Response of Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae) to Inbreeding, and Its Characterization as an Element of Incompatibility System

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The results of the study of seed reproduction systems of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) under self-pollination and open-pollination are summarized (2- and 12-year experiment on self-pollination; electron microscopy). It was shown that in optimal years the generative sphere of pine is in equilibrium, with the populations being characterized by a minimum level of self-fertility (Rsf = 0.13–0.14). The ratio between self-sterile, partly self-fertile and self-fertile forms is 8ss : 4psf : 1sf, the proportion of inbred progeny is 7–8%. It was found that self-pollination partially reduces cone yield and increases the share of empty seeds. During self-pollination, the incompatibility of the self-sterile forms is ultrastructurally manifested in formation of the isolation zone at the border of pollen tube and nucellus, or of the embryo and endosperm. In early embryogenesis, the isolation zone between embryo and endosperm reaches a diameter of 1–2 cells, indicating the intensity of incompatibility processes. It has been shown that in slightly anomalous (cold or warm) and dry years the level of self-fertility increases in proportion to the strength of weather stress, and the sample structure changes. The share of inbred progeny increases from 1/12 in optimal years to 1/9, 1/5 and 1/3, in cold and warm, moderately dry and severely dry years, respectively. This confirms the participation of inbreeding in the adaptation of the seed gene pool to the habitat. The organization of the genetic incompatibility system in the pine and its changes in the transition from gymnosperms to angiosperms are discussed.

Авторлар туралы

N. Kuznetsova

All-Russian Research Institute of Forest Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: nfsenyuk@mail.ru
Russia, 393087, Voronezh, Lomonosov Str., 105

