Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Structure of Ethyl Butanoate and Methyl Pentanoate Flames
- Authors: Dmitriev A.M.1,2, Osipova K.N.1,2, Knyazkov D.A.1,3, Gerasimov I.E.1, Shmakov A.G.1,2, Korobeinichev O.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch
- Novosibirsk State University
- Far Eastern Federal University
- Issue: Vol 54, No 2 (2018)
- Pages: 125-135
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0010-5082/article/view/153088
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508218020016
- ID: 153088
Cite item
Abstract
The structure of premixed ethyl butanoate/O2/Ar flames stabilized on a flat burner at atmospheric pressure was studied by molecular beam mass spectrometry. Mole fraction profiles of the reactants, stable products, and major intermediates and temperature profiles were obtained in flames of stoichiometric (φ = 1) and rich (φ = 1.5) combustible mixtures. Experimental data are analyzed and compared with previously obtained experimental and numerical data for methyl pentanoate flames. The structure of ethyl butanoate flames is simulated using a detailed literature chemical-kinetic mechanism for the oxidation of fatty acid esters. The experimental profiles are compared with the simulated ones, and the conversion pathways of ethyl butanoate are analyzed. Based on a comparative analysis of experimental and simulated data, the main shortcomings of the model presented in the literature are identified and possible ways are proposed to improve the model. The decomposition of ethyl butanoate and methyl pentanoate are discussed based on an analysis of their conversion pathways; similarities and characteristic differences between their oxidation processes due to the structural differences of the molecules of the fuels are outlined.
About the authors
A. M. Dmitriev
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: artem_dmitriev@inbox.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
K. N. Osipova
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Email: artem_dmitriev@inbox.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
D. A. Knyazkov
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Far Eastern Federal University
Email: artem_dmitriev@inbox.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Vladivostok, 690091
I. E. Gerasimov
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch
Email: artem_dmitriev@inbox.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
A. G. Shmakov
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Email: artem_dmitriev@inbox.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
O. P. Korobeinichev
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch
Email: artem_dmitriev@inbox.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
Supplementary files
