-type deposit in Kamchatka, is localized in quartz, secondary quartzites, and alunite–sericite–kaolinite–quartz metasomatites. Gold-bearing parageneses indicate the leading role of selenium in mineral formation, contain high-fineness native gold, sulfoselenotellurides, tellurides, and selenides of Au, which crystallize from acidic fluids with salinity of 1–5 wt % NaCl eq. at temperatures of 290–175°C.