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Agadzhanayn A.M. 1992. To a question on evolution of self-incompatibility in Angiosperms: gene mutation. – Bot. Zhurn. 77 (1): 19–32 (In Russ.).
  2. Barnes B.V., Bingham R.T., Squillace A.E. 1962. Selective fertilization in Pinus monticola Dougl.: Results of additional tests. – Silvae Genet. 11: 103–111.
  3. Bramlett D., Popham T.W. 1971. Model relating unsound seed and embryonic lethal alleles in self-pollinated pines. – Silvae Genet. 20: 237–268.
  4. Belostotskaya S.N. 1979. Peculiarities of male and female gametophyte development in intra- and interspecific hybridization. – Russian Forest Sciences. 5: 61–72 (In Russ.).
  5. De Nettancourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Berlin. Springer-Velgar. 230 p.
  6. De Nettancourt D. 2001. Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Berlin. Heidelberg. Springer-Velgar. 332 p.
  7. Dogra P.D. 1967. Seed sterility and disturbances in embryogeny in conifers with particular reference to seed testing and tree breeding in Pinaceae. – Stud. For. Suec. 5: 1–97.
  8. East E.M. 1929. Self-sterility. – Bibliogr. Genet. 5: 331–368.
  9. Ferrer M.M., Good S.V. 2012. Self-sterility in flowering plants: preventing self-fertilization increases family diversification rates. – Ann. Bot. 110 (3): 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs124
  10. Forschell C.P. 1974. The development of cones and seeds in the case of self- and crosspollination in Pinus sylvestris L. – Medd. Stat. Stog. Storskn.-inst. 43: 3–42.
  11. Franklin E.C. 1970. Survey of mutant forms and inbreeding depression in species of the family of Pinaceae. – USDA Forest Service Res. Paper. SE-61: 1–21.
  12. Franklin-Tong V.E. 2008. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms. Berlin. Heidelberg. 313 p.
  13. Hagman M., Mikkola L. 1963. Observation on cross-, self- and intraspecific pollination in Pinus peuce Griseb. – Silvae Genet. 12 (3): 73–79.
  14. Isakov Yu.N., Semerikov V.L. 1997. Relationship of genotype for some allozyme loci and ability for self-pollination in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). – Russian Journal of Genetics. 33 (2): 213-215 (In Russ and Engl.).
  15. Johnson L. 1945. Reduced vigor, chlorophyll deficiency and other effects of self-fertilization in Pinus. – Can. J. Res. 23: 145–149.
  16. Konar R.N. 1962. A qualitative survey of the aminoacids and sugars in the developing female gametophyte and embryo of Pinus roxburghii Sar. – Phytomorphology. 8: 168–173.
  17. Kordyum E.L. 1978. Evolutionary cytoembryology of angiosperms. Kiev. 220 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Koski V. 1973. Embryonic lethals of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. – Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 16: 1–30.
  19. Kotelova N.V. 1956. Influence of self-pollination and cross-pollination on the quality of seeds and seedlings of Scots pine. – Scientific and technical information. Moscow. Vol. 20. P. 1–74 (In Russ.).
  20. Kotelova N.V., Khromova L.V. 1974. K voprosu ob opylenii i roste pyl’tsevykh trubok u dvukhkhvoynykh sosen pri ksenogamii [To the question about the pollination and pollen tbe growth in the two-needles pines at the xenogamy]. – In: Physiology, breeding and gardening of cities. Moscow. Vol. 51. P. 44–50 (In Russ.).
  21. Kozubov G.M., Trenin V.V., Tikhova M.A., Kondratieva V.P. 1982. Reproductive structures of gymnosperms (Comparative description). Leningrad. 104 p. (In Russ.).
  22. Kuznetsova N.F., Isakov Yu.N. 1987. Ultrastructural aspects of physiological incompatibility in Scots pine. – Russian Forest Sciences. 3: 11–16 (In Russ.).
  23. Kuznetsova N.F. 1991. Development of the male gametophyte of Scots pine in self-pollination and open pollination. – Russian Forest Sciences. 3: 27–33 (In Russ.).
  24. Kuznetsova N.F. 1996. Genetic system of incompatibility and its display in Scots pine. – Russian Forest Sciences. 5: 27–33. (In Russ.).
  25. Kuznetsovs N.F. 2009. Effect of climatic conditions the expression of self-fertility in Scots pine. – Russian Journal of Ecology. 5: 390–395 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413609050105
  26. Kuznetsova N.F., Mashkina O.S. 2011. Stress response and its aftereffects in Scots pine in ontogenesis and during the change of generations. – Conifers of the Boreal Area. XXVIII (1–2): 83–90 (In Russ.).
  27. Kuznetsova N.F. 2012. Self-fertility in Scots pine as a system for regulating close relationships and species survival in an adverse environment. – In: Advances in Genetics Research. Vol. 9. New York. P. 83–106.
  28. Lewis D. 1944. Incompatibility in plants. – Nature (London). 153 (3889): 575–578.
  29. Maletsky S.I., Denisova E.V. 1974. Perspektivy ispol’zovaniya intsukht-metoda v selektsii diploidnykh i tetraploidnykh form sakharnoy svekly [Perspectives of use of incucht-method in selection of diploid and tetraploid forms of sugar beet]. – In: Theoretical and Practical Problems of Polyploidy. Moscow. P. 5–13 (In Russ.).
  30. Mashkina O.S., Kuznetsova N.F., Isakov Y.N., Butorina A.K. 2009. Self-fertility in Scots pine as a mechanism of resistance to chemical mutagens. – Russian Journal of Ecology. 40 (6): 399–404 (In Russ. and Engl.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413609060046
  31. Mergen F., Burley J., Furnival G.M., Furnival G.M. 1965. Embryo and seedling development in Picea glauca (Monch) Voss after self-, cross-, and mind-pollination. – Silvae Genet. 14 (6): 188–194.
  32. Park Y.S., Fowler D.P. 1984. Inbreeding in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill) B.S.P.): self-fertility, genetic load and performance. – Can. J. For. Res. 14 (1): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1139/x84-003
  33. Poddubnaya-Arnoldi V.A. 1976. Cytoembryology of angiosperms. Foundation and Perspectives. Moscow. 508 p. (In Russ.).
  34. Pozhidaeva I.M., Isakov Yu.N. 1989. Cytogenetic analysis of common pine trees contrasting in self-fertility. – Russian Journal of Genetics. 25 (4): 674–682 (In Russ.).
  35. Rea A.C., Nasrallah J.B. 2008. Self-incompatibility systems: barriers to self-fertilization in flowering plants. – Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52 (5–6): 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.072537ar
  36. Remington D.L., O’Malley D.M. 2000. Whole-genome characterization of embryonic stage inbreeding depression in a selfed loblolly pine family. – Genetics. 155 (1): 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.1.337
  37. Sarvas R. 1962. Investigation of the flowering and seed crop of Pinus sylvestris. – Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 53: 1–198.
  38. Singh H. 1978. Embryology of Gymnosperms. Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy. Vol. XII. Berlin-Stuttgart. 302 p.
  39. Svintsova V.S. 2002. Character of variability of reproductive traits of Pinus sylvestris L. in conditions of Central Russian forest-steppe (Voronezh region): PhD Thesis. Voronezh. 22 p. (In Russ.).
  40. Surikov I.M. 1991. Incompatibility and embryonal sterility of plants. Moscow. 220 p. (In Russ.).
  41. Tupy J. 1959. Callose formation in pollen tube and incompatibility. – Biol. Plantarum. 1: 192–198.
  42. Vishnyakova M.A. 1989. Structural and functional bases of self-incompatibility in flowering plants. – Bot. Zhurn. 74 (1): 137–152 (In Russ.).
  43. Williams C.G., Savolainen O. 1996. Inbreeding depression in conifers: implication for breeding strategy. – For. Sci. 42: 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/FORESTSCIENCE%2F42.1.102
  44. Williams C.G., Auckland L.D., Reynolds M.M., Leach K.A. 2003. Overdominant lethals as part of the conifer embryo lethal system. – Heredity (Edinb). 91 (6): 584–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800354
  45. Zhao H., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Song Y., ZhaoF., Zhang Y., Zhu S., Zhang H., Zhou Z., Guo H., Li M., Li J., Gao Q., Han Q., Huang H., Copsey L., Chen H., Coen E., Zhang Y., Xue Y. 2022. Origin, loss and retain of self-incompatibility in angiosperm. – Plant Cell. 34 (1): 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab266

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2.

Жүктеу (102KB)
Метадеректер
3.

Жүктеу (34KB)
Метадеректер
4.

Жүктеу (1MB)
Метадеректер
5.

Жүктеу (1MB)
Метадеректер

© Н.Ф. Кузнецова, 2023

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>