Effects of Angle of Attack and Bluntness on Heating Rate Distribution of Blunt Models at Hypersonic Speeds
- Authors: Saiprakash M.1, Senthilkumar C.2, Kadam sunil G.3, Rampratap S.P.3, Shanmugam V.3, Balu G.3
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Aerospace Engineering
- Department of Aerospace Engineering, MIT Campus
- Directorate of Aerodynamics
- Issue: Vol 54, No 6 (2019)
- Pages: 850-862
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0015-4628/article/view/156442
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462819060090
- ID: 156442
Cite item
Abstract
The effects of nose radius on stagnation and surface heat transfer rate along the surface are addressed in this research paper. Experiments are carried out in hypersonic shock tunnel, at hypersonic Mach number of 6.56 for 11.38° apex angle blunt cone with nose radius of 0.2R, base radius of R. Similarly, experiments are carried out at Mach 7.32 for 13.87° apex angle blunt cone models with nose radius of 0.18R′, base radius of R′. Test is performed at stagnation enthalpy of 1.4 and 2 MJ/kg with effective test time of 3.5 ms. Convective heat transfer measurements have been carried out on the test model at two different angles of attack, namely 0° and 5° with angle of rotation of 0°, 90°,180° with platinum thin film sensors. ANSYS-Fluent used to simulate the flow over the blunt models at different Mach numbers. The measured shock standoff distance from Schlieren visualization images compared with theory and computational fluid dynamic study for both configurations. The measured stagnation heating value is compared with theoretical value estimated using Fay-Riddell expression and numerical simulation. The measured heat transfer rate is higher for configuration 1 than configuration 2. The increases in heat transfer rate is due higher density ratio across the shock wave and the reduced shock layer thickness. The measured shock layer thickness is 2.06 mm for Mach 6.56 and 3.45 mm for Mach 7.32. The heat transfer rate is higher for Mach 6.56 as compared to Mach 7.32.
About the authors
M. Saiprakash
Department of Aerospace Engineering
Author for correspondence.
Email: iamsaiaero@gmail.com
India, Hyderabad, Telangana
C. Senthilkumar
Department of Aerospace Engineering, MIT Campus
Author for correspondence.
Email: cskumar34@gmail.com
India, Chennai, 600044
G. Kadam sunil
Directorate of Aerodynamics
Author for correspondence.
Email: sgk54@yahoo.com
India, Hyderabad, 500058
Singh Prakash Rampratap
Directorate of Aerodynamics
Author for correspondence.
Email: sprakash29@gmail.com
India, Hyderabad, 500058
V. Shanmugam
Directorate of Aerodynamics
Author for correspondence.
Email: shanmugam@drdl.drdo.in
India, Hyderabad, 500058
G. Balu
Directorate of Aerodynamics
Author for correspondence.
Email: gbalu_aed@drdl.drdo.in
India, Hyderabad, 500058
Supplementary files
