Comparison of Shale Inhibitors for Hydration, Dispersion, and Swelling Suppression


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The properties of conventional shale hydration inhibitors were studied using samples of Longmaxi shale. The inhibition was evaluated by the rolling recovery test, linear swelling rate, and clay interlayer spacing. The results indicate that K2SiO3 inhibits clay hydration far better than other inorganic shale inhibitors while polyamine is superior to other organic shale inhibitors of clay hydration. Alkaline solution is more effective in suppressing shale dispersion. A neutral environment has little impact on this parameter. On the contrary, an acidic medium can even promote it. Most of the inhibitors are incapable of suppressing simultaneously clay dispersion and expansion. Therefore, they should be used in conjunction to suppress synergistically clay hydration, dispersion, and expansion.

About the authors

Cheng Cao

State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University

Author for correspondence.
Email: caochengcn@163.com
China, Chengdu

Xiaolin Pu

State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University

Email: caochengcn@163.com
China, Chengdu

Gui Wang

State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University

Email: caochengcn@163.com
China, Chengdu

Tao Huang

Southwest Drilling Company of Zhongyuan Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd, Sinopec

Email: caochengcn@163.com
China, Chengdu


Copyright (c) 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies