Structure of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene–air counterflow flame
- Authors: Gonchikzhapov M.B.1,2, Paletsky A.A.1, Tereshchenko A.G.1, Shundrina I.K.2,3, Kuibida L.V.1,2, Shmakov A.G.1,2, Korobeinichev O.P.1,4
-
Affiliations:
- Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch
- Novosibirsk State University
- Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry, Siberian Branch
- Far Eastern Federal University
- Issue: Vol 52, No 3 (2016)
- Pages: 260-272
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0010-5082/article/view/152490
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508216030023
- ID: 152490
Cite item
Abstract
The combustion of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in airflow perpendicular to the polyethylene surface (counterflow flame) was studied in detail. The burning rate of pressed samples of UHMWPE was measured. The structure of the UHMWPE–air counterflow flame was first determined by mass spectrometric sampling taking into account heavy products. The composition of the main pyrolysis products was investigated by mass spectrometry, and the composition of heavy hydrocarbons (C7—C25) in products sampled from the flame at a distance of 0.8 mm from the UHMWPE surface was analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography mass-spectrometry. The temperature and concentration profiles of eight species (N2, O2, CO2, CO, H2O, C3H6, C4H6, and C6H6) and a hypothetical species with an average molecular weight of 258.7 g/mol, which simulates more than 50 C7—C25 hydrocarbons were measured. The structure of the diffusion flame of the model mixture of decomposition products of UHMWPE in air counterflow was simulated using the OPPDIF code from the CHEMKIN II software package. The simulation results are in good agreement with experimental data on combustion of UHMWPE.
About the authors
M. B. Gonchikzhapov
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: munko2010@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Vladivostok, 630090; Vladivostok, 630090
A. A. Paletsky
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch
Email: munko2010@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Vladivostok, 630090
A. G. Tereshchenko
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch
Email: munko2010@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Vladivostok, 630090
I. K. Shundrina
Novosibirsk State University; Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry, Siberian Branch
Email: munko2010@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Vladivostok, 630090; Vladivostok, 630090
L. V. Kuibida
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Email: munko2010@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Vladivostok, 630090; Vladivostok, 630090
A. G. Shmakov
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State University
Email: munko2010@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Vladivostok, 630090; Vladivostok, 630090
O. P. Korobeinichev
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch; Far Eastern Federal University
Email: munko2010@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Vladivostok, 630090; Vladivostok, 690950
Supplementary files
