Cytogenetic monitoring of enterprise workers in contact with radionuclides

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Buccal micronucleus cytome assay (BMCA) using the accumulation index (Iac) of cytogenetic damage is currently one of the best methods of cytogenetic monitoring. The personnel of the enterprise having contact with radionuclides were examined twice with an interval of one year. Three groups were examined: group 1, not in contact with harmful factors (control); group 2, in contact mainly with the chemical factor, group 3, in contact mainly with the radiation factor (the annual accumulated dose is low – up to 5.2 mSv). An integral indicator of harmfulness was calculated, also taking into account the severity and intensity of the work process. In group 3, it is twice as high as in group 2. The average frequencies of cells with cytogenetic damages (micronuclei and nuclear protrusions) in the control group are 1.78 ± 0.27‰ и 2.25 ± 0.40‰ (2021 and 2022), in group 2 – 1.64 ± 0.70‰ и 1.86 ± 0.34‰; in group 3 – 2.81 ± 0.71‰ и 2.91 ± 0.60‰ respectively. The index of accumulation of cytogenetic damages in the group of personnel in contact with radionuclides is 1.2–2.2 times higher than in the other two (p < 0.05). A repeat examination of the personnel a year later confirmed that the identified patterns are not random. Comparison of the BMCA biomarkers shows their good agreement at the two examination periods and with the data of a previously conducted examination at another radiation facility. The presented approach is a convenient tool for assessing the negative impact of environmental factors at the group and individual levels.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

L. P. Sycheva

State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

Author for correspondence.
Email: lpsycheva@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123182

S. M. Kiselev

State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: lpsycheva@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123182

V. V. Shlygin

State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: lpsycheva@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123182

N. K. Shandala

State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: lpsycheva@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 123182

References

  1. Fenech M., Knasmueller S., Nersesyan A. et al. The buccal micronucleus cytome assay: New horizons for its implementation in human studies // Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2024. V. 894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503724
  2. Fenech M., Holland N., Zeiger E. et al. The HUMN and HUMNxL international collaboration projects on human micronucleus assays in lymphocytes and buccal cells – past, present and future // Mutagenesis. 2011. V. 26. P. 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geq051
  3. Sycheva L.P. Diagnostics, correction and prophylaxis of prepathological states using the non-invasive cell technology is one of the ways of longevity // Front. Genet. 2015. V. 6. P. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00184
  4. Sycheva L.P., Kiselev S.M., Shandala N.K. Cytogenetic analysis (buccal micronucleus cytome assay) of radioactive waste management workers // Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2021. V. 870–871.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503403
  5. Щекина Е.В., Масленский В.В. Оценка индивидуального профессионального риска для работников литейного производства на основе методики расчета вероятности утраты работником трудоспособности в зависимости от состояния условий труда на рабочем месте // Молодой исследователь Дона. 2018. T. 13. № 4. С. 170–179. [http://mid-journal.ru]
  6. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2013.
  7. Оценка состояния здоровья персонала предприятий, осуществляющих деятельность по обращению с отработавшим ядерным топливом и радиоактивными отходами. Методические рекомендации. МР ФМБА России 12.031-2020 // https://fmbafmbc.ru/scientific-activities/publishing/publisher/
  8. Сычева Л.П. Биологическое значение, критерии определения и пределы варьирования полного спектра кариологических показателей при оценке цитогенетического статуса человека // Мед. генетика. 2007. Т. 6. № 11. С. 3–11.
  9. Сычева Л.П. Цитогенетический мониторинг для оценки безопасности среды обитания человека // Гигиена и санитария. 2012. Т. 91. № 6. С. 68–72.
  10. Vral A., Fenech M., Thierens H. The micronucleus assay as a biological dosimeter of in vivo ionising radiation exposure // Mutagenesis. 2011. V. 26. P. 11–17.https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geq078
  11. Bazyka D., Finch S.C., Ilienko I.M. et al. Buccal mucosa micronuclei counts in relation to exposure to low dose-rate radiation from the Chornobyl nuclear accident and other medical and occupational radiation exposures // Environ. Health. 2017. V. 16. № 1. P. 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0273-x
  12. Torres L.A., Santos Rodrigues A. Dos, Linhares D. et al. Buccal epithelial cell micronuclei: Sensitive, non-invasive biomarkers of occupational exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation // Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2019. V. 838. P. 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox. 2018. 12.009

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Percentage of personnel (in %) with low (green), acceptable (yellow) and high (red) levels of cytogenetic stress.

Download (195KB)
3. Fig. 2. Proportion of personnel (in %) with low (green), medium (yellow) and high (red) cytogenetic damage accumulation index (Iac).

Download (215KB)
4. Table 2. Fig. 1

Download (55KB)
5. Table 2. Fig. 2

Download (62KB)
6. Table 2. Fig. 3

Download (55KB)
7. Table 2. Fig. 4

Download (73KB)
8. Table 2. Fig. 5

Download (55KB)
9. Table 2. Fig. 6

Download (56KB)
10. Table 2. Fig. 7

Download (53KB)
11. Table 2. Fig. 8

Download (53KB)
12. Table 2. Fig. 9

Download (34KB)
13. Table 2. Fig. 10

Download (43KB)
14. Table 2. Fig. 11

Download (54KB)
15. Table 2. Fig. 12

Download (65KB)
16. Table 2. Fig. 13

Download (36KB)
17. Table 2. Fig. 14

Download (48KB)
18. Table 2. Fig. 15

Download (43KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).