Comparative Study of the Severity of Renal Damage in Newborn and Adult Rats under Conditions of Ischemia/Reperfusion and Endotoxin Administration


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Oxidative kidney injury was compared in newborn and adult rats under conditions of ischemia/reperfusion and in experimental model of systemic inflammation induced by endotoxin (LPS of bacterial cell wall) administration. Oxidative stress in the kidney accompanied both experimental models, but despite similar oxidative tissue damage, kidney dysfunction in neonates was less pronounced than in adult animals. It was found that neonatal kidney has a more potent regenerative potential with higher level of cell proliferation than adult kidney, where the level proliferating cell antigen (PCNA) increased only on day 2 after ischemia/reperfusion. The pathological process in the neonatal kidney developed against the background of active cell proliferation, and, as a result, proliferating cells could almost immediately replace the damaged structures. In the adult kidney, regeneration of the renal tissue was activated only after significant loss of functional nephrons and impairment of renal function.

About the authors

I. B. Pevzner

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University; V. I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

T. A. Pavlenko

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

V. A. Popkov

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

N. V. Andrianova

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

L. D. Zorova

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University; V. I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

A. A. Brezgunova

Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

S. D. Zorov

Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

S. S. Yankauskas

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

D. N. Silachev

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University; V. I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

D. B. Zorov

A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University; V. I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology

Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

E. Yu. Plotnikov

Institute of Molecular Medicine, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: plotnikov@belozersky.msu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow


Copyright (c) 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies