Description of the Divergence of Subpopulations in the Hierarchical System under the Analysis of Isonymy. III. Surname Inbreeding Coefficient

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The hierarchical structure of metapopulations characteristic of humans with their subdivision into parts (subpopulations), usually classified on the basis of administrative-territorial division, principles of biological systematics, etc., is considered. Attention is focused on the description of surname divergence of subpopulations. The surname inbreeding coefficient Fs is expressed through the divergence indices, which is similar to the traditional inbreeding coefficient in population genetics. Its expansion by hierarchy levels into the sum of increments of the surname inbreeding coefficient corresponding to separate levels is obtained. The relationship between the found decomposition and the decomposition of the dispersion of the distribution of the surname concentration by subpopulations is demonstrated. With an additional assumption about the independence of the concentration of the surname and Fs, the factorization of Fs by hierarchy levels is found in line with the ideas of S. Wright. It is simplified with a small surname divergence of subpopulations when the Fs coefficient of the entire metapopulation is equal to the sum of the average Fs values at individual levels of the hierarchy. The underestimation of surname inbreeding was obtained, when subpopulations of a higher rank serve as units of observation instead of undivided subpopulations of the first level of the hierarchy. These results are statistical characteristics of the hierarchical structure, and not a feature of a particular population system, and do not follow from one or another model of microevolution. They are computationally independent of the hierarchical system under study, but allow characterizing their heterogeneity quantitatively. The results obtained refer to rural and urban hierarchical metapopulations as separate components of the entire population. In an appendix that can be read independently, genetic analogues of the properties found are given without proof in respect to the genetic structure of a metapopulation.

About the authors

V. P. Passekov

Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: pass40@mail.ru
Russia, 119991, Moscow,

References

  1. Ревазов А.А., Парадеева Г.М., Русакова Г.И. Пригодность русских фамилий в качестве квазигенетического маркера // Генетика. 1986. Т. 22. № 4. С. 699–703.
  2. Гинтер Е.К., Зинченко P.A., Ельчинова Г.И. и др. Роль факторов популяционной динамики в распространении наследственной патологии в российских популяциях // Мед. генетика. 2004. Т. 3. № 12. С. 548–555.
  3. Crow M.F., Mange A.P. Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname // Soc. Biology. 1982. V. 29. № 1/2. P. 101–105.
  4. Rogers A.R. Doubts about isonymy // Hum. Biology. 1991. V. 63. № 5. P. 663–668.
  5. Lasker W.G. Surnames and Genetic Structure. Cambridge: Cambr. Univ. Press, 1985. 148 p.
  6. Сорокина И.Н., Чурносов М.И., Балтуцкая И.В. и др. Антропогенетическое изучение населения центральной России. М.: Изд-во РАМН, 2014. 336 с.
  7. Сорокина И.Н., Рудых Н.А., Крикун Е.Н., Сокорев С.Н. Применение фамилий в популяционно-генетических исследованиях (на примере зарубежных популяций) // Науч. ведомости БелГУ. Сер. Медицина. Фармация. 2016. № 19 (240). Вып. 35. С. 5–10.
  8. Пасеков В.П. К анализу случайных процессов изонимии. I. Структура изонимии // Генетика. 2021. Т. 57. № 10. С. 1194–1204. https://doi.org/10.31857/S001667582110009X
  9. Пасеков В.П. К анализу случайных процессов изонимии. II. Динамика дивергенции популяций // Генетика. 2021. Т. 57. № 11. С. 1318–1329. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016675821110114
  10. Пасеков В.П. Описание дивергенции субпопуляций в иерархической системе при анализе изонимии. I. Дисперсия как показатель дивергенции // Генетика. 2022. Т. 58. № 6. С. 713–727.
  11. Пасеков В.П. Описание дивергенции субпопуляций в иерархической системе при анализе изонимии. II. Вероятности неизонимных встреч // Генетика. 2023. Т. 59. № 11. С. 1326–1340.
  12. Wright S. The interpretation of population structure by F statistics with special regard to systems of mating // Evolution. 1965. V. 19. P. 395–420.

Copyright (c) 2023 В.П. Пасеков

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